Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'NO2' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (163)
[ 163 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#129 - mrfourtysevenman
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#128 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
why do u guys like science? I got an F in science and I have to retake it again and its stupid -_____________- I dont even get over half of this stupid ****
#145 to #128 - thebreech
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
#141 to #128 - pidgeon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
You don't understand it because it's stupid? Riiiiight.
#133 to #128 - gilgindor
Reply +7
(06/01/2012) [-]
Or maybe you're just ******* stupid.
#131 to #128 - pureflamesammich
Reply +8
(06/01/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#127 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #17 at Mane-tenance **
#122 - roflstorm
Reply +3
(06/01/2012) [-]
she asked another student
he said....
#171 to #122 - fuzzehmushroom [OP]
Reply 0
(06/02/2012) [-]
I saw what you tried to do there... But the correct formula is Potassium Oxide. Sorry bud.
#172 to #171 - roflstorm
Reply 0
(06/02/2012) [-]
WRONG
potassium oxide would be KO
this is OK
oxide potassium
#173 to #172 - fuzzehmushroom [OP]
Reply 0
(06/02/2012) [-]
Correct, but Oxide potassium does not exist. The non-metal has to go last. Faggot.
#174 to #173 - roflstorm
Reply 0
(06/02/2012) [-]
just ******* go with it!
#175 to #174 - fuzzehmushroom [OP]
Reply 0
(06/02/2012) [-]
I would have, had you not said i was wrong. XD Ah well.
#158 to #122 - Milotic
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
Oh man I saw what you did there   
Good one bro
Oh man I saw what you did there
Good one bro
#121 - ultimasuperbeing **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#123 to #121 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
I'm guessing you're one of those "oh look, a lot of people like something, I'd better hate it" types. Other people like it, deal with it.
#124 to #123 - ultimasuperbeing **User deleted account**
+9
has deleted their comment [-]
#118 - mrkickasscomedy
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
#115 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
Why use nitrogen dioxide, while nitrogen oxide is NO
#125 to #115 - pukingrainbows
Reply -1
(06/01/2012) [-]
Because NO barely exists for more than a fraction of a second.
#119 to #115 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
you mean nitrogen monoxide?
#126 to #119 - unhappyspanners
Reply +2
(06/01/2012) [-]
I think you can use either. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
#114 - Deception
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
**Deception rolled a random image posted in comment #88 at Haddock lol **
#111 - Cambro
Reply +17
(06/01/2012) [-]
#106 - Userjames
Reply +5
(06/01/2012) [-]
**Userjames rolled a random image posted in comment #307 at HARRY POTTER GEEKKKKK ** mfw today is science day
#105 - slicerv
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#104 - ahetal
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 - stripeygreenhat
Reply +9
(06/01/2012) [-]
#112 to #103 - crippledturtle
Reply +5
(06/01/2012) [-]
#100 - faithrider
Reply +6
(06/01/2012) [-]
**faithrider rolled a random image posted in comment #224 at future single mom ** FOR SCIENCE!
#109 to #100 - JudasLitl
Reply +3
(06/01/2012) [-]
angry grill disagrees
#99 - angelbur
Reply +4
(06/01/2012) [-]
How did this get front page???
#97 - acharminbear
Reply +1
(06/01/2012) [-]
#96 - anon
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
The hell is a geography teacher asking chem questions for?
#95 - likeoneninja
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
**likeoneninja rolled a random image posted in comment #45 at Tyson Hammer **
#94 - likeoneninja
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#89 - etherlord
Reply +2
(06/01/2012) [-]
This was on my chemistry final 3 hours ago.... I wish I saw this sooner. I'm not sure if I put it as molecular or empirical.
#107 to #89 - rplix
Reply +1
(06/01/2012) [-]
Well...if you used the % of each substance to find an equation that would be empirical. Molecular is just the simplifying of the empirical formula.
#108 to #107 - etherlord
Reply 0
(06/01/2012) [-]
I didn't remember any of that at the time of my exam.