Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
40 comments displayed.
#288 - Chichiquilota
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
**Chichiquilota rolled a random image posted in comment #27 at Every Morning ** pic probly not related
#295 to #288 - superclamsquared
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
Sort of
#287 - RodasAPC
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
**RodasAPC rolls 61**
#285 - Churd
Reply +5
(03/04/2012) [-]
#283 - freshblob
Reply +14
(03/04/2012) [-]
It's impossible to scientifically prove or disapprove the existence of a god or a higher being but if there is one, I'm quite certain he's thoroughly disappointed in us.
#284 to #283 - houseofbrick
Reply -22
(03/04/2012) [-]
You can't disprove that my grandfather was Bruce Lee, therefore my grandfather was Bruce Lee.
#293 to #284 - freshblob
Reply +16
(03/04/2012) [-]
That makes no logical sense.

God is a theoretical entity which no current scientific method can prove or disapprove.

Bruce Lee is a physical entity and therefore can be proven with current scientific methods such as DNA testing.

Your argument is invalid. Good day sir.
#348 to #293 - Splinther
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
Quite, however, the majority of the events in the bible are quite easy to disprove (Noah's Ark, the story of creation, etc.)

There is no reason to believe that there is a conscious creator; at least, none of the conscious creators that have been documented/imagined by any religion in the history of humanity.

One could argue that the universe itself is evidence for a creator (But then who created the creator?) because the universe (in its current form) has existed for a finite amount of time.
#286 to #284 - Worx
Reply +13
(03/04/2012) [-]
Family tree, bitch.
#282 - huecomundo
Reply -2
(03/04/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#280 - Deception
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
**Deception rolled a random image posted in comment #107 at Bad day dino **
#278 - davegrowl
Reply +7
(03/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#277 - royalunicorn
Reply +1
(03/03/2012) [-]
#272 - commentremoved
Reply +9
(03/03/2012) [-]
#271 - thefasrdog ONLINE
Reply +14
(03/03/2012) [-]
Ohho! Its funny because there** are** many different Interpretations in all of the Abrahamic religions...
#275 to #271 - janewayunderseven
Reply +2
(03/03/2012) [-]
Well used sir, thumb for you.
#268 - CapnInterwebz
Reply +6
(03/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#266 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
could someone please shortly explain the 4 diffrent versions (I'm not sure if I want to be christian)
#269 to #266 - thefunniestjunk [OP]
Reply +2
(03/03/2012) [-]
In the New Testament, there are four different accounts of Jesus's life by different people

#281 to #269 - anon
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
They just focus on different points, like how he is God, how he is King, and other **** like that.
#264 - copycopy
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#270 to #264 - CapnInterwebz
Reply -2
(03/03/2012) [-]
I know!
#263 - thebigcountry
Reply +5
(03/03/2012) [-]
#261 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#265 to #261 - copycopy
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#257 - lolzordz
Reply +32
(03/03/2012) [-]
daaang you see dat ass right thur?

mmm yeahhh yeahh

that **** is smokin hot

fo sho, fo sho....
#294 to #257 - tranminh
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
****** lol'd
#252 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
Atheism
#341 to #252 - TheZohan
Reply +1
(03/04/2012) [-]
That is just an over-simplification of the Big Bang theory and the Evolutionary theory, which you are not required to believe in if you're an atheist.
Pic very related.
#289 to #252 - volconhammer
Reply 0
(03/04/2012) [-]
COSMICISM

The belief that humanity is a small and insignificant part of an infinatly vast universe. That no matter what humanity does it really wont matter. and that nothing cared as we came to exist and nothing will mourn us when we all die out.
#262 to #252 - mrtwilightsparkle
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
Everyone who commented on this made this the best religious debate ever.
#260 to #252 - aciar
Reply +2
(03/03/2012) [-]
That's not Atheism, that's science bro.
#258 to #252 - feelythefeel
Reply +4
(03/03/2012) [-]
#255 to #252 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
You're right, it doesn't make any sense without the Wizard.
#259 to #255 - ninjasquirle
Reply +1
(03/03/2012) [-]
#254 to #252 - agbravens
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
#245 - Darianvincent
Reply +10
(03/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#276 to #245 - slamerz
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#244 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolls 380** 1 < quads
#238 - tweetyftw **User deleted account**
+7
has deleted their comment [-]