checkmate

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

infinitereaper

Channel: trump

next random

Comment

join list: theTRUTH (1670 subs)
Mention History

Tags: checkmate

Nit
The Senate Intelligence Ced' l' ' , invited James (Jamey be testify in ' see-. sien next week. I Getty
Jamey declines [', testify before ?! blir,, ;' l,

...

+832

Views: 47881 Submitted: 05/13/2017

Block User's Content

Block Channel Content

Related Top Content:

JUSTICE: DOMESTIC TERRORISM (ANTIFA & BLM)

1648

>the great liberal "argument"

1618

It's a win-win situation

Very Fake News Gets BTFO

1171

Happy Birthday Pence

1170

People Dying Again: Fuck Islam Edition

1130

Idaho Refugee Migrant Sexual Assault Cover Up

1095

Cant Cuck The Tuck

909

CNN Stages Muslim Sympathy

890

On Terrorism

850

Sara Winners Gets BTFO

798

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (110)

First 2 Last

[ 110 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#10 - spartantoaster#206 on commentsRank#206

Reply+146

(05/13/2017)[+](6 replies)

stickied by infinitereaper

you see I think it's less complicated, Trump knows that he is not a russian spy or puppet. So he fired comey knowing he had jack **** on him. He was invited to testify but either had nothing or if he did have something it would incriminate him far more than trump.

#24 to #10 - amakakeru

Reply+1

(05/13/2017)[-]

Based Jew wrote an article saying basically the same thing. He did criticize Trump for his timing though.

#28 to #24 - boarderlinegreat

Reply+1

(05/13/2017)[-]

Maybe his timing was, well, ******* intended

#34 to #28 - amakakeru

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

Well that was the implication in the article haha. The fact is, whether there was some other intention with the timing it did have a negative effect in propagating the russia narrative, www.dailywire.com/news/16318/real-sto... I believe this is the article. He's written about it several times. I do think he's right about why he fired Comey though. I think Trump knows these accusations are false, and he was getting frustrated because Comey wouldn't admit there was no evidence and that he wouldn't focus more on the white house leaks that trump is actually concerned about.

#80 to #10 - anon id: d75d5a6b

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

I've been watching this autistically since 2015. Comey is the good guy. He wants to testify openly because he knows congress will leak and twist his words, we wants the public to know exactly what he has to say. It also prevents him from answering any classified questions, as there IS a mole hunt going on and many of the top suspects are congressmen who may be asking the questions. By having the hearing publicly he avoids the possibility of damaging the ongoing investigation into the real moles while letting the public know as much as he can

#74 to #10 - phtholognyrrh

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Good summary bro

#58 to #10 - anon id: fa580521

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**Politics is never that simple. Ever. Always complicated messes that are designed to confuse and baffle the people so no one really knows what is going on because they woven a web of lies into each other's lies.

Another way of describing this. Politics is a poorly written fan-fiction created by numerous people who are constantly trying to write in their special OC's and Shippings while trying to retcon each other cause they don't like your waifu.

#1 - infinitereaper [OP]

Reply+60

(05/13/2017)[+](1 reply)

stickied by infinitereaper

#79 to #1 - anon id: 62fadf9c

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Guess I will post to the first comment. Had dinner with some of my Dad's friends, and one of them is a FBI agent. So we asked him what he thought of former Director James Comey.

He said that Comey is not a bad guy, it's just that he lacks the temperament for the job. Specifically he likes to play hero and interject himself into things he has no business in.

Example, last July, Comey said that Hillary Clinton was grossly negligent with her private email server. And that her intentions don't matter with regards to mishandling classified information. But he said "No reasonable prosecutor would bring charges in this case". That is where he overstepped his bounds, he is the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and their vested powers are to investigate not prosecute. The FBI concerns itself with gathering facts and hands them over to the Attorney General at the Department of Justice. James Comey injected himself into the political sphere when FBI is supposed to be apolitical.

Fast forward to a recent Senate hearing, Comey made a fool of himself and the Bureau. Supposedly that was the last straw for Trump as he has wanted to fire him for sometime. According to my FBI friend, Trump should of fired Comey immediately after inauguration. He was already a political hot potato from the election.

#4 - bicornedbagel

Reply+82

(05/13/2017)[-]

>Liberal Friend Quote

"Comey got fired after he was investigating the Trump/Russia Relations."
Yeah Libby because he ******* found nothing
"YEAH, THEY SAID THEY FOUND NOTHING. AFTER THEY FIRED HIM"
They fired him because he was wasting time, also he said multiple times he was innocent.
"YEAH BUT THEY FIRED HIM AFTER HE WAS DOING THE INVESTIGATING"
WHICH LEAD TO NO CONCLUSION, LIBBY.
"Trump is driving this country into the ground"
You mean driving it off the ******* tracks and starting to ascend

---

This is our second Manifest Destiny, saddle up boys they can't stop it.

#9 to #4 - severepwner

Reply+11

(05/13/2017)[-]

A trap lecturing a liberal nu male on being brainwashed is a humorous image.

#70 to #4 - contak

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

Lets not forget that the investigation was taking place five to 6 spots below comey and Comey was just the mouth piece. God liberals are **********, do they really think Comey was the one getting testimony, putting **** together, writing briefings and all of that ****?

#82 to #4 - burgersystem

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Any chance your from Philly sounds like a libby I know

#83 to #82 - bicornedbagel

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

nope im from cali.

send god

#66 to #4 - fellatio

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

"driving this country off into ascension" by pissing away foreign relations as well as funneling tax payer money into his own pocket. Don't forget trying real hard to get rid of everyone related to an investigation that he swears up and down is nothing.

#14 to #4 - aldothenazi

Reply-10

(05/13/2017)[-]

U hav frends ? Lol. Btw i have image in my head that u look like more buff and tall version of Matt Damon is it true?

#17 to #14 - bicornedbagel

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

nope, very very wrong.

#19 to #17 - aldothenazi

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

Dont ruin my fantasy REEEEEEE!

#20 to #17 - aldothenazi

Reply-1

(05/13/2017)[-]

Wait u r not reaper stop pretending u r u fagit.

#21 to #20 - bicornedbagel

Reply+4

(05/13/2017)[-]

I'm infinitereaper but a trap and much more gay

#22 to #21 - aldothenazi

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

Cant get much gayer than reaper.

#23 to #22 - bicornedbagel

Reply+9

(05/13/2017)[-]

I've surpassed him

#26 to #23 - xexion

Reply+3

(05/13/2017)[-]

Infatuated with a character that's a girl, drawn as a girl, and sounds like a girl, that they just called a guy.
That's not very gay.

#81 to #26 - sleeperagent

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

They're called traps for a reason

#86 to #81 - xexion

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

It's pretty straight to like something that looks like a cute girl.

#90 to #86 - sleeperagent

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

if you know its a dude its still p gay

#107 to #90 - xexion

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Which is more gay: liking dudes that look like men, or liking dudes that look like women?

#110 to #107 - sleeperagent

Reply0

(05/17/2017)[-]

liking dudes

#25 to #23 - aldothenazi

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

Damn thats impressive as duck but disgusting at same.

#61 to #22 - thememegod

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

phanact

#31 to #21 - lolrushero

Reply+1

(05/13/2017)[-]

wait youre a trap?

#32 to #31 - bicornedbagel

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

Correction
>becoming trap/femboi

#76 to #32 - aoeui

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

gl bro

#56 to #32 - lolrushero

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

very nice wish you all the best

#16 - Marker

Reply+17

(05/13/2017)[-]

Comey willing to testify, but only in public: report

thehill.com/policy/national-security/...

#6 - Lintutu#451 on commentsRank#451

Reply+4

(05/13/2017)[-]

i dont understand, what bluff from trump are we referring to?

#8 to #6 - mcqwark

Reply+15

(05/13/2017)[-]

Trump tweeted saying " Comey better think twice about leaking classified info or I might leak recordings of our conversations In the white house" or something along those lines.

#18 to #8 - Lintutu#451 on commentsRank#451

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

thanks

#5 - AngNoop

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

I'm probably Trump all day. I argue for him alot. I'm confused is he under investigation or not?

#7 to #5 - JGKingpin#38 on commentsRank#38

Reply+10

(05/13/2017)[-]

There is a counterintelligence investigation going on about Russia's interference.

If by chance evidence comes about that Trumps campaign was involved, then he would be placed under official criminal investigation.

It's an investigation into Russia. Trump is just tagged onto the name of it all cause the media and political opposition want you to think it's a criminal investigation.

#35 to #5 - landcucumber

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

Yes he is.

#42 to #5 - logicalreason

Reply-6

(05/14/2017)[-]

He and his entire cabinet are.

#43 to #42 - deaminzaints

Reply+4

(05/14/2017)[-]

Except they arent.
www.dailywire.com/news/16378/fact-che...

#89 to #43 - tanditsky

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

This is absolute head-in-the-sand ignorance.
How can you possibly not think he's under investigation when all of the information and news outlets are saying otherwise.
Comey has testified under oath that he is investigating the trump campaign for Russia links.
Trump said in a recent interview with NBC that he wasn't under investigation, and then immediately afterwards says he wants to investigation to be sped up. This is not a man that can stick to his story.

#91 to #89 - deaminzaints

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

First off, news outlets have generally not been good at telling the truth lately in case you havent heard.
Secondly, Source me when Comey said that, because Comey has also said, on multiple occassions that he WASENT investigating Trump, both to Trumps cabinet AND members of the senate, BOTH DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLIC.

What Comey is ACTUALLY doing (or was) is investigating Russian ties to US officials, mostly under the election periode. That means everyone, left and right. Trump and his cabinet has not been put under investigation because so far, they have not found anything linking that investigation to Trump or his people.

Of course the media has lost all ability to ask more than 1 question per day, so they heard "Russia" and "investigation" in the same hour long talk and immediately shat out articles about Trump being investigated.

Sure you may not think Trump can stick to a story, whatever thats your opinion, but how the **** do you think Comey can? or the media? if anything they are ADHD riddled 5 year olds in toys stores.

#93 to #91 - tanditsky

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

I disagree, news is always complicated, lots of different outlets have different opinions. It's just at the moment everyone doesn't like trump very much so trump fans think that means they're lying about all the **** he does.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/... here's a video of him saying it

Okay just to address your last point, that's because the media isn't just one guy, it's lots of different people, again, with differing opinions. Trump is the president of the US, if anyone needs to stick to a story it's him, don't try and deflect the blame to other people.

#94 to #93 - deaminzaints

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Wait, so you disagree that the news outlets have had a hard time telling the truth lately, but you dont see how that statement conflicts with the media also openly being against trump in every way?
That is the exact point. how can you trust an orginazation which is actively going against someone, to accurately report on that person?
During the election, multiple news stations reported on the stories of Trump sexually assaulting a flight attendant and how he has an illegitimate son and all the other women coming out with allegations, they were reported as true. interviews were conducted with anyone who agree with the story, but none were conducted with actual eyewitnesses or people who simply questioned the validity.
And what ended up happening? After the election, all allegations were dropped, but you wouldnt be faulted for not hearing about it, since most news stations did not update the stories in any way.
You dont have to be a Trump fan to realise that its just objectively ****** up how the news react to ANYTHING these days. Its borderline russian.

Now, onto the meat of what you linked:
This article was written on March 20th, just like the guy below me showed a similar article from the exact same day.
The article is therefor old and you cant trust that it is thouroghly updated.
Since this article has come out, Comey has on 3 occasions specifically said that he was NOT investigating Trump or his cabinet directly.
Multiple briefings were held in which senators from both Democrats and Republicans say that they were told the same, so its not just Trump saying this isnt happening.

The issue here is that the Media is bad at telling the truth. Ive pointed this out further down as well and i said the same thing in the comment you just responded to:
"What Comey is ACTUALLY doing (or was) is investigating Russian ties to US officials, mostly under the election periode. That means everyone, left and right. Trump and his cabinet has not been put under investigation because so far, they have not found anything linking that investigation to Trump or his people."

What this means is that, If connections are found to Trump and his people, then they will by neccesity also be under investigation.
But as of right now, they are NOT. No links have been found yet.
If you watch the video, Comey states:
I have been authorised by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, And that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia."

Which is what i just said previously. So you know. Thanks for finding the qoute.
But as you can see, the Media did not understand that statement the same way and simply reported that Trump and co. are already under investigation, when they are not. which is why the media is a **** show.

Also, you can say the media are multiple people, but Comey is not. This whole story is about what Comey said and how he said it. It is not deflecting blame when you are specifically blaming the guys who single handedly created this situation because of what he said.

#45 to #43 - logicalreason

Reply-7

(05/14/2017)[-]

Except they are.

#47 to #45 - deaminzaints

Reply+4

(05/14/2017)[-]

As Byron York of The Washington Examiner points out, Republican Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Democratic Ranking Member Diane Feinstein (D-CA) commented on the exchange. Grassley said that Comey “should tell the public what he told Senator Feinstein and me about whether the FBI is or is not investigating the president. On Tuesday, the president’s letter said that Director Comey told him he was not under investigation. Senator Feinstein and I heard nothing that contradicted the president’s statement.” Grassley then ripped the “speculation” that had drawn conclusions from Comey’s original statements.

#48 to #47 - logicalreason

Reply-6

(05/14/2017)[-]

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, took the extraordinary step on Monday of announcing that the agency is investigating whether members of President Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

Mr. Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee created a treacherous political moment for Mr. Trump, who has insisted that “Russia is fake news” that was cooked up by his political opponents to undermine his presidency. Mr. Comey placed a criminal investigation at the doorstep of the White House and said officers would pursue it “no matter how long that takes.”

Joined by Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, Mr. Comey also dismissed Mr. Trump’s claim that he was wiretapped by his predecessor during the campaign, a sensational accusation that has served as a distraction in the public debate over Russian election interference. Taken together, the two provided the most definitive statement yet that Mr. Trump’s accusation was false.

The New York Times and other news organizations have reported the existence of the investigation into the Trump campaign and its relationship with Russia, but the White House dismissed those reports as politically motivated and rallied political allies to rebut them. Mr. Comey’s testimony on Monday was the first public acknowledgment of the case. The F.B.I. discloses its investigations only in rare circumstances, when officials believe it is in the public interest.

“This is one of those circumstances,” Mr. Comey said.

Mr. Comey said the F.B.I. was “investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”

www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/us/politic...

#50 to #48 - deaminzaints

Reply+3

(05/14/2017)[-]

Gonna point out that, your article is from March 20th, which is, in case you dont know, months ago. The Statements made by the Senate members are from this Tuesday.
The media took statements from Comey and others out of context and didnt check their validity, which resulted in them all reporting, and still saying, that he is under investigation, even though Comey reportedly said he wasent at least 3 times and everyone else briefed on the issue also says he isnt.

#51 to #50 - logicalreason

Reply-5

(05/14/2017)[-]

>Man says he is investigating a person.

>Man is fired by person he is investigating.

>Man being investigated says that he was not under investigation.

Would you believe this from anyone else? If the chief of police said the mayor was being investigated, and then the mayor fired the chief and said he wasn't being investigated, everybody would assume that the Mayor is hiding something. It is the same here.

#52 to #51 - deaminzaints

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

It is not the same here.
Comey made a statement that the media twisted.
Comey repeatedly said that their reporting was false.
Other senators who were briefed on the issue says the same.
Comey is then later fired AFTER having said it was not true.

And yet you still believe what the media told you? the man himself said it wasent true, what kind of logicalreason is that?

#53 to #52 - logicalreason

Reply-6

(05/14/2017)[-]

Yes, with his livelihood under threat from the president of the USA, he recanted and claimed there was no investigation.

#54 to #53 - deaminzaints

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

HIS LIVELIHOOD WAS NOT UNDER THREAT YOU IDIOT.

He recanted the statements months ago. If you follow the news you know he didnt even have any idea he was being fired until it actually happend, how the **** does that then work? are you calling him a psychic?

#55 to #54 - logicalreason

Reply-6

(05/14/2017)[-]

Trump threatens him, he recants. That is how it works in America. You think the strong-arm game doesn't get played here? Hell, you trumpkins are famous for accusing Clinton of playing it.

#57 to #55 - deaminzaints

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

You really are just an idiot...
Why the hell would Trump strong-arm him if he was going to fire him anyways? and why wouldnt Comey think that the strong-arming would then also be something to take under investigation? if he honestly believed Trump was worth investigating, he wouldnt just shut up like that.

Just ******* quit dude, you were ill-informed about the issue, but the more you try to dig yourself out of it, the more you just look like a conspiracy theorist madman.

#59 to #57 - logicalreason

Reply-4

(05/14/2017)[-]

See when you resort to insulting the person you are debating, you have just lost that debate.

#68 to #59 - cutiepyro

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

he's insulting you because he showed you evidence and you decided to ignore it

#72 to #68 - logicalreason

Reply-3

(05/14/2017)[-]

He ignored my evidence as well. The reason trumpkins have to resort to insults is that their repositories of knowledge only run breitbart deep.

#92 to #72 - deaminzaints

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

Didnt ignore your "evidence", i pointed out that your news source was from 2 months ago and thus is a bit outdated, whereas the statements and article i linked and im sourcing came from 5 days ago.

You simply ignored it and started going into a conspiracy theory instead of staying on point and sourcing who said what when.

#95 to #92 - logicalreason

Reply-2

(05/14/2017)[-]

Trumpkins would ignore a source if it was the holy spirit himself telling him they are wrong. Your only response would be "Thanks for correcting the record top kek lul lul lul .02 cents has been added to your account lul lul lul lul kek frog god yayayayayaya lul lul lul"

#96 to #95 - deaminzaints

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

Looks to me like you are mad that you forgot to look at the goddamn date of the article before you linked it.
Also shows you probably didnt read it.

#108 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/15/2017)[-]

You just gotta have that last word huh? No judgment, im the same way.

#105 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

Whatever you say little fella.

#106 to #105 - deaminzaints

(05/14/2017)[-]

Thats probably the smartest thing you've said since... well... your first comment.

#103 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

I wouldn't lower myself to the level of a common peasant. Just enjoy your dingy little 1 room, while I eat dinner on my balcony.

#104 to #103 - deaminzaints

(05/14/2017)[-]

Sounds like someone who is walking back on his words.
I have a balcony too. also multiple rooms. Denmark is neat like that.

Also should i just send you a pic of my dick so we can go full cock-competition over here? couse you know, at this point why not humiliate yourself a little more eh?

#101 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

9th floor condo with a view of the river. Walking distance to work and all the local hotspots. Very very nice. Much nicer than anything you could afford. But Im just a crazy nutjob...

#102 to #101 - deaminzaints

(05/14/2017)[-]

How do you know what i can afford, you dont know how much i make.
More importantly, wanna have a showoff? you show me yours, and ill show you mine.

#99 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

More insults, how clever, that must be a result of your superior European education. Do Eurotrash neckbeards live in basements like American neckbeards do?

#100 to #99 - deaminzaints

(05/14/2017)[-]

Insults are reserved the for the ones who earn them through their stupidity, im glad you like them.
And no, i live in a big and nice apartment with excellent wifi, close to the city center, no issues with heat or water and which costs me very little of my earnings.
How bout you?

#97 to #96 - logicalreason

Reply-1

(05/14/2017)[-]

No, I saw the date. The information he gave before being strong-armed by Trump is far more reliable than information he gave after being threatened by Trump. Trump is still threatening him. You refuse to consider anything that doesn't strictly follow your pre-set rhetoric.

#98 to #97 - deaminzaints

(05/14/2017)[-]

No i refuse to follow absolute conjecture of some conspiracy theorist on the internet who says something with no evidence.
I mean you in case you didnt catch that, i know you probably didnt.

#64 to #59 - anon id: 238e87d4

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

No he resulted to insulting you because you lost the debate about several post back and as just as you said you keep dinging yourself in deeper and you are to dumb to even realize. He's insulting you because he can't stand any more your ignorance.

#87 to #59 - deaminzaints

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

When you try and debate using outdated information and complete conjecture, then you lost the debate which is, like, 3 comments into this talk? nice.

#46 to #45 - deaminzaints

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

They arent.

#49 to #46 - logicalreason

Reply-2

(05/14/2017)[-]

They are.

#2 - shisno

Reply+7

(05/13/2017)[-]

okay, is there a recap about this?

#12 to #2 - anon id: 51b64006

Reply+5

(05/13/2017)[-]

I think its got something to do with Trump firing Comey while the FBI is apparently investigating the whole "Trump/Russia" thing.

Basically its a throw back to Nixon and watergate.

#67 to #2 - fellatio

Reply+1

(05/14/2017)[-]

Comey asks for more resources to devote to the investigation.
Trump asks to find reasons to fire him.
Trump fires Comey.
Acting FBI head and the other heads all say russians have compromised our elections.
Comey says he is only willing to testify in public.
Trump threatened Comey (a private citizen) into not testifying

#63 - anon id: 9a761ef8

Reply+5

(05/14/2017)[-]

You do know he refused because he wanted a PUBLIC HEARING... LOL YOU TRUMP MONKEYS LOVE FAKE NEWS

#27 - doktorevil

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

This is ******* crazy.... That is my actual post on 4chan.... Jesus ******* christ what are the odds.... I know you ******* wont believe me, but my jaw just freaking dropped!

#38 to #27 - notmcburd

Reply+5

(05/14/2017)[-]

#29 to #27 - boarderlinegreat

Reply+2

(05/13/2017)[-]

Pics or it didn't happen

#88 to #29 - doktorevil

Reply0

(05/14/2017)[-]

I ******** on 4chan all the ******* time, do you expect me to keep a record of all that? Hella noo! Most of it is semi-illegal anyways !

#109 to #88 - boarderlinegreat

Reply0

(05/15/2017)[-]

it was just bants brah

#30 to #27 - bulwark

Reply+1

(05/13/2017)[-]

Sejt

#11 - renjininety#46 on commentsRank#46

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

I feel like these two pics should be switched......would make better sense

#13 to #11 - anon id: 407a4f89

Reply+5

(05/13/2017)[-]

#15 to #13 - renjininety#46 on commentsRank#46

Reply0

(05/13/2017)[-]

faggot. why yes i do like to read the punchline before the joke/story.............what do you can someone who posts as anon? kinda bad example but do you get my point?

First 2 Last

[ 110 comments ]

Add Comment

join list: theTRUTH (1670 subs)Mention History

join list: theTRUTH (1670 subs)
Mention History