Not a bad idea, really. . Jimmy Pearse l hour ago - at tell a feminist at a womens only restaurant you' re transgender and if they refuse service just sue them
x
Click to expand

Not a bad idea, really

Jimmy Pearse
l hour ago - at
tell a feminist at a womens only restaurant
you' re transgender and if they refuse service
just sue them for going against your rig ht as
a trans female and then claim the money
and use it to fund male only restaurants and
when feminists complain then show them
their female only restaurants and then
feminism will be over because it will be such
a huge hypocrisy all those within feminism
will implode due to their rage and form a
black hole in which all feminism will be
sucked into thus leading to the golden age
of humanity.
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1199
Views: 40194
Favorited: 86
Submitted: 08/01/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to the-jelly-school submit to reddit

Comments(170):

[ 170 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - infernis ONLINE (08/01/2014) [-]
What, there are woman-only restaurants? But ..why?
#119 to #11 - thelooney (08/02/2014) [-]
Check your privilege cis scum you are raping me by eating next to me.
or smth along those lines i guess
#127 to #11 - acksl (08/02/2014) [-]
It's a serious threat
It's a serious threat
User avatar #98 to #11 - Zaxplab (08/02/2014) [-]
I wonder how easily a really cute cross-dresser could get in there...
#58 to #11 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
to protect from the scary penis monsters
User avatar #12 to #11 - teranin ONLINE (08/01/2014) [-]
to make a safe space from penis.
User avatar #15 to #12 - reginleif (08/01/2014) [-]
>implying you can ever be safe from the girth
#89 to #15 - ubermasterfaggot (08/02/2014) [-]
Praise our lord and savior, Jizzus Christ
Praise our lord and savior, Jizzus Christ
User avatar #6 - bluenebula (08/01/2014) [-]
The psycho feminists of today are already massive hypocrites. They don't care about fairness and equality, they just want to be better than everyone else. Even other women. That's what those kids of feminists want now, to feel superior to everyone else.
#129 to #6 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
Way to ******* repeat the same **** I hear every day on this site. WE GET IT FEMINISM IS BAD UGH UGH XDDDDD
#111 to #6 - captaincapital (08/02/2014) [-]
but they don't want to be better than everyone else.. there is seriously almost nothing to worry about in the time and place we live right now, so people are just finding stuff to make problems out of
#128 to #6 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
That notion has nothing to do with real feminism.
You guys are circlejerking to a feminist-hating guy who's obviously too uneducated to even use punctuation.
Come on, really?
#142 to #128 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
It is the real feminism though.
#145 to #142 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Notice how even bluenebula said "of today"?
Yes, a lot of "feminists" are ******** crazy see Tumblr .

But i'm telling you, i'm a feminist and the only power i want to take away from men are the power they have over women.

So, no: it's not the "real" feminism - it's a relatively new branch of "feminism".
I'd say go ahead and use the term "feminazi" I ******* hate that term - But use it against psycho Tumblr-"feminists", and not feminists.

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending a state of equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women.

^THIS is real feminism. Don't call anything but that feminism.
#146 to #145 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
That's like saying modern neo-nazis are not real nazis.
Forms change, deal with it.
those modern feminists are as real as old feminists.
#153 to #146 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Over-simplification incoming:
Nazis: kill jews
Neonazis: kill jews

Feminists: want equality
Tumblr-"feminazis": do not want equality

Do you see my point?
Besides, feminism is splitted between real feminists and not - they are not the "new" feminism, they're a pest. A male-privilege aware pest to feminism and still a threat to patriarchy
#158 to #153 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
You're overly biased because you consider yourself "a real feminist" and don't like those retards.
P.S I hope you are a female
#159 to #158 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
I am biased in the way that the people you're trying to dub "feminists" do not represent my movement.
P.S: why would my gender even matter?
#160 to #159 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
They're are as real feminists as it gets.
There is no a law book which defines who are feminists and who not.


P.S it does but I'm too lazy to be explaining all that **** now but if you are a male, I got bad news for you
#161 to #160 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
There is no law book, no, but can i call myself an astronaut for being a feminist?
Words have meanings and feminism, in short, means fighting for equality among genders.
P.S: your gender doesn't really matter. Wether you're a horrible troll or someone who fell for the bait does.
#162 to #161 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
Astronaut is not an abstract concept like a feminist.
You just keep repeating ******** , it won't make it right.
P.S yes, it does.
#163 to #162 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Abstract or not, there's a definition of feminism, and your "feminists" aren't meeting the criteria.
Take this quote btw:
"Accusations of male bashing and man hating work to discredit feminism because people often confuse men as individuals with men as a dominant and privileged category of people. Given the reality of women's oppression, male privilege, and some men's enforcement of both, it's hardly surprising that EVERY woman should have moments when she resents or even "hates" men.” (Allan Johnson, "The gender knot," p. 107

I'd love to have a discussion, even with a poor troll, but if you don't raise any points I think we'll just call it a day, ok?
#168 to #163 - stalini (08/02/2014) [-]
You still did not understand **** , right?
Feminism does not belong to any of its groups, no one has right to define what's wrong and what's correct feminism
User avatar #108 - leonhardt (08/02/2014) [-]
>Feminists
>Understanding hypocrisy

You're pinning the entirety of your plan's success on that point, right there.
Well, good luck.
#130 to #108 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
You know what hypocrisy is?
Being the ruling class and pretending like women AND ******* men fighting for equality pose as a threat to anything but your privilege.

Male feminist/egalitarian
User avatar #147 to #108 - sciencexplain (08/02/2014) [-]
Implying feminists of today ever understand anything. (but muh womyn's studies)
User avatar #149 to #147 - leonhardt (08/02/2014) [-]
That is the opposite of what I was implying
User avatar #151 to #149 - sciencexplain (08/02/2014) [-]
I know what your comment was about. I just wanted to feel like I was contributing, but I guess I'm not relevant in most things. Being an explain effectively voids your right to involve yourself in anything other than your user focus, and to break through that coats you in red thumbs.
User avatar #52 - deltagaming (08/02/2014) [-]
woman only restaurants? what?
#54 to #52 - colonelxj (08/02/2014) [-]
Yeah, if it's for women only then how will they get the guy to pay the bill?
Yeah, if it's for women only then how will they get the guy to pay the bill?
#102 to #54 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
The "guy".
User avatar #91 to #54 - Steinwolf (08/02/2014) [-]
I bet the chefs are male as well.
#107 to #91 - fatalhermit (08/02/2014) [-]
i bet the dishwashers are male
#56 - psychotayto (08/02/2014) [-]
There's female only restaurants?!
#7 - ryles (08/01/2014) [-]
id like to see someone attempt this at some point
id like to see someone attempt this at some point
User avatar #42 to #7 - crazyanimal (08/02/2014) [-]
This gif has a total of 4 frames
#124 - bitofatit (08/02/2014) [-]
GIMME AT LEAST ONE COMMA MAN SHIET
GIMME AT LEAST ONE COMMA MAN SHIET
User avatar #67 - timmywankenobi (08/02/2014) [-]
Actually there is a horrible stupid marketing plan to open a chain of female only restaurants across north America in the next two years and apparently three are opened or about to open and are already under scrutiny by the civil rights courts as to whether or not this violates men's civil rights and if it would be unfair considering it has been stated by the supreme court in no uncertain terms that no white or men only establishments can be opened . To which the official feminist elitists response has been "Who cares ?" and "Ya but were not men".
#109 to #67 - ramsus (08/02/2014) [-]
WHAT THE **** ?!?!? They are actually using the "But we are not men" excuse?!?!? How can a group of people be so ******* hypocrite?!?!? DO THEY REALLY THINK THAT THEY CAN USE OR IGNORE THE FACT THAT THEY ARE WOMEN WHENEVER IS CONVENIENT FOR THEM

If you are not a man then you don't have the rights to vote, if you are not a man then you should stay at home and never think in such thing as studying or working, IF YOU ARE NOT A MAN THEN YOU WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO ACCESS HEAVEN.

**** I'M MAD.
User avatar #69 to #67 - theexo ONLINE (08/02/2014) [-]
Well then it's basically free money. When they open up one these restaurants just walk in with a camera and when they deny you service because your a male sue the **** out of them for denying you. It isn't technically against the law but you could bring it up the chain till the supreme courts makes it illegal
User avatar #70 to #69 - timmywankenobi (08/02/2014) [-]
yes if you can find a decent lawyer you can absolutely do that.
#31 - mattwithnonumbers ONLINE (08/01/2014) [-]
lol feminism wouldn't even be a thing if hypocrisy was all it took to destroy it.
#73 - legitimately (08/02/2014) [-]
Holy run-on sentence Batman!
#33 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
they're prepared for that.

you can't fight their hypocrisy in their eyes.

you can't rid them of the **** in their brain.
#131 to #33 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
EVERY television network is a white/male network.
EVERY gym except for women's only gym's are a male gym.
EVERY other campus center is a cis-center

Try to understand that the world favours cis/white/men more than trans/non-white/women

I am a white cis male and i can honestly say that i am privileged above any of these classes. It's not fair and special places/arrangements or whatever is not the optimal way to go about things, but it is the best way just now.

Until these people are truly equal i believe we need to show some respect and let them have their space.

Bashing feminism is not the way to go. Understanding the difference between Tumblr-"feminism" and original, true feminism is a good start.

Whatever you might call it though, can we agree that women are in general, forget about women's-only restaurants, women's-only gyms etc. not as privileged as men?
User avatar #137 to #131 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
can you, by chance, explain how women are not as privileged as men?
#139 to #137 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Have you ever been cat-called?
Can you walk the streets at night without the fear of being raped?
Ever noticed how women's surnames tend to change when being married?
These are just a very small number of ways our society disprivileges women.
Want to know why sometimes (every day) it is harder to be a woman? Find a woman and ask her. I am not the best person to tell you, since i am not a woman.

I am open for a further debate if you still have questions.
User avatar #140 to #139 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
no; people yell/say/whatever a lot of **** all day, when you can't deal with that then i'm just sorry for you
yes, i still feel uncomfortable though because there can be someone with a knife or gun trying to ******* rob me
it's your own decision.
(wearing make-up, high heels or anything is also your own decision and as such, doesn't count. periods don't count either, because, well, society can't just change that)
#141 to #140 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Trust me, people don't say half the **** to you that they'd say to a woman.
I feel you on the uncomfortable thing, but imagine being simply being weaker and a much bigger subject to rape on top of that.
It IS your own decision, but herein comes societal pressure, norms from religion Most religion is grossly male-privileged, do i have to elaborate?

About the whole make-up/whatever, yes it's your decision, but again societal pressure - that's where we're heading, right? I'd say it ******* counts.
I, as a man, am privileged in the sense that i don't get asked if i'm "feeling well" or "sick" if i go without makeup.

If i, as a man, am nice to strangers, they are less likely to think i'm flirting - and also if i'm having a bad day and don't care to answer people on the street, women double my age won't say "hey baby, gimme a smile" or any **** like that I have witnessed this multiple times
User avatar #144 to #141 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
and oh my god that last part. i always look like i'm in a bad mood even when i'm not. girls in my class when i went to school (i came along with them pretty well) used to say that to me every day, multiple times.
#148 to #144 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Ok so first of all, note that nothing i write ever has to do with a single individual, it is social tendencies.

Men are in no way pressured to shave. If you CAN grow a beard, it is considered handsome In my country it is hugely fashionable atm. . If you're a teenager/young man who can't grow an aesthetic beard, people will interfere because you're not "man" enough for it see where i'm getting? .

Men are also in no way pressured the same way as women to look good, groom, get in shape etc.

Seriously, don't give me "hints" - say what you need to say and let's have an open discussion.

Please do list just a couple of subjects where women are subject to privilege over men.

As my finishing point and answer to your "bullcrap": please note the difference between isolated incidents and social tendencies that hit pretty much every woman.
#154 to #148 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
yes, men are pressured in the same way as woman. see how people are being **** on simply because they look like nerds? **** , we laugh at guys a little too thin and a little too thick alike; we critisize males looks as much as women critisize looks of other females; looks are as (if not more) important to them as they are for men when looking for a partner.
speaking of which, there are dating services men have to pay to use while women can use them free of charge.
the reason women are asked if they don't feel well without makeup is, well, they look as healthy. note the eyes in particular.
custody battles are pretty much where women are most privileged. a friend of mine isn't allowed to see his daughter because the mother is ******* crazy and doesnt allow him. he can't afford to go to court and there is no other way to force her to let him see his daughter. saddest part about it is that he's pretty much the nicest guy i know
#155 to #154 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
I'm not saying men aren't pressured, but all pressure men face, women face more perhaps except for custody cases, i won't even argue with that

Dating services letting women in for free is a fair point, yes, but does it equal to the harassment women face online as in the real world?
Besides, when men pay for **** , they get a feeling of the woman "owing them something" and the is not empowering at all. That is male privilege disguised behind economy.
A lot of women I know some want you to pay for them, i know really don't feel comfortable with someone paying for them.

^We had this night club in my country once, that let women in for somewhere between 0-7dollars can't remember and men had to pay around 30-45. This made a very uneasy environment where the women didn't feel comfortable because the men came in with a feeling of "paying to be with the women who came in free or of low charge". This is not preferable for any gender.
The men at this nightclub did not behave nicely, to put it softly.

Women do NOT LOOK UNHEALTHY WITHOUT MAKEUP! This is a social construct, and brace yourself for Oprah: You are brainwashed, I am brainwashed - we are all brainwashed.
This is a standard case of social construct believed as "human nature" Why do you think i "look like a girl" when i have makeup on? .
User avatar #156 to #155 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
no, really, women don't look unhealthy without makeup, just LESS healthy
#157 to #156 - macbookfan (08/02/2014) [-]
Agreed Still in the sense of brainwashing , but do you see how women are pressured way more than men to be aesthetically pleasing?

I need to do nothing but put on a t-shirt and pants to be socially acceptable.
For women, it's quite a longer journey.
User avatar #143 to #141 - huszti (08/02/2014) [-]
men are also socially pressured to shave their faces (and sometimes also to work out). women have commented on me growing a beard/not shaving (including my boss's wife, other co-workers or classmates in school).
i could give you a hint about that "feeling well" or "sick" part but i think i'll give you a chance to figure it out yourself.
the last part is pretty much bullcrap though, people think you're flirting (or trying to) all the time.

also lets not forget all the things where men are disprivileged.
#92 to #33 - RedJoker (08/02/2014) [-]
You know....   
As much as I dont agree with this at all.    
   
That is a REALLY good analogy
You know....
As much as I dont agree with this at all.

That is a REALLY good analogy
User avatar #16 - Greevon ONLINE (08/01/2014) [-]
Simple. Go into one, refuse to be served based on gender, sue. You don't have to claim anything, the fact that they are discriminating at all is illegal as a restaurant has no legitimate reason to be segregated. At least, that's how it would work out in America, but from the article there are some opening in China and the UK, I don't know how those will turn out.
#41 to #16 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
Actually I think they can, as a private company, legally. Still idiotic.
#47 to #41 - vorarephilia (08/02/2014) [-]
Laws from the civil rights movement still exist, all I need is a lawyer to give a very 'by the books' kind of case  Under *long ass legal location and case files* it is illegal to discriminate against a customer for race, and gender. , and since juries are going to be split evenly with male and female, i can get the 1/2 majority needed for a civil case easily.   
   
BOOM! rent paid for a year True Justice has been served.
Laws from the civil rights movement still exist, all I need is a lawyer to give a very 'by the books' kind of case Under *long ass legal location and case files* it is illegal to discriminate against a customer for race, and gender. , and since juries are going to be split evenly with male and female, i can get the 1/2 majority needed for a civil case easily.

BOOM! rent paid for a year True Justice has been served.
User avatar #138 - antiponiesuser (08/02/2014) [-]
except they dont understand the concept of hypocrisy.

thats why they created the ''trigger'' words
User avatar #43 - kommandantvideo (08/02/2014) [-]
Female only restaurants don't actually exist, do they?
User avatar #72 to #43 - vitamingreen (08/02/2014) [-]
[small]"The latest trend in dining all over the world including Dubai, Las Vegas, London and Zhengzhou, China is women-only restaurants, where men are not allowed.
What may seem like an unfairly exclusive establishment (especially if it was the other way around) has become the norm in various cities around the world, as steakhouses and beer-tasting clubs in London are mainly female-oriented.
The latest eatery to cater to the fair sex is set to open next month in London’s Soho area, as The London Evening Standard reports that Sofakingcool on Frith Street will reopen as KC’z Bar on February 1st as a women’s-only restaurant."
elitedaily.com/life/culture/womenonly-restaurants-trending-world/
User avatar #45 to #43 - klick (08/02/2014) [-]
There are many restaurants and bars that geared towards women, but they can not ban men. At lest in Canada.

In America, however, members only eateries exist and you need to be a member to get in. The requirement may be that you can not have a penis?
#46 to #43 - shikoti (08/02/2014) [-]
I know there are gyms that have branches that are one sex only....there are girl only gyms but...if a gym said male only...oh man the fire. The one thing I hope people take into consideration ( I am a dude). When you consider: Atheist, Feminist, other people who believe in this or that religion. You usually only hear from the people who do nothing but harm that view. I have met some people who are feminist and if they see gender inequality they will speak up about, regardless of the gender. They just want an even playing field.


That being said most often the ones who have the loudest voices/strongest opinion are the extreme cases. You rarely see an average person on the news you have the extremely weird and wacky person. I myself was raised as a Christian, I ran a chapel for a year. I have and never will ask someone why they do or do not believe in god. It is not my place. Same with any standpoint.....but if you wont shut up about it and will not stop shoving your views in my face in a manner that is putting me down.... then that is bad. Again this is just my view point.
#93 to #46 - RedJoker (08/02/2014) [-]
We need more people like you Sir
#48 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
The site is dying.   
You know why?   
This guy got a hundred of his 			*********		 from tumblr in the top 200 (probably proxy'd, I want to believe FJ is not that retarded).   
Why browse FJ for reposted tumblr 			****		, when you can browse tumblr?   
It's the end of FJ. And we're barely going to miss it.
The site is dying.
You know why?
This guy got a hundred of his ********* from tumblr in the top 200 (probably proxy'd, I want to believe FJ is not that retarded).
Why browse FJ for reposted tumblr **** , when you can browse tumblr?
It's the end of FJ. And we're barely going to miss it.
#126 to #48 - alexanderh (08/02/2014) [-]
The site has had similar content for the last 3 years, and the amount of reposts hasn't changed a bit.
FJ isn't dying.
User avatar #94 to #48 - nocta (08/02/2014) [-]
this is teranin tho, not the tumblr faggot
#167 to #48 - teranin ONLINE (08/02/2014) [-]
I have no idea what you're talking about, anon.  I post a lot of 			****		, from all over the internet, and I'm not sure what you're getting at at all with the proxy comment as you can post content freely from a single IP address.
I have no idea what you're talking about, anon. I post a lot of **** , from all over the internet, and I'm not sure what you're getting at at all with the proxy comment as you can post content freely from a single IP address.
User avatar #68 - bighairyfart (08/02/2014) [-]
>Implying logic works on feminists
User avatar #132 - knarta (08/02/2014) [-]
Do you guys seriously have such a big problem with feminism? Do you like face situations where feminists scream at you everyday?

Maybe it's because I lived in France and Switzerland, but I can not remember a single situation like the ones you guys complain about. I mean there was this one Pussy Riot thing in Zürich once (which i thought was pretty cool cause there waz boobies in the newspaper the next day), but it lastest 10min and didn't really bother anyone.

Do you guys get kicked in the balls everyday by feminists in the US?
User avatar #152 to #132 - leonhardt (08/02/2014) [-]
This Feminism/Anti-Feminism war is purely internet based.
Sure there are a handful of crazy cunts that will actually go out and scream into a megaphone about how they're so oppressed, but most things you read online don't actually happen in real life.

I know. It's a big pill to swallow.
#103 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
Real feminism is about equality; a women's only restaurant is the opposite of that.
#87 - anon (08/02/2014) [-]
American businesses can't do that, though. The Federal Civil Rights Act takes away a business's ability to deny based on race, religion, or national origin, and the exact wording of the law is to "all people". Transgenders, homosexuals, men, women, children, and any other variation of the word "person" fall under the protection of the FCRA's anti-discrimination clause, thus making it illegal for a restaurant to cater only to women.

It's a pretty good plan, anyway. Doing this in any restaurant that denies service to men would be a good way of bringing awareness to how idiotic modern feminism is becoming in the United States; I'm not entirely too sure about other North American laws or lack thereof on how businesses should be run, but this **** doesn't belong in my America.
User avatar #104 to #87 - Izen (08/02/2014) [-]
actually that's hiring in the government sector
a private business may do whatever
Hence why Howard University, a private entity, is allowed to deny all non-blacks
or why shelters can turn certain people away
only public jobs and government sector have to abide by such
User avatar #95 to #87 - animalsgreenberet (08/02/2014) [-]
businesses in America do, however, reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for legitimate reasons. all they have to do is make up a ******** reason why you don't deserve to be served and they can kick you out.
User avatar #101 to #95 - capslockrage (08/02/2014) [-]
Use your head, that's a lot different than having some sign on the outside saying "no men allowed"
User avatar #63 - rmoran (08/02/2014) [-]
I got half way through that "sentence" and my mind ran out of breath.
[ 170 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)