Effect of feminism 115. severe cognitive dissonance. June as 2014 1. 1. 199 nudes Some ticks carries a disease, so we' re supposed to amid them all. Some sharks

Effect of feminism 115

June as 2014 1. 1. 199 nudes
Some ticks carries a disease, so we' re supposed to amid them all.
Some sharks bite people, so we' re supposed to always be cautious in
the sees n.
Some snakes are venomous, so if you cant decide whether it' s deadly
or not, assume deadly.
But no, not all men.
Some blacks steal, so we' re supposed to always be wary of black people.
shut the **** up you gadda mu racist piece of ****
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 36028
Favorited: 36
Submitted: 07/03/2014
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to the-jelly-school


Anonymous comments allowed.
#35 - Fwimble (07/04/2014) [-]
yeah theres a little thing humans have that's different than other animals
User avatar #36 to #35 - TheHutchie (07/04/2014) [-]
I'd heard people mention gay brains, but this is the first time I've ever seen a picture of one. Very interesting.
User avatar #1 - miia ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
i cant even tell what its trying to do at this point
#2 to #1 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
She's saying all men should be avoided because a small percentage of men engage in violence toward women.

The counterpoint to her collectivist narrative is the guy making the same statement about black people, in an attempt to snap her out of that bigoted view.

It didn't work.
#5 to #2 - anon (07/03/2014) [-]
It did work- with men, the women said it's fine; but with black people, it's suddenly racist and unacceptable, using the same reasoning. It's unacceptable logic for black people but acceptable logic for men, with the same logic, hence the photo's title "cognitive dissonance", just google what that means.
#6 to #5 - anon (07/03/2014) [-]
Oh, I see what you mean. Yeah, it didn't work xD
#7 to #6 - anon (07/03/2014) [-]
Yeah, I have just realised you uploaded the photo, and titled it. My bad xd
User avatar #3 to #2 - miia ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
it looks like the same person is saying the thing about black people and the things about sharks and stuff
User avatar #4 to #3 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
No the person changes when it gets to the black people part.

The first person is using the shark comments and such to try to justify her bigoted point of view
User avatar #19 to #4 - schwerdaddy (07/03/2014) [-]
The confusing part is the grey box being around everything except the last line. So the part about black people is grouped with the original user's words. I have no idea why this is.
User avatar #75 to #3 - xxbandwagonxx (07/04/2014) [-]
I'm seeing the same thing you are.
#56 - EdwardNigma (07/04/2014) [-]
Even if they didn't carry diseases, would you want a tick anywhere near you in the first place?
User avatar #59 to #56 - theoneweirdguy (07/04/2014) [-]
little vampires 'n' ****
#60 to #59 - boothead (07/04/2014) [-]
**** the little ***** only thing worse than ticks are the blacks.
#34 - MrLewis (07/04/2014) [-]
i dont what this was saying.

i dont know what the comments are saying.

i dont know who i should be angry at.

help me bandwagon.
#43 to #34 - grrphc (07/04/2014) [-]
Thank goodness I'm not alone.

Who the **** is on which side?
#45 to #43 - goldengohan (07/04/2014) [-]
"but no, not all men" is sarcasm if that helps
User avatar #46 to #34 - bugsbob (07/04/2014) [-]
Kill them all and let whoever the **** is in charge of this ******** sort it out.
User avatar #55 to #34 - theaveragejoe (07/04/2014) [-]
im with you. i have no idea whats going on
User avatar #73 to #34 - xxbandwagonxx (07/04/2014) [-]
Can't help ya here, mate
User avatar #62 to #34 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
This post is about how many feminist organizations say things like "All men are rapist or potential rapists " "all men are violent and abuse women and children" "all men are potential child molesters or rapists " . But if anyone were to act the same way towards say black people by saying "All black people steal " or against Jew by saying "All Jews horde shekels" or "all gay men sodomize little boys" they would immediately be called out as racist,anti-Semitic and homophobic. Feminist have created a state of sever cognitive dissonance when it comes to misandry.
#104 to #62 - MrLewis (07/04/2014) [-]
**** I GET IT

im flippin retarded for not seeing that earlier.

thank you magic man
#57 - Jeff C (07/04/2014) [-]
I always try to avoid women, they have cooties and **** . Gross.
#193 to #83 - Jeff C (07/04/2014) [-]
Your name is maroon but your name is blue, faggot
User avatar #165 to #57 - zeroqp (07/04/2014) [-]
men **** too you know.
#169 to #165 - Jeff C (07/04/2014) [-]
You are mistaken sure, I meant cooties and **** as in cooties and things like cooties, not cooties and **** as in cooties and they take *****
User avatar #190 to #169 - zeroqp (07/04/2014) [-]
I was just kidding... haha
User avatar #47 - whypop (07/04/2014) [-]
Feminism has become anti-men
Mens Rights Activism has become anti Feminism

Its all about Egalitarianism.
User avatar #81 to #47 - smashingtonic (07/04/2014) [-]
It's all about removing feminism
User avatar #48 to #47 - itsthatguyagain (07/04/2014) [-]
I think you mean it's all about not giving a **** .
User avatar #49 to #48 - whypop (07/04/2014) [-]
#130 - clavatninenine (07/04/2014) [-]
>Tumblr Feminazis
>Tumblr Feminazis
User avatar #86 - rippercrust (07/04/2014) [-]
There was a picture floating around saying "Not all men are bad, but Imagen if you had a bowl of m&ms and 10% were poisoned, would you eat a handful?"
Totally ****** up, if the same picture was floating around but insted of "Men" it was "somalians" then the same tumblr kids that shared the first one would rage about it being blatantly racist
there are alot of problems in society that make girls feel unsafe and whatnot and they are problems that need to be fixed but all that i ever see From both sides of the argument is a battle of the sexes over who has it worse and its ********

I'd qq somewhere else like facebook or real life but then everyone would just call me a misogynist
User avatar #92 to #86 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
SJW's and feminists declared war on men and masculinity.
User avatar #96 to #92 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
Please send me a copy of their deceleration, I'd like to see who signed it. I actually wouldn't be surprised if there was a SJW one written up somewhere but feminists, really? Declared war. Really?
User avatar #125 to #96 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Sure, the millions of people who bought and agree with The SCUM Manifesto. Take that as the declaration.
User avatar #161 to #125 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
Is that actually a thing? I'm entirely too sleep deprived for sarcasm and googling.
User avatar #166 to #164 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
First off, I have difficulty trusting avoiceformen, they've always been quite biased.
Second, I have to wonder how many feminists this represents. Keeping in mind that feminism isn't one unified group (which may be one of their problems) and even if several prominent members are a part of it, that doesn't mean they represent the whole thing. Because, you know, it's hard to represent a group that is really just a loosely associated collection of like-minded-ish people with a fairly vague identifier attached to it.
I appreciate the effort but I can't read any of these because being tired puls... this , equals rage vomit.
User avatar #167 to #166 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
1: I didn't say read the AVFM article, it just has the links to the agent orange files. Should have used this link, I guess? agentorangefiles.com/
2: millions.
User avatar #93 to #86 - MrDeadiron (07/04/2014) [-]
The vast majority of women feel unsafe because they're extremely insecure.
#84 - listened (07/04/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#54 - lucariopwnz (07/04/2014) [-]
Some feminists are obnoxious cunts, avoid them all.
User avatar #51 - trolljunkusa (07/04/2014) [-]
You don't exactly avoid ticks because of the disease, but because they're SUCKING YOUR ******* BLOOD

Sharks are very gentle animals, unless you provoke them

Snakes are usually quite friendly, and poisonous snakes are pretty obvious
User avatar #71 to #51 - champaigne (07/04/2014) [-]
******* just suck though
User avatar #67 to #51 - leonhardt (07/04/2014) [-]
Or if the sharks are hungry and you look like food, or just happen to be in front of them.
#17 - lozarus (07/03/2014) [-]
Tumblr being a retard, what a surprise.
#53 - fuckoatmeal (07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #70 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Guys calm the **** down, avoiding and being cautious of all men does not equal hating all men and wishing they were dead. It just means not being in a vulnerable position until I know a person well enough to judge whether or not they are rapey.
User avatar #221 to #70 - technoshaman (07/05/2014) [-]
Hey, you and I had an interesting discussion here a little while ago and I respect your opinions. I went back to look at it and notice timmywan was being his usual misogynistic duchey self. Please don't pay him any mind, I've had it out with him before. He's in his own close-minded little world.
User avatar #224 to #221 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/06/2014) [-]
I figured after he started referencing MRA statistics as if they were worth a damn. Unfortunately that was very late in the conversation
User avatar #100 to #70 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
I understand the logic but I have some issue with it. Wouldn't it seem a bit ridiculous of a man to avoid or tip-toe around women because he was afraid one was going to accuse him of rape and get him sent to jail, or because they might drug and rob him? It's normal to be cautious around new people, that's part of our biology, but to be actively worried about a specific crime around only one sex seems, I don't know, paranoid. I wish there was a better word for that.
User avatar #109 to #100 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
In a prison enironment, you're not meant to put yourself in a vulnerable position because someone will shank you or rape or who knows what else. In prison, male rape is extremely common.

It's not a case of tiptoeing around a man, it's just making sure someone else knows where I am, going to the bathroom in pairs, avoiding being with a man that seems suspicious to me where we would be hidden. You know. Just the same as when you work in a convenience store in the middle of the bad part of town, everyone is a thief unless proven otherwise. You watch them like a hawk.
User avatar #116 to #109 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
Again, I understand reasonable caution around unfamiliar people, but correct me if I'm wrong; in your last sentence you are straight up saying that all men are rapists until proven otherwise. When is a person proven not to be something, as you can't prove a negative.

And real life isn't a prison environment, as most people haven't committed any crime, nor do they want to.
And for the record, prison rape isn't as common as pop culture likes to make it seem. Most prison prison sex is actually consensual with prisoners who make themselves available for it. I wish I could remember the source on that.
#126 to #116 - cerebrallawlsy (07/04/2014) [-]
I am not hating or trying to start something, but I would agree that in that certain settings a man is considered dangerous to a woman until proven otherwise. Especially after certain and particular news blow ups in the US about guys who have been murdering women/people in general because women won't date or like them. And even more so being in Canada, our government does a lot to educate the masses about assault against women. Buses have advertisements from the government that say, "It's a girl! There is a 50/50 chance she will be assaulted in her life"

It's not just women whining and complaining or lying. There are real facts that prove men are pretty much the top danger to a woman's life, whether it be to end or cause harm to it. A woman is also more likely to be molested/raped by someone she knows than a stranger, as well. My own mother, when she was about 17, was once choked out by her ex-boyfriend because she wouldn't date him again and he even said to her, "If I can't have you, no one can". For myself, I once had a guy who supposedly loved me and even though I told him a thousand times I wasn't interested in a relationship or a friendship, he was so persistent that I was honestly scared for my life. He would one minute send me messages about how much he loved me and then the next minute be like, "You're nothing but a goddamn bitch and I ******* hate you, I knew all along you were so fake and I wish I never ******* met you" and THEN be like, "Baby I'm so sorry I didn't mean it, I'm just having a bad day"

Lol, I also had a guy once tell me that I was SO hot I was perfect for being raped. And then he didn't understand why I was upset by his comment.
User avatar #173 to #126 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
You do know all of those ad's are put there by feminists right ? and feminists don't use facts they invent them. If you read the actually stats you'd know that the 50/50 thing uses the feminist definition of assault which includes lying to a woman,yelling,screaming,arguing,grabbing her hand,slapping,pinching,emotional assault, spraying water on her, stealing from her,rubbing her arm without verbal consent, kissing her without verbal consent,swearing at her,constantly texting her or looking at her phone in a possessive manner, pulling her hair,punching,kicking,defending yourself from her violence,asking her were she was and who she was with all the time.financial abuse (borrowing money and not paying it back) by this definition researchers have found 100% of men will be assaulted in their lives. Feminist are sneaky and redefine definitions to make things seem worse to scare women it's called scare tactics. So you met 1 guy who was crazy out of 4.2 billion ? that's you proof society needs to see all men as potential rapists ? I was once mugged by a black guy so that mean all black people are thieves right ?
User avatar #220 to #173 - technoshaman (07/05/2014) [-]
"...by this definition researchers have found that 100% of men will be assaulted in their life."

You just invented a fact. And by your definition I'd say 100% of women will also be assaulted in their life. Because who hasn't been yelled at before. There are people who try to spread misinformation but it isn't all feminists, by my reckoning it isn't even most feminists. There are always going to be dishonest people who lie or use warped logic to push their agendas and sometimes those people get to positions of authority (source: every government ever). But most people aren't terrible like that.
User avatar #223 to #220 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/06/2014) [-]
no most people aren't terrible but it only takes a few in key positions.
User avatar #120 to #116 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
To me, they kind of are. Corner store situation, all they have to do is pay and they're not theives. For me, all they have to do is not invade my space repeatedly and they're casj. I've had people press me into bars, or try and grab my boob on public transport. While that obviously doesn't make them rapists, it means they don't respect my consent/will/desires and it means they're not someone I'd be drunk around.
User avatar #140 to #120 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
See, that's a big part of it. I'm a psych major and what you've just described represents something I've been saying about this for a long time. Groping means someone is a douche, but being a rapist (or any other violent criminal) usually comes with some sort of emotional and/or mental issues that sets one apart from normal societies. I assume you were referring to the Elliot Rodgers shooting at the start of your comment. What the media (and twitter) liked to glance over is the fact that he was SEVERELY mentally disturbed. Normal, well adjusted people don't generally committing violence and if western society would stop making mental health such a taboo issue maybe people like him could have been identified and helped/put away before he did anything.

I totally understand not wanting to get groped, that's a common enough problem that stems from society not teaching enough respect for basic humanity and a lot of men think they can get away with it. hell, a lot of women think they can get away with it, I've never liked being touched without an invitation, regardless of the persons sex . It's just that I've been (fairly violently) sexually assaulted before and it always bothers me when people equate things like groping or disrespectful comments with that.
User avatar #142 to #140 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]

Rapey isn't calling someone a rapist, and I did say being rapey 'obviously doesn't make them rapists'
User avatar #156 to #142 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
I've never never heard the term rapey used other than as a descriptor for a person who might commit rape or a place where rape may occur. Well, I guess you learn something new every day.
User avatar #103 to #100 - shanethedragon ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #105 to #103 - technoshaman (07/04/2014) [-]
I guess that would apply, but I feel like a word less dependent on the circumstances would do a better job describing the concept.
User avatar #106 to #105 - shanethedragon ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
gonna keep trying. sexinoid?
User avatar #77 to #70 - slapchoppin (07/04/2014) [-]
oh but when i'm cautious of women because theres a chance they might be a cunt i'm a misogynist
User avatar #79 to #77 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Ok apart from the fact that being a rapist and being a cunt are REALLY DIFFERENT, no. Being cautious of someone is not the same as hating a group of people based on their gender.
User avatar #87 to #79 - slapchoppin (07/04/2014) [-]
of course they're REALLY DIFFERENT that was the part that was supposed to make the joke obvious
User avatar #88 to #87 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I've had a lot of people say that to me completely seriously
#95 to #88 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
what percentage of men do you consider rapey? because to my knowledge its a very small amount.... so is your first instinct always "oh theres a guy hes probably rapey since i dont know him well enough to know otherwise "
User avatar #97 to #95 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Rapey as in rapists? Of men that I'm likely to interact with (adverse to all men, including people from countries where rape is a norm) I'd say.. I dunno, 6-8%? Rapey as in people that will take advantage of me or try to cop a feel, that sort of thing, I'd double it.

Only 10-15% of snakes are venemous. If you lack the knowledge to identify a snake, you wouldn't put yourself in a position in which it can harm you. You wouldn't pick it up, or spook it, etc. Same logic. At least snakes have distinct patterns.
#118 to #97 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
6-8%? Jesus, I know way more than 100 guys, and I'd wager maybe... 2 of them could do something like that? ****** sake, you're either hanging in the wrong part of town, or this is a really ******* insulting generlization.
User avatar #121 to #118 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I also know over a hundred guys and I know (knew, I don't talk to them any more for obvious reasons) at least 8 people who have done some pretty shady **** .
#123 to #121 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
so, out of over a hundred guys, 8 have done "shady **** ." Does that mean rape? Or drugs? Prostitutes? Because, a drug user isn't necessarily a rapist, nor is someone who pays for sex. Either way, no, I've come to the conclusion that you're a sexist. You're generalizing, and frankly, it's offensive as **** . I work in retail in a shady part of town. Anyone can be a shoplifter, or a robber... But it doesn't mean I'll assume they are from the beginning. That's just ******* rude.
User avatar #131 to #123 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Obviously a drug user isn't a rapist, that's flat out illogical. I mean like sleeping with an underage person who can barely walk, sticking their dick into a woman who is passed out, getting caught roofying someone, straight up rape.

Someone walks into your store you're not gonna blindfold yourself, are you? You keep an eye on them.
User avatar #175 to #131 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
keeping you eye on someone in your store does not equate to believing every person who walks into the store is a thief until proven otherwise. Also by your logic women should not be allow around children since the majority of child abuse comes from biological mothers and as you said we can't know which mothers are abusive so we should we need to treat all mothers like child abusers until proven otherwise right ?
User avatar #176 to #175 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
If I'm sexist, how come literally every single one of my favourite people is male?
User avatar #177 to #176 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
you can have male friends and still-hold sexist views.
User avatar #178 to #177 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Being sexist is hating one gender for nothing more than the fact that they are that gender.
User avatar #179 to #178 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
yes or believing/spreading hateful things about that entire gender even if only 5.6% are responsible.
User avatar #180 to #179 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I said 6% of the men I interact with, but EXCUSE ME for being a WHOLE FOURTH OF A PERCENTILE OFF.
User avatar #181 to #180 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
that's not the point . the point is you said women should view all men as potential rapists even though only 5.6% of men will ever commit a rape. Which is why I said since 60-65% of child abuse by your comes from mothers by your bigoted logic we should view all mothers as potential child abusers.
User avatar #183 to #181 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
The difference between your apparently false scenario is there are multiple large organisations both official and non dedicated to identifying and remedying abuse situations. When there's an app that can tell me one particular man has been seen punching a woman and to keep an eye on him, let me know and I'll stop making sure I'm not alone at night.
User avatar #219 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
The quotes are real. As I said before I am aware that there are many equality feminists but as long as the radical are in charge of the majority of lobbies and councils and corporations ,average everyday women with no power saying they believe in equality while still clinging to the outdated,debunked and sexist notion of patriarchy theory will not have any effect on feminist policy or feminist legalities. Feminism is corrupted by greed and bigotry at the highest levels and it is dying because of it. Hopefully egalitarianism will take over when feminism is gone.
User avatar #217 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Wait wait wait providing evidence of some high ranking feminist women being sexist is sexist ?
User avatar #218 to #217 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
You didn't do that, though. You provided satire, false quotes and extremists who misrepresent the movement. I am one of many, many sane feminists, we're not hard to find if you look. The difference is, the people who yell and scream about 'equal rights' on the internet tend to be the extremists. They, shocking as it sounds, behave extremely to get attention. Negative or positive.
User avatar #215 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
I also included radical/man hating quotes from many well respected feminists.
User avatar #216 to #215 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Isn't it ironic that you called me sexist and now you yourself are behaving in a very sexist manner?
User avatar #212 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Because No Feminist organizations ever denounced any of these things except the #castration day one because it is "too radical", and no feminist has ever been penalized for being a radical and radical feminism is taught in universities which is encouraging them.
User avatar #214 to #212 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Gee that's a super interesting and also entirely wrong opinion.
User avatar #213 to #207 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Apart from the fact that still none of those are proof that Feminists welcome radical ideals, none of those are serious posts. They're all mocking radical feminism.
User avatar #209 to #207 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
How in the hell is that proof that Feminists accept Feminazis with open arms.
User avatar #205 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Soo you have no proof then ? Cause I have asked like 10 other feminist the same question and none of them had any proof either they just said someone had told them or they thought they read it somewhere. Rumors are not proof or fact. I believe all feminist even equality feminists are controlled by the higher up feminists the one's in the big feminist Corporations,Lobbies and Universities Councils. Also the fact that radical feminists are invited into feminist organizations rather then expelled is quite revealing of feminist bigotry. The bottom line is I can't trust any feminist until they start kicking out man hating radicals, just like the MRA's ban and block out and excommunicate Woman haters and people that advocate violence on a regular basis.
User avatar #206 to #205 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
"Show me one shred of evidence (feminists don't dispise feminazis) cause I couldn't find any"
User avatar #185 to #183 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
well then when there are apps that do the same for women plus tell me which women are gold diggers I'll do the same.
User avatar #182 to #181 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
60% of rapes are commited by men, so by your logic we should view all men as rapists.. oh wait. And actually according to this study, 55.6% of abuse cases on children under the age of 15 were by the father or stepfather, so..

User avatar #203 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Show me one sherd of evidence elliot rodger was a mra cause I couldn't find any and in fact has internet history contain 0 mra sites or threads on reddit or anywhere else he had no conversation with any mra ever and according to the facts he didn't even know of MRA's existence. CAFE has been working on men's shelters etc but it is taking a long time because feminist resistance to the idea of male victims is violent and radical. Every-time MRA's try to build shelters or centers ect for men Feminist send death and bomb threats.
User avatar #204 to #203 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
I actually read an article by my state news saying that Elliot was a frequent visitor of a couple of MRA based reddits, and that it was a mix of MRA ideals, being told that he was owed the world and being crazy that set him off. Also the only case of that I can think of was a female Male Rights Activist (not associated with the MRA) petitioning for a mens shelter and she was sent death threats by two old cows.

You have a bit of a hypocritical perspective: feminists are all feminazis, but MRAs are not radical at all.
User avatar #202 to #200 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
And by the by, Elliot Rodgers was an MRA. I'm not saying all MRAs are Elliot Rodgers, but it's clear he was influenced by them quite heavily.
User avatar #201 to #200 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
A voice for men is an MRA website (they're 'antiactivists' not pro male activists) and is as trustworthy and legitimate as one in four usa. Also "Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders." While that is of her opinion, it is also the legal definition. In 2008 (a year before the paper that quote references and two years before the NISVS) Australia updated it's definition of a rapist to: A person who sexually penetrates another person without consent of that other person shall be guilty of rape.

MRAs are basically the male rights equivalent of feminazis. A quote I rather like goes something along the lines of 'You complain about how battered womens shelters out number battered mens shelters three to one, but while we're working hard to make those shelters possible, you campaign to tear them down instead of campaigning to build your own.'
User avatar #198 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
Trust me they used her "work" and definitions look up her **** for yourself.
User avatar #199 to #198 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
I know who she is, any feminist worth their grain of salt know's who she is. Any feminist worth their grain of salt does not agree with her methods at all. But she hasn't been active for a long time.
User avatar #196 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
The CDC used feminist definitions and that sexual violence work was done by a radical feminist Dr Mary Koss who says in that cdc paper that men can't be raped by women and she claims a man forced to penetrate a vagina as consensual sex, further more she counts kissing,groping or molesting a woman without consent as rape. In fact if you look at her work 70% of the woman she says were raped say they were not raped and like 15% married the person ! .
User avatar #197 to #196 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
No. Legally (not 'the feminist definition), rape is defined as nonconsensual penetration, be it vaginal, oral or anal. A man being raped by a woman in terms of being fed a stimulant and ridden is classified as 'sexual assault' not 'rape' because the man is not penetrated. I don't agree with that myself, but that's how he law defines it.

Furthermore, I just download the NISVS (the national survey that data is a summary of) and not only is Mary Koss not credited anywhere in the document, she's not even listed in the 'suggested citaitons'.

So basically you're full of **** .
User avatar #192 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
"% of men that commit a crime' and comparing it to '% of gender who commits said crime'. They're different ******* statistics, you idiot. " No they are not you **** wit the percentage of males committing a crime and the percentage of men committing a crime are the exact same number because male is the gender and men are male they are literally synonyms.
User avatar #194 to #192 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/05/2014) [-]
The percentage of men that commit a crime is not the same as the percentage of a gender having commit said crime. If you hve a hundred men and five of them are rapists, 5% are rapists. If you have a hundred children, five of them were abused, two by their father and three by their mother, 60% of the abuse cases report to have been vicitims of the mother. Saying that 60% were made victim to their mother does not report on how likely a mother is to abuse her child. They're different statistics you twit.

Here, government released crime fact sheet. Top left. One in five say they have experienced rape at some point in their life time. www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/SV-DataSheet-a.pdf and keep in mind that half of rape cases aren't reported.
User avatar #191 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
1 in 4 women being raped is a completely debunked feminist number based solely on their feelings not facts or evidence. Go and try to find non feminist numbers even remotely close to 1 in 4 .(Protip you wont because that number is completely fabricated as part of their fear-mongering and rape hysteria campaign.)
User avatar #186 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
"A British retrospective prevalence study of 2,869 young adults aged 18-24 (May-Chahal & Cawson, 2005) found that mothers were more likely than fathers to be responsible for physical abuse (49% of incidents compared to 40%). However, part of the difference may be explained by the greater time children spend with their mothers than fathers"
User avatar #184 to #182 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I wasn't using Australian numbers also they didn't divide father for step father or mother from step mother and important distinction. Also in the US the number of rapes committed by men is about 58% that means 42% is by women those numbers are pretty close and men massively under report. Again it's your logic not mine retard.
User avatar #189 to #184 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Oh also while 5.6% of men may commit rape, one in four women have been raped. So there you go.
User avatar #188 to #184 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I have been called homophobic for not wanting to date women because I personally think vaginas are gross as **** , despite the fact that I have one. I have been called bigoted and racist for saying that the logic of Americans and gun ownership is ****** up. And now I'm sexist for being cautious around people I don't know. Cool.

Hey, next time you're in a city, don't lock your car, cause being cautious is sexist.
User avatar #187 to #184 - thirdjess ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Lets see, if a woman you don't know asks for a large sum of money she's probably a gold digger. If a man drags me into an ally, what am I meant to do. It's a lot easier for you to say 'hey don't spend my money' than for me, a hundred pound woman, to fight off an attacker, male or female.

Also if you read like one sentence down you'll see that it's a difference in severity. The fathers will leave a black eye, the mothers will make em feel bad on the inside. The logic I was mimicking was that you were taking '% of men that commit a crime' and comparing it to '% of gender who commits said crime'. They're different ******* statistics, you idiot.
User avatar #174 to #97 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
you're sexist.
User avatar #117 to #70 - funbaggy (07/04/2014) [-]
Eh, can't really blame you, gotta keep yourself safe.
#42 - bluwizard (07/04/2014) [-]
**bluwizard rolled image** if i was the logical *****
#132 - tomijuju (07/04/2014) [-]
User avatar #63 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
This post is about how many feminist organizations say things like "All men are rapist or potential rapists " "all men are violent and abuse women and children" "all men are potential child molesters or rapists " . But if anyone were to act the same way towards say black people by saying "All black people steal " or against Jew by saying "All Jews horde shekels" or "all gay men sodomize little boys" they would immediately be called out as racist,anti-Semitic and homophobic. Feminist have created a state of sever cognitive dissonance when it comes to misandry.
#74 to #63 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
Yet there are so many men, particularly on this site, who believe in the 'if she wears revealing clothing she's asking to be raped' train of thought. That thought is basically saying men can't contain their cocks, thus all men are potential rapists.
User avatar #89 to #74 - ninjaroo (07/04/2014) [-]
Have you people never heard the phrase "Asking for it" before? It's not a literal phrase, when we say she was asking for it we're saying that she was being a ******* idiot, attracting attention to herself and opening herself to danger.
User avatar #90 to #74 - timmywankenobi ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
I doubt there are many people on this site or in the 1st world who believe women wearing slutty clothes deserve to be raped, and in fact there have been studies that have proven conclusively that less then 2% of people in the US and 0% of people in Canada actually believe it . Furthermore it is only feminists that claim men believe it as a justification for their hatred. If you haven't heard about the studies you can thank feminist for suppressing them because they don't support the feminist agenda of hate.
User avatar #58 - wellimnotsure (07/04/2014) [-]
Wait a minute, is he implying that blacks are people?
User avatar #37 - lolollo (07/04/2014) [-]
The fact that "some people are X" is supposed to motivate you to get to know people before you tell them where you live, give them a spare key to your house/apartment, and email them a copy of your list of fears, not to avoid absolutely everyone under the guise they're going to kill you if given the chance. In fact, wasn't that very lesson the point of every single Rom Com since Rom Coms were a thing? That it's OK to be wary of new people, but completely asinine to lock yourself away from society until your only potential partner left for you is a litter of cats?
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)