| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Channels |
| User Rankings |
The Truth About Weed (read desc.)
EDIT !SOURCES!: Ok, guys, for those interested in further reading, here is a list of sources;
********* cuts tumor growth in half: w...more »
EDIT !SOURCES!: Ok, guys, for those interested in further reading, here is a list of sources;
********* cuts tumor growth in half: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm
Neurons regenerate: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060814133621.htm
Cannabinoids fight cancer: You need to login to view this link
THC fights cancer (WARNING: this is a pro-pot site, may be bias): You need to login to view this link
Cannabis inhibits cancer cell growth: www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95/n2/full/6603236a.html
Schizophrena is not caused by ********* : You need to login to view this link
Same as above: www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/richard-shrubb/cannabis-does-not-cause-s_b_946149.html
I have more but it's like 12:40am and it's Christmas, yo.
EDIT: I'm going to make a second one of these, which will have sources to back up each claim and also dispute the things that people are falsely presenting as facts in the comments section. It is nice to see people are having a discussion, however, instead of just screaming abuse at each other.
Seriously, aside from Morbid-Chanel I think weed is the main thing you ******* get butt-hurt about.
I see you all arguing with second-hand information that you got off a friend or you think you remember your dad saying once.
This isn't pro-weed propaganda, I don't give a **** if you smoke or not. These are just facts.
Enjoy.
Tags: The truth about
DIIE TRUTH WBOUT WEED
CIRCE THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME COR[’
I. WEED IS ADDICTIVE
ADDICTIVE. IT REVER AIRS BEER RRD REVER WWII
BE. THE THIRT MRKU IT UP JUST
RAER' T. THIS IS BASIC BIOLOGY. WIIWII YOU mm
GET '' ADDICTED. DO YOU
EVER KROW WHIT THRD MERIS..? IT MERIS
THIRT YOU' RE ROT RARILY ADDICTED. YOU JUST
IIKE TO GET MIIMII. YOU mm GET
ADDICTED TO VIDEO
GAMES. BUT SHIIT. YOU KROW THIRT “IT CREE
DORR TO IT YOU' D BE RBIO TO STOP PITYING.
it. WEED CRUSES
SCHIZOPHRENIA
THIS one IS PRETTY INTERESTING. BUT RISA
URI’ MURDED. WEED IS JUST R . If
YOU' RE HERITICS. YOU DIRVE TO WORRY
WBOUT. Ir. HOWEVER. YOU WERE GOIMG TO
DEVELOP IR ARTER ure RRYDAY.
WEED JUST MAKES IT RAPERY QUICKER. SO
INSTEAD or IT DEVELOPING " RGE M. YOU GET
IT " RGE " SUCKS. YERH. BUT USE
COMMER SEASE: “YOUR DRD WRS M
WHO DIED or ILVER . YOU
DOR' T DRICK. “YOUR DRD HRS
SCHIZOPHRENIA. YOU DOR' T SMOKE WEED.
ROT ORIO DOES ROT CRUSE
SCHIZOPHRENIA. IT DOESE' T CRUSE MT IOR(' r
TERM DAMAGE TO YOUR METTRE OR
WEII BEING. RRD HERE' S MOTHER run .
WIIWII YOUR MEMORY IS UNDOUBTEDLY ****
WIIWII HIGH. YOU' RE R IOT MORE VERBOSE.
R STUDY ( BY THE BBC IERS) GOT
R DUDE TO PRAIRIE SOME VAPE. THEY GOT HIM
TO OISTER TO R RADIO PARY. TIBER IMMEDIATELY
DESCRIBE THE STORY. or COURSE HE COUNTR' T
REMEMBER IT. THER THEY RAKED IIMM TO ROME
EVERY WORD HE COURD THIRT BEARR WITH THE
Berrett 'M'. HE WERT on [OR RGSS. INSTED
DIERDRE'S or WORDS. IT' S BECAUSE
WEED JUST THE WRY YOUR SYNAPSES
SIRE. YERLI. YOU I’ ORGEE HUN’. BECAUSE
THOSE ' RAER' T WORKING
PROPERLY. BUT THE HUN’ YOU RIVERDG KROW
IS MUCIS. MUCIS EASIER TO REMEMBER. WHICH
IS WHY PEOPIE GET 'DEEP' WIDER STORED.
S. WEED HRS RORI
RORA orrow WWII BEILEVE THIS ORE. SO DO me
R I’ RRD GOOGIE IT. YOU' II BE MARIED.
OK. OK. HERE IT GOES: PROHIBITS
CRUZER CEIL GROWTH.
YOU IET THIRT SARK IR YET?
YOU SMOKE WEED. YOU' RE '/ o IERS OIKEIN
TO GET CRUZER. THRD' S ROT MRDD UP STRT.
RRD HERE' S THE THIMG: “YOU HRVA CRUZER
RIVERDG. THE IR THC WI“
REDUCE TUMOR SHE. WEED CURES
CRUZER. . WEII. ROT PROPERLY. BUT
YOU GET WIART I MERR.
THE MOST I’ UCKED UP PRUT? THE U. S.
GOVENRMENT HRS KROWE THRD
PROHIBITS CRUZER CE“ GRAWR CIRCE THE ERRIE
501. RRD THEY STIIL KEPT IT .
EVERYTHIMG YOU HRVA JUST RERD IS TRUE. RRD THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED. RRD THR' I" S
THE POINT: “YOU WRAT TO ROGUE YOU HRVA TO DOLOUR ' RESERACH. I' SEER
R or YOU COMMEMT on POSTS WEED. SAYING THRD CRUSES
CRUZER. THRD IT IS R . I PROMISE YOU. PRI. IT Rlr' T.
EVERYTHIMG YOU HRVA JUST RERD WI“ STRID " ORDER SCRUTINY. I' M GIVING YOU
If WE WRAT POT TO BE NEGRI . WE HRVA TO EDUCATE
OURSELVES. "POTS IIKE AWESOME BRO" WI“ nor GET US TAKER SERIOUSLY.
SCIENCE IS on OUR SIDE. THE RRE on OUR SIDE. RRD If WE om SHAKE orr THE
IDIOT STARER' IMAGE. THER MAYBE WE CRR MRKU R . OR RT EERST WIR RR
ARGUMENT WHER SOME SOUCRE SRYS WEED IS RRD ...
I HRVA SHERRI SOURCES FOR ARCH one or THESE SCRIMS. m SOME CREES MORE THRE
M. RRD I HRVA R IOT MORE. TOO. “THIS " SUCCESSF' RRD GETS R GOOD RESPONSE. I
WI“ POST MORE "ow. HAPPY . MOTHER I'
CIRCE THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME COR[’
I. WEED IS ADDICTIVE
ADDICTIVE. IT REVER AIRS BEER RRD REVER WWII
BE. THE THIRT MRKU IT UP JUST
RAER' T. THIS IS BASIC BIOLOGY. WIIWII YOU mm
GET '' ADDICTED. DO YOU
EVER KROW WHIT THRD MERIS..? IT MERIS
THIRT YOU' RE ROT RARILY ADDICTED. YOU JUST
IIKE TO GET MIIMII. YOU mm GET
ADDICTED TO VIDEO
GAMES. BUT SHIIT. YOU KROW THIRT “IT CREE
DORR TO IT YOU' D BE RBIO TO STOP PITYING.
it. WEED CRUSES
SCHIZOPHRENIA
THIS one IS PRETTY INTERESTING. BUT RISA
URI’ MURDED. WEED IS JUST R . If
YOU' RE HERITICS. YOU DIRVE TO WORRY
WBOUT. Ir. HOWEVER. YOU WERE GOIMG TO
DEVELOP IR ARTER ure RRYDAY.
WEED JUST MAKES IT RAPERY QUICKER. SO
INSTEAD or IT DEVELOPING " RGE M. YOU GET
IT " RGE " SUCKS. YERH. BUT USE
COMMER SEASE: “YOUR DRD WRS M
WHO DIED or ILVER . YOU
DOR' T DRICK. “YOUR DRD HRS
SCHIZOPHRENIA. YOU DOR' T SMOKE WEED.
ROT ORIO DOES ROT CRUSE
SCHIZOPHRENIA. IT DOESE' T CRUSE MT IOR(' r
TERM DAMAGE TO YOUR METTRE OR
WEII BEING. RRD HERE' S MOTHER run .
WIIWII YOUR MEMORY IS UNDOUBTEDLY ****
WIIWII HIGH. YOU' RE R IOT MORE VERBOSE.
R STUDY ( BY THE BBC IERS) GOT
R DUDE TO PRAIRIE SOME VAPE. THEY GOT HIM
TO OISTER TO R RADIO PARY. TIBER IMMEDIATELY
DESCRIBE THE STORY. or COURSE HE COUNTR' T
REMEMBER IT. THER THEY RAKED IIMM TO ROME
EVERY WORD HE COURD THIRT BEARR WITH THE
Berrett 'M'. HE WERT on [OR RGSS. INSTED
DIERDRE'S or WORDS. IT' S BECAUSE
WEED JUST THE WRY YOUR SYNAPSES
SIRE. YERLI. YOU I’ ORGEE HUN’. BECAUSE
THOSE ' RAER' T WORKING
PROPERLY. BUT THE HUN’ YOU RIVERDG KROW
IS MUCIS. MUCIS EASIER TO REMEMBER. WHICH
IS WHY PEOPIE GET 'DEEP' WIDER STORED.
S. WEED HRS RORI
RORA orrow WWII BEILEVE THIS ORE. SO DO me
R I’ RRD GOOGIE IT. YOU' II BE MARIED.
OK. OK. HERE IT GOES: PROHIBITS
CRUZER CEIL GROWTH.
YOU IET THIRT SARK IR YET?
YOU SMOKE WEED. YOU' RE '/ o IERS OIKEIN
TO GET CRUZER. THRD' S ROT MRDD UP STRT.
RRD HERE' S THE THIMG: “YOU HRVA CRUZER
RIVERDG. THE IR THC WI“
REDUCE TUMOR SHE. WEED CURES
CRUZER. . WEII. ROT PROPERLY. BUT
YOU GET WIART I MERR.
THE MOST I’ UCKED UP PRUT? THE U. S.
GOVENRMENT HRS KROWE THRD
PROHIBITS CRUZER CE“ GRAWR CIRCE THE ERRIE
501. RRD THEY STIIL KEPT IT .
EVERYTHIMG YOU HRVA JUST RERD IS TRUE. RRD THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED. RRD THR' I" S
THE POINT: “YOU WRAT TO ROGUE YOU HRVA TO DOLOUR ' RESERACH. I' SEER
R or YOU COMMEMT on POSTS WEED. SAYING THRD CRUSES
CRUZER. THRD IT IS R . I PROMISE YOU. PRI. IT Rlr' T.
EVERYTHIMG YOU HRVA JUST RERD WI“ STRID " ORDER SCRUTINY. I' M GIVING YOU
If WE WRAT POT TO BE NEGRI . WE HRVA TO EDUCATE
OURSELVES. "POTS IIKE AWESOME BRO" WI“ nor GET US TAKER SERIOUSLY.
SCIENCE IS on OUR SIDE. THE RRE on OUR SIDE. RRD If WE om SHAKE orr THE
IDIOT STARER' IMAGE. THER MAYBE WE CRR MRKU R . OR RT EERST WIR RR
ARGUMENT WHER SOME SOUCRE SRYS WEED IS RRD ...
I HRVA SHERRI SOURCES FOR ARCH one or THESE SCRIMS. m SOME CREES MORE THRE
M. RRD I HRVA R IOT MORE. TOO. “THIS " SUCCESSF' RRD GETS R GOOD RESPONSE. I
WI“ POST MORE "ow. HAPPY . MOTHER I'
...
| |
#179
-
mayormilkman (12/26/2011) [-] 
Weed is good for Alzheimer's patients, yet it increases one's chances of getting Alzheimer's.
Also not funny. Just another post for circle jerking comments.
Also not funny. Just another post for circle jerking comments.
#576 to #179
-
jimihendrixangel (11/03/2013) [-] actually it dosen't cause alzheimer's, it's because of the aluminum foil, but they're not 100% sure. Because they have found out that alzheimers patients have a lot more iron in their blood, but they're not sure if it is iron things that causes alzheimers or alzheimers that make you get more iron in your blood....
#116
-
thecharliesheen (12/26/2011) [-] I hate to say it, but actually weed IS addictive...
Not physically, but mentally addictive.
And no, that doesn't mean you 'Just like to get high", it means your mind starts to need it to function. Believe it or not, ANYTHING can be mentally addictive I.E. chocolate, internet, WEED, even eating toothpaste.
All physically VS mentally means is that instead of your body shutting down without it, it still functions, however your mind will almost cease to function without it. You FEEL like you need it, and it's just as real as a physical addiction to you. The only difference is one will cause damage to your system, and one will not.
All the rest of that is pretty true, but I have seen weed wreck lives because someone didn't have the willpower to tell themselves no.
All the stoner-junkies can thumb this down if they want, but I'm not saying anything is wrong with smoking weed so long as you still maintain control over youself, just simply correcting a mistake made here.
Not physically, but mentally addictive.
And no, that doesn't mean you 'Just like to get high", it means your mind starts to need it to function. Believe it or not, ANYTHING can be mentally addictive I.E. chocolate, internet, WEED, even eating toothpaste.
All physically VS mentally means is that instead of your body shutting down without it, it still functions, however your mind will almost cease to function without it. You FEEL like you need it, and it's just as real as a physical addiction to you. The only difference is one will cause damage to your system, and one will not.
All the rest of that is pretty true, but I have seen weed wreck lives because someone didn't have the willpower to tell themselves no.
All the stoner-junkies can thumb this down if they want, but I'm not saying anything is wrong with smoking weed so long as you still maintain control over youself, just simply correcting a mistake made here.
#132 to #116
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
Actually, SMOKING weed is very bad for you. ********* smoke contains FOUR ******* TIMES the amount of certain toxins present in cigarette smoke. You might think, oh no those must not be bad toxins, but that's where you're wrong. Those toxins actually are the ones that cause tar build up in the lungs, which leads to bronchitis, emphysema, and lung cancer. ********* smokers actually build a "smoker's cough" THREE TO FIVE TIMES faster than cigarette smokers. The damage to the body as a whole however is no where near as serious as cigarette smoke.
#213 to #132
-
thecharliesheen (12/26/2011) [-] Well of course it's bad for you, you're inhaling a substance that's not supposed to be there that's very damaging. But when I said "not anything wrong", I didn't mean "it's perfectly healthy."
I meant I don't see anything morally wrong with smoking it. The health benefits/damages are theirs to weigh. Not mine.
I meant I don't see anything morally wrong with smoking it. The health benefits/damages are theirs to weigh. Not mine.
#199 to #167
-
wiredguy (12/26/2011) [-] I'm afraid he's right actually, but the worst type is when you put weed in a normal roll up cigarette. For some reason they mix together badly and can completely **** you up even if you go light. But what he's talking about is when people don't use filters in weed, if you make a normal cig then you put a filter in, which takes out some of the tar but most people don't put filters in weed, so you get all the tar, rather than a quarter of it. So ********* itself is not worse than tobacco, it's just the way you take it.
So basically don't smoke it, take it some other way or try and use filters. Sorry man :(
So basically don't smoke it, take it some other way or try and use filters. Sorry man :(
#157 to #145
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
From what I remember after writing a paper on the positive and negative effects of ********* . All of the sources took about a month to find and I had a library database to do the research from which I am no longer privy to. We had to have at least 12 sources. I don't remember a single one.
#189 to #186
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
no, it doesn't. I was putting emphasis on that sentence just in case you're as irrational as most people I argue with. Which it seems like because you haven't shown any counter-evidence yet and your only counter-argument is "NUH UH".
Also I found this. It's no where near as informative as I hoped I could find but meh. [url deleted]
Also I found this. It's no where near as informative as I hoped I could find but meh. [url deleted]
#202 to #186
-
wiredguy (12/26/2011) [-] He's right though, tar is not some mystery substance that appears in tobacco, it's kinda like wet carbon, so any smoke you inhale produces minute amounts of tar in the lining of your lungs, four times as much if you use unfiltered weed (refer to my other comment).
#349 to #202
-
carfreak (12/26/2011) [-] Alright, so I was ignorant about the tar. My original point is that cigarettes are worse for you than weed. There is a much greater risk of getting lung cancer or having health problems with cigarettes than you are with weed. There are not anywhere near as many addicting and poisonous chemicals in it.
#570 to #349
-
wiredguy (12/26/2011) [-] Yes, you're right but we were talking about the tar so your point is irrelevant.
Anon was being an idiot and not making his point very well so you misunderstood and thought he was talking about the whole thing, not just tar and similar effects.
I'm not anti weed in any way, in fact I plan on getting into it a little later, from a good, rat poison free source my sister is good friends with. I'm just planning on knowing as much about the negative and positive effects as possible -.- As far as I'm aware, there are almost as many bad effects as there are good but that doesn't mean it's bad for you, if you work hard enough you can prove the miraculous/fatal qualities and effects of everything. I'll give you two examples:
1. The positive one - Dynamite, thought of as a horrible killing explosive by many, has been proven to "cure" cancer, this was only because it made for a good news story. The Mail (a very ******** paper from England) said that when injected into the tumor, it would eat away at it while doing minimal damage to surrounding cells. What they failed to mentio n was that it sin't a good idea injecting liquid TNT, that it would probably **** up the entire cancerous region through damage cause by the swelling of the tumor and that it would not stop the cancer from retreating. They basically just focused on the good points of the theory, to make for good news.
2. The negative one - Some people once made a survey stating that we should do all we can to eradicate the sales of dihydro monoxide, a dangerous chemical which can cause death if accidentally inhaled, is a major component in acid rain, it constantly wearing away many landscapes and beautiful architecture and, worst of all, is sold bottled in shops throughout the world. Guessed what it is yet? Water, and a large proportion of members of the survey voted yes to ban sales of this chemical.
A similar thing happens with weed, the pros only know/showcase the good parts and vice versa...
Anon was being an idiot and not making his point very well so you misunderstood and thought he was talking about the whole thing, not just tar and similar effects.
I'm not anti weed in any way, in fact I plan on getting into it a little later, from a good, rat poison free source my sister is good friends with. I'm just planning on knowing as much about the negative and positive effects as possible -.- As far as I'm aware, there are almost as many bad effects as there are good but that doesn't mean it's bad for you, if you work hard enough you can prove the miraculous/fatal qualities and effects of everything. I'll give you two examples:
1. The positive one - Dynamite, thought of as a horrible killing explosive by many, has been proven to "cure" cancer, this was only because it made for a good news story. The Mail (a very ******** paper from England) said that when injected into the tumor, it would eat away at it while doing minimal damage to surrounding cells. What they failed to mentio n was that it sin't a good idea injecting liquid TNT, that it would probably **** up the entire cancerous region through damage cause by the swelling of the tumor and that it would not stop the cancer from retreating. They basically just focused on the good points of the theory, to make for good news.
2. The negative one - Some people once made a survey stating that we should do all we can to eradicate the sales of dihydro monoxide, a dangerous chemical which can cause death if accidentally inhaled, is a major component in acid rain, it constantly wearing away many landscapes and beautiful architecture and, worst of all, is sold bottled in shops throughout the world. Guessed what it is yet? Water, and a large proportion of members of the survey voted yes to ban sales of this chemical.
A similar thing happens with weed, the pros only know/showcase the good parts and vice versa...
#234 to #163
-
fiendtastic (12/26/2011) [-] What do you think resin is, hun? If you smoke in tobacco in a pipe the residue is called tar, but smoke weed in a similar pipe and the residue is resin. They look similar, and have a similar texture.
#453 to #132
-
sherpa (12/26/2011) [-] HEY! While smoking blunts, or joints, or bowls, or whatnot, you're inhaling smoke. WHICH IS BAD FOR YOU. That's why the smart people like me "smoke" out of a vaporizer. (It's not really smoking because you're only inhaling vapors from heating the pot, not burning it.)
Tl;dr
Joints= Bad
Vaporizer=Good
Tl;dr
Joints= Bad
Vaporizer=Good
#105
-
sonnenbankshaver (12/26/2011) [-] "everything you have just read is true"
Thanks random stranger from the internet who made up a ****** post about weed, now I know for sure!
Thanks random stranger from the internet who made up a ****** post about weed, now I know for sure!
#454
-
yutakenusername (12/26/2011) [-] The only way I support the legalization of ********* is for medical purposes. I don't support smoking weed for the intent to abuse it. Inhaling anything into your lungs is detrimental to your health and if you smoke ********* early in your life, it risks damage for your developing brain. There's more, of course. But I don't judge a person by their lifestyle. I stay away from drugs, but if someone else chooses to use them, it isn't my decision and I don't preach to others on how they should live their life.
#471 to #454
-
poontanglife (12/26/2011) [-]
Eat it instead then.
You know how to get ********* away from a brian in devolpement? Legalize it... There was a huge study that proved its easier for american youth to get their hands on cannabis than on alcohol, because its sold on a black market that doesnt gives a **** about age, were alcohol is sold by people who loses their job if they sell it to underages.
You saw what OP said right??
Educate yourself... brah.
There isnt a single factual reason to keep ********* illegalized, i dare you.
You know how to get ********* away from a brian in devolpement? Legalize it... There was a huge study that proved its easier for american youth to get their hands on cannabis than on alcohol, because its sold on a black market that doesnt gives a **** about age, were alcohol is sold by people who loses their job if they sell it to underages.
You saw what OP said right??
Educate yourself... brah.
There isnt a single factual reason to keep ********* illegalized, i dare you.
#571 to #471
-
yutakenusername (12/26/2011) [-] Thank you for recommending me to educated, but I think I am. I've taken many drug courses in health and I think I know what I'm talking about. The only way I'd support it is for medical purposes, I don't support it otherwise. That's that, have a nice day.
#575 to #574
-
yutakenusername (12/26/2011) [-] Because I definitely care what a person using the internet, yet fails to know anything about me thinks. I think I'll stop replying now because we're wasting our time.
#576 to #575
-
poontanglife (12/26/2011) [-] It really is people like you that keep our society from evovling.
#79
-
LtMcG (12/25/2011) [-] Lots of things cause cancer and lots of things help the healing of cancer. It does not mean weed is the leading cause of cancer nor the leading solution to cancer.
Everything is addictive as you mentioned. But that is not what is keeping weed illegal. If it was, then there would be plenty of more things would be illegal.
What is keeping weed illegal? It's like you mentioned OP, that image all weed users have is a stupid stoner who wastes his/her life as a non contributing member to society. I don't have a statistic that would confirm that image though, but going with what you see and hear from media and social interaction, that is the image of weed smokers I have.
I don't think weed smokers are bad people nor immoral cause there are plenty of worse things for your body. I just find it ridiculous that you throw around these facts like it is supposed to change anything. Put down the bowl of fugnions and start acting like a productive member of society. Prove that to the world. Prove that there is nothing inhibiting of weed from the economic and societal activities of everyday life.
And you can't due this with scientific statistics. Every weed smoker has to change their image and their habits. It only takes one to ruin everything you have built up.
/rant *pic unrelated
Everything is addictive as you mentioned. But that is not what is keeping weed illegal. If it was, then there would be plenty of more things would be illegal.
What is keeping weed illegal? It's like you mentioned OP, that image all weed users have is a stupid stoner who wastes his/her life as a non contributing member to society. I don't have a statistic that would confirm that image though, but going with what you see and hear from media and social interaction, that is the image of weed smokers I have.
I don't think weed smokers are bad people nor immoral cause there are plenty of worse things for your body. I just find it ridiculous that you throw around these facts like it is supposed to change anything. Put down the bowl of fugnions and start acting like a productive member of society. Prove that to the world. Prove that there is nothing inhibiting of weed from the economic and societal activities of everyday life.
And you can't due this with scientific statistics. Every weed smoker has to change their image and their habits. It only takes one to ruin everything you have built up.
/rant *pic unrelated
#485
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
Wow, where to begin with this post... how about reality.
1. The first comment about weed being non-addictive is false. While you may only be psychologically addicted to the substance, the obsession will manifest itself in physical signs. It is a placebo effect, or stomata form disorder. Thus making it an actual addiction. Furthermore, the statement, “just stop when ever you want,” is antithetical to your previous statement about it being psychologically addictive.
2. The causes of schizophrenia, though thought to be genetically linked, are relatively unknown. So justifying a smoke by saying no one you are related to is schizophrenic is unfounded. In addition, schizophrenia appears in males around the ages of 18-25, so you will die far more quickly.
3. Is correct. How ever, in a series of studies performed by the Harvard Medical School, ********* does indeed cause lung cancer in rats.
If you smoke a joint have fun, but do not be a ***** and back your pleasures with imaginary science.
1. The first comment about weed being non-addictive is false. While you may only be psychologically addicted to the substance, the obsession will manifest itself in physical signs. It is a placebo effect, or stomata form disorder. Thus making it an actual addiction. Furthermore, the statement, “just stop when ever you want,” is antithetical to your previous statement about it being psychologically addictive.
2. The causes of schizophrenia, though thought to be genetically linked, are relatively unknown. So justifying a smoke by saying no one you are related to is schizophrenic is unfounded. In addition, schizophrenia appears in males around the ages of 18-25, so you will die far more quickly.
3. Is correct. How ever, in a series of studies performed by the Harvard Medical School, ********* does indeed cause lung cancer in rats.
If you smoke a joint have fun, but do not be a ***** and back your pleasures with imaginary science.
#522 to #485
-
chaosacaza (12/26/2011) [-] First of all, You are right with your first point but it would take you smoking a amount which is very un-lightly but through defined use of the word addiction you are right.
However your second and third points are misguided and also you said cause lung cancer in rats? Where in the post does it say weed does not cause lung cancer in rats? The second can you actually show any which information on how weed causes schizophrenia? You might get it yes but there is no such link to weed causing it through medical study. If you want post have fun, But don't be a ***** and back your point up with ill thought arrangement's and baseless claims. Baka..
However your second and third points are misguided and also you said cause lung cancer in rats? Where in the post does it say weed does not cause lung cancer in rats? The second can you actually show any which information on how weed causes schizophrenia? You might get it yes but there is no such link to weed causing it through medical study. If you want post have fun, But don't be a ***** and back your point up with ill thought arrangement's and baseless claims. Baka..
#97
-
kanofworms (12/25/2011) [-] The Amount of ***** I give about weed is rapidly decreasing with every "weed is actually good, smoke and get high all the time"
#254
-
micronoo (12/26/2011) [-] first things first i have nothing againsed weed or its use, i just don't like people thinking of it as some sort of god like substence, use it if you want just sont rant about it 24/7. p.s i smoke weed.
1. schizophnia apears when your a teenager no when you're middle aged
2.you never exsplained why "your 61% less likely to get cancer" heres were i point out that most persnteges are made up on the spot
no offence intended. just smoke it for what it is not what you want it to be. in my oppinion it does some good and some and bad, like alcahol . when it comes to legalization, it should but wont happen theres just to many diffrent views
toke toke toke away just dont spam fj with a constant flow of weed posts
1. schizophnia apears when your a teenager no when you're middle aged
2.you never exsplained why "your 61% less likely to get cancer" heres were i point out that most persnteges are made up on the spot
no offence intended. just smoke it for what it is not what you want it to be. in my oppinion it does some good and some and bad, like alcahol . when it comes to legalization, it should but wont happen theres just to many diffrent views
toke toke toke away just dont spam fj with a constant flow of weed posts
#291 to #254
-
dryhead (12/26/2011) [-]
Yo - read the description, I have linked to the sources that tell you what you'd like to know. None of it is ******** .
If you're going to take the time to write a few paragraphs trying to debase me, why not take a few extra minutes to read the sources I have provided in the description? That will probably settle any concern you have before you even bother to post.
Moreover, this isn't for you. This is for the educated stoners, the stoners in college/university that are fed up of being treated like idiotic yuppies there on daddies money, or any stoner that wants to be taken seriously.
If you're going to take the time to write a few paragraphs trying to debase me, why not take a few extra minutes to read the sources I have provided in the description? That will probably settle any concern you have before you even bother to post.
Moreover, this isn't for you. This is for the educated stoners, the stoners in college/university that are fed up of being treated like idiotic yuppies there on daddies money, or any stoner that wants to be taken seriously.
#458 to #291
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
One point that rarely gets mentioned when arguing for legalization is the ability to test for "how high" a person is for legal cases. Sure, getting it legalized and making money and selling it and growing it and all that **** can be easily figured out.
But what if someone is high, and gets into a car crash and kills someone, or is pulled over for a traffic violation and is found to be high, how is a cop supposed to measure that highness to press charges for driving under the influence. if there was an effective measureable method to "breathalyze" for weed on the spot than i think that the movement could get that little nudge forward that it needs to **** . Until then...no legalization.
But what if someone is high, and gets into a car crash and kills someone, or is pulled over for a traffic violation and is found to be high, how is a cop supposed to measure that highness to press charges for driving under the influence. if there was an effective measureable method to "breathalyze" for weed on the spot than i think that the movement could get that little nudge forward that it needs to **** . Until then...no legalization.
#323 to #291
-
micronoo (12/26/2011) [-] what? no, the message was that i wanted to get accros the most is that i want to browse fj not and not be smaked round the head with a million and one posts on weed. if you want to help that much go support a campaign that supports weed legalization it gets allot more done. it ******* your post that was annoying it was the million that came before and then yours was just another one.
#555
-
thesoulless (12/26/2011) [-] 2 side notes:
1. No, ********* does not cause schizophrenia, however it does increase the risk of developing schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, etc.
2. Weed itself does not cause cancer, but actually smoking weed does increase the risk of developing cancer, because you would be inhaling smoke and possibly ash, which are both carcinogens, obviously this applies to smoking joints and stuff like that, you`d be just fine with a vaporizer or whatever.
1. No, ********* does not cause schizophrenia, however it does increase the risk of developing schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, etc.
2. Weed itself does not cause cancer, but actually smoking weed does increase the risk of developing cancer, because you would be inhaling smoke and possibly ash, which are both carcinogens, obviously this applies to smoking joints and stuff like that, you`d be just fine with a vaporizer or whatever.
#125
-
anoned (12/26/2011) [-] Anything can be addictive, it doesn't have to have an addictive substance to be addictive .
#154 to #125
-
dontevencare (12/26/2011) [-]
That's called being habitually addictive, it's basically just mental weakness. The addicted that's properly dangerous is psychologically addicted, means you actually think you need it, and you'll have proper reactions if you don't.
By the same logic, mcdonalds, games, funnyjunk, all the stuff people like, should all be illegal.
By the same logic, mcdonalds, games, funnyjunk, all the stuff people like, should all be illegal.
#203 to #45
-
wiredguy (12/26/2011) [-] No but there's no reason to hold your breath in the first place, in fact it makes it worse for you OO
The chemicals which get you high are absorbed instantly because there are receptors for that kind of thing which just grab them but the tar_, takes a few seconds to stick, so you're not making the high any better but you are taking in more smoke...
The reason people think it makes it better is because after holding your breath you get a momentary high off the lack of oxygen, which people obviously thought was the weed taking extra effect. Well it isn't, sorry :\
The chemicals which get you high are absorbed instantly because there are receptors for that kind of thing which just grab them but the tar_, takes a few seconds to stick, so you're not making the high any better but you are taking in more smoke...
The reason people think it makes it better is because after holding your breath you get a momentary high off the lack of oxygen, which people obviously thought was the weed taking extra effect. Well it isn't, sorry :\
#221 to #203
-
theoriginaltyson (12/26/2011) [-] Did I say that it was better to hold your breath for as long as you can? Did you even read my comment?
#490
-
SilverBladeMaster (12/26/2011) [-] How about you also show 3 major downsides that are about as equally effective ?
#455
-
sytheris ONLINE (12/26/2011) [-]
First off, i have no problem with Weed, I support it's legalization-I also do not smoke it, personal choice.
But Weed does have an unhealthy effect-inhaling smoke, under any circumstances is bad for your health. mainly the reason I do not smoke pot-the effect would be less intense then cigarette smoking, but I proffer not to inhale polluted air, no matter what it was polluted by-if you want to, more power too you.
Either legalize Pot, or illegalize tobacco-thats my opinion, though doing both would be wonderful.
-drink alcohol, and realizes how hypocritical his point is, but still feels it is valid-
But Weed does have an unhealthy effect-inhaling smoke, under any circumstances is bad for your health. mainly the reason I do not smoke pot-the effect would be less intense then cigarette smoking, but I proffer not to inhale polluted air, no matter what it was polluted by-if you want to, more power too you.
Either legalize Pot, or illegalize tobacco-thats my opinion, though doing both would be wonderful.
-drink alcohol, and realizes how hypocritical his point is, but still feels it is valid-
#504 to #455
-
2scared2login (12/26/2011) [-]
I feel the same way about inhalation, I've never done it, but I am curious about ingesting it. I feel like it wouldn't have such a bad effect because it's not drowning your lungs in smoke, you're merely eating a plant that's not poisonous.
Oh and don't even worry about being a hypocrite, it's something everyone has in common.
I know I am.
Oh and don't even worry about being a hypocrite, it's something everyone has in common.
I know I am.
#196
-
theonlysherriff (12/26/2011) [-]
Anyone interested in learning about weed from a well researched source should watch when we grow on youtube. Its a 50 minute or so long documentary but I think it's worth the watch.
Alternatively watch Super High Me, same concept more funny
Alternatively watch Super High Me, same concept more funny
