Stoner Faith. This is why stoners dont go to the middle east Getting stoned to death means a whole different thing over there.
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Stoner Faith

This is why stoners dont go to the middle east
Getting stoned to death means a whole different thing over there

Tags: lol wut
+2217
Views: 77548
Favorited: 112
Submitted: 05/17/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to konradkurze Subscribe to stoner-humor E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(235):

[ 235 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
User avatar #173 - tisjunkisdamnfunny (05/18/2013) [-]
way of death by rocks to the head is usually appealing to most ********* smokers
User avatar #184 to #173 - lolfire (05/18/2013) [-]
Now that's just rude.

I really hope you don't think the majority of cannabis users are stoners.
A lot of us want absolutely nothing to do with the whole stoner culture.
User avatar #186 to #184 - tisjunkisdamnfunny (05/18/2013) [-]
this isnt really a stoner-friendly community anyway...why i love my grasscity
User avatar #185 to #184 - tisjunkisdamnfunny (05/18/2013) [-]
nah just a bad joke...
i smoke everyday myself but its just funny when i see the ******** ones in history laugh when we talk about someone being stoned to death
0
#169 - taila has deleted their comment [-]
#131 - bdowns (05/18/2013) [-]
**bdowns rolled a random image posted in comment #2 at Women seeking men **
0
#139 to #131 - deathcampforjewtie has deleted their comment [-]
#128 - dreamthrow (05/18/2013) [-]
Yeah, religion is bad and that gives people an excuse to rot their brain.

And captioning TV shows is not good content.
+2
#144 to #128 - superstraight **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #161 to #144 - goobdol (05/18/2013) [-]
Why did an apple make the front page at one point in time?

Doesn't mean it's funny...
-1
#165 to #161 - superstraight **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#137 to #118 - ninjamyles (05/18/2013) [-]
i would actually like to point out a flaw in this picture, atheism is NOT the belief that there is no god, it is just the lack of a belief.

the belief there is no god is a belief and therefore can be based on no evidence because it is a belief
User avatar #141 to #137 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
the picture doesn't have that flaw, though.

"I don't believe in God" is the same thing as a lack of a belief. He's not stating that God doesn't exist; he's stating that he doesn't have that belief.

If he were to have siad "I believe that there is no god" then the situation would be different.
User avatar #150 to #141 - ninjamyles (05/18/2013) [-]
by using the word "believe" it automatically makes it about belief, and there exculeds the fact it being atheism
User avatar #153 to #150 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
you also said that atheism was a "lack of belief," using that very word.

The athiest here just reworded that phrase.

"I don't believe in God" isn't actively stating that God doesn't exist. It's just stating that he has a lack of belief.
User avatar #155 to #153 - ninjamyles (05/18/2013) [-]
hummmm.... fair enough. i admit defeat.
#160 to #155 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
that doesn't mean I don't still love you






that doesn't mean I don't still love you
#138 to #137 - tugaii (05/18/2013) [-]
Wouldn't not having a belief be agnostic and atheist is not believing there is a god,
User avatar #151 to #138 - taintedangel (05/18/2013) [-]
Agnostic means "I'm not sure, and I can never be sure".

So pretty much, yeah.
User avatar #148 to #138 - ninjamyles (05/18/2013) [-]
Agnosticism is the view that the existence or non-existence of any deity is unknown and possibly unknowable

atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.

-5
#113 - anonymous Comment deleted by konradkurze [-]
0
#108 - arizonastar has deleted their comment [-]
#107 - DangerToManifold (05/18/2013) [-]
comic sans.
comic sans.
User avatar #101 - henryfordthegod (05/18/2013) [-]
Yes except the entire bible is not correct

it seems that fellows particularly just got under influence and lied
User avatar #189 to #172 - henryfordthegod (05/18/2013) [-]
thank you
#94 - huntergriff ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
User avatar #92 to #90 - galkawhm (05/18/2013) [-]
Draco Malfoy was.
#87 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Why would you do this? Religion and weed in one post? Are you trying to make everyone on funnyjunk get a case of the butthurts?
#93 to #87 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
I don't care about either, what's offending me is something produced my Seth MacFarlane is on funnyjunk, funny's in the name, and funny has never been associated with Seth MacFarlane so it makes no sense.
+8
#85 - palemotherfcker **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #96 to #85 - spyisspy (05/18/2013) [-]
edible hair
0
#112 to #96 - palemotherfcker **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#78 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
weed is bad. It's a weakness. I hate the people who can't have fun with their friends without weed. It's pathetic that they can't enjoy themselves at a ******* party with all their friends without needing to smoke. Or the people who smoke to hide from their problems. It's just a crutch. Man the **** up and deal with your problems. Life is hard, man up. It's also bad for the body and pot heads insist there's no bad side affects. It lowers your lung capacity. It also lowers your reaction time. ********* smoke burns a lot hotter than tobacco smoke so that also damages the lungs. It's known to lower sperm count as well. Weed also causes memory loss.

But one of the biggest problem with weed is the people you buy it from. You buy it from your local drug dealer, that's not that bad, but up the ladder is where the ******** dealers are. The ones who ******* kill people or hurt them and cause fear. That's who your money is going to. Even if you just smoke casually.
#175 to #78 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
sad you didnt log in, you deserve nuclear thumbs
sad you didnt log in, you deserve nuclear thumbs
User avatar #146 to #78 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
You shouldn't get mad at people limiting themselves. That's their own problem.

As for the drug cartel thing? Personally, I advocate for legalization - but only of domestic products, not imports. That way police can focus on the drugs that, while not terrible by themselves, cause the deaths of hundreds each year.
#154 to #146 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
It's easier to just keep it all illegal. How the **** can you tell the difference between home grown weed and mexican grown weed? It's green... is weed... there's no difference.
User avatar #158 to #154 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
You can tell because people can monitor the border for drugs coming in. With the dearth of people monitoring domestic production, many more officials can be allocated to the border (thus also solving illegal immigration disputes)

And that only needs to be done at the border states; everywhere else it would be inconvenient to get it from Mexico when there's a dealer right around the corner.

Are you so set in your opinion that you really thumb people down?
User avatar #176 to #158 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
******** , the CIA is HELPING import the drugs
all those so-called ************* at the border end up with the drugs being seized to make an appearance of taking action but the drug arent destroyed theyre taken into usa and distributed qyuietly
User avatar #216 to #176 - HarvietheDinkle (05/19/2013) [-]
1) cite your sources and provide proof
2) Once you've proven yourself, riddle me this: for what reason would they do that?

I'm also taking into account the hypothetical situation where this doesn't happen. So my point still stands.

User avatar #217 to #216 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/19/2013) [-]
they do it in order to prolong the 'war on drugs'
if they ever actually won it, they might have to stop taxing people for it, meaning less revenue for them to spend, so they import drugs to keep taxes high and keep up making showy arrests to convince people theyre actually doing something

You need to login to view this link

www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=80FCkmjiOvk#!
User avatar #220 to #217 - HarvietheDinkle (05/19/2013) [-]
I'm sorry but regardless of whether or not what you're saying it's true, both of these sources seem like the standard conspiracy-theory type of sources.

I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, but when I read/listened to either of these they weren't the most convincing, because they seemed really opinionated.

Also, like the point I made to anon yesterday: legalizing drugs will also decrease demand for Central American drugs everywhere but the border states, because it will be inconvenient to import drugs when there's a dealer just around the corner.

regardless of what the CIA might be doing, I don't think they can't stop a whole nation's shift in demand.

Also, wouldn't the gov't get a lot of profit from taxing the sale of ********* ?

Finally, just to give you some context, I've never done drugs in my life. I really don't care if others do it either, but I do think it should be their choice.
User avatar #250 to #220 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/20/2013) [-]
uhhhh the guy was military intelligence, hes seen the **** going on.......
so a witness to it all is wrong.....

legalize what drugs? weed could be legalized as a painkiller instead of chemical **** chemists sell, but other drugs? you want legal ****** , cocaine, etc?

on a note ive been trying to point out....if weed was outright legalized, then the ATF would demand tons of regulations on it and corporations would poison the **** out of it like they do tobacco....so you'd have weed that kills people
User avatar #252 to #250 - HarvietheDinkle (05/21/2013) [-]
And there are tons of military intelligence people who disagree. A story can be spun every which way to support one's side.

I'm simply talking about weed.

At this point, it seems like we'll never agree (considering the last point you tried to make, which has no backup whatsoever. It's easy to make accusations; proving them is another thing). So this'll be my last comment.
User avatar #253 to #252 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/21/2013) [-]
well think about it, the 'war on drugs' has been going on since 1860 when the first anti-drug laws were passed, and Nixon just made a big deal about it in 1970 to flex his political power......so what, 152 years of anti-drug policies and action in usa and STILL the problem is getting worse,

it may have begun with good intentions to protect the people from partaking of detrimental substances, but the government quickly saw how effective all the tax punishments for drugs were and changed their system to not just tax those caught with drugs, but punish them with fines and tax EVERYONE and claim the money is used to fight the drug trade

look at the 'war on terror' ...taxpayers are paying HOW MUCH to 'fight' that, and because its made a nice sum, the government has no declared it plans to spend another 10-20 years in the middle east, meaning americans are stuck paying that tax with no guarantee that war will end
same deal with war on drugs, it makes money, so they keep it going by importing drugs to spread around usa then tax the public to clean them all back up
#187 to #176 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Holy **** people are really this paranoid... everything's a conspiracy huh? ******* nutcase...
#162 to #158 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Yeah because criminals always ******* obey they laws right? I thumb up the right person and thumb down the wrong. It just so happens that i'm right in this instance. If I was browsing comments on other posts and see an argument that I want to read, I will thumb the person who is right and thumb down the person who is wrong. No difference.
User avatar #164 to #162 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
you're going to have drugs coming in from Central America whether or not it's illegal. But with more monitors, there will inevitably be less.

It's a win-win scenario. Less demand for foreign drugs (due to domestic production) + more drug monitors = less drugs coming into the US, which disincentivises drug cartels to sell to the US, which is the major cause of the cartel wars.
#188 to #164 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Or people just stop being ******* idiots and don't buy drugs. It's that simple. Do not buy the drugs and there wont be an issue. But people are too god damn stupid. I don't want to give those criminals a victory when they don't deserve it. This is exactly what they want to happen.
User avatar #215 to #188 - HarvietheDinkle (05/19/2013) [-]
taking drugs is a personal freedom that should be allowed.

Like suicide. You can think it's a stupid thing to do, but as long as you're not directly harming anyone else, it should be allowed.
#221 to #215 - anonymous (05/19/2013) [-]
One of the governments duties is to keep it's citizens safe. It should not be allowed.
User avatar #214 to #188 - HarvietheDinkle (05/19/2013) [-]
You replied to the same person twice.

As for the stoners acting stupid and annoying, I agree. But that's their own problem.

As for the drug wars, the only people at fault are the cartels and the people who buy from them. However, as I just stated, this can be fixed instead of being stubborn and supporting the same position because pride justs gets in your way.
#222 to #214 - anonymous (05/19/2013) [-]
The criminals should not get what they want after breaking the law for so many years. Just don't do drugs, it's that simple. but drug addicts are idiots because they're rotting their brains away so they can't even realize the damage they're doing.
User avatar #236 to #222 - HarvietheDinkle (05/19/2013) [-]
concerning comment #221: So you think that security far outweighs rights. Now, this is completely subjective. I have a different view than you. I can understand where you're coming from, so let's agree to disagree.

But what about those who haven't smoked yet, but want to do so legally? They aren't criminals.
#242 to #236 - anonymous (05/19/2013) [-]
As long as they don't act on their desires they're fine. Don't break the law and you're good. You don't have the right to slowly kill yourself no... no matter how much you want to you can not do it. We shouldn't let idiots be idiots. We should try to limit their stupidity.
User avatar #246 to #242 - HarvietheDinkle (05/20/2013) [-]
Why shouldn't you have the right to harm yourself as long as you don't harm others in the process?
#247 to #246 - anonymous (05/20/2013) [-]
Because like I said we have to protect the idiots from themselves. What kind of a moral person just sits back and watches someone slowly killing themselves? Sorry but i'm actually a good person... there's nothing wrong with helping your fellow man.
User avatar #249 to #247 - HarvietheDinkle (05/20/2013) [-]
I shouldn't be bothered because of other peoples' actions. That's their problem.

Also, who am I to argue if harming themselves makes them happier? It's fine to want to help, but only if they agree to it. Otherwise you're just oppressing them.

Finally, are you actually getting two accounts to thumb me down?
User avatar #248 to #247 - HarvietheDinkle (05/20/2013) [-]
Show me a significant number of people who have died using weed.

I don't think it's wrong to watch a person kill themselves.

Morality is entirely subjective; neither you nor I can say with certainty that you're right.
#163 to #162 - HarvietheDinkle (05/18/2013) [-]
That's why you have people monitor the borders.

This isn't the same as asking them to willingly obey laws. This is saying that by getting rid of cops who monitor domestic production, you can have many more patrol the border for foreign-grown drugs coming in.

uwotm8.jpg read first.
#190 to #163 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Posted this same response above you but it goes the same for you so reposting it here.

Or people just stop being ******* idiots and don't buy drugs. It's that simple. Do not buy the drugs and there wont be an issue. But people are too god damn stupid. I don't want to give those criminals a victory when they don't deserve it. This is exactly what they want to happen.
User avatar #134 to #78 - capslockrage (05/18/2013) [-]
He is right about the stoners that can't even function if they don't have their weed, it's pathetic.
#122 to #78 - icecreamonnips (05/18/2013) [-]
>anonymous copypasta   
>2 favorites    
1/10, troll harder
>anonymous copypasta
>2 favorites
1/10, troll harder
#127 to #122 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
I'm not trolling, i'm being completely serious.
#95 to #78 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Listen here you Republican smew, You have your guns, we have our weed. **** off.
User avatar #135 to #95 - capslockrage (05/18/2013) [-]
He is a duck?
#182 to #135 - huntergriff ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
...according to anon, yes...he is a duck.
#103 to #95 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Pretty sure it says nothing about smoking weed in the constitution...
User avatar #136 to #103 - Endofzeeworld (05/18/2013) [-]
Doesn't say anything about driving, either, does it?
#156 to #136 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
I'm just saying you can't compare guns to weed. And it's illegal in most states to have weed.
#183 to #156 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Obviously he's in a state where weed is legal.
#191 to #183 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
And that means his government officials are idiots.
#86 to #78 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
IGNORE THE COPY PASTA
#83 to #78 - mythicdragoon (05/18/2013) [-]
I might be the only one here that thumbed you up bro
#105 to #83 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
And I appreciate that. At least not everyone is a stupid pot head druggy.
User avatar #258 to #105 - bladeguy (08/18/2013) [-]
you are such a admin.
#84 to #83 - WaffleROFLSlice (05/18/2013) [-]
It's because it's an overdone copy paste troll trying to bait some maddies.
#104 to #84 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
It doesn't make it any less true. I mean what I say.
#111 to #104 - XxanerkiztjunkyxX (05/18/2013) [-]
But who are you to say we can't smoke?
The way I see it reality sucks, and being in a different state of mind is better, which is probably what all of humanity has been thinking since the beginning of time; considering the fact that alcohol has been around forever as well as the use of hemp and ********* and plenty of other drugs? Life sucks, its fun to change it up a bit, I have no problem with your opinion although the tobacco reference burning at a lower temperature is ******** , smoke a cigarette and smoke a joint tell me which burns more haha trust me on that one. But yea long story short I like drugs and other mind altering substances, the reason I like them a lot is because I'm antisocial, and I rather prefer to be with either the same 4 or 5 people I've known most of my life or just time to myself, and well if I want to get hammered, if I want to get stoned, if I want to get high, if I want to "harm" myself then I don't see how that would affect or give someone so much anger to have to vent out to everyone who does drugs.
#114 to #111 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
So instead of trying to improve your reality you hide in a fantasy land from all your problems. I feel the same way about alcohol that I do about weed, both are bad. So you're antisocial and instead of working on your social skills you just smoke weed to change your state of mind... pathetic. I don't like stupid people and if you willingly damage your body than you're an idiot.
#121 to #114 - XxanerkiztjunkyxX (05/18/2013) [-]
You make it seem like I should improve my social skills, like I said I just don't like to hang around people, is that really so bad? I have no desire to improve any social skills, I got a job, I pay my bills, I help my family, I'm going to school, I play piano, I workout, I do what I gotta do, I just prefer to do things alone, I think you missed that. Also weed and alcohol don't make a fantasy land, they just make everything a little more bearable, but I get what your saying and why you think the way you do, it's the usual opinion of someone who isn't into drugs when they haven't tried, and some people do try and don't enjoy them but hey it's all a personal choice right?
You make it seem like I should improve my social skills, like I said I just don't like to hang around people, is that really so bad? I have no desire to improve any social skills, I got a job, I pay my bills, I help my family, I'm going to school, I play piano, I workout, I do what I gotta do, I just prefer to do things alone, I think you missed that. Also weed and alcohol don't make a fantasy land, they just make everything a little more bearable, but I get what your saying and why you think the way you do, it's the usual opinion of someone who isn't into drugs when they haven't tried, and some people do try and don't enjoy them but hey it's all a personal choice right?
User avatar #177 to #121 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
still, if youre mentally weak enough to need any form of drug as a psychological crutch, then life sucks
#126 to #121 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
It's bad that you smoke weed not that you don't hang out with a lot of people. If you choose to be a lonely antisocial **** than so be it, just don't smoke weed. You're making the wrong personal choices in life.
User avatar #116 to #114 - starcrotch (05/18/2013) [-]
The way I see it is let people do what they want to do, I smoke weed but when I'm hanging with friends that don't, I don't smoke before or when I'm hanging with them, in fact I don't even think about it. I go to parties sober if its a party we can't do drugs at, and I go to parties stoned when we can do drugs there. I have been smoking for 2 years and since then I've been doing better I'm school and I've made a lot of friends, cause it helped me feel less nervous when I talked to people. Weeds only helped me.
#119 to #116 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
The way you see it is wrong. If you don't smoke weed with certain friends or at certain parties than there's no need to smoke weed. It's not hard to have a good time without needing to be high or drunk... So you used the drug to alter your personality instead of working on your issues.
User avatar #166 to #119 - starcrotch (05/18/2013) [-]
Okay your telling me to stop smoking weed so I can help myself with my issues that weed solves? Lol. Okay so I stop smoking weed, pay for counseling, (which costs way more then the weed) to help get rid of my social anxiety. You sir, are an idiot.
#193 to #166 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Right now you're being lazy and taking the easy way out. Instead of fixing your problems you use a crutch. When you sober up your problems are still there.
User avatar #195 to #193 - starcrotch (05/18/2013) [-]
Lol, I don't have any problems though. I enjoy my life sober. I'm sober right now and reading the **** you write is making me laugh like I'm stoned.
#197 to #195 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
You're an antisocial little **** , that's the problem.
#132 to #119 - WaffleROFLSlice (05/18/2013) [-]
So you judge people who use caffeine as well?

You used coffee to give yourself energy instead of working on your stay up late issues.
#159 to #132 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
Actually I don't drink coffee.
#167 to #159 - WaffleROFLSlice (05/18/2013) [-]
But would you hold the same scrutiny for someone who drinks coffee?
#194 to #167 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
I would not. It's not the same and you're an idiot for trying to make that comparison. Someone is physically tired so they drink coffee.
User avatar #196 to #194 - starcrotch (05/18/2013) [-]
And someone's physically tired of your bull **** they go smoke.
#76 - ragged (05/18/2013) [-]
Haley is easily the worst character on that show.
Haley is easily the worst character on that show.
User avatar #192 to #76 - matttboyagain (05/18/2013) [-]
But she gives the show conflict and the rest of the characters someone to hate so she's cool to stay. She's the anti-Stan.
User avatar #97 to #76 - darthblam (05/18/2013) [-]
Of course, she's the Meg of American Dad... but worse really because she won't shut up about her "rebellious" hipster ideals.
#125 to #97 - ragged (05/18/2013) [-]
She's more like Brian than Meg.
User avatar #179 to #125 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/18/2013) [-]
kinda half/half
shes the most hated one like meg, but carries some intellectual rebel ideals like brian

pretty much seth mcfarlane just took family guy and halfbred the characters to make a new series
- hence why stan smith looks like quaqmire with joes body
#205 to #179 - ragged (05/19/2013) [-]
I compared her to Brian because they're both ways for Seth to spew Liberal BS.
User avatar #206 to #205 - konradkurze ONLINE (05/19/2013) [-]
yeah pretty much
thats kinda his thing...through family guy, american dad, and robot chicken

very angry self-hating jew that one
User avatar #117 to #97 - DiabloStrawhat (05/18/2013) [-]
I'm almost entirely convinced that she's a parody of Lisa from the Simpsons: a female character that exists for the sole purpose of being hated
#149 to #117 - OoJesusoO (05/18/2013) [-]
But at least Lisa is funny at times and Haley is just...there. my favorite characters from least t greatest are Jeff/haley(I hate them both equally), Stan, Steve, Claus, Francine, Roger easily.
#89 to #76 - clownsplosion (05/18/2013) [-]
I couldn't agree more with you.
#168 to #89 - anonymous (05/18/2013) [-]
steve is an annoying **** with a squeaky voice
#198 to #168 - clownsplosion (05/19/2013) [-]
Also true.
Also true.
#71 - ofmiceandmen (05/18/2013) [-]
Damn Hailey, walk into a bible study and say that?
User avatar #70 - sirhyden (05/18/2013) [-]
I don't really care either way, each side should have there own beliefs or lack there of and stick to them, offer them to each side but don't be a **** about it....
[ 235 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)