Please?. `... This channel is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of ponies and when the drains finally scab ov
x
Click to expand

Comments(72):

[ 72 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - anon (09/23/2012) [-]
no
#22 to #1 - mrleaps (09/24/2012) [-]
Way to fight the power anon.
Way to fight the power anon.
#24 - methodius (09/24/2012) [-]
This channel is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of ponies and when the drains finally scab over, all the users will drown. The accumulated filth of all their love and tolerance will foam up about their waists and all the bronies and haters will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll look down and whisper "No."
This channel is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of ponies and when the drains finally scab over, all the users will drown. The accumulated filth of all their love and tolerance will foam up about their waists and all the bronies and haters will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll look down and whisper "No."
0
#27 to #24 - bronydude **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#16 - nighthawxx (09/23/2012) [-]
HUG FIGHT
User avatar #20 to #18 - nighthawxx (09/24/2012) [-]
You're lucky I'm on my phone
#21 to #20 - spamakaze (09/24/2012) [-]
VICTORY!
#8 - zekeon (09/23/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#14 to #8 - wtfbandit (09/23/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#7 - bobsuruncle (09/23/2012) [-]
FOR 			*****		 SAKE, STOP BEING SO 			*******		 ADORABLE. IF YOU WERE REAL I WOULD JUST CUDDLE THE LIVING 			****		 OUT OF YOU.   
   
			****		 you're so cute
FOR ***** SAKE, STOP BEING SO ******* ADORABLE. IF YOU WERE REAL I WOULD JUST CUDDLE THE LIVING **** OUT OF YOU.

**** you're so cute
User avatar #30 to #7 - hahafunnyuwhore (09/24/2012) [-]
quick Question, how do you do small text like you did?
User avatar #64 to #30 - aldheim (09/24/2012) [-]
There's three F's next to each other in the comment writing box. Click the smallest one and write in between the two [small] things that appear.
#31 to #30 - anon (09/24/2012) [-]
Like this.
User avatar #79 to #31 - hahafunnyuwhore (09/24/2012) [-]
yeah what anon said
#71 to #7 - domfiveofive (09/24/2012) [-]
if anyone needed this
if anyone needed this
User avatar #28 - hahafunnyuwhore (09/24/2012) [-]
I will love you will all my heart,soul.... and penis
0
#26 - bronydude **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#15 - alucord (09/23/2012) [-]
How could I not?
User avatar #11 - estevan (09/23/2012) [-]
Oh, you'll be loved :D
#6 - jdsalenger (09/23/2012) [-]
Daaawwww! You and your cuteness Fluttershy! Curse You! Curse you with infinite hugs!
#5 - sinery (09/23/2012) [-]
Yes
User avatar #2 - poniesareghey (09/23/2012) [-]
Why is it so fat.
#68 - nakedclothes (09/24/2012) [-]
it is pony, therefore thumbs up

take a look at the following statement and try and work out why funnyjunk doesn't like bronys
#9 - sanshiiuum (09/23/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #4 - diabolicgnome (09/23/2012) [-]
that is a big ass picture
User avatar #78 - notsofriendly (09/24/2012) [-]
how can you love something that is not real? oh wait, you can, just look at those religous foks!
User avatar #86 to #78 - drastronomy (10/02/2012) [-]
HAH


User avatar #32 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
dont read if you are easily buthurt, bad sport incoming

to bad love is just a human construct and doesn't really exist, or better yet defined:
love is nothing but chemical reaction in the brain and could/can be blocked by either drugs, big enough trauma, or practice.
0
#33 to #32 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #36 to #33 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
i am a sadist, and i like being negative
+1
#38 to #36 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #63 to #38 - aldheim (09/24/2012) [-]
Not believing in love is like not believing in luck.
Sure, a scientific stance should alter viewpoint on the two, but they still exist.
No matter how you describe, love is real. Obviously. That's why we invented the word love. To convey the meaning of the emotion.
Just as luck is real, and a person can be lucky. It's just what those words mean.
User avatar #41 to #38 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
ok, good, you dont have to believe me if you dont want to, i was just saying / passing by
#73 to #33 - derpytiem (09/24/2012) [-]
some ponys just want to watch the world burn.
me included
#34 to #32 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
No, bud, that's physical attraction, not love.
Being attracted to someone for reasons other than wanting to tap that is.
User avatar #35 to #34 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
every feeling/emotion is nothing more than chemical reactions in the brain, that, like i sad before, could/can/should be blocked
#37 to #35 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Then nothing ******* exists. Are you happy now?
#39 to #37 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
i am a sadist, and want to watch the world die, yes i am ******* happy
#40 to #39 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Actually, you're wrong. The concept in and of itself exists. The fact that it's a chemical compound is meaningless.

**** you.
+2
#42 to #40 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#43 to #42 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
I dislike assholes.
+1
#44 to #43 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#46 to #44 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Is one who retaliates suddenly an aggressor? Perhaps. I'm certainly too lazy for philosophy.
0
#47 to #46 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #50 to #46 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
it depends on the way and/or manor in which he/she /it returns the aggression
User avatar #48 to #40 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
any way you dont have to believe me if you dont want to, this is just my point of view of the world
User avatar #45 to #40 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
hahaha, i admire your optimism, but it's like an idea, i know that it is there and that exist, but if it has no purpose then it's meaningless
#49 to #45 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
I never said it had a purpose, I said it exists.

Also, if you know it exists, why did you say it did not?
User avatar #51 to #49 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
it exist and yet it doesn't, its like software, it exist, but one cant touch it, you can see it, but you cant touch it, unless you have an external force, acting upon it, following this example it would be hardware
#52 to #51 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Does software not exist then? I don't see your logic here.
User avatar #53 to #52 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
like i said, software, an idea, or love does and doesn't exist in on itself unless it was a way of expressing it self through a medium, software cannot exist without hardware, and idea cannot exist without someone to write it down or actually practice it, and love cannot exist without our brain/chemicals that make them, if you block/remove the medium they stop existing.
#54 to #53 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
That's certainly true, but it is also true of a great many other things. It's kind of a silly statement. Does such a thing really matter? The fact of the matter is that our brains (hopefully) exist, so who gives a **** ?
User avatar #55 to #54 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
i do, because it make me think in a particular way,
and our brains exist because we can see them, touch them, the pathways through which ideas, chemical reaction (emotion/feelings) go through also exist, and because we and/with them exist, ideas and emotions and feelings also exist
#56 to #55 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Well, my point is that you can think all you want about if they weren't there, but they DO exist, because we DO have brains, and thus it would be meaningless to ponder about how they wouldn't exist if we didn't have em, because we do.
kind of a run-on sentence but whatever.
User avatar #57 to #56 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
i never gave a thought to how they wouldn't exist if we didn't have them, because that's just going strait to the point of it, i was pondering on how we would exist if we didn't have them, and how they exist, and why
User avatar #58 to #57 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
p.s. the why thing was just like a side note, and i forgot to add that how would we exist it we removed them/blocked them more than not having them in the first place, or anything surrounding it
#59 to #58 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
Blugh, this is just getting kinda ridiculous, now. since it just boils down to personal opinion at this point, and i'm bored, I say we should just leave it at that.
User avatar #60 to #59 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
ok
#61 to #60 - sgtsmilies (09/24/2012) [-]
cool
User avatar #62 to #32 - aldheim (09/24/2012) [-]
Love is not a human construct, does exist, and is a chemical reaction within the brain.
User avatar #80 to #62 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
the idea of love in on itself is nothing more than a human construct because its a chemical reaction in the brain, and being thus, it could be changed into something else, removed completely, or made stronger with certain external forces.
the name we have given that chemical and/or chemical reaction that passes through our brains, that we feel, and express, with our actions and else, that we call love could be changed into numbers and letters, rendering it meaningless
User avatar #81 to #80 - aldheim (09/24/2012) [-]
Wrong again, because the meaning of the word is what love is.
There is literally nothing in this world that is not a result of a chemical reaction. Therefore, things based in chemical reactions can still have meaning.
I understand you want to be a grumpy little nihilist shattering everybody's illusion of a meaningful life, but there is no external force, no universal law that dictates what is important and what is not. Therefore, everything has the depth, the meaning, the importance, that each individual assigns to it.
#82 to #81 - leto (09/24/2012) [-]
the meaning of the world is what we make of it, each and everyone of us, both separately as individuals and as a collective species, depending on our own goals, and ideals.   
(theoretically speaking, i would presume, because chemistry is not the only science that governs the universe).   
its not that i want to be a "grumpy little nihilist shattering everybody's illusion of a meaningful life", its just my point of view of life, it just so happens to be negative.   
i do agree with that last part, but when i said the thing about external forces i wasn't talking in such a universal context   
(i have to admit that i do applaud you for the way you stand your ground)
the meaning of the world is what we make of it, each and everyone of us, both separately as individuals and as a collective species, depending on our own goals, and ideals.
(theoretically speaking, i would presume, because chemistry is not the only science that governs the universe).
its not that i want to be a "grumpy little nihilist shattering everybody's illusion of a meaningful life", its just my point of view of life, it just so happens to be negative.
i do agree with that last part, but when i said the thing about external forces i wasn't talking in such a universal context
(i have to admit that i do applaud you for the way you stand your ground)
#12 - remilia (09/23/2012) [-]
This image has expired
**remilia rolled a random image posted in comment #276614 at Item Discussion ** okay will love you, just start sucking my dick already
[ 72 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)