Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
10 comments displayed.
#146 - ludislavonac
Reply +5
(11/13/2012) [-]
In comparison with bendingfags, bronies aren't that bad
#203 to #146 - Wallaq [OP]
Reply +1
(11/13/2012) [-]
Yeah I agree. Im a huge Avatar fan but the way fj was during the last 3-4 episodes of LoK was dreadful. Even as an "avatard" it was painful to see.
#147 to #146 - mothertrollbegood
Reply 0
(11/13/2012) [-]
In all honesty I really wished channels couldn't reach front page because in my view they're all as bad as each other. Ponyfags spreading their fagyness over everything (i.e Pony fortress 2, Call of Pony, Yugipony. That crap needs to stop) and bendingfags covering the front page in their ********* that are usually "OMG DID U C THAT PLOT TWIST?!?"
#148 to #147 - ludislavonac
Reply +5
(11/13/2012) [-]
Perhaps, but in that case we would miss a lot of good posts from other (usually funny or otherwise cool) channels
#149 to #148 - mothertrollbegood
Reply +3
(11/13/2012) [-]
That is true, I was going to say that you can just subscribe to them and check that but how could you find them in the first place, maybe a secondary front page that only consist of channel posts
#153 to #149 - ludislavonac
Reply +3
(11/13/2012) [-]
That kinda beats the purpose of it, it would again consist of ponies and other types of fandom faggotry with perhaps only a few funny posts from good channels... let's just conclude that there is no good solution and funnyjunk is heading down the drain
#155 to #153 - mothertrollbegood
Reply +3
(11/13/2012) [-]
but also with saying that it would be implying it hasn't been in the drain for a while.
#158 to #155 - ludislavonac
Reply +3
(11/13/2012) [-]
Ok let me rephrase that, It's heading even further down the drain
#159 to #158 - kanatana
Reply +3
(11/13/2012) [-]
Can we all just stop and agree that there is some content from the channels that is actually funny, some that isn't, and that we really should have a filter in which we can choose NOT to see some channels when viewing content?
#233 to #159 - ludislavonac
Reply 0
(11/13/2012) [-]
Yap, that's the best solution