SJWs say black people look like apes

#2 - mangyblacksheep#95 on commentsRank#95

Reply+861

(07/11/2017)[-]

#35 to #2 - asbrustle#83 on commentsRank#83

Reply+79

(07/11/2017)[-]

#146 to #35 - guillem

Reply+2

(07/12/2017)[-]

have this

#69 to #2 - anon id: d637e616

Reply+29

(07/11/2017)[-]

Because it was one of the first comments on the post. If you look at posts it's usually a really early comment, because everyone that makes a comment after you also probably thumbed you up while they looked at the comments. Something funny but made later will never get as many thumbs because so few people are going to look at it.

#151 to #69 - ogthegreat#304 on commentsRank#304

Reply-1

(07/13/2017)[-]

Not necessarily true. If a comment is funny enough, it will get its own following. This is evident in this comment. It is comment #2 yet it has more green thumbs than >>#1.

#21 to #2 - iipandaii

Reply+25

(07/11/2017)[-]

Stock images are gold

#23 to #2 - kouzan#266 on commentsRank#266

Reply+18

(07/11/2017)[-]

I love your username and this post.

#114 to #2 - webpage

Reply+14

(07/12/2017)[-]

#66 to #2 - mangyblacksheep#95 on commentsRank#95

Reply-35

(07/11/2017)[-]

How the **** did this make the frontpage?

#133 to #66 - loganmadder#88 on commentsRank#88

Reply+11

(07/12/2017)[-]

A common term is to shoot yourself in the foot, which means you did something dumb and hurt yourself. Not necessarily physically.

#1 - wdparsell#194 on commentsRank#194

Reply+275

(07/11/2017)[-]

well those outraged people are racist.

#14 to #1 - yunch#105 on commentsRank#105

Reply+21

(07/11/2017)[-]

Seriously. Do they even realise that the Apes are the actual protagonists of the film?

So we're putting blacks as apes...but we also make them the heroes in the film?

#109 to #14 - pigbull

Reply+3

(07/12/2017)[-]

honestly if i was an ape I'd be outraged.

#135 to #14 - elcreepo

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

The previews all made it seem like the humans are the protagonists

should I watch the actual movie now

#118 to #1 - kuroka

has deleted their comment [-]

#120 to #118 - wdparsell#194 on commentsRank#194

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

Like in general, or like me personally?

I like John Adams

#121 to #120 - kuroka

Reply+1

(07/12/2017)[-]

it was a really bad joke goy, I didnt realize how hypocrital I looked till I saw my profile picture with the comment lmao.

#3 - theroflcer#207 on commentsRank#207

Reply+165

(07/11/2017)[-]

#7 to #3 - kmichel

Reply+58

(07/11/2017)[-]

That's a sign that he thinks way too highly of himself, or is just a whore for attention.

#25 to #7 - anon id: 872e1a40

Reply+38

(07/11/2017)[-]

Probably both.

#150 to #3 - anon id: ff9b2d47

Reply0

(07/13/2017)[-]

Someone should mail this to his house in the dozens

#19 - shenro

Reply+146

(07/11/2017)[-]

they continue to prove that they're the actual racists here and not the people they rage at.

#4 - eljimbo#219 on commentsRank#219

Reply+51

(07/11/2017)[-]

**eljimbo used "*roll picture*"**
**eljimbo rolled image** The ape wears it better and is also more handsome. Plus the ape wouldn't have such a girly looking limp fist.
This is definitely a case a primate being superior to, ahem, a 'man'.

#20 to #4 - anon id: 09282d6f

Reply+19

(07/11/2017)[-]

Humans are primates.

#70 to #20 - eljimbo#219 on commentsRank#219

Reply0

(07/11/2017)[-]

#107 to #70 - enoughwithjojo

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

I mean, he's not wrong
Humans are scientifically classed as primates

#113 to #4 - stabbedinthecrotch#26 on commentsRank#26

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

******* simian

#131 to #113 - eljimbo#219 on commentsRank#219

Reply-1

(07/12/2017)[-]

nah you

#64 - hapasan

Reply+44

(07/11/2017)[-]

It's not that "he looks like the monkey" per se, its that the monkey wears a blue vest, so BLM and SJWs think that they are trying to make it look like him.
However, people pointed out that the older Planet of the Apes films had apes that wore blue vests, so it was a homage to that, and not some sort of representation any person.

In my opinion, its dumb that they would get outraged over that. Not only because they are wrong, but because people can easily make fun of the obvious joke.

#123 to #64 - mysisterismywaifu

Reply+1

(07/12/2017)[-]

Thats still just as dumb of a reason.
"Hurdurr the monkey is wearing a blue vest, and our ****** leader wears a blue vest, so RACISM."
Cant make this **** up.

#147 to #123 - hapasan

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

Did you read my entire comment

#83 to #64 - talldumbdork

Reply-3

(07/11/2017)[-]

A blue vest alone didn't bring them to that huge reaching accusation......

#94 to #83 - ballsmcnig

Reply+2

(07/12/2017)[-]

What else did, then? I'd love to hear your opinion.

#110 to #94 - talldumbdork

Reply+1

(07/12/2017)[-]

I think I may be misunderstanding hapasan's statement considering the redthumbs. It seemed like he was inferring the main reason sjw and blm considered the monkey to be a representation of the human BLM activist was solely due to the jacket. It seemed like he was downplaying the possibility of blm comparing a monkey to a african american human and using that as a trigger, while they are perpetuating the same stereotype they get angry about. My point is the jacket alone isnt why they thought the monkey looked like the blm activist. It was the jacket AND the stereotype of african americans being monkeys, which shows their hypocrisy. Did i misread it maybe? I apologize for my autism if I did.

#148 to #110 - hapasan

Reply+1

(07/12/2017)[-]

Ah, you got it now. I didn't mean to infer it was just the blue vest that they were mad about, but the blue vest was the catalyst of what set them off.
For example, BLM can't get outraged at the movie makers for something like "This movie's apes are BLM" because there is really nothing really to suggest that. However, the blue vest gives them "evidence" they need to say that the apes represent BLM.
By toppling the blue vest argument, BLM's whole argument falls apart.

#149 to #148 - talldumbdork

Reply+1

(07/12/2017)[-]

I gotcha and agree.

#11 - leonhardt#85 on commentsRank#85

Reply+30

(07/11/2017)[-]

>Liberals
>People

Pick one

#13 - FeeFieFoe

Reply+23

(07/11/2017)[-]

On a different note, one of the trailers I saw where Ceaser and his buddies talk to a stray ape, their whole dialogue is pretty impressive along with the CGI, and the tone of the other trailers seems to be pretty dark, definitely more interesting than the Mark whalberg movie.

#82 to #13 - talldumbdork

Reply+2

(07/11/2017)[-]

I like the acting and the cinematography of all the new movies for Apes. My biggest issues are how awful they make the general human race to be. Yes, there are awful humans. But there are also hundreds of thousands of kind humans who would want peace and love. These movies so far have focused on the ugly side and only had a few select humans who cared at all and werent murderous animals. I would be more inclined to go with the plot if there was more of a civil war kind of story between humans and apes against other humans. It's similar to many alien movies where humans are awful yet again and fire nukes or attempt to kill them first when they land. I just believe it would be more complicated then that, and enough humans would support protecting and supporting apes. Finally, I dont like prequels when I know the overall ending. Apes will win eventually, no matter what. I think these are really good movies, I just have those problems.

#143 to #82 - FeeFieFoe

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

I believe one of the humans' excuses is that the apes becoming smart led to some kind of disease, like in the trailer i was referring to, the stray ape learned how to speak, and the humans around him got sick.
It seems that these movies are going a different route, and also, not so much a spoiler of the movie but a spoiler nonetheless the directors are apparently going against canon and making their own rendition of the ''planet of the apes'' storyline, just a line I read from a website but I hope its true

#125 to #82 - anon id: 7be50433

Reply0

(07/12/2017)[-]

though i agree with your point about pota i dont agree with your point about the alien(s) movie, the reason the characters in those movies are mostly rambo lookalikes is because they were chosen specifically by wayland to send rambo lookalikes rather than a reasonable human being, so it fits the plot of wayland just sending in macho dumbasses to clean a mess with phre muscle so they dont realize the giant **** up wayland made, thats why the rileys are so ******* reasonable because theyre one of the more normal typenof humans in those movies (but mind you theres more the limelight is just mire focused on the GUHH SHOOT FIRE KILL characters as its a) funner to see them die b) theyre a better point of focus in an action movie (which is what the majority of alien movies are sadly too few are actual horrors)).