>When your government finally lets you post online again as - #167448346 added by anonymous at PUT PEOPLE INTO GROUPS

Reply+342

(12/06/2017)[-]

Impeached for what? Exactly what statute has he violated?

US Constitution, Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Constitution doesn't allow impeachment because you don't like him or his policies. Anyone who says differently is lying or ignorant.

#132 to #4 - dasgaybro

Reply0

(12/07/2017)[-]

**dasgaybro used "*roll picture*"**
**dasgaybro rolled image**

Isn't it obvious?

Aggravated assault on people's feelings!
Oh wait that's not actually trumps doing... IMPEACH CNN!

#114 to #4 - anon id: 11773371

Reply-1

(12/07/2017)[-]

He obstructed justice not once, twice, but FIVE TIMES. He interfered with the Russia probe. Obstruction of Justice is impeachable and he damn well should be.

#97 to #4 - youredgyusername

Reply0

(12/07/2017)[-]

Can't say i like the guy or his policies but that's just insulting. Race does not translate into any political stance regardless of the demographics of any one politicians constituents. Still sitting on the Mueller investigation though...

#86 to #4 - ryuggu

Reply0

(12/06/2017)[-]

he hurt their feelsies

#80 to #4 - bumblebeetoona

Reply+3

(12/06/2017)[-]

Obstruction of Justice
Violating Foreign Emoluments Clause
Violating Domestic Emoluments Clause
Undermining the Independence of the Federal Judiciary and the Rule of Law
Undermining Freedom of the Press

#136 to #80 - cockassunited#56 on contentRank#56

Reply0

(12/07/2017)[-]

Firing Comey was not obstruction of justice.
What "gift, emoluments, offices, or titles" has Trump received from a foreign state without the consent of congress? And no, his children running his business is not the same thing.
Criticizing a judge is not against the law. 1st amendment applies to the president as well.
Criticizing the press is not against the law. 1st amendment applies to the president as well.

So what you're saying is, Liberals have nothing to Impeach for, which is why it was unanimously voted down in congress today? Stay mad snowflake. :^)

#149 to #136 - bumblebeetoona

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

so you dont know what the word "unanimously" means, but you think you have a grasp on what constitutes an impeachable offense?

k, kiddo...

#150 to #149 - cockassunited#56 on contentRank#56

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

Mate you think saying critical things about the press/a judge constitute impeachment. I'd say that outweighs a grammar mistake when we're talking about U.S law.

#151 to #150 - bumblebeetoona

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

that isnt a grammar mistake, that is you literally not knowing what you are talking about.

the president's right to free speech is constrained in many ways that your's and mine aren't. For instance, he it not allowed to knowingly intimidate members of the press or other branches of government and can be impeached for doing so.

#152 to #151 - cockassunited#56 on contentRank#56

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

It was a grammar mistake, it was literally the misuse of a word. This is like the height of all fallacies you're indulging in right now because your argument is so terrible. Lol.

Being critical of the press or a judge is not intimidation. There is no legal precedent for your claims, literally anywhere at all. You're just making **** up and attacking word choices because you don't actually know what you're talking about beyond "MUH DRUMPF"

#153 to #152 - bumblebeetoona

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

there is very little legal precedent for any impeachment.

"Being critical of the press or a judge is not intimidation." - that isnt for you and me to decide. While I personally dont think what he has said so far amounts to intimidation, it is definitely something he can be impeached for.

#154 to #153 - cockassunited#56 on contentRank#56

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

There is no precedent because the law you claim he broke doesn't exist. This isn't the first time a president has been openly critical of a judge or the press. John Adams literally signed a law making criticism of the government by press 100% illegal, and guess when he was impeached? You just don't know what you're talking about.

"That isn't for you and me to decide." You're right, it's for Congress to decide. And they literally just decided impeachment wasn't warranted. GG.

Saying critical things about judges/the press is not intimidation. Saying critical things about judges/the press is not an impeachable offense by any stretch of the imagination.

#155 to #154 - bumblebeetoona

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

"making criticism of the government by press"???? did you swap those 2 on accident? because this doesnt help your argument.

the first amendment LITERALLY says that the government including the president can't impede the free press. violation of the 1st amendment is impeachable.

impeding an independent judiciary is obstruction of justice, which is an impeachable offense.

#156 to #155 - cockassunited#56 on contentRank#56

Reply0

(12/08/2017)[-]

You might want to reread that one again, bud.

Being critical of the press is not impeding their right to do anything.

Being critical of a judge is not obstruction of justice.

You literally just said it's not for me or you to decide, and then you just go on to ignore the fact that the people's who's job it is to decide, just said impeachment was not warranted. You lost. See you in 2020 when you lose again.

#25 to #4 - beefkakes

Reply+4

(12/06/2017)[-]

It's being said by the same people who don't know that impeachment doesn't mean removal from office.

#17 to #4 - Deavas#382 on commentsRank#382

Reply+5

(12/06/2017)[-]

The big one I've heard that seems to have any weight behind it is "obstruction of justice"
However i have no idea what specifically they're referring to if anything at all

#43 to #17 - anon id: c0054f5b

Reply-4

(12/06/2017)[-]

It seems like you dont have basic common sense.
Not so common among AMERIFATCUCKS

#78 to #43 - Lintutu#464 on commentsRank#464

Reply+1

(12/06/2017)[-]

Then tell us ahmed, what did he do?

#76 to #43 - vortexicon

Reply+3

(12/06/2017)[-]

Calm down masterboll

#121 to #76 - masterboll

Reply-3

(12/07/2017)[-]

not me

#59 to #43 - zombielovez

Reply+6

(12/06/2017)[-]

What is this ground zero level of bait? like you aren't even logged in... This is some advanced autism.

#39 to #17 - Ruspanic

Reply-1

(12/06/2017)[-]

The argument is that he knew Flynn committed perjury but told James Comey to stop investigating him anyway
And also that he fired Comey ostensibly for investigating him

#46 to #39 - anon id: c0054f5b

Reply-3

(12/06/2017)[-]

The argument is that drumpf is a danger to the world cuck

#49 to #46 - Ruspanic

Reply+2

(12/06/2017)[-]

you're probably a troll, but even if that's true it's not an actual crime you can impeach someone for

#54 to #49 - anon id: c0054f5b

Reply-3

(12/06/2017)[-]

nice changeable hawk eagle

#12 to #4 - RageGuyyourmom

Reply0

(12/06/2017)[-]

its next to impossible to actually achieve it because even if evidence and I mean irrefutable proof came out he could theoretically pardon himself or just do what Nixon did and resign and have your VP pardon you, its more of to inspire hate against him than to actually achieve anything

#6 to #4 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+75

(12/06/2017)[-]

He huwt deiw feewings. Dat should be iwwegaw. No idea whether I got this baby talk right.

I do agree with you where it shouldn't be possible to impeach Trump though. I haven't actually heard of him doing anything illegal. Don't know if that golden shower with the prostitutes actually happened or counts.

#128 to #6 - checkemninja

Reply+2

(12/07/2017)[-]

Lmao it was a prank ran by 4chan that retarded news media outlets picked uo on and ran with

#42 to #6 - anon id: c0054f5b

Reply-15

(12/06/2017)[-]

why talk like that, leaf cuck

literally anyone that supports drumpf is apparently dumb but you talk like an retard?

#45 to #42 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+5

(12/06/2017)[-]

There seems to have been a misunderstanding. I was making fun of liberals.

#47 to #45 - anon id: c0054f5b

Reply-6

(12/06/2017)[-]

I know what you were trying to do leaf

To you a lbieral is anyone that doesnt worship drumpf

**** DRUMPF

#116 to #47 - anon id: 4e600324

Reply+2

(12/07/2017)[-]

>When your government finally lets you post online again as long as you ******** about trump

#50 to #47 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+4

(12/06/2017)[-]

Actually, to me a liberals is someone who falls on the left side of the political spectrum. They do not necessarily have to not worship Trump. I was merely making fun of people on the far left who hate Trump.

#21 to #6 - anon id: 6fd12a99

Reply+22

(12/06/2017)[-]

That golden shower thing was a joke started by 4 chan

#22 to #21 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+5

(12/06/2017)[-]

I though I heard something about it in the news.

#56 to #22 - totallynotahobo

Reply+3

(12/06/2017)[-]

You did. Then they did a retraction.

#27 to #22 - KillinTime#271 on commentsRank#271

Reply+11

(12/06/2017)[-]

you did, but since when did that mean anything?

#30 to #27 - raggg#6 on commentsRank#6

Reply+2

(12/06/2017)[-]

Since like 50% of America started learning what to be angry about from it.

#48 to #30 - removekimchi

Reply+10

(12/06/2017)[-]

some gov spook got a hold of the "dossier" full of 4chan memes and thought it was real. buzzfeed and some other sites reported it without investigating if it was real or not first. laughable

#52 to #48 - Ruspanic

Reply-9

(12/06/2017)[-]

that's not actually true. 4chan took credit, but there's no evidence that anything in there originated on 4chan

The dossier was compiled by an ex-MI-6 guy who ran a private intelligence firm in Europe. Don't know how he got the info or why he thought it was reliable

#58 to #52 - removekimchi

Reply+12

(12/06/2017)[-]

other things in that dossier included Don ******* obama's wife while he sat in the corner, it's totally made up memery

#60 to #58 - Ruspanic

Reply-6

(12/06/2017)[-]

that wasn't in the dossier, not sure where you got that from

The dossier said he hired prostitutes to piss on a bed where Obama had slept when he stayed in that hotel

#88 to #60 - Ruspanic

Reply+1

(12/06/2017)[-]

people are thumbing me down without even checking if I'm right
This is easily verifiable. Here is the dossier. The piss-related thing is on page 2. Now someone please show me where it says Trump ****** Michelle Obama
www.documentcloud.org/documents/32599...

Or which part 4chan supposedly came up with

#120 to #88 - robotwhale

Reply+1

(12/07/2017)[-]

Prostitutes is one thing but now we are accusing Trump of bestiality?

#106 to #88 - landcucumber

Reply0

(12/07/2017)[-]

Don't even try arguing with these people.

For you other dumb *****
Steel the guy who made it is a well respected expert on Russian intelligence and has many contacts in Russia. It's straight up spy stuff. He has been right enough times before the election that he is considered by experts to be a reliable source.
The 4 chan stuff is fake get over it funnyjunk!

#131 to #106 - Ruspanic

Reply-1

(12/07/2017)[-]

some people are just misinformed man, nothing wrong with correcting inaccurate misconceptions. Even if the particular person I'm directly addressing is too stubborn to acknowledge it, other people may see my comments.

Worth pointing out also that even though the dossier didn't come from 4chan, that doesn't mean it's accurate. None of the saucy allegations in it have been confirmed, and mistakes were found in it right away - even Buzzfeed pointed out some of them when it published the memos.

#11 to #6 - pawnman

Reply+47

(12/06/2017)[-]

That was fake Buzzfeed article that CNN ran with hoping it was true. It would have been hilarious if it was.

#148 to #11 - anon id: 08a06a1c

Reply0

(12/07/2017)[-]

buzzfeed. any literally anything i see that cites buzzfeed as a source i automatically dismiss them as being a credible source. most lying msm uses buzzfeed and i already dismiss them lol,