Gun Control?. Gun are dangerous, they just leap up and shoot at people right?.. This proves they don't listen either. freedom


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #21 - xdjerredlongxd (05/19/2013) [-]
This proves they don't listen either.
User avatar #24 to #21 - konradkurze (05/19/2013) [-]
proves guns are women:

* They dont listen
* They do harm when abused
* You have to do ********* to get one, and ********* to care for one
* The fun they offer lasts only as long as the person having fun with them wants it to
* If you abuse gun too long, the courts will take it away from you and cause you legal and financial punishments
#209 to #24 - mooghens ONLINE (05/20/2013) [-]
But you can silence a gun
User avatar #318 to #209 - nogphille (05/20/2013) [-]
you can silence the second with the first..
User avatar #25 to #24 - shockstorm (05/19/2013) [-]
my god... I finally understand...
#26 to #25 - konradkurze (05/19/2013) [-]
dont **** with female guns
#389 to #24 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
" ********* to get one and take care of one"
False, It took me 30 minutes to go to a gun show and get my Remington 760 30-06, no background check, and all I have to do is clean out the barrel and oil it after use.
User avatar #659 to #389 - konradkurze (05/20/2013) [-]
okay so you took the prostitute way of guns
go to a special place, throw money at someone, poof, got what you want
#58 to #24 - anon (05/19/2013) [-]
i wouldnt say ********* to get one im 18 in highscool and they sold me an ar 15 after signing a paper giving them money and waiting three days
#27 - petjon (05/19/2013) [-]
#48 - jedisquirrel (05/19/2013) [-]
Do you really want to take their jobs away?
Do you really want to take their jobs away?
User avatar #97 to #48 - icecreamonnips (05/19/2013) [-]
#100 to #48 - emosadpanda (05/19/2013) [-]
"gets paid more"
#280 to #144 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
to be fair a person can't write w/o a writing utensil so a person can't misspell a word in their writing w/o access to a pencil. just the same someone can't shoot another person w/o a gun. also pencils have erasers so you can undo a misspelling but you can't undo a gunshot.
#61 - felixjarl ONLINE (05/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #70 to #61 - smithforprez (05/19/2013) [-]
is that fiberglass?
#72 to #70 - felixjarl ONLINE (05/19/2013) [-]
I have reached a new lvl of butthurt so big that i can take it.
User avatar #73 to #72 - smithforprez (05/19/2013) [-]
lol, fiberglASS

oh **** the sky is turning yellow, the ********* is REAL
#34 - serhiy (05/19/2013) [-]
This image has expired
guns don't kill people
'uh' 'uh'
I kill people
with guns
User avatar #193 to #34 - laspussy (05/20/2013) [-]
vagina vagina

i wanna have sex with your vagina
User avatar #47 to #34 - zorororonoa (05/19/2013) [-]
#302 - Exar (05/20/2013) [-]
I know this might seem like overkill...but I like to take this opportunity to enlighten anyone who wishes to read this. I wrote a research paper for a college english class on gun control and learned a lot.

It's come to my attention that the media commonly labels guns as the root of all evil, especially those categorized as "assault rifles". They claim that rifles are used in connection with heinous crimes and should be banned.

"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics" - Mark Twain.

Statistics don't lie people. Here are the FBI's the murder by weapons statistics for 2011:
Total: 12,664
Handgun: 6220
Rifles: 323
Shotguns: 356
Other guns: 97
Firearms not stated: 1587
Knives, fire, drowning, hands, etc: 4081

Of all the murders committed in the United States, only 323 (that's less than 3%) of the total homicides used the very weapon that the media thinks we should ban: a rifle.

That 3% statistic holds up for the 1990's and 2000's as well.

Banning rifles won't solve a damn thing.
User avatar #315 to #302 - wium (05/20/2013) [-]
since you are talking about statistics, lots of other countries ban guns are have low death rates caused by guns.
#326 to #315 - Exar (05/20/2013) [-]
Yes they do. However, those countries like Sweden and Britain have a higher violent crime rate than the U.S.
User avatar #371 to #302 - mookiez (05/20/2013) [-]
I did research for a speech class in college last semester. Saying that we need guns and banning them will only make things worse. I had to give it to 30+ people. I had good statistics and events where people had guns and didn't have guns in an event of a crime. I got a a for that speech, everyone loved it.
#271 - gibroner (05/20/2013) [-]
The other day I forgot to put my gun in it's cage and it went out got a bunch of toddlers addicted to drugs, raped multiple retarded school children, and burned of bus full of senior citizens if only I'd listened to the politicians
The other day I forgot to put my gun in it's cage and it went out got a bunch of toddlers addicted to drugs, raped multiple retarded school children, and burned of bus full of senior citizens if only I'd listened to the politicians
#16 - iamtheblackgoat (05/19/2013) [-]
Technically, yes, guns do kill people

But someone has to be wielding that gun and make the choice to misuse that powerful tool in order for it to actually kill

I'm just waiting for the gun debate to flare up in the comments
#31 to #16 - anon (05/19/2013) [-]
Technically guns don't kill people the bullet kills people
if you want to get technical
User avatar #35 to #31 - ilovehitler (05/19/2013) [-]
we can go further.
Blood loss kills people, not bullets.
User avatar #336 to #16 - anonymouzx (05/20/2013) [-]
Technically, they don't. Bullets kill people.

But someone has to load it into the gun and make the choice to misuse that powerful tool in order for it to actually kill.

User avatar #483 to #16 - oceanfrank (05/20/2013) [-]
but do the objects themselves actually press the trigger on their own and kill the person?

Christians: 0
Atheists: 0
2nd Amendment: Still debated
User avatar #552 to #16 - missrainbowdash (05/20/2013) [-]
consider the following, if these crazy people only had knives, people could just run away from them.
User avatar #577 to #16 - ilikebuttsex (05/20/2013) [-]
captain obvious... AWAAAAAAAAY
#613 to #16 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
31 replies. Good job, Iamtheblackgoat
User avatar #32 to #16 - asasqw (05/19/2013) [-]
Yes just like how forks make people fat.
User avatar #36 to #32 - bramdk (05/19/2013) [-]
ok please just stick comparing tools to guns up your bum. I dont care about gun control one way or the other, but saying a hammer or a fork is simmilair to a gun is ******** .
A hammer is used to hammer nails in, a fork is used to eat. Yes you can bash someones skull in with a hammer and YES you can ******* get fat from eating to much
a gun kills things and thats all it does
#173 to #16 - xXScrappyJrXx (05/20/2013) [-]
not actually joining in the conversation/debate just posting this as it's relevant to you're picture
don't hate me
#82 to #16 - dirtyharold (05/19/2013) [-]
then if it's the gun killing people we should put it in jail
#138 to #16 - anon (05/19/2013) [-]
i guess almost everything in existence kills people

we should ban everything
#184 to #16 - notafunnyguy (05/20/2013) [-]
TECHNICALLY, blood loss or organ failure caused by the bullet shot by the gun that is wielded by the person, is the real killer
User avatar #561 to #16 - spysappinmysasha (05/20/2013) [-]
Bears kill people. and Bears made that choice all on their own.

I think we all know the real issue here...
#57 to #16 - anon (05/19/2013) [-]
pools kill more people than guns everyday and they mostly kill children, does that mean we should ban pools?
i understand that guns were made to kill and that people want to feel safe, but one thing you have to understand is that the vast majority of gun owners have no intention and never will have any intention to use their gun(s) to bring harm to others. less than one percent do have those intentions and a large portion of them get their guns illegally so a ban wouldn't stop them.
and another thing to consider is that law enforcement can't be everywhere at once and in many cases they need to rely on civilians to defend themselves due to long travel distances or overwhelming opposition.

(just a general statement about my stance on gun control)
User avatar #17 to #16 - konradkurze (05/19/2013) [-]
well most objects when used by the wrong person can be a weapon used to harm or kill someone
User avatar #19 to #17 - iamtheblackgoat (05/19/2013) [-]
I can kill multiple people from a removed distance in a short amount of time with a gun...a rock or a stick or even a chainsaw or a weedwhacker are all slow and have the possibility of close-up retaliation
#33 to #19 - winglit ONLINE (05/19/2013) [-]
I can rather easily improvise an explosive device with information found on the internet, and basic understanding of chemical reactions, a bomb can take out multiple people in a short time from a removed distance, do we ban all forms of combustive chemicals? do we ban radio transmitters or cell phones to prevent explosives from being improvised? if youre really that determined to kill someone you will find a way, its not a question of banning guns its a question of teaching people the proper use and care of weapons, and not making murderers out to be the anti hero, I know a dozen names of brutal murderers and villains, I know 1 actual hero by name and only because he was a sniper who killed hundreds for the good guys... no one remembers the good guys, so maybe instead of worrying about the tools they might use we can worry about our entire society glorifying school shooters and plastering their names over every ******* news channel? making them world famous?
User avatar #20 to #19 - konradkurze (05/19/2013) [-]
bows and crossbows can do ranged attacks too
pretty straightforward to build a bow too, you dont need a license to have one, can carry it in public, hell you can even add poisons onto the arrows easily enough

ban bows too?
User avatar #22 to #20 - iamtheblackgoat (05/19/2013) [-]
You average handgun is small, easily concealable device that holds multiple rounds and is very easy to fire

A bow is a large piece of material that is not easy to hide, you can only fire one arrow at a time, and any idiot can bump you and ruin your shot, whereas a misfiring gun can cause a lot more'd have to be surrounded by some pretty dense ************* to not have them suspect you're up to no good if you're carrying a bow around

Honestly, I own a gun and I think that gun laws shouldn't go too far, but people who don't respect them and think that they should unregulated are too naive to own them
User avatar #23 to #22 - konradkurze (05/19/2013) [-]
well i do believe that guns do require laws to define standards to their use and care, and where needed, who should or should not own or have access to guns

also i think that society needs to educate people in the proper morals of guns, where to and not to carry or use, etc

respect is a major issue, for too long people have been getting progressively indifferent or ignorant about responsible gun ownership, taking them for granted and ignoring safety....thats one major step we need to fix
User avatar #542 to #22 - cabbagemayhem (05/20/2013) [-]
I disagree completely. More people need to carry guns because it is the only deterrent to shooters (and quite effective). Few people, no matter how mental, are stupid enough to try to shoot up a room full of armed men. Mental illness is being diagnosed to an insane number of people. It's possible their understanding of mental illness is still premature. After all, what we call crazy is often quite subjective, and used to qualify anyone who thinks different than we do. Restricting rights based on that could potentially even be used to cut out sectors of society.
#28 to #17 - mattseven (05/19/2013) [-]
Of course, but a fork wasn't created to kill, even though it could, if stuck in one's throat. Guns were made to kill people, and this is why I'm against weapons.
If your argument is that your hobby is to go at a shooting range, maybe you need a new hobby, or just some paintball or airsoft equipment....
Just think about it, why would you want to wield something made to end one's life?
Call me butthurt, throw me the red thumbs, but I don't care.
It isn't about the thumbs, it's about sending a message.
User avatar #39 to #28 - blackcomet (05/19/2013) [-]
Guns were used to hunt for food. A bow can only shoot an arrow so far, but guns have a greater reach. Like all things humanity bastardized it and we kill each other with the tools we have.
Take away the invention of guns and everything used to kill, and I promise you we will find new ways.
User avatar #45 to #28 - sheepysquirrel (05/19/2013) [-]
So forks were created to eat, that means forks make people fat by your logic.
User avatar #64 to #45 - mattseven (05/19/2013) [-]
Of course, but responsible use of a fork leads to healthy eating.
Normal use of a gun includes killing my default.
User avatar #75 to #64 - smithforprez (05/19/2013) [-]
people are the problem, no people, no problem.
User avatar #78 to #75 - mattseven (05/19/2013) [-]
People are generally problematic.
User avatar #660 to #28 - konradkurze (05/20/2013) [-]
i agree, people dont need to go to ranges just to randomly shoot **** .....and people dont need to shoot random animals for the sadistic sport of putting their heads on a wall, hunting should only be for food or animal population control,

people should only need a few guns for home defence, because god knows theres tons of ******* assholes out there, and people have the right to use force to protect their families from intruders
a lioness will rip the head off anithing treatening her cubs, so whats wrong with a human putting a bullet in someones leg to disable them till police arrive

yes guns were originally made for attacking people, but smart people learned how to use them defensively, we need to spread that message
User avatar #662 to #660 - mattseven (05/20/2013) [-]
My point is that if nobody had guns, there would be less home intrusions (as anything else that can be used as a weapon is way less effective than a gun). And if by lack of luck, anyone breaks into your house at night, there are other ways to defend yourself than guns. I think this is why pepper spray was invented.
I'm just saying that there are better ways of doing all these things, without a gun that it. I live in a country with good gun control, and there are so many less murders than in America.
User avatar #663 to #662 - konradkurze (05/20/2013) [-]
not really, not every intruder carries a gun, and people can protect themselves from pepper spray
if pepper spray became the mainstream defence, then intruders would just wear goggles

what country do you live in?
User avatar #665 to #663 - mattseven (05/20/2013) [-]
I live in Canada
I agree with your point, but I still think guns shouldn't be sold to the public anymore.
User avatar #715 to #665 - konradkurze (05/20/2013) [-]
where the most violence comes from people arguing who's the most sorry
User avatar #717 to #715 - mattseven (05/20/2013) [-]
" **** you! I was sorry before you were!"
#44 to #28 - almightysausage (05/19/2013) [-]
"but a fork wasn't created to kill"
#283 to #44 - winglit ONLINE (05/20/2013) [-]
Yeaaaaah Ima need to see your registration for that Assault Fork...
#587 to #28 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
You have a point about guns being intended for killing, I'll give you that much. You said you're against weapons which I would assume encompasses anything that could be lethal at a range, like guns and bows. Have you ever considered what would happen to wildlife populations if we couldn't hunt? When wildlife populations get too large they have a tendency to run over into human populations causing problems. Deer/moose/caribou/elk can cause potentially lethal car wrecks, wild boar will attack with little to no provocation, and other predatory species may leave their over populated habitats in search of food in human populations including pets,livestock,and even some people.

That's just part of the issue, I'm sure if we took guns away from law abiding citizens that wouldn't deter criminals from obtaining them through illegal means. It may keep some like those who would rob gas stations from getting guns, which could decrease violent crime, but it wouldn't stop it.
User avatar #661 to #587 - mattseven (05/20/2013) [-]
Sorry for not being clear about that, but I actually am against personal property of a gun. People shouldn't have guns home, that's it. However, there could be people whose jobs are to hunt animals where the population is getting excessive, and take the gun back to the "office" or something like that.
#18 to #17 - iamtheblackgoat has deleted their comment [-]
#368 - gunguru (05/20/2013) [-]
more civilians are killed every year by hammers than by guns. plus one cannot judge the masses by the actions of a few. we just need more responsible people.
more civilians are killed every year by hammers than by guns. plus one cannot judge the masses by the actions of a few. we just need more responsible people.
#448 to #368 - urbemarmis (05/20/2013) [-]
medical malpractice kills more people a year than guns. it scares the **** out of me to think my fiance who is going to get an unnecessary surgery in june has a better chance dying due to the carelessness of a doctor than from being shot. and even with the whole gun statistic the death rate includes accidents and the number of bad guys killed by the cops or in self defense
#650 to #368 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
I hope you're just trolling. If you believe that you'll believe anything.
User avatar #664 to #368 - cullenatorguy (05/20/2013) [-]
Really? There are about 30 gun-related murders each day, and over 100 injuries from guns each day. That's a lot of pain, and there's even more each day from hammers? I doubt it.
User avatar #447 to #368 - taintedangel (05/20/2013) [-]
...or just have some psyche-evaluations for people who want guns?
User avatar #583 to #447 - DrPeppir (05/20/2013) [-]
We need more of this kind of thinking.
User avatar #592 to #583 - taintedangel (05/20/2013) [-]
Yeah, cus the guns themselves aren't the problem. The problem is the human aspect to it. The gun is a tool. A tool for killing, but nonetheless a tool. You can still have your guns, but only if you are trained on how to handle them safely and also be mentally stable enough to think logically with them, and use them for hunting wildlife (with the proper permits), using them on the gun ranges, and to defend yourself against attackers with a small fire arm.
User avatar #581 to #368 - DrPeppir (05/20/2013) [-]
I find that hard to believe, no offense. Sauce of statistics?
#88 - iworshipsanta (05/19/2013) [-]
**iworshipsanta rolled a random image posted in comment #160 at What Pythons look like ** what really kills people
#630 to #88 - kingrui (05/20/2013) [-]
sauce? its a nostalgic feeling
User avatar #644 to #630 - inspectah (05/20/2013) [-]
I think its Codename kids next door or grim adventures of billy and mandy. Either those or some show with a similar art style.
User avatar #646 to #644 - kingrui (05/20/2013) [-]
probably Billy and Mandy, never watched the other show

Thanks anyway
#60 - Dairycow (05/19/2013) [-]
**Dairycow rolled a random image posted in comment #2137072 at Friendly ** what actually kills people
#240 to #60 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
Flawless roll
User avatar #546 to #60 - cabbagemayhem (05/20/2013) [-]
That kills me.
#62 to #60 - ehzio (05/19/2013) [-]
Well no **** , Yuno kills everyone
User avatar #6 - alexdevlin (05/19/2013) [-]
As I remember from that episode;
"Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Guns protect people from people with bigger guns"
#37 to #6 - fireyvoidence (05/19/2013) [-]
Don't mean to pick bones with you or anything, but he actually says people with SMALLER guns.
User avatar #65 to #6 - theexplodingcheez (05/19/2013) [-]
... by killing them."
#400 - MrMeatStick (05/20/2013) [-]
guns dont kill people
i kill people... with guns
User avatar #427 to #400 - carlfroch (05/20/2013) [-]
User avatar #41 - Das (05/19/2013) [-]
No it's those ************* dogs you have to worry about.
#239 - jrondeau **User deleted account** (05/20/2013) [-]
Sums up most everyone I see in my age demographic that's pro gun control
User avatar #353 to #239 - ocnamesaregone (05/20/2013) [-]
"Thinks banning guns won't solve anything"

"Bans murder"

**** you.
User avatar #559 to #353 - cabbagemayhem (05/20/2013) [-]
According to studies, it won't solve anything.
User avatar #721 to #559 - ocnamesaregone (05/20/2013) [-]
I'd like to see those so called studies.
#722 to #721 - cabbagemayhem (05/21/2013) [-]
It's the studies showing sharp and lasting increases in violent crime in Britain and other countries following gun control legislation. I haven't had to post them in a while, as they're pretty well-known, but I'll google it for you if necessary.
pic related, but not as detailed as I would like
User avatar #723 to #722 - ocnamesaregone (05/21/2013) [-]
I'd like to see the sources of that study. Also, I'd like to see a bunch of factors regarding the why of that raise.

**** , maybe the 2008 economic crash pushed poor peoples to their limits (not necessarily just giving an exemple of an explanation).

Still not convinced.
#724 to #723 - cabbagemayhem (05/21/2013) [-]
Oh, you really haven't seen them? Well, I suppose you're pardoned, but never vote based solely on personal inference -- always research. A simple search will return all the data you need. The UK ban was in 1997 which was almost immediately followed by sharp and lasting increases in violent crime. Available data in other regions show similar correlations, such as Australia, Hawaii, Jamaica, and several inland U.S. states.
User avatar #122 - SpcRamon (05/19/2013) [-]
So do knives...and a car...and a crane...and the black plague.

In fact, every day objects can be used to kill someone.

Pen: Stab someone in the eye or throat
Hammer: Bash someones brains out.
Towel: Strangle someone with it.
Door: Place someone's head directly between the door and the door frame and start trying to shut it really really hard and multiple times.

So... Yes, guns can kill people. But so can everything else. But they all need one thing.

People to do it.
#153 to #122 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
OH 			****		 BAN DOORS!   
#167 to #166 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
You're right. I'm sorry.   
Actually brown.
You're right. I'm sorry.

Actually brown.
User avatar #188 to #167 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/20/2013) [-]
pics or it didn't happen
#210 to #188 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
Of my dick? Just who do you think I am? Phanact?
Of my dick? Just who do you think I am? Phanact?
User avatar #211 to #210 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/20/2013) [-]
i bet it isn't brown.
#214 to #211 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
You know, you're actually right. It's more a darker shade of bistre.
#219 to #218 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
Tempting, but I don't want to be the product of my own mischief. Next i'll be in the window. Or the wrong side of a ban. Then again there is **** . Then again England drives on the other side of the ******* road.
User avatar #220 to #219 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/20/2013) [-]
you could give me a link
#221 to #220 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
I could.
I could.
User avatar #222 to #221 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/20/2013) [-]
are you sure?
#223 to #222 - triggathepirate (05/20/2013) [-]
Could as in could, but won't.
Could as in could, but won't.
User avatar #713 to #223 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/20/2013) [-]
"are you sure" as in, Are you sure you don't want to?
#175 to #172 - huntergriff ONLINE (05/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#137 to #122 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/19/2013) [-]
Guns have no use other than killing things, breaking things and making people with small dongs feel good about themselves. Pens can write, hammers can fix things, towels can dry people off, doors can be used to keep people out or let them in.
#145 to #137 - anon (05/19/2013) [-]
To someone with a foolishly simple mind, yes, guns kill people and have no other use. But to people with actual brains, they realize that the point in having a gun is making sure no one harms you or your family, as it's stupid to think the police can always get there in time. Guns are made legal in the hopes that you never have to use them, and as such, cities in the U.S. with higher gun presence actually have lower levels of crime because criminals are afraid of being killed.
User avatar #141 to #137 - kommandantvideo (05/19/2013) [-]
And killing things isn't good? Sorry, what if I live in the country and I need to feed my family? Oh, gee, guess I'm not eating. What if there's a man with a sledgehammer in my home, trying to kill me? Oh, no gun, guess I need to fight him with my hands. You can't focus on the bad things in everything, or else you're gonna have a really bad time in life.
User avatar #288 to #137 - vatra (05/20/2013) [-]
Not true. They are used in sport. Target practice, and marksmanship competitions. But that is irrelevant. The express purpose of this tool is to kill, which is perfectly fine as the threat of death is often enough to deter most criminals. Texas, our second largest states, and some of the most lax gun laws, has one of the lowest interpersonal crime rates. Where California, Near the same size, which has some of our strictest gun laws, has one of the highest interpersonal crime rates.
User avatar #148 to #137 - exarzero (05/19/2013) [-]
I am a hunter... I use guns for food, and, deterring criminals who would try and rape or kill my family. I have been robbed before when I lived with my parents. The guy had a ******* HAMMER. If my dad did not scare him off with the shot gun my two sisters and I could be dead. You don't have to like guns at all. But can scre off when you try to take mine.

Take away guns, enjoy the bombs. There will always be something for mass murder. I DO agree with strict regulations and psychological testing to use them, but not getting rid of them. I live in Texas, where I hunt I see the food cans and other things the drug runners leave around.
User avatar #143 to #137 - SpcRamon (05/19/2013) [-]
And yet I can still kill people with them. Guns are weapons, that is their soul purpose in their creation. It was to defeat the bow, which was created to defeat the spear, which was created to defeat the club, which was created to defeat the rock, which was used to defeat the fists.

Trying to be moral about it is stupid. Gun control is nice idea, but that is only taking away a single weapon from the thousands that can be used. Guns at least have the decency to kill you quickly if done right.

You also didn't need to be a dick and thumb everyone down.
User avatar #147 to #143 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/19/2013) [-]
I said nothing other than guns can only be used to kill people. I didn't say that that was good or bad.

You also didn't need to be a dick and assume the worst of people.
#253 to #137 - harryblazer (05/20/2013) [-]
youre 100% right. gun is used to kill. It serves no other purpose 9unless you count target shooting or restoring old guns for a hobby) but it really depends on whos on the recieving end of the barrel.Thats why People keep saying feinstein and the anti-gun lobbys use tragedys like sandy hook to push their political agenda. God forbid we get one story in the news were some one uses a firearm to defend themselves from a criminal
User avatar #123 to #122 - unikornanarkyh (05/19/2013) [-]
I've even seen trees kill people. Those mother ******* are patient as aaaaaall **** .
User avatar #126 to #122 - vatra (05/19/2013) [-]
That's the point the that snippet from the show was making. The objects are just tools.
User avatar #127 to #126 - SpcRamon (05/19/2013) [-]
Indeed. People kill people is the main focus of the statement. Oh well.
User avatar #130 to #127 - vatra (05/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, that's the thing that makes me laugh about the gun control. Say they accomplished the impossible and got guns out of the hands of everyone but the police and military. Criminals would just use a different tool. They are approaching the issue with a completely wrong angle.
User avatar #136 to #122 - kommandantvideo (05/19/2013) [-]
User avatar #139 to #136 - thelegitsuperfurry (05/19/2013) [-]
#177 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
Here's a couple questions for those who want to ban guns:

How's that going for drugs?

How did prohibition work out?
User avatar #182 to #177 - drunkasaurus (05/20/2013) [-]
that would be fine if the same people fighting tooth and nail for gun rights weren't the same people trying to keep weed illegal. There's hypocrites on both sides of the fence
#192 to #182 - anon (05/20/2013) [-]
To be fair, not everyone who's pro-gun is anti-weed. That's the republican stereotype, and while it may come from a kernel of truth, it's not 100% accurate. Also, not everyone who is pro-gun is republican.
User avatar #235 to #182 - deathcampforjewtie (05/20/2013) [-]
I'm pro-gun, and pro-weed. I see no problem with both, in the hands of people who know how to properly use them. I know some extremely peaceful, caring people with firearms, and the hardest worker I know smokes weed.
#169 to #161 - xoyv (05/20/2013) [-]
chill out guies

i got this
#81 - someponynew (05/19/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people, uh uh, I kill people, with guns.

If a guy messes with me, I shoot him with my load, All over his chest and face, and down his throat.
#105 to #81 - lordmoustach (05/19/2013) [-]
Old people burning old people burning, put your hands up
Old people burning old people burning, put your hands up
User avatar #128 to #105 - xdjerredlongxd (05/19/2013) [-]
whoa oh oh. if u liked it than u shoulda put a ring on it.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)