Makes sense.. no it doesn't.. Drop the gun, or I'll shoot Makes sense no it doesn't Drop the gun or I'll shoot
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (306)
[ 306 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
66 comments displayed.
#12 - shadowrated
Reply +66
(01/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Drop the gun, or I'll shoot
#118 to #12 - sammyjankiis
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Great movie. I highly recommend it!
#21 to #12 - Tsuna
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Only In Bruges.
#24 - omarski
Reply +56
(01/26/2013) [-]
in england no one has guns (apart from specialised armed units that only respond to gun related crimes which there are few) our normal police dont even have guns and 11,000 of us dont die every year from gun crime.

you can live with out guns the rest of us do.
#229 to #24 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
But see, if someone just walked down the street in England shooting people with an assault rifle he'd probably kill about twenty people, but in America he might kill five or six before someone in the crowd shoots back. So you really have to ask, is it really worth banning them? I mean, if people continued shooting places up at the same rate they are now we'd be even worse off.
#268 to #24 - dirtyharold
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
its also completely  illegal to defend your home or yourself in England.    
   
EX: guys robbing your home.    
you: ello police some wanker is robbing me bloody flat   
police: right o mate we'll do our best to get there an chase em with our wakety wakety beating stickaroos. but for now all you may do is sit'n watch. the wanker and make sure he dont injure himself mate or else he can sue you
its also completely illegal to defend your home or yourself in England.

EX: guys robbing your home.
you: ello police some wanker is robbing me bloody flat
police: right o mate we'll do our best to get there an chase em with our wakety wakety beating stickaroos. but for now all you may do is sit'n watch. the wanker and make sure he dont injure himself mate or else he can sue you


#300 to #24 - theelderscrolls
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Well you see...this is The Unite States Of America. We left because we didn't want to live like you.
#66 to #24 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
well if you don't have guns, of course you will have less gun crimes

however, that doesn't necessarily mean your crime rate is any better as a result. just a thought to think about
#91 to #24 - kirkbot
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Switzerland has more guns per person than America
do you ever hear about gun crimes in Switzerland in the international media?
yeah didn't think so
#97 to #91 - inflatablewalrus
Reply -1
(01/26/2013) [-]
its because americans are stupid not because of the guns. you should have to pass an IQ test to get a gun license
#96 to #91 - jinkazama
Reply -4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Your argument is about as sound as "But bills mom lets him have TWO weiners."
#162 to #24 - Faz
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
Im from England and i would feel a lot safer in a country without guns than one with them but in America they cant just ban guns like we did here in the UK, the UK is small and very easy to monitor and we are an island, smuggling guns into the UK is an INCREDIBLY difficult feat but since America borders Mexico and that border is almost impossible to fully monitor guns would still find a way to the criminals in America.
#136 to #24 - chazzxz
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
You don't have ridiculous amounts of illegal guns pouring over your border on a daily basis. America is in a situation where guns are present in criminals' hands regardless of any laws we make right now. The issue is whether taking licensed guns out of the hands of civilians will help anything (it probably won't).
#254 to #136 - fuckdisshit
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
yeah but illegal guns get in so easily because the country allows guns. If there are no guns I doubt as many would get in because if you see someone with a gun you take it away instead having to check if its legal or not
#302 to #254 - chazzxz
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
they get in because our southern border security is rubbish. If a border guard sees a gun he doesn't say "Hey that guy crossing the border has a gun, lets assume its registered and let him take it. Step one is border security, an issue nobody in our country is even talking about.
#51 to #24 - IronWill
Reply +4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Good luck on zombie apocalypse.
#207 to #51 - mrcowll
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Bitch I plan to get close and personal with these bastards. Not pussy out with a firearm.
#251 to #207 - alexkarino
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
You'll probably die of infection within the first 72 hours of the outbreak than.
#41 to #24 - cactaur ONLINE
Reply +5
(01/26/2013) [-]
wait wait wait, you're telling me that because you guys banned guns you have less gun related incidents? pfft, you probably will also say that if you banned cars you will have less car related incident and if you banned pools you will have less drowning.
#98 to #41 - omarski
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
school children don't get shot in the face in England.
#198 to #98 - cactaur ONLINE
Reply -4
(01/27/2013) [-]
that's what happens when you make places gun free zones.
#47 to #41 - leharpy
Reply -9
(01/26/2013) [-]
Not exactly sure what you're getting at.

But anyway, whenever England and Australia banned guns violent crime shot up by astronomical levels, England is the most violent place in the EU I believe. For comparison, in the Czech Republic, you can buy new full autos and concealed carry and whatever you want. Less strict than the US once you get your basic license there. They're quite a peaceful and non-violent place.
#49 to #47 - mrbull
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
Czech Republic and peaceful used in the same sentence. I didn't think I'd ever see the day. My uncle lives there, I've been there once and from that experience I'll never go there again. It is not peaceful and non-violent place.
#55 to #49 - leharpy
Reply -9
(01/26/2013) [-]
www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2012-GPI-Map-with-Rankings-and-Scores.pdf
www.visionofhumanity.org/globalpeaceindex/2012-gpi-findings/
The Czech Republic was 13th on the GPI this year, for comparison, the UK is 29th. There are tons more sources that show they're a peaceful country. The Roma account for 60% of the prison population and only a few percent of the actual population, so there's that. Also, the majority of crimes there are breaking into cars.

You clearly were in some Roma craphole neighborhood or you have no clue what you're talking about.
#58 to #55 - mrbull
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Have you ever been to the Czech Republic?
#65 to #58 - leharpy
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link
wiki.answers.com/Q/How_safe_is_it_to_travel_in_the_Czech_Republic_and_are_there_any_precautions_that_a_tourist_should_take
You need to login to view this link
I plan on going, and know several people from there. What gave you the impression it wasn't a safe place? Apparently they hate on gay people though, just learned that.
#195 to #65 - cactaur ONLINE
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
the **** you doing?!?! Don't the red thumbs mean anything to you? You do not know how to conduct an argument in FJ. First of all you do not post links to support your argument, that there is just plain silly. What you have to do it divert the question or argument to a more emotional stand point and you must have it look like that those opposing your want to club baby seals and use their blood to summon the great lord Cthulhu. And, this is the important  part, make a lot of name calling. The more the merrier i say. Finally you must end the argument as if you're opposition is beneath you and not worth arguing in the first place. Hope that helps you, you ignorant twat.
the **** you doing?!?! Don't the red thumbs mean anything to you? You do not know how to conduct an argument in FJ. First of all you do not post links to support your argument, that there is just plain silly. What you have to do it divert the question or argument to a more emotional stand point and you must have it look like that those opposing your want to club baby seals and use their blood to summon the great lord Cthulhu. And, this is the important part, make a lot of name calling. The more the merrier i say. Finally you must end the argument as if you're opposition is beneath you and not worth arguing in the first place. Hope that helps you, you ignorant twat.
#14 - ninjalazor **User deleted account**
+37
has deleted their comment [-]
#29 - semisane
Reply +28
(01/26/2013) [-]
You're really going to convince people to change their opinions on gun control by posting this on funnyjunk.
#17 - nass
Reply +26
(01/26/2013) [-]
The thing is, all these guns are controlled by people who were trained using them properly.
#218 to #17 - dadukesta
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
>Implying people who arn't trained to shoot properly shoot people to death.
#224 to #17 - notafunnyguy
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
so why cant we train civilians to use guns properly
#308 to #224 - natedimes
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
That type of service would have to be subsidized somehow. If by the Government, you'll likely say hello to higher taxes. If it's privatized, it'll probably be too expensive for most.

Also I'm not too fond of the idea of turning a nutjob who can't use a firearm properly, into a nutjob who can use one properly.
#3 - snowshark
Reply +17
(01/26/2013) [-]
That's a pretty good point. Now, I could get into the debate nice and early by staring examples of countries that are far safer to live in that ban the ownership of guns outright or by bringing up the arguable notion that America is way too far gone with the gun-craze to ever be saved from the idiocy that particular brand of idiocy and that removing guns would make perfect sense if America wasn't so ******* useless at educating it's population on why guns are a bad idea and even worse at taking account of their psychological needs so that they -don't'- go and shoot the **** out of someone because they're too angsty for life...   
   
But at the end of the day, this is Funny Junk and I'm here to laugh. So here is a baby catching fire. Because it makes me laugh.
That's a pretty good point. Now, I could get into the debate nice and early by staring examples of countries that are far safer to live in that ban the ownership of guns outright or by bringing up the arguable notion that America is way too far gone with the gun-craze to ever be saved from the idiocy that particular brand of idiocy and that removing guns would make perfect sense if America wasn't so ******* useless at educating it's population on why guns are a bad idea and even worse at taking account of their psychological needs so that they -don't'- go and shoot the **** out of someone because they're too angsty for life...

But at the end of the day, this is Funny Junk and I'm here to laugh. So here is a baby catching fire. Because it makes me laugh.
#4 to #3 - wheresthefudge
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
At first I was going to thumb you down because I completely disagree with pretty much everything you said.   
But then I realized.
At first I was going to thumb you down because I completely disagree with pretty much everything you said.
But then I realized.
#7 to #4 - snowshark
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nice .gif by the way. There's not enough compliments on this site so, nice gif.
#6 to #4 - snowshark
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Basically. This is funny junk. A baby catching fire is funny. It pleases me in a slightly questionable but, though understandable manner.   
   
Arguments are a pointless waste of time which stop the comment section from being funny. Here is another gif. It is not in context but it always makes me laugh a little bit.
Basically. This is funny junk. A baby catching fire is funny. It pleases me in a slightly questionable but, though understandable manner.

Arguments are a pointless waste of time which stop the comment section from being funny. Here is another gif. It is not in context but it always makes me laugh a little bit.
#8 to #6 - wheresthefudge
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Fair enough. Let's see...   
Yes. This one makes me giggle upon occasion.
Fair enough. Let's see...
Yes. This one makes me giggle upon occasion.
#9 to #8 - snowshark
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
He auditioned for the part of Harry Potter.   
   
Sucks to be him.   
   
Have a motivational penguin. It makes me smile.
He auditioned for the part of Harry Potter.

Sucks to be him.

Have a motivational penguin. It makes me smile.
#10 to #9 - wheresthefudge
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Man, you know what I just realized? The animal onto which Malfoy's head has been shopped is a rabbit. I always thought it was a hedgehog.
Man, you know what I just realized? The animal onto which Malfoy's head has been shopped is a rabbit. I always thought it was a hedgehog.
#11 to #10 - snowshark
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
True. Rabbits are not very good at not ******* everything they can fit their manhood inside (and the fitting inside part is optional.)
#193 - jouten
Reply +13
(01/27/2013) [-]
More civilians die in Chicago through gunshots than in Afghanistan

#200 to #193 - generaljosh
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
There is no doubt in my mind that that is an actual fact
#201 to #200 - jouten
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
#203 to #201 - generaljosh
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
See, that article is being deliberately misleading by comparing civilian shootings to combat shootings. The vast majority of troop casualties in Afghanistan result from IEDs, not from shootings.
#205 to #203 - jouten
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
Doesn't really make the situation better you know. This means that more people are shot in Chicago than soldiers who are killed by explosions in Afghanistan
#226 to #203 - goblingang
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
It's the Daily Mail, don't pay attention to it...
#18 - azraelthemage
Reply +9
(01/26/2013) [-]
When I was in High School, we had a cop on campus at all times in case of an emergency. We never had a single problem because of that. Why this isn't standard school policy all across the country is beyond me.
#25 to #18 - ruinmassacre
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
same here. I actually thought it was the norm until SHES happened
#27 to #18 - hillko
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
We have that, except he isn't allowed to carry weapons.
Which kinda defeats the purpose of him being there
#30 to #27 - nucularwar
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
we had one but he had a tazer not a gun, which i guess works too
#38 to #30 - azraelthemage
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Ours carried both. He even used the tazer a few times.
#78 to #18 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
mine does while its only like a 500 person school in like one of the safest towns in illinois where the crime rate is actually close to 0, the only bad thing would be the evergrowing use of heroin, while a neighboring school that is ******* huge probably thousands of kids has no police officer and has a really bad crime/gang rate
#75 to #18 - comradewinter ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
How do you know it was because of that? School shootings don't happen that often, you know. Considering the amount of schools compared to the number of school shootings, you're more likely to be killed by tripping on wet surface.
#83 to #75 - azraelthemage
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Because there was this one time a kid assualted the principle (who was in a wheelchair with a broken leg at the time), and the cop tazed and arrested his ass. We didn't have any trouble like that for as long as I was there after that.
#5 - nyj
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
I find it funny when rednecks go into an uproar whenever gun safety is brought up. It's not like we're taking guns away. It's just necessary to make them harder to get. Although, the simplest response to that argument (though a little lazy) is to say that "guns don't kill people". No, but people use guns to kill people.. Keeping guns out of the hands of insane people is what recent legislation looks to do -- and with that, I agree.
#13 to #5 - autoxx
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
The legislation already existed, it was just ill enforced.
What you did was sacrifice freedom in exchange for theoretical security /sarcasm/ which of course ALWAYS works... /Sarcasm/
#15 to #5 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Except the current gun ban talks are on primarily the ergonomics of the weapon, it's okay to shoot someone as long as you're not comfortable?
#19 to #5 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Knives and other melee weapons kill people too. Should we restrict that too?
#22 to #5 - demonicgoop
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nope. Ur dum. Being a redneck is fun. The more insane people there are, the more people will die, and we need to lower the population cause there will be more cities built, and **** cities cause they ruin things.
#310 to #5 - karson
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
honestly, it is kinda tough to get a gun if the dealer follows all the legal procedure. As long as you don't have a criminal history or history showing you're crazy, you can buy a gun. people who shouldn't be allowed to have guns buy guns through private transactions, where the seller is often just a normal citizen who wants to sell their gun and is not aware of the buyer's background, or does not care, so the laws aren't followed. truth be told, there are already a lot of laws that make a gun harder to get. just some sellers don't follow those laws. they need to be better enforced.
Also, we shouldn't put restrictions on mag capacities and the like. if only non-crazies and non-criminals can get their hands on a gun, it would be unnecessary.
TL;DR: We don't need more laws, we already have a few thousand, there just needs to be a better way to enforce them and the result would be very noticeable.
pic unrelated.
#186 - keasbyknight
Reply +7
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#223 to #186 - samxdaxman
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
that is Saints Row 3 in a nutshell...... except in SR shed be naked and beating the **** out of them.
#271 to #186 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Dildo Lance... I want it for science.
#280 to #271 - dirtyharold
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#288 to #280 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]