What could be the third game?. Of course what else. 4 in Billi!, i, lilla.. You guys know there isn't going to be an emerald remake.. ...right? There wasn't a 3rd remake for Firered/Leafgreen. Nor was there a crystal remake for Heartgol gen 3 remake
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - namdelliks ONLINE (05/08/2014) [+] (7 replies)
stickied by pikminpoo
You guys know there isn't going to be an emerald remake.. ...right?
There wasn't a 3rd remake for Firered/Leafgreen. Nor was there a crystal remake for Heartgold/Soulsilver.
#2 - nightmarecorpse (05/08/2014) [-]
stickied by pikminpoo
#20 - icametocomment (05/09/2014) [-]
Is this a ******* thing? Are we really getting Ruby/Sapphire remakes?!
#26 to #20 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
It hasnt been confirmed whether to be a remake or a sequel. So still look into it in the future
User avatar #29 to #26 - BmanX (05/09/2014) [-]
It's a remake. They're not making sequels to Pokemon games that came out 10 years ago. These are just following in the footsteps of FireRed and LeafGreen and HeartGold and SoulSilver.
#37 to #29 - xcoreyx (05/09/2014) [-]
They ******* better be
User avatar #22 to #20 - valkarian (05/09/2014) [-]
Yeah Omega Ruby & Alpha Saphire. Surprised you didn't know about it it was everywhere when it was announced.
User avatar #23 to #22 - icametocomment (05/09/2014) [-]
Well **** , I may actually have to get a 3DS then.
User avatar #51 to #23 - captainpatters (05/09/2014) [-]
3ds's are ******* amazing.

I wish you many a good times with yours.

User avatar #24 to #23 - valkarian (05/09/2014) [-]
Or 2ds little cheaper
User avatar #25 to #24 - icametocomment (05/09/2014) [-]
Good idea.
User avatar #28 to #25 - darkdragonswrath (05/09/2014) [-]
Why play a 2D game in 2D get a 3DS you get an extra D.
User avatar #42 to #28 - gereorth (05/09/2014) [-]
Because not everyone cares about the slide for the 3D effect. I mean, I got a 3DS but NEVER use that function.
User avatar #41 to #25 - fitemeirlbro (05/09/2014) [-]
ignore anon 2ds is pretty good and is cheaper also the 3d sucks
#36 to #25 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
no, no it's not. 2ds is like a tablet with two screens, 3ds is way better.
User avatar #30 to #20 - fukkentyranitar (05/09/2014) [-]
Its super ******* confirmed bro.
User avatar #33 - thelucci (05/09/2014) [-]
Because "Chaos" is a letter of the greek alphabet
#72 - megakillerx (05/09/2014) [-]
#75 to #72 - datmine (05/09/2014) [-]
What was that?
User avatar #54 - friendlyanonymous (05/09/2014) [-]
Omega Ruby, Alpha Saphire, and Beta Emerald:Fedora of Friendzones edition.
User avatar #35 - houseofscarlet (05/09/2014) [-]
I wouldn't get too hopeful for an Emerald remake. I mean, up until recently everyone was convinced that Pokemon Z was inevitable but then the remakes were announced. And, when Soulsilver and Heartgold were released, they didn't remake Crystal to join them. Just based on the past, I'm just sayin that Emerald may not be next on the list
User avatar #39 to #35 - languagexplain (05/09/2014) [-]
Emerald remake is most likely not gonna happen though.
User avatar #43 to #35 - gereorth (05/09/2014) [-]
May not? It won't. These remakes will follow the story of Emerald. Remember how HeartGold/SoulSilver did the same with Crystal? They followed the story of suicine.
User avatar #38 to #35 - languagexplain (05/09/2014) [-]
Emerald was released after firered and leaf green. Pokemon Z is still a possibility.
User avatar #34 - monkeybrains (05/09/2014) [-]
Beta Emerald
#18 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
epsilon emerald
User avatar #13 - pokemanaphy (05/09/2014) [-]
It's funny because Omega is a Sonic character
User avatar #1 - orcova (05/08/2014) [-]
I know this has only been up for an hour, but it needs more thumbs.
User avatar #40 - magicaltoast (05/09/2014) [-]
I am alpha and omega the beginning and the end
User avatar #76 - asadshoe ONLINE (05/09/2014) [-]
darkskin why is there no emerald?
User avatar #79 to #76 - pikminpoo (05/09/2014) [-]
nikskard is your lord now
User avatar #77 to #76 - darkskin (05/09/2014) [-]
because they dont need it
they will incorporate elements of it into the two games like they did with heartgold and soulsliver
#73 - cunttoaster (05/09/2014) [-]
User avatar #67 - avatardsucks (05/09/2014) [-]
doubt theyre gonna do an emerald remake since they didnt do one for crystal on the DS.
User avatar #65 - puffingpuffin (05/09/2014) [-]
Fools, Rayquaza is both the alpha AND the omega!
User avatar #46 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
So, will these be made for the regular DS?
User avatar #47 to #46 - boblywop (05/09/2014) [-]
I think they only announced it for the 3DS. Might change, not sure
User avatar #48 to #47 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
Goddammit.. I'm giving up on Nintendo if they're only going to make this for the 3DS and 2DS..
User avatar #49 to #48 - sexyhimself (05/09/2014) [-]
oh no, a gaming company stopped making games for their previous series of consoles and are focusing on their new series of consoles, this has never happened before and they need to be stopped!!!!
User avatar #50 to #49 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
They've lost hundreds of millions of dollars, and the Nintendo 3DS was a fail in sales. Not even going to start on the abomination they call 2DS.

The smart thing for them to do is to release it once more for the regular DS considering about 10 times more customers own a regular DS than the amount of customers that own a 3DS or 2DS combined.

It has nothing to do with me whining, like you're implying with your childish sarcastic remark, it has to do with sense of sales and trying to gain the company some actual money again.
User avatar #58 to #50 - datgermanguy (05/09/2014) [-]
Nintendo 3DS fail in sales? Are you mental?
Of course more people own an DS than an 3DS right now, but the sales for the 3DS are great and went even higher when Pokemon X/Y came out.
For sure they won't release these games for the DS. The new engine for the Pokemon games is great and I really look forward to see Hoenn with it.
User avatar #59 to #50 - thunderkrux (05/09/2014) [-]
I don't understand how the 2DS is an abomination, or the 3DS for that matter. They are actually rather decent handheld systems, and the selection of games is rather eye-catching.
User avatar #62 to #59 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
You're not honestly going to tell me the 2DS is well designed, right?
User avatar #80 to #62 - JOEKEWL (07/06/2014) [-]
It's bulkier yes, but cheaper. And cheaper is why im on team Nintendo.
User avatar #66 to #62 - thunderkrux (05/09/2014) [-]
Actually it's not bad. I own one. I don't see any issues with it.
#63 to #62 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
The 2DS is well designed for it's intended purpose - for younger children.
User avatar #74 to #63 - drtrousersnake ONLINE (05/09/2014) [-]
and college students that don't like spending more money than they need to
#53 to #50 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
The DS doesn't have the hardware to deal with the updated game engine.

Gameboy to Gameboy Colour, Colour to Advance, Advance to DS, DS to 3DS/2DS. Progress will always carry on, I don't see how you can think it's justified that they should make a gimped version of the game for a decade-old console rather than their new beefier model. Hell, the 3DS has been out for years, if anything it's about time we got a newer model. Nintendo isn't in nearly as much trouble as people keep saying - their income has always been, and always will be, primarily in Japan.
User avatar #56 to #53 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
I think it's justified because it'd make them a lot more money..

But I can't disagree with you on the fact that the original DS probably isn't strong enough to handle the new game engine. Hadn't thought of that.
User avatar #68 to #50 - mutzaki (05/09/2014) [-]
Are you a dummydum? The 3DS was a great success for Nintendo, and the DS came out in ******* 2004.
Just because you haven't been looking at actual sales figures and are too poor to get either of those consoles, doesn't mean Nintendo should try to keep the DS alive for another 10 years.
So sit down, you're embarrassing yourself.
User avatar #71 to #68 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
Look at who's embarrassing himself, making ridiculous assumptions. If you would come with actual facts I'd take your seriously, like with some of the others who've responded.

But you're just downright childish.
#52 to #50 - anon (05/09/2014) [-]
#61 to #52 - mentlgen (05/09/2014) [-]
Goddamned anons....
Goddamned anons....
User avatar #55 to #50 - theattackmaster (05/09/2014) [-]
I agree, I almost love ruby enough to buy a 3ds or 2ds. Almost, and ruby was my first pokemon game, it is just sad. It would be absolutely great if they released it on the original ds, buttttt, living in the past won't do us any good.
User avatar #57 to #55 - furrypuppy (05/09/2014) [-]
I personally really dislike the 3DS and 2DS, so I'll never get either of those. Still sad though.
User avatar #60 to #55 - mentlgen (05/09/2014) [-]
Twas my first proper Pokemon play-through, such a shame it is 3/2DS exclusive. They are really terrible reasons to buy them. "DUUH. 3DS HAZ 3D! DUUH!" and the 2ds is just a DS with the capabilities to play 3ds games...without 3d? awuddafuq?
User avatar #69 to #46 - gereorth (05/09/2014) [-]
No. Because the NDS is old content now. The 3DS has been released for about a year, atleast. Black/White 2 was released quite "recently". Even when the 3DS was already released. At some point they're going to move on. You should be upset with the GBA, it had the least Pokémon content. The NDS had 4 Pokémon games. Diamond/Pearl/Platinum, Black/White 1 & 2 and HeartGold/SoulSilver.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)