Countries during World War Two OC. My first attempt at OC even though I know its polandball and not proper OC, spent ages on this I hope you like. Also I know t Poland Ball Ball OC first ww2 britain america i was told to us admin
Click to expand

Countries during World War Two OC

Countries during World War Two OC. My first attempt at OC even though I know its polandball and not proper OC, spent ages on this I hope you like. Also I know t

My first attempt at OC even though I know its polandball and not proper OC, spent ******* ages on this I hope you like. Also I know that the US declared war on december 8th 1941 but it's practically 1942 and i wanted to create effect(see i've even done research! haha)
Cheers, Englishfag.

oh bloody hell
**** **** ****
yes yes
jolly good it' s
ahh yes is
all of comings
together l
lol are you
hehe friends
ahhahh right.
try it bitch
ohh lala
Tres bien we won!
hamm maybe
gimme two mins
japs did ******
**** you world
hoorah bitch
wait wut
theres a what
oh err two mins
oh it' s over?
thats good aint it
plz halp
is it hot in
something is
definitly burning
oh **** its
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 74246 Favorited: 115 Submitted: 03/26/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to englishfag Subscribe to oc-comic-makers submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #137 - englishfag (03/27/2014) [+] (1 reply)
stickied by englishfag
New OC Content! Recent history of afghanistan, hope you enjoy!
#14 - aryastarkismywaifu (03/26/2014) [-]
Friendly warning: People tend to get upset when you use the circle tool for polandball
User avatar #15 to #14 - englishfag (03/26/2014) [-]
I tried but my circles were woeful without the tool!
User avatar #128 to #15 - sadisticsalmon ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
Thats the point
User avatar #77 to #15 - honkan (03/27/2014) [-]
They are kinda supposed to be.
User avatar #19 to #14 - newsuperyoshi (03/26/2014) [-]
A fail to see a problem with 'merica.
User avatar #35 to #14 - badmotorfinger (03/27/2014) [-]
"doesn't help until the end"

we were focused on fighting in the Pacific.
Those little islands couldn't have defended themselves.
The Chinese and Australians couldn't hold on forever.
User avatar #51 to #35 - bluerangermartin (03/27/2014) [-]
Google "war profiteering"
User avatar #52 to #51 - badmotorfinger (03/27/2014) [-]
your point?
#53 to #52 - bluerangermartin (03/27/2014) [-]
A whopping 20 seconds of research. Well I know you aren't going to be easy to talk to.
User avatar #54 to #53 - badmotorfinger (03/27/2014) [-]
i said that the US was involved, just elsewhere.
what does making money off selling weapons have to do with this?
User avatar #55 to #54 - bluerangermartin (03/27/2014) [-]
Because you didn't help until the end
User avatar #59 to #55 - falloutfanatic (03/27/2014) [-]
Prepare to be slapped by the big dick of knowledge:
WWII in Europe could have been won without the US, i admit that openly and freely to start with so you understand where i am coming from. The local resistances of the occupied countries, along with the stone cold tenacity of the USSR war machine and the British basically owning half the planet at that point kinda tipped the scales in favor of the allies. The US basically speed up what was the eventual downfall of the third Reich with the influx of manpower. The war in Europe was a combined effort and i will NOT dispute that. HOWEVER. The war in the Pacific WAS Americas fight, and our main focus of the war. That was our war, the one we joined, fought, and eventually triumphed in. In percentages, if (conservatively) america did 15-30% of the work in Europe, it did 85% of the work in the Pacific, with 7.5% being the Chinese resistance, and 7.5% being every other power in the area (Australia, Great Britain, etc...). We fought that war for, if going off the accepted start of WWII, September 1st 1939, 4 of its 6 year run. You are a misinformed cunt and deserve to be dipped in a pool of molten lead for being so historically inaccurate.
User avatar #69 to #59 - reginleif ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
No it really couldn't.... both Russia and the UK were sucking the US teat's dry WAY before official involvement. We gave both countries **** tons of food, supplies, and logistical support with which both countries would have been ******* useless.

Even with US support the Ruskies were massively under equipped and it got to the point where the soldiers were told to "pick up the equipment of their fallen comrades".

Anyways point is both the UK and Russia were total charity cases during WW2 who nearly ran their countries to the ground trying to stop Hitler...... could they have won with their men alone and US support? Yes..

Could they have done it alone? **** NO The limey bastards would be speaking German right now....

The US was best support NA to the pathetic carries UK and Russia. :/ Bitches never want to thank the support though.
User avatar #81 to #69 - hydraetis ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
Except the US could not have won the war solo either, and going by all of the comments I've seen from Americans about their role in WWII, it seems like most of you are under the impression that you could have.
User avatar #90 to #81 - playerdous (03/27/2014) [-]
Britain's greatest defense was the English channel. The US has an ocean on each side. If the US never entered the war (say japan never attacks) there would still be no reason to fight since there was no threat to the US homefront.
And since Germany keeps bouncing back better and stronger than the rest of Europe I could care less if they won the European theater.
#111 to #90 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
You know, you can't take the credit of having won the war if you didn't actualy fight it to help. That's like thanking someone for driving by when you were going to commit suicide and the person driving by, by chance, manages to coonvince you not to do it.
User avatar #177 to #111 - playerdous (03/27/2014) [-]
Did I ******* say anything about credit?
User avatar #92 to #90 - quasatranquility (03/27/2014) [-]
If the Nazis would've won, you'd have had a much bigger problem on your hands. Much bigger. Also, no wonder people don't wanna thank assholes like you. You're exactly the kind who thinks America is some kind of hero for stepping in and helping it's allies. Well guess what, it was pretty beneficial for the US to get rid of the Nazis instead of letting them take over all of Europe. So they did this for the benefits of their own country. They're no more heroes than anyone else.
User avatar #178 to #92 - playerdous (03/27/2014) [-]
Really I don't see the problem, the amount of resources necessary to launch an assault on US soil (make that the entire north and south American continent) was to grand for the 1940s.
And no I don't think we're heroes, I think we acted as we should have. Which was taking on the Asian theater, and giving supplies to the European theater.
We benefited from the Nazi push, so many refugees fled to America along with many scientist and theorist.
Once again I said nothing about heroes. you're just generalizing me into your **** tier opinion of Americans.
User avatar #182 to #178 - quasatranquility (03/28/2014) [-]
Your entire comment is basically saying "we didn't have to fight, but we did it anyway" as if you did it to be nice. You're horrible at expressing yourself if you didn't mean to say that. By the way, do you actually mean "I could care less" (as you wrote), or did you mean "I couldn't care less"? Because I've never heard anyone say "I could care less".

Also, and ocean didn't stop the Japanese from attacking the US, nor did it stop the US from dropping two massive middle fingers in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So no, I don't think and ocean would've stopped Nazi's who, by then, would've controlled nearly all of Europe.
User avatar #184 to #182 - playerdous (03/29/2014) [-]
"If the US never entered the war (say japan never attacks)"
User avatar #185 to #184 - quasatranquility (03/29/2014) [-]
"there would still be no reason to fight since there was no threat to the US homefront"

Implying you didn't have a reason to fight, indirectly saying "We didn't have to, but we did it anyway". Which is incorrect. Of course no one had to, but everyone did it mostly for their own benefits.
User avatar #91 to #69 - quasatranquility (03/27/2014) [-]
No one likes thanking an arrogant asshole who claims to be some kind of ******* hero. The US helped, but are no more, nor less, of a hero than any other county involved. That's the ******* problem. I have no problem giving the US credit for helping us out, hell nearly half the soldiers on D-Day at Normandy were American. But many Americans I've seen talking, and talked to, about it, have talked as if THEY single handedly crushed the Nazis.

I won't thank any American who doesn't thank the Europeans for what they did during the war.
#107 to #69 - Jowi (03/27/2014) [-]
We don't thank you because it wasn't aid you gave us, you sold it to us. A debt we are still paying back. You don't say thank you to someone charging you extortionate rates with huge interest % for necessary rations that we needed to fight a war that we didn't start and we weren't prepared for.
#160 to #69 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
You realise that no self-respecting support would leave their carry to do everything early game then jump in and killsteal everything right?

P.S. You are the exact reason that a lot of people hate the US

P.P.S. You are a cunt
#139 to #69 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
Wow, yes equipment that wasn't nearly as advanced as it should be. Without US involvement the war would be at most a year longer.

But then again until Britain took Burma you were getting ****** by the Japanese, of course maybe then they could fight a single-front hahahha

Apparently you didn't hear of the battle of Britain, where they crushed Germany's chances of taking over Britain and Ireland, and pretty much left the allies a base for the invasion of western europe.
User avatar #181 to #139 - reginleif ONLINE (03/28/2014) [-]

you mean the time the limey bastards almost lost the war were it not for the fact that hitler took his sweet ass time getting to Dunkirk?

Please tell me more about how good the Brits are at war.
#110 to #69 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
You're saying that as if it would have been a bad thing. The US is ruled by happy merchants today thanks to thé holocaust not succeeding and the whole world is being terrorized by the biggest terrorists of the terrorists: ******* United ********* of America. Yeah, see how well this is working out for the poor people on the Gaza strip.
User avatar #64 to #59 - captainrattrap (03/27/2014) [-]
No he should just play less call of duty and read more history books is all...
User avatar #56 to #55 - badmotorfinger (03/27/2014) [-]
what about North Africa and Italy?
what about Japan?

plus, we were selling thousands of weapons and vehicles to our allies
#148 to #35 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
The war officially began in late 1940 and early 1941. Pearl Harbor was bombed late 1941 so America entered the war just under half way through. America split its forces to try and fight two fronts of the war- The Pacific Theater in which Japan was our biggest challenge and the Eastern Theater in which American/British troops were fighting through out Africa. It wasnt until 1944 that Allied forces directly invaded mainland Europe.
User avatar #127 to #35 - sadisticsalmon ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
You ******* wot m8, Look up Tobruk, now look up the Brisbane line, bitch, we could have held em off forever.
User avatar #36 to #35 - badmotorfinger (03/27/2014) [-]
**** , we were also in Africa and Italy
User avatar #47 to #14 - AnomynousUser ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
...but 'Merica did help before the end... we did basically everything outside of sending actual troops to the battlefield until Pearl Harbor. Without our supplies, I doubt they could have held on.
User avatar #125 to #47 - sadisticsalmon ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
Maybe, but Germany would never have beaten the Russians
User avatar #179 to #125 - playerdous (03/27/2014) [-]
Because the Russians were to good at doing that themselves.
User avatar #173 to #125 - AnomynousUser ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
Idk if they would have or not without American supplies after Great Britain would have fallen (again, without our supplies)
User avatar #18 to #14 - thebtardist (03/26/2014) [-]
**** me thats hilarious
User avatar #21 to #14 - gammajk ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
"everyone thinks your delousing program is genocide"
Lol, I see /pol/ made this
User avatar #73 to #14 - westonbeast (03/27/2014) [-]
Japanese man has leaf village head protector.
#40 to #14 - mightypoggers (03/27/2014) [-]
chunky surrender monkey
chunky surrender monkey
#6 - thekeeperofthumbs (03/26/2014) [-]
>Not doing the USSR
#12 to #6 - englishfag Comment deleted by englishfag [-]
User avatar #16 to #6 - asmathiel (03/26/2014) [-]
Because USSR ain't did **** for Poland(ball).

User avatar #100 to #16 - eternalvoid (03/27/2014) [-]
Well, read a history book. USSR didn't do anything for poland because Hitler and Stalin did a pact on conquering poland together and splitting it 'in the middle', one part for germany, on part for russia, so to speak.
#122 to #100 - asmathiel (03/27/2014) [-]
Well, stop being sarcastic.
I know Poland history better than most people in the world. Why? Because I live in this hole. And I know a lot about pact Ribbentrop-Molotov.
And did you know that when The Warsaw Uprising started, USSR army waited near Warsow (right side of the Wisła river) when the nazis were totally destroying Warsaw?
They abandoned it not because they were afraid of USSR army. They did it, because more than 90% of it was turned to ashes.
Read a history book about it. You will know that we have the most badasses people ever.
#8 to #6 - englishfag (03/26/2014) [-]
The USSR and Japan were in my plans but i thought it was too long and would get boring,
I just made this hope it's up to scratch
#13 to #8 - comradewinter ONLINE (03/26/2014) [-]
Everyone knows neither Germany nor USSR would sustain the non-aggression pact. It was convenient for Germany because they could focus on crushing the west within a certain time before they moved onto the USSR, and it was convenient for the USSR because they could go through with the stalination and mobilizing troops once both the west and Germany were weak. They both had ill intentions, and hated each other by standards. They just didn't fight right away because it could end in problems for both sides.
#17 to #13 - serotonin (03/26/2014) [-]
Soviets before war tried to make alliance with GB and France and were turned down (both countries tought of Union as second grade power). Only after allies turned them down did Soviets negotiate with Germany
#118 to #17 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
GB and France saw Germany destroying the USSR as the most favorable outcome of an inevitable war.
User avatar #44 to #17 - wimwam ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
Very interesting (if true). Source?
#80 to #44 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
standard history book.
User avatar #9 to #8 - englishfag (03/26/2014) [-]
I can't get this picture to scale for the comments for the life of me, nor the content for that matter and i'm computer illiterate compared to most on this site so anybody want to make a larger version to look at would be much appreciated.
#20 - englishfag (03/27/2014) [-]
New comic in similar format will be up tomorrow it shall be kept a secret until then.

Also this is all meant as satire nobody gives a **** if it's not historically accurate to the word there is no need for a **** storm below
#84 to #20 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
But satire is only funny if it has some truth in it.
And this just screams "I have no idea what actually happened in WW2".

I only come here for reposts. Your OC is ******* horrible, fj. Face it.
#93 to #20 - anonnumthreeseven (03/27/2014) [-]
Circle tool isn't allowed to be used in polandball
#94 - meightavenger (03/27/2014) [-]
**meightavenger rolled a random image posted in comment #1 at Old but Gold **
#105 to #94 - gedab (03/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#114 to #94 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
User avatar #134 to #94 - givememoarpony (03/27/2014) [-]
no roll can top this. but that does not mean i shouldn't try.
#135 to #134 - givememoarpony (03/27/2014) [-]
**givememoarpony rolled a random image posted in comment #13 at Spiders Man **
#22 - include (03/27/2014) [-]
You forgot Italy, Japan and the USSR.
You forgot Italy, Japan and the USSR.
User avatar #49 to #22 - AnomynousUser ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
I feel like 'Merica could either have more land or completely changed the Soviet Union by not nuking Japan... We would have launched a full-scale land invasion of Japan with the Soviets (there were already plans drawn out and the Soviets declared war against Japan shortly before their surrender), we would have won eventually, and Japan would have been split up into a communistic Soviet half and a 'Merican half. Without the mutually assured destruction that came with the arms race caused by the nukes (the Manhatten Project still being secret) , then the US would not have been as likely to take the containment policy to the Soviet's spread of communism. Without the mutually assured destruction and with the war on communism, we would have started fighting each other and the US would have thrown a few nukes at the Soviets in fear of another costly war , which they would (hopefully) surrender to after a few hit, and we'd get to do what we want.

Or, at least, that's my idea.

...I don't know why I chose you to tell this to.
User avatar #71 to #22 - reginleif ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
No need for Japan, we all know it's going to end in a nuke joke. :/
#112 to #71 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
God, I ******* hate you, you are the most selfrighteous americunt on this site. I wish for you to die a slow and painful death after witnessing the death of your loved ones.
User avatar #117 to #112 - trojanmannn (03/27/2014) [-]
calm down cunt
User avatar #180 to #112 - reginleif ONLINE (03/28/2014) [-]
I don't know whether to correct you for thinking I'm the most self righteous anything on this site.... or to feel special knowing someone loves me.
#85 to #22 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
Everyone pays attention to poland all the time :/ We suffered as well..
#121 to #85 - neznanc **User deleted account** (03/27/2014) [-]
Same here bro, same here... Picture shows partisan liberated teritory in Yugoslavia. In 1943.
#27 - HarvietheDinkle (03/27/2014) [-]
>circle tool
>circle tool
#1 - englishfag (03/26/2014) [-]
I can do more if enjoyed, love this site to bits and have been on it for years. Here's my favorite picture of the comic.
User avatar #7 to #1 - murraysnoopy (03/26/2014) [-]
#26 - unknowntablets (03/27/2014) [-]
you forgot the USSR...
#96 - thalfak (03/27/2014) [-]
#108 - Jameshaich (03/27/2014) [-]
Using the circle tool...
User avatar #124 to #108 - englishfag (03/27/2014) [-]
Sorry, new one wont have a circle in sight!!
User avatar #2 - jokexplain ONLINE (03/26/2014) [-]
- definitely counts as OC. good luck in your quest to reach frontpage
- nice Dylan Moran reference
- funny and accurate over all. I wish you success
User avatar #3 to #2 - englishfag (03/26/2014) [-]
Cheers brother!
User avatar #129 to #2 - sadisticsalmon ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
It's really not very accurate, it's more resting on false stereotypes for laughs
User avatar #131 to #129 - jokexplain ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
and what do you expect from polandball comics exactly?
I said it was accurate for the purposes of cheap comedy, it didn't say anything that was blatantly false.
User avatar #34 - stifflerxchong (03/27/2014) [-]
Canada ************ do you speak it !
User avatar #25 - sovietsamurai (03/27/2014) [-]
My country participated more than the americas did in WW2

And yet you show them and not us?

User avatar #70 to #25 - reginleif ONLINE (03/27/2014) [-]
being panzer fodder doesn't count as participating. :/
#45 to #25 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
America was kind of a big deal in WW2...
User avatar #83 to #45 - flemmi (03/27/2014) [-]
the USA gave the killing blow but the Soviet union has fought for many years.

in the end it was both together. if Hitler would have not have to fight on two sides his army would have crushed russia in the end.
User avatar #154 - garfvader (03/27/2014) [-]
Actually Ireland decided to stay neutral during the war as a means to try and stay safe but that idn't stop around 40,000 Irish solders going and fighting with Britain

Lets not also forget when the Germans accidentally Blitz'd Dublin, they weren't sleeping then
User avatar #155 to #154 - actionmastermegatr (03/27/2014) [-]
I think it's referring to to the Irish government sitting back and doing nothing rather than Irish soldiers who left to join the British army.
User avatar #156 to #155 - garfvader (03/27/2014) [-]
did you even read the second half of my comment

User avatar #157 to #156 - actionmastermegatr (03/27/2014) [-]
Yes the Luftwaffe did bomb Dublin but the Irish government still stayed neutral at the hight of the Dublin blitz
User avatar #95 - liquidvoodoo (03/27/2014) [-]
Us Irish were more or less starving during WWII due to food shortages and rationing..

But damn, was this a good comic
User avatar #147 to #95 - englishfag (03/27/2014) [-]
#115 - anon (03/27/2014) [-]
I think the US gets involved too early on this sketch.
User avatar #141 to #115 - mrnoodlez (03/27/2014) [-]
The US entered the war officially in 1942. Other than that it practically funded the entire Western front and sent resources to the Soviets. Then when the US entered we had to fight in Tunisia, Libya, Sicily, Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Philippines, Alaska, China, Korea, a few more places I can't remember AND fund the British so that they wouldn't go into a famine at home or run out of tanks. The US did a whole ******* lot, so kiss my ass.
#28 - newbtube (03/27/2014) [-]
This is probably the only Polandball content i've ever liked
This is probably the only Polandball content i've ever liked
#29 - smoothbunz (03/27/2014) [-]
When was Indonesia in ww2??
Not much of a history buff, could someone educate me a little please?
User avatar #30 to #29 - superbigfupa (03/27/2014) [-]
I think it's suppose to be Poland, flag is wrong though
User avatar #32 to #30 - fatskinnyguy (03/27/2014) [-]
It's intentional. It's a main theme in polandball
User avatar #43 to #30 - sladee (03/27/2014) [-]
"poland is upside down", that's a joke in this comics.
#65 to #29 - indonesia (03/27/2014) [-]
that's not me, I'm wearing a hat
User avatar #31 to #29 - goodguygary (03/27/2014) [-]
it's poland and yes, the palette swap is intended
User avatar #33 to #31 - smoothbunz (03/27/2014) [-]
That explains it, after taking a second glance
Pretty miss-leading imo

Thanks anyway.
User avatar #67 to #31 - indonesia (03/27/2014) [-]
******** , that's me!
User avatar #62 to #61 - stgfilitov (03/27/2014) [-]
NO MOUTHS YOU ******* !
#63 to #62 - nthmetal (03/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #116 to #63 - tranquilizer (03/27/2014) [-]
Yeah but...
He's right you know
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)