Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#9 - ssfrenchfry
Reply +1
(06/20/2012) [-]
The government didn't plan it, they just knew about it and didn't do anything.
#13 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(06/20/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #48 at STD Color Changing Condoms **
anon agress
#27 to #13 - theavatarspupil
Reply +2
(06/20/2012) [-]
...................................this picture looks like lisa simpson sucking bart simpson's dick
#14 to #13 - charasmaticjdub
Reply +6
(06/20/2012) [-]
People are saying that the London 2012 olympic symbol is secretly racist because the sign appears to read "ZiON" which many find offensive.

When the logo for the London Olympics was unveiled in June 2007 at the cost of £400,000 there was significant public uproar due to both the cost and how terrible it looked. Despite public pressure, the International Olympic Committee stood fast on keeping the logo, with no flexibility. In other words, this particular logo was very important.
Why?
There are many interpretations spread about the net, all intended to dissolve the true symbolic meaning behind the logo. It has been claimed to look like a swastika, a runner and even Lisa Simpson but these are all ridiculous diversions.

On first glance you can easily make out the numbers 2012, but why the random ‘dot’?

Are we to believe that the London 2012 Olympics are going to facilitate the implementation of Zion – the ‘New Jerusalem’?

Crazy stuff.
#34 to #14 - greatboobya
Reply +1
(06/20/2012) [-]
when it's not picked apart like it is in your picture it does look a little bit like swastika and it's hard to make out "zion" in original one.
#23 to #14 - kisushima
Reply +4
(06/20/2012) [-]
We're British. We can't do **** all right. Won't happen.

Pic unrelated.