Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#69 - quietbrony
Reply +15
(01/05/2013) [-]
It didn't...
#80 to #69 - srapture
Reply +4
(01/05/2013) [-]
The entire top row of photos are beach shots taken with no preparation. I'm not saying they're better, but it's certainly biased.
#88 to #80 - BabyPainter
Reply 0
(01/05/2013) [-]
It may be... but if they prepare what difference would it make if any photo altering program weren't involved?

The first one looks relatively prepared and is pretty cute but I don't find it sexy at all.
Its like a 10yr old with boobs.... or just a skinny boy with a wig on... Buuuuut then again I dunno what floats your boat, so I'll just stop now :).
#97 to #88 - srapture
Reply +1
(01/06/2013) [-]
I'm good with anything between 'that kind of skinny where you can see a bit of ribs and hipbone, but not to the point that their cheeks start to kind of cave in' and 'enough fat on them to form a constant and even layer and make them look thickish and yet keep it's taught shape but not enough so that things start to hang down'.
#76 to #69 - heardaboutnsfw
Reply 0
(01/05/2013) [-]
Eh, I like the girl in the pink more than the rest.
#79 to #76 - bitchcake
Reply +1
(01/05/2013) [-]
Because "pink"? Or because silicone?
#104 to #79 - heardaboutnsfw
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Never said because of pink, just stating that the girl in the pink bikini is the one that I found the most attractive.