Sign me up.. You have to have played SCP Containment Breach and know what SCP-682 is to get it... This is SCP 682 Are you sure now it's realy wort it? Sign me up You have to played SCP Containment Breach and know what SCP-682 is get it This 682 Are you sure now it's realy wort it?
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (17)
Anonymous comments allowed.
17 comments displayed.
#1 - furrysheaperd ONLINE
Reply +2
(04/24/2013) [-]
and where do i play this?
#2 to #1 - aarkthedragon [OP]
Reply +1
(04/24/2013) [-]
www.scpcbgame.com/

Sorry, but 682 doesn't really look like that.
#3 to #2 - furrysheaperd ONLINE
Reply +13
(04/24/2013) [-]
so no furry porn?
#4 to #3 - ohhitheree
Reply +4
(04/24/2013) [-]
No, the real SCP 682 is a freak reptile that has a hate for all life, is nearly impossible to kill, and can talk. Every attempt to kill him has failed, and they have tried many times. They put him in a room with another SCP, SCP 173. SCP 173 is more or less a weeping angel, only much faster and very ugly. When they put him in a room with 173, he stared at it for six hours straight. Then they poked out his eyes, so he grew new ones, a ton of them.
#11 - notapancake
Reply +6
(04/25/2013) [-]
This is SCP 682

Are you sure now it's realy wort it?
#12 to #11 - rgmayhem
Reply 0
(04/25/2013) [-]
If you want to be eaten...
Yes.
#16 to #11 - aarkthedragon [OP]
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
Thats 682 when its damaged enough to handel...how do we know it doesn't look like a sexy bitch normally?
#13 - arziben
Reply +3
(04/25/2013) [-]
www.scp-wiki.net/main

SCP 682 is the worst peace of **** you could step upon, it indirectly destroyed a whole SCP facility when they managed to find a weapon against it
#14 to #13 - mayormilkman
Reply 0
(04/25/2013) [-]
There's some others I'm more scared of. 682 is mainly just hard to contain.
#15 to #14 - arziben
Reply 0
(04/26/2013) [-]
yes I might have overreacted

even SCP-173 isn't the worse
#17 to #15 - vasilyzaytsev **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(10/05/2013) [-]
like scp-87?
#7 - mayormilkman
Reply +2
(04/25/2013) [-]
... or have read the article on the SCP Foundation wiki.
#8 - novagodx
Reply +1
(04/25/2013) [-]
WTF THAT HAD NO FURRY AT ALL, IT was scary and ****
#10 - Turtleboner
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#9 - rprol
Reply 0
(04/25/2013) [-]
**** you OP. That's possibly the worst one of all of them.
#5 - anon
Reply 0
(04/24/2013) [-]
WHERE'S THE FUNNY?!?!
#6 to #5 - aarkthedragon [OP]
Reply 0
(04/24/2013) [-]
Read description.