paradox. . DJYEDI} PM iti ‘lira?! Hun LI Bab? WILL ‘mu TELL ME A Icti'. simple answer sirbonzaiatak
x

Comments(199):

[ 199 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - thefurie (02/11/2013) [-]
simple answer
+20
#49 to #2 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
+191
#67 - awesomeunicorn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #96 to #67 - ctrlaltdeleet (02/12/2013) [-]
thats morbid.. :D
+4
#190 to #96 - killakahn has deleted their comment [-]
#202 to #190 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
Any idea what manga that's from? I've got retardedly short manga knowledge.
+1
#203 to #202 - killakahn has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #167 to #67 - kailybailybo (02/12/2013) [-]
This is better than the original.
+7
#58 to #26 - recio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+15
#72 to #26 - shinykakuna **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#68 - bannanpojk (02/12/2013) [-]
He fell asleep so hard that he grew a mustache.
User avatar #3 - aesguitar ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
My next statement is false.



The previous statement is true.
#144 to #3 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
The first one is true and the second one is false.....sooo, where is the paradox ?
User avatar #151 to #144 - aesguitar ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
If the second one is true then that means that second one is also true.

1st = next statement is true
2nd = 1st make this statement false
3rd = 2nd makes 1st statement false
4th = 1st statement is now false so 2nd in now true
... repeats infinitely without a single correct answer.
User avatar #17 to #3 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
There's a simpler version of that if you wanted it:

This statement is false.
User avatar #4 to #3 - sirbonzaiatak (02/12/2013) [-]
New Mission: Refuse this Mission

Does a set of all sets contain itself?
User avatar #20 to #4 - lordbyronxiv (02/12/2013) [-]
Of course a set of all sets contains itself.

What you're looking for is "Does the set of all sets that don't contain themselves, contain itself?"

If this set does contain itself, then it shouldn't be in the set, which means it doesn't contain itself, which means its in the set, etc etc.
User avatar #5 to #4 - aesguitar ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
An assassin's last mission was to go back in time and kill himself.
#8 to #5 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
And so an alternate reality is made. That's not a tough one at all.
User avatar #6 to #5 - sirbonzaiatak (02/12/2013) [-]
A barber (who is a man) shaves all and only those men who do not shave themselves. Does he shave himself?
User avatar #16 to #6 - crazyhindu (02/12/2013) [-]
only if he wishes to not have a majestic beard
User avatar #1 - redrex ONLINE (02/11/2013) [-]
thats not really a paradox
User avatar #29 to #1 - cupcakedevourer (02/12/2013) [-]
But what if it is a paradox
And the fact that it's not a paradox
Makes it a paradox?

lol i don't know where i'm going with this
User avatar #79 to #29 - drunkasaurus (02/12/2013) [-]
does that even make sense? I can't decide...
#179 to #79 - saladtongsofdeath (02/12/2013) [-]
This image has expired
it will if we go deeper
User avatar #7 to #1 - mrgusti (02/12/2013) [-]
not at all
User avatar #36 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
That's not a paradox... A paradox would be... "Is the answer to this question no?"
#37 to #36 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
non (latin)
User avatar #40 to #37 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
You can't use another language man...
#75 to #40 - fullbodycondom (02/12/2013) [-]
and why the **** not?
User avatar #160 to #75 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
Because it's still a no...
#195 to #160 - fullbodycondom (02/12/2013) [-]
It's a no, but not "no".
User avatar #213 to #195 - vexaton (02/13/2013) [-]
Exactly...
User avatar #52 to #36 - plumotje (02/12/2013) [-]
Absolutely not.
There's your answer.
User avatar #53 to #52 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
That's a form of no
User avatar #60 to #36 - zezenzerg ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
the answer to this question is "no"
User avatar #91 to #36 - aquae (02/12/2013) [-]
john is kill
User avatar #38 to #36 - sanctium (02/12/2013) [-]
maybe
User avatar #39 to #38 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
Well if you say maybe, you're just delaying the paradox. That implies the answer might be yes or no, but it's currently in a state where both are true. If both are true, then the answer is both yes and no, making it even more ****** up.
User avatar #41 to #39 - sanctium (02/12/2013) [-]
Is that a challenge? Can I procrastinate until the point that the paradox implodes the universe?
User avatar #42 to #41 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
Until the state of the answer is determined, yes you can, but in the end, it's a paradox.
User avatar #43 to #42 - sanctium (02/12/2013) [-]
True that.

Would potato be a valid answer though?
User avatar #44 to #43 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
No, because you are not answering it with yes or no (or maybe in your case)
User avatar #135 to #36 - halomike (02/12/2013) [-]
Or: "This statement is false."
#59 to #36 - vorack **User deleted account** (02/12/2013) [-]
Not only is the answer either yes or no, it is also a superposition in which it is both yes and no.
User avatar #159 to #59 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
I explained this earlier, and yeah you're right. It cannot be either, so it's both. It's like Schrödingers theory
User avatar #83 to #59 - aesgard (02/12/2013) [-]
I guess you are french right?
#65 to #36 - crazyolitis (02/12/2013) [-]
Ye- no... Maybe... **** .
+3
#45 to #36 - massus **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69 to #36 - greeneyedgamer ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
The answer to that question is not "no".
The answer to that question is "The answer to that question is not 'no'.".
#74 to #69 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
but then there is a no in the answer and then the answer isnt no but then it is.
User avatar #90 to #74 - greeneyedgamer ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
Just because the answer contains "no" doesn't mean that the entire answer is "no".
User avatar #157 to #74 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
He's actually right. That is the only way to answer that (that I know of)
#47 to #36 - lyuun (02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#54 to #47 - gisuar (02/12/2013) [-]
i could watch this for hours
User avatar #48 to #47 - vexaton (02/12/2013) [-]
"We knows the answer to this one!"
#57 to #36 - taintedangel (02/12/2013) [-]
I'm gonna say yes, definitely yes.
#163 - tenmillionbears (02/12/2013) [-]
EVERYTIME I see this on here I get so mad. For the umpteenth time: IT'S NOT A PARADOX!
#189 to #163 - doctorstein (02/12/2013) [-]
Neither is Pinocchio saying this nose will grow. It never said that he needed to lie for his nose to grow, just that it would if he lied. If he said his nose would grow, it would.
Neither is Pinocchio saying this nose will grow. It never said that he needed to lie for his nose to grow, just that it would if he lied. If he said his nose would grow, it would.
User avatar #204 to #189 - destismad (02/12/2013) [-]
With the Pinocchio paradox, the key word is "will" grow. "My nose will grow."
If it's a lie, his nose will grow, at which point it will no longer be a lie as he told the truth that his nose will grow, so it shouldn't have grown, of course if it doesn't, then he did lie and it should've. So on and so on.
#24 - galaxyguy ONLINE (02/12/2013) [-]
Mfw that's not a paradox and he's using lay improperly!
User avatar #15 - theexplodingcheez (02/12/2013) [-]
wtf that's not even a paradox
#21 - youxbarstard (02/12/2013) [-]
This will be useful one day...I know it.
+8
#92 - thatguynobodylikes **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #93 to #92 - spearpwi (02/12/2013) [-]
Consider the fact that the kid is very young and thinks it to be perfectly logical.
+2
#94 to #93 - thatguynobodylikes **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #196 to #193 - polifemo (02/12/2013) [-]
wow nice research
User avatar #198 to #196 - palmtoyourface (02/12/2013) [-]
not really, type in funnyjunk and bedtime paradox on google and you will find 3 pages of this fucmking reposted meme
#197 to #196 - anon (02/12/2013) [-]
*faith in humanity restored
#199 to #193 - RepostDetective (02/12/2013) [-]
Thank you for making my job easier my dear FJ citizen

<-- OP
#33 - tyraxio (02/12/2013) [-]
This is not at all a paradox
User avatar #9 - Crusader (02/12/2013) [-]
That is more of an oxymoron, a paradox is something that cannot be true, whereas an oxymoron is 2 contrasting ideas that reveal an inner truth.

And no, an oxymoron is not an 8 sided idiot.
#205 - DrollHumor (02/12/2013) [-]
I read this in the voice of the children from Invader Zim.
I read this in the voice of the children from Invader Zim.
User avatar #149 - Omegashenron (02/12/2013) [-]
Because he's trying to relax his muscles and slowly make his body fall asleep jesus people wtf? Thats the laziest paradox i've ever heard.
[ 199 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)