Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#166 - anon (08/06/2013) [-]
Dont deny child's rights for your ass's pleasure. Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother, who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by homo people.
1 Mama + 1 Papa = True Parents. Lessons from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
2. “In France, marriage is not designed to protect the love between two people. Marriage is specifically designed to provide children with families. The most serious study done so far demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gay parents.” said Xavier Bongibault, an atheist homosexual.
#167 to #166 - anon (08/06/2013) [-]
3. "I was raised by two women, suffered from the lack of a father, a daily presence, a character and a properly masculine example, some counterweight to the relationship of my mother to her lover. I was aware of it at a very early age. I lived that absence of a father, experienced it, as an amputation. As soon as I learned that the government was going to officialize marriage between two people of the same sex, I was thrown into disarray. It would be institutionalizing a situation that had scarred me considerably. In that there is an injustice that I can in no way allow. I would've jumped into the fray and would have brought a complaint before the French state and before the European Court of Human Rights, for the violation of my right to a mom and a dad." Jean-Dominique Bunel, a specialist in humanitarian law.
#237 to #167 - sanguinemaiden (08/06/2013) [-]
But I don't understand the part about a 'right to have a mom and dad'.
If my biological father is out of the picture (deceased, takes off, whatever), and my mother is homosexual, then she's not just gonna wake up one day and decide she wants to be with a man again. Either she's going to be with a woman, or she's gonna be with nobody, so I'm still out of my right to 'have a dad'.
So what, do we forcibly remove children from parents once we find them to be homosexual and place them in traditional families that have a mom and a dad? That argument doesn't make any sense.

My dad abandoned us when I was a baby and my mother never remarried. Should I be enraged that she selfishly deprived me of my rights to having a father in my life by not finding another husband? Should I have been removed from my home and placed with a foster family with one male and one female parent to protect my rights?
User avatar #175 to #167 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
...sociological studies show that gay parents are statistically better than straight parents because of some handy reasons:

1) Gays don't have kids by accident
2) Gays are usually in a long and commited relationship long before they get the opportunity to raise a child so they're less likely to divorse.
3) Gays don't want to become a part of a homophobic statistic and take extra care in their responsibilities as parents.

So ya... Mr. Anon.... quoting bigots doesn't make the view any less bigoted. Would you prefer orphans remain parentless than have a gay set of parents?
User avatar #186 to #175 - RobsonT (08/06/2013) [-]
Don't be a thumb whore by picking on Anons, that point was valid and since you have no idea what it's like to have homosexual parents I suggest you just skim over the comment and say nothing instead sticking your net in the water by an Anons comment and hoping for green thumbs
User avatar #189 to #186 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
Also, you don't need to stick your hand in a fire in order to have an opinion on how stupid sticking your hand in fire is. You don't need to have had gay parents to have an understanding of the effects of homosexual parenting.
User avatar #193 to #189 - RobsonT (08/06/2013) [-]
You are American?
User avatar #204 to #193 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
Were you planning on going somewhere with that assertion that I can only imagine was going to lead to a prejudiced insult?
User avatar #195 to #193 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #187 to #186 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
I was correcting his completely invalid point that sociological studies support his bigoted opinion.

The other two points were also just the opinions 1 - 3 individuals and in no way reflect any kind of objective data on the issue.

Seriously... calling me a thumb whore for calling about a bigot... really? If he wasn't an anon I'd have replied the exact same way, buddy.
User avatar #191 to #187 - RobsonT (08/06/2013) [-]
Wa wa wa, sir, buddy,bigot, anon, boom green thumbs for nothing
User avatar #196 to #191 - Sethorein ONLINE (08/06/2013) [-]
oh yes, yes. I'm positively ROLLING in thumbs for my comment, right?

0's across the board, buddy. Not to mention I'm rank 500ish in the comment rankings... I'm not exactly fishing for thumbs at this point. I'm in no risk of ever being banned...
 Friends (0)