Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#19 - angarwaen
Reply +7
(06/27/2013) [-]
I dunno know if this meeting thing is true, but i remain sceptical.

Have you ever tried to hide a AK47 under your ******* jacket?
They are huge!

<Not trusting this posts is usually the wise thing to do
#87 to #19 - neokun
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
I love how it flat out states that it will damage the battery yet some people still went with it
#48 to #19 - sightlysuperset
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
They might have been modified with a folding stock or something.
#44 to #19 - lordaurion
Reply +1
(06/27/2013) [-]
No, they're really not. THey're 5 inches shorter than an M16 and 15 if it has a folding stock. They're tiny.
#24 to #19 - italianfrosttroll ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
Immediately after I read this I was like wait a minute, got my AK, and decided that either they had some big ************* coats or it's a lie.
#27 to #24 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
Their officer's dress uniform jackets are rather large, but I still don't see how they could hide ak-47.
#35 to #27 - majorlulz
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
You do realize the Butt of the Rifle could be cut down? I mean it would reduced accuracy but who needs that?
#31 to #27 - italianfrosttroll ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
Nor do I good sir.
#38 to #31 - memeaholic [OP]
Reply 0
(06/27/2013) [-]
Quit whining about veracity, guys.   
Everybody knows that false facts are the best facts.
Quit whining about veracity, guys.
Everybody knows that false facts are the best facts.