The diversity of Fox news anchors.. The diversity of Fox news anchors.. fox Racist
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#14 - diedede (07/03/2014) [+] (117 replies)
stickied by thechildmolester
Roll yours
User avatar #241 - admin (07/04/2014) [+] (5 replies)
stickied by thechildmolester
#61 to #6 - anon (07/03/2014) [-]
at least three of them have brown eyes
User avatar #183 to #6 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
Hey its their ceo
User avatar #239 to #183 - applejackhf (07/04/2014) [-]
Don't insult Hitler like that.
User avatar #240 to #239 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
You're right, my apologies
User avatar #244 to #183 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
You're not serious right? Hitler would be a proud supporter of CNN in the modern day, They love EVERYTHING HE LOVED! Big Government, gun control, genocide (Abortion).
User avatar #248 to #244 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
Ok, first of all that was a joke, and one not to be taken seriously at that. Second, I'd rather live in a country governed by a big Government regulated by the people (yeah I know that's not the case right now) instead of a syndicracy. Third gun control. I love guns just as much as the next guy but not nearly as much as my own life. And lastly, abortion isn't genocide you fear mongering whorebag. I apologize for that last but I don't believe anybody but the woman has a say in what exactly happens down there. And as far as I'm concerned you're not sentient until you open your eyes for the first time
User avatar #252 to #248 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
Also, big government? You're dumb as **** , when has it ever worked out for the good of the people? Mao and Stalin seemed to do a good job.
User avatar #249 to #248 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]

There are roughly 32,000 deaths a year is the US and declining from Gun Violence

60% Are suicides thats 19,200
3% are accidentals that's 960
4% are justified that's 1,280
33% are homicides that's 10,560
80% of homicides are gang related. That's 8,448

That leaves 1,712 in a society of 312 million people.

That leaves a 0.00010256410256 chance of death by gun.
0.000008564102564 if you don't hang out in the hood, are not planning on committing suicide, and not planning a crime

Are you really that scared?
User avatar #257 to #249 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
First, I'm referring to an actual democracy, run by the people. Not the oligarchy we seem to be living in now. And second, yes I'm aware of the falling death rate in gun violence and I'm not scared. Its the right wing gun-nuts I have a problem with. They'll place their rifles above anything. I'd love to have me a nice M14, but I totally would not mind a plethora of tests and certifications to ensure that I wasn't a threat to myself or others. Even if it did take a few years (overestimation).
User avatar #260 to #257 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
The wild west was a democracy, the people determined your fate not the law, Democracy for 51 is hell for the 49.
User avatar #261 to #260 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
That's why were a constitutional Republic... well supposed to be....
User avatar #259 to #257 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
Then move to ******* Canada, I will not give up my rights for your feelings.


How's them free speech zones workin out as well? Look them up if you want to get pissed off, oh and the mangitued of unlawful searches on legal pot growers in states which it is legal.

Its all ******* ******** , you will never have a true democracy, that's why it is never mentioned in the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE ******* BILL OF RIGHTS.

User avatar #263 to #259 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
Ok, I think you're misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. That, or you are understanding what I'm trying to say but completely stopped giving a **** . No, we can't have a true democracy in the sense of the word, but I'd rather my government listen to the common people than a corporate mega conglomerate that speaks in money and who's leisure time consists of polluting lakes and sterilizing soybeans. And sacrificing rights? Who said anything about that? There's nothing wrong with possessing the right to own an M14, but there is something wrong giving somebody like you the right to own an M14. Simple regulation isn't the same as complete restriction, and its much more efficient than openly selling to anybody who can pay, no matter how many kids they plan on murdering that day.
User avatar #280 to #263 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
When's the last time a M14 or a M1a was used in a mass shooting?

I have one, I also have quite a lot of firearms and I would never do anything like that, don't punish the many for the actions of the few... Maybe we should focus on Mental health services, I know they ******* suck. That would help more... Or maybe, harsher punishment for gang members.....
User avatar #282 to #280 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
Harsher punishments wouldn't work, even if we did allow them. But, you're on the right track. If the Mental health services took an active role in analyzing gun owners, I think it would be better. Now, just because the gun death rates are actually falling, doesn't mean we shouldn't consider safety, that's really all I'm saying. Regulation would promote safety, without complete restriction
User avatar #281 to #280 - epicactual (07/04/2014) [-]
Well I was using the M14 as an example, hell it could be any firearm. And yes, just because you're passionate about your opinions doesn't make you liable to go on a mass shooting, so I apologize for that. Also, yes I'm aware our governments kind of failing at this whole Constitutional Republic thing. When I said oligarchy before I wasn't joking.
User avatar #279 to #263 - iatedub (07/04/2014) [-]
No **** , I wish the Government would listen and take into consideration the word of the people, but they could give a **** less about sheep...
#228 - patyboyz (07/04/2014) [-]
**patyboyz rolled image** oh look another one
**patyboyz rolled image** oh look another one
#220 - wrocky (07/04/2014) [-]
but they orr rook the same
User avatar #233 to #220 - redstonealchemist (07/04/2014) [-]
i agree, maybe they're related
#209 - findaway (07/04/2014) [-]
looks like my xvideos recommended videos list.
#236 to #209 - dorfdorfdorf (07/04/2014) [-]
>not using bing for all of your porn needs
psh. ******* pleb.
#25 - goseikiba (07/03/2014) [-]
Maybe that's what the producers' preference to pork.
User avatar #113 - jewsburninindaoven (07/04/2014) [-]
**jewsburninindaoven rolls 039** Their collective IQ
User avatar #5 - tiagodisouza (07/03/2014) [-]
I'm gonna be offensive here and say that if i saw them on the street i'd peg them for dumb women, they just give out that look... especially the middle and top left ones
#11 to #5 - mattymc (07/03/2014) [-]
its fox, they're ALL dumb. Even when correct, they come across as backward, racist, *********
that being said liberals are irresponsible, overbearing, and still somehow naive
#37 to #11 - stalini (07/03/2014) [-]
I hope one day you'll realize how dumb you are
#48 to #37 - mattymc (07/03/2014) [-]
sorry, did i hurt your feelings? i meant to add the word pundit in there.
#77 to #48 - stalini (07/04/2014) [-]
thanks for confirming my point that you were indeed dumb
#102 to #77 - mattymc (07/04/2014) [-]
I could provide plenty of credentials to the prove you wrong but I'm curious, how am i "dumb" where my statements incorrect? Did they offend you? Please, enlighten me.
User avatar #41 to #11 - metalmind (07/03/2014) [-]
Some of them are just beeing paid to pretend to be stupid.
#174 - nabexis (07/04/2014) [-]
<--An actual segment on Fox News stole the Bioshock Infinite logo. Irony at its best.
User avatar #234 to #174 - dorfdorfdorf (07/04/2014) [-]
idk, i mean, maybe the general idea, but that doesn't really look like a carbon copy
#269 to #174 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
I guess they didn't have enough space to add, "From the Brown People."
#146 - toguro (07/04/2014) [-]
"This bitch is wearin the same colour as me. One of us is going to change honey and it ain't me"
User avatar #193 - theladystrangler (07/04/2014) [-]
Who cares?
#100 - swedishassassin ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Well, honestly, if they had black or other minorities as anchors, people would attack them as "Uncle Toms" or token anchors.

Though, I'll say, I am a fan of the darker hair myself.
User avatar #189 to #100 - hoponthefeelstrain (07/04/2014) [-]
I remember once Fox news was pissed because a black author suggested santa be represented as a penguin and not a white old guy. Just because she said as a kid most of the famous people and mythical characters she loved where white so she felt left out or that something was wrong with her skin color. And other kids of various races might feel that way too, so if santa was an animal, not a penguin everything would be okay.

Well this pissed fox off and they said "sorry kids but Santa is white, he just is, and he always will be." Imagine if it was a black anchor saying that.
User avatar #125 to #100 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-]
I've seen many times in which Hannity uses uncle toms as guests in order to be able to talk **** about blacks.
User avatar #126 to #125 - swedishassassin ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
AND thank you for being an example for me.
User avatar #127 to #126 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-]
Seriously, just look, after every racist statement he always asks his uncle tom "am i right? yes, yes masta."
User avatar #130 to #127 - swedishassassin ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Alright, look. I agree with you, in truth. But I do get sick of the other side getting a free pass, when their racism is just on a prettier platter, which I honestly think is worse than blatant racism.
User avatar #133 to #130 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-] the media in the US is horrible but Fox news takes the cake.
User avatar #134 to #133 - swedishassassin ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
No offense, but I already said I agree with you; I don't need to watch that video. I think MSNBC takes the cake, but I realize my own bias.
#135 to #134 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-]
I doubt liberals watch msnbc as religiously as conservatives watch fox news.
#141 to #139 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-]
dat bioshock reference
User avatar #140 to #139 - Fjcf (07/04/2014) [-]
not ******** you
User avatar #129 to #127 - swedishassassin ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
Thank you for your assistance in my point
User avatar #218 to #211 - greenfiredragon (07/04/2014) [-]
tun tun tuuun tuun tun tuuun tun tun tuuun.... Aryan News
#124 - fuckoatmeal (07/04/2014) [-]
** *********** rolled image** Cause they all believe whatever they are told.
#201 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
Pic somewhat related.

Seriously, why only target Fox News?
User avatar #204 to #201 - brobafett (07/04/2014) [-]
Because they're evil CIS scum who don't talk about important things like my opinions!
User avatar #191 - ilovemyguns (07/04/2014) [-]
No Megyn Kelly? What is this **** ?
User avatar #178 - tehlulzbringer (07/04/2014) [-]
wow they're ******* WHITE

How dare they!
User avatar #184 to #178 - tehlulzbringer (07/04/2014) [-]
and another thing: there's only two women in the picture
your attacks on fox are just as crooked as fox itself

stay salty liberals
User avatar #225 to #184 - captainprincess (07/04/2014) [-]

only two women

how do two women look like 9 different women this is weird
User avatar #64 - Kabutops ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
i honestly dont think some of them are attractive at all
#70 to #64 - anon (07/04/2014) [-]
Please tell me more.
User avatar #1 - schnizel ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
What more do you need?
User avatar #2 to #1 - endodoobiesmoke (07/03/2014) [-]
more blonde sluts???
#3 to #2 - schnizel ONLINE (07/03/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)