well.... I guess that's that. it's about god damn time.. I figured out the answer to this one when I was 3. Get on my level.
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

well.... I guess that's that

it's about god damn time

+1833
Views: 52722
Favorited: 114
Submitted: 01/30/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to roofeeoh Subscribe to fucking-science E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(242):

[ 242 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#13 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (6 replies)
I figured out the answer to this one when I was 3. Get on my level.
User avatar #5 - ssjkirby ONLINE (01/30/2013) [+] (11 replies)
There actually isn't really an answer.

First we'll assume that it is "Which came first the chicken or the chicken egg," because eggs were around a long time before birds.

Once this is established, it is just how people decide to define things. Is a chicken egg a chicken egg because it was laid by a chicken or because it has an undeveloped chicken fetus inside of it?

Do you see where I'm going with this or should I explain further?
#73 - mltex (01/31/2013) [-]
EVOLUTION BITCHES!
EVOLUTION BITCHES!
#78 - RandomSauce (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
hey-oh, chicken on a raft.
User avatar #25 - bakinboy (01/30/2013) [+] (4 replies)
wrong you ****** . if it was not a chicken that laid the egg, it would not lay a chicken egg. it would lay an egg where, the egg itself is from that species, but the chicken is inside a not-chicken egg.
#37 to #25 - slyve (01/31/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Dude, you don't call NDG a ****** . That **** does not fly. Go **** yourself.
#17 - applescryatnight ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
this was pretty obvious to me at a young age.
even before i knew about evolution and such
i never understood why people didnt get this
#42 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Neither. God did.
#45 to #42 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
0/10
#48 - Fagdust (01/31/2013) [-]
The egg has been around since male/female reproduction came about through evolution some time shortly before the Cambrian explosion. Eggs with protective shells came about through reptiles. At some point a reptilian proto-bird with a strong resemblance to a reptile laid an egg with a genetic structure differing enough from its predecessor that it was more bird than reptile - this happened for generations until there was a line where one was not a bird, but one was.

So, the bird egg came before the bird, because it was laid by a animal that was not defined as a true bird. There had to have been, at some point, a clear threshold that differentiated the one specie from the other.

That is why the egg comes before the bird. Same thing with the chicken, except the modern chicken comes from the hybrid offspring of the red and grey junglefowl, however; the same process applies, there was at one point a non-chicken laying an egg that birthed a true chicken.
#174 - mehmachine (01/31/2013) [+] (3 replies)
THEN WHAT WAS THE BIRD BEFORE THE CHICKEN AND WHEN DID THE TRANSITION FROM PRE CHICKEN TO CHICKEN BEGIN!?
User avatar #158 - kathuzada (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
What if the chicken was born
+5
#131 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (15 replies)
User avatar #2 - sanditroll (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Was a scientist really needed to tell people this ? I figured this out in 3rd grade.
#177 - drfranky (01/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #100 - notsofunnycomedy (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS!
#196 - amsel (01/31/2013) [+] (5 replies)
The chicken came first, created by God 6000 years ago along with the rest of the world and everything on it.

Creationists - 1
Neil DeGrasse Tyson - 0
User avatar #214 to #207 - xgeneration (01/31/2013) [-]
Aloe?
User avatar #109 - darudelink (01/31/2013) [+] (34 replies)
that's some deeeep **** , man. that means my kid, or even yours, could be the next in our ******* species. like, a ******* Klingon or some ****
User avatar #118 to #116 - shadowstepone ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
there are hundreds if not thousands of generations between one species and the next on an evolutionary chain. each one carries on genes or mutates a teeny, tiny amount. the creature that gave birth to the first chicken was almost indistinguishable from the chickens themselves.
+3
#104 - keggut **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#50 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [+] (2 replies)
evolutionists believe nothing created itself, and no one has ever seen the big bang but they believe it happened.

creationists believed god has always been and created the universe and all that inhabits it.

difference between the two: nothing, they both believe in something they've never seen and taken the words from others. Live by faith, or live by science. Think about it.



User avatar #74 to #50 - ofmiceandmen (01/31/2013) [-]
Evolution is backed by scientific findings.

Religion is not.
#33 - BowChickaBowWow (01/31/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Comment Picture
#21 - MrMustacho (01/30/2013) [+] (17 replies)
then what was that bird called
sparrows don't lay chicken eggs
evolution flows, one species doesn't become another from one generation to the next
User avatar #23 to #21 - TheHutchie (01/30/2013) [-]
Obviously at some point the bird that evolved into the chicken was not a chicken yet. Ergo, it must have crossed the line from "not-chicken" to "chicken" at some stage.

A non-chicken would not be born, live as a non-chicken then suddenly become a chicken overnight, but a non-chicken could lay an egg from which the hatching creature can in fact be counted as a chicken.
[ 242 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)