Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#104 - anon
Reply 0
(06/21/2014) [-]
Instead of being a douchebag who smokes weed and thinks science is cool, yet does nothing more to involve yourself in the science community but read a horrible interpretation of the paper in an article written by IFLS, try reading the actual paper. They don't leave anything out.
#109 to #104 - atomicman
Reply +1
(06/21/2014) [-]
I agree. This article seems insanely non scientific. Also the entire picture does not make sense to me. Look at my comment #94
#120 to #109 - umaya
Reply +1
(06/21/2014) [-]
about 90% of science articles are written by idiots who simplify it poorly and incorrectly or just copy half of it and leave out the explanations.
#122 to #120 - atomicman
Reply +1
(06/21/2014) [-]
Agree entirely. Man I wish someone would make it more clear that most of these are ********. Alot of people are getting fooled by this.

What I'd recommend. Never trust any article unless data has been provided by a considerably good university or any other scientific institute.