NUKING JUPITER..... This site has more information on the matter but for those less scientifically or mathematically inclined it might be a bit boring. . Did we jupiter science Nuclear potato
x
Click to expand

NUKING JUPITER....

(Enlarge)
NUKING JUPITER..... This site has more information on the matter but for those less scientifically or mathematically inclined it might be a bit boring. . Did we

This site has more information on the matter but for those less scientifically or mathematically inclined it might be a bit boring.

You need to login to view this link

Did we Nuke Jupiter?
Several years ago I was reading about the Galileo unmanned spacecraft which we sent to examine
Jupiter' s moons. The Galileo space probe was plutonium powered and was still functioning when it
was decided to crash the probe into Jupiter to prevent contamination of Jupiter' s moon Europa.
As a war nerd and always fond of learning about very destructive devices...
I always knew how a plutonium nuclear bomb worked.
This made me think... did we really do that... so like any internet nerd with a weird curiosity, I googled it and
sure enough others had come to the same conclusion and some with more knowledge than me.
A Plutonium nuclear bomb would slightly resemble a soccor ball where plates powered by
an explosive force would force an extreme pressure on the plutonium creating a critical
mass and cause nuclear Fission,
In short - Extreme pressure causes plutonium atoms to split and create massive energy...
i. e. an explosion.
Now Jupiter is big....
Gravity is significantly higher due to is
massive size meaning anything that comes
into contact with Jupiter would get crushed
and since it has no 'hard surface' it would
A continue falling as it was crushed.
About now you should be putting two and two together.
Plutonium + Pressure = Nuclear Explosion
Satellite powered by plutonium + Jupiter' s atmospheric pressure = ?
one month after the satellite was plunged into
Jupiter' s hydrogen depths..... this appeared.
Because of Jupiter' s densely compacted atmosphere. An objec' t rubric" into jupiter would be slowed
but would still eventually reach a crushing depth.
JUPITER - October, 19 was
Then these pictures were taken 30 minutes after
the First black splotch discovery.
Hamm that black trailing spot wasn' t there before.....
UT an UT
Astronomer' s discounted the possibility of an impact by asteroid due to the trailing
nature of the black splotch. We had recorded impacts before and this was different.
So did we nuke Jupiter? '
Most of which in this image was taken from a website (link in desc.) just simplified, supprized,
and shortened
So the next time someone asks if
its possible to turn Jupiter into a
second sun by Nuking it. _
You know its not.
We accidentally tried it...
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+429
Views: 15799
Favorited: 52
Submitted: 06/01/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to verycoolcat Subscribe to fucking-science submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - danielfm (06/01/2012) [+] (6 replies)
boom thread? boom thread
boom thread? boom thread
#40 - peanutbutterjuice (06/02/2012) [+] (12 replies)
Actually, Jupiter has a ******* HIGH amount of gravity, only the moons in it's Orbit can withstand. If ANYTHING passes through, ex. the nuke, it will crush like an ant going into the Mariana's Trench. Therefore, we didnt
#44 to #42 - thexiled (06/02/2012) [-]
You are 32, supposedly have a degree in astronomy, yet you got so easily offended by a simple anonymous post and called them a **** tard like a 12 year old would? I feel bad for anyone who disproves any of your work....
User avatar #28 - missdaisy (06/02/2012) [+] (7 replies)
If we nuked it, we would all be dead. Its a gas planet and if u set it off it would just explode.
User avatar #30 to #28 - shikurukato (06/02/2012) [-]
So that might be the dumbest comment on funnyjunk today.

Good day sir, I am so very glad it wasn't me.
#29 - anonymous (06/02/2012) [+] (1 reply)
so they nuked Jupiter just to check if it will turn into another sun? What an assholes. Wouldn't it be kinda apocalyptic. No wonder nobody wants to come in contact with humans...
User avatar #32 to #29 - thepinkestofthepie (06/02/2012) [-]
No. You are an idiot.
#25 - lesmiserables (06/02/2012) [-]
See THIS **** is what should be on the science ******* ******* science hugochannel.
#21 - tartar (06/02/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Jupiter being a gas planet, the satellite could not detonate unless impacting on a solid surface. js
User avatar #26 to #21 - jefglv (06/02/2012) [-]
Dude, didn't you read it? High gravity? Satellite crushed? The high pressure would still split the plutonium atoms, detonating it.
User avatar #27 - madeyegubbins (06/02/2012) [+] (2 replies)
ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS.
EXCEPT EUROPA.
ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE.
USE THEM TOGETHER USE THEM IN PEACE.
#13 - anonymous (06/02/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Though technically powered by nuclear energy, the power source for Galileo was a General Purpose Heat Source Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator, which is very unlike a bomb. It simply harnesses the energy from it's radioactive decay.

It uses Pu-238 which is not a fissile material (unlike it's brother Pu-239 which is very fissile). So irregardless of how much pressure is applied, the Pu-238 cannot begin a fission process. Thus there couldn't be any man induced nuclear bomb from Galileo.
#6 - illusiveman (06/02/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #39 - iamrexraptor (06/02/2012) [-]
what if it exploded like alderaan and we were just like "the **** did we do!"
User avatar #17 - I Am Monkey (06/02/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Why is it that NASA is so concerned with "contaminating" other planets with earth bacteria? In this case they may have been referring to the plutonium, but it's usually in reference to accidentally spreading life. What exactly would be the downside to this?
+1
#19 to #17 - speightsix **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #62 - fantomen (06/02/2012) [-]
not possible.
the probe was powered by a plutonium nuclear battery.
It contains WAY to little plutonium to reach critical mass, and start a fission chain-reaction.
Worst thing that could happen would be that a small amount of radioactive heavy metal rained down on Jupiter.
User avatar #61 - Ryukenblaze (06/02/2012) [-]
anyone want a piece of skin off my toe?
User avatar #60 - gregoriez (06/02/2012) [-]
i actually understand this
#22 - anonymous (06/02/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#16 - anonymous (06/02/2012) [-]
Well no. Nuking it wouldn't do **** . Jupiter isn't big enough to start the fusion process. Setting it on fire wouldn't work because there's a severe lack of oxygen to keep any sort of burning going.
User avatar #14 - bakinboy (06/02/2012) [-]
it would have to be at critical mass in order to detonate and not just fizzle
#4 - skooman (06/01/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Wouldn't it not burn also due to the lack of oxygen because of their being no atmosphere on Jupiter capable of holding it? Or am I totally Brain-Farting right now?    
Gif Unrelated
Wouldn't it not burn also due to the lack of oxygen because of their being no atmosphere on Jupiter capable of holding it? Or am I totally Brain-Farting right now?
Gif Unrelated
#5 to #4 - anonymous (06/01/2012) [-]
Nuke's don't need oxygen, the expanding power comes from material at the blast site which is vaporized by the excess of radiation and heat.
#3 - anonymous (06/01/2012) [-]
this was a good read, actually made me think. Thank you. But more items are reuired to create a fission reaction.
User avatar #33 - deathlordgusta (06/02/2012) [-]
depends on what kind of plutonium was used.
 Friends (0)