High School Science Panda. .. Well yeah.. That´s the acceleration of which any object will speed up towards the centre of the earth.. But that does't mean it understands gravity.
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#25 - anon (02/20/2013) [-]
I don't understand gravity and I go down slides.

I must be panda.
#22 - thedarkestrogue (02/20/2013) [-]
oh look. Commenters thinking they're physicists because they understand basic physics.
oh look. Commenters thinking they're physicists because they understand basic physics.
User avatar #24 to #22 - snakefire (02/20/2013) [-]
because correcting somebody who is wrong makes someone holier than thou?
User avatar #27 to #24 - feffog (02/20/2013) [-]
shut up knuckles

youre just an echidna, you dont understand philosophy
User avatar #28 to #27 - snakefire (02/20/2013) [-]
MY LIFE WAS DEVOTED TO PROTECTING A ROCK
User avatar #29 to #28 - feffog (02/20/2013) [-]
oh i see carry on then
User avatar #2 - huchkizz ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
Well yeah.. That´s the acceleration of which any object will speed up towards the centre of the earth..
But that does't mean it understands gravity.
#3 to #2 - teranin ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
this panda has a better understanding of gravity than the people who would ordinarily use a slide like that... Doubt you'll find many under the age of say, 12, who actually know that equation or what it means.
this panda has a better understanding of gravity than the people who would ordinarily use a slide like that... Doubt you'll find many under the age of say, 12, who actually know that equation or what it means.
#4 to #3 - huchkizz ONLINE (02/19/2013) [-]
True that. But I can´t seem to find a possible good reason for 12 y/o to know the formula of gravitational pull.. Or anything in mayor physics -> implying hat the Panda actually understands anything.   
Image very related.
True that. But I can´t seem to find a possible good reason for 12 y/o to know the formula of gravitational pull.. Or anything in mayor physics -> implying hat the Panda actually understands anything.
Image very related.
User avatar #19 - tealkangaroo (02/20/2013) [-]
that the acceleration due to gravity... and it's slightly different depending on how close to the equator you live...
#15 - cameronr (02/20/2013) [-]
That would be the formula for acceleration. Not the force of gravity.
#17 to #15 - mackigol (02/20/2013) [-]
It's the value for the average gravitational field strength for Earth, and thus the acceleration due to gravity.
User avatar #20 to #15 - semilunarknight (02/20/2013) [-]
Also it's not a formula, it's a constant. which isn't actually constant
User avatar #5 - critias (02/19/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, but where is your SOH CAH TOA formula to find the slide's angle mitigation of gravity?

Gtfo
#8 to #5 - HappyMeal (02/20/2013) [-]
Actually it is just:


(Mass of the Panda)(9.81m/s^2)sin(Angle of the Slide) = Force in the Y direction
#9 to #8 - HappyMeal (02/20/2013) [-]
It can vary between cos/sin depending on where you want the axis.
#10 to #9 - lykabaus (02/20/2013) [-]
BY GOD, i can understand you entirely as i am taking AP Physics right now.....
#14 to #5 - anon (02/20/2013) [-]
Haha we did this in physics just today!
#21 - eclecticparadigm **User deleted account** (02/20/2013) [-]
Well, Panda's from China, Panda therefore must be Asian.
Well, Panda's from China, Panda therefore must be Asian.
#33 - grahamorange (02/27/2013) [-]
you are forgetting the coefficient of static friction, that is why the panda stays on, that would be a better response than the acceleration of gravity
#32 - alfredisbatman (02/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#31 - rabaneristo (02/20/2013) [-]
Yeah, but can he explain why kids love this so much?
#23 - anon (02/20/2013) [-]
inertial reference frame

a= 9.8 m/s^2 upward

wot
#7 - glassofmilk (02/20/2013) [-]
still having trouble with trees
#6 - anon (02/20/2013) [-]
i thought the force of gravity = G(mM/R^2)?
#12 to #6 - hakx (02/20/2013) [-]
Technically, what you have there is just a formula to find that gravitational force between two objects. The number given in the picture is the "gravitational constant" or accleration of graivity on earth
#13 to #12 - rubberhose (02/20/2013) [-]
nope, gravitational constant is G = 6.67 x 10^11.   
   
that there is g = 9.82 m/s^2. which is GM/r^2 where r is roughly the radius of earth
nope, gravitational constant is G = 6.67 x 10^11.

that there is g = 9.82 m/s^2. which is GM/r^2 where r is roughly the radius of earth
#16 to #13 - hakx (02/20/2013) [-]
Woops, G = "6.67x10^-11" though, not +11, but yeah you get the point

but g can still be considered a constant of gravity on earth...
#18 to #16 - rubberhose (02/20/2013) [-]
**** , you're right. forgot the '-'

but no, g cant be considered a constant of gravity. it is a constant, but it is the acceleration due to gravity
User avatar #1 - lunasshadow (02/19/2013) [-]
******* Asians
 Friends (0)