Get fuckin told. Tags are related to this post.. Maggie -shared A relationship is net a test so why cheat?' s photo. Teacher: the gnu see God? Class: He Teacher brains
Upload
Login or register

Get fuckin told

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Get fuckin told. Tags are related to this post.. Maggie -shared A relationship is net a test so why cheat?' s photo. Teacher: the gnu see God? Class: He Teacher

Tags are related to this post.

Tags: brains
Maggie -shared A relationship is net a test so why cheat?' s photo.
Teacher: the gnu see God?
Class: He
Teacher: the you inner: God?
Class: He
Teacher: Then there isn' t a God!
Yfq qfq qqv gqq qqv ‘Student raises their hand'
Sir, can we see gear brain?"
Teacher: He
goudere: Can gnu teeth your brain?
Teacher: He
Student: ah dang. w gnu cien' t have a
Haul?
Put this as your status if you believe in GED
and gnu will stand up far him no matter''
Like ' Comment ' Unfollow Post ' Share ' 45 minutes age ' It
Itll Todd -*adjusts he science hat*
Consider the follwing:
You can absolutely see and touch your bran. N one would need e
an MRI machine to do so. MRI, or magnetic resonance imagine,
machines vii give we a fantastic look at your bran through
magnetic fields and radio waves without that pesky radiation
from Sprays. Not enough? Try out a fancy FMRI machine, which
uses simfar techniques to pant an even clearer picture of active
parts of the bran through reading the magnetic properties of stuff
in your blood. You rean want more? Scream it out louder, because
it' s about to get painful. Given a sufficient cutting tool and a
ricki:: eless threshold fer pan, we can very easiy open up your own
head and look in the mirier. This e not recommended.
In short, one can see, measure, observe, and directtv prove the
brain' s existence. whie saving that being unable to see and touch
the medically means that there en' t one e a bad argument,
astonishing only that we cannot see and touch the (a more
appropriate assertion would be that the cannot be directtv
observed, therefore cannot be proved or disproved with
current methodology), applying these criteria to someting that
can directtv and corrosively be observed, ike the bran, does not a
vadd argument make.
This rebuttal e made passible by a generous grant from science and
viewers ike we.
2 minutes ago ' like
Write iii comment...
...
+1425
Views: 62995 Submitted: 05/26/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (333)
[ 333 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - pappathethird
Reply +224 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]


but honestly, that was pretty cool
#28 to #2 - anon id: ff1cc6b8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
Wheres the tally of internet arguments that devolved into coming up with terrible insults?
#114 to #28 - themonkeyfish
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
... there is no wall in existence big enough for that scoreboard...
#266 to #2 - anon id: 85d80c07
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Actually no because its a copy pasta
User avatar #3 - helljeez
Reply +166 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
Can you see farts? Can you touch farts? No?
Therefore there are no farts
#8 to #3 - lordjordn
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#24 to #3 - anon id: 35215221
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
Therefore, God is a fart.

Some believe in it fully, others blame it for tragedies, while some deny it, while knowing that deep down inside, it exists.
#141 to #3 - breakfastlunch
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#163 to #3 - anon id: 66520075
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I can smell them, and I can isolate and analyze the air they occupy to verify their chemical presence

Therefore there are farts.
#190 to #3 - anon id: 522e456e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Imma smell the **** outta yo farts, boy
User avatar #196 to #3 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
You can observe the evidence of a fart.
#249 to #3 - nitrorussian
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, what were you saying?
I'm sorry, what were you saying?
#283 to #249 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#13 - teenytinyspider
Reply +81 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
#15 to #13 - luddethebunny [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
**** yeah, Tomska!
**** yeah, Tomska!
#91 - Cleavland Steamer
Reply +57 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #129 to #91 - capslockrage
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I have never met an atheist that looked like that, just saying.
User avatar #232 to #129 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
i've never seen a post like that posted without copious amounts of sarcasm. just saying
#205 to #129 - anon id: 13d2300b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
it's a joke
#315 to #91 - anon id: 767f1e33
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Good thing I'm neither.
#329 to #91 - doctorgolgo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Like there'a a "typical" anything.
Yer argument is invalid.
#160 to #91 - spetsnazvymple
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
why does he have a pentagram around his neck
User avatar #263 to #160 - ainoninom
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that maybe he isn't christian
#318 to #263 - anon id: 767f1e33
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Pentacles aren't always used in a religion context, although they can be. The pentacle was used in Christianity in the past to represent the 5 wounds of Christ. Many Christians do wear pentacles for different reasons. So you really don't know.
#264 to #263 - spetsnazvymple
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
well he still has a religion
#265 to #264 - ainoninom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Good point
#317 to #160 - anon id: 767f1e33
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
It's a pentacle. When a pentagram is within a circle it is a pentacle. Secondly, I would assume from the rest of his attire he's probably wearing it for looks rather than his actual religion.
User avatar #102 to #91 - martbeast
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
love ur name bro
User avatar #195 to #91 - rokkarokkaali
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
If you looked like that, you'd also think there was no god.
#119 - crosskill
Reply +55 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
A Princeton University profressor was a militant atheist and he told all of hsi students that they shouldnt belive in God and tried to prove theres no God.

"If God were exist" he said "this chalk would not break when I drop it. God would want to prove his existance so he would make the chalk not break" and then the profressor drop the chalk and it broke.

He did this every day in class until a student stood up and said that he believed in God. the Princeton profressor smiled and said "Oh yeah, well how can you explain the chalk." and the profressor laughed and then said "i'll up the ante. If god exists then to prove his existence he will come down to earth to this very classroom and give me a blowjob." And then the ceiling opened and God came thundering down and did exactly that. "No homo" god said

- Genesis 4:13-27
#273 to #119 - nightdude
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
if god were exist then who was chalk?
User avatar #127 to #119 - Crusader
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Until i read the end, I was tempted to correct this.

And I still am, so I will explain why God does not show himself.

In everything God does, in every instance he has asked someone to do something, it has been "in faith"
Faith literally means belief without evidence, therefore if he showed himself the entire system of faith is destroyed. The entire point of being a good person in faith of being rewarded would become null.
User avatar #228 to #127 - akkere
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Ah, but you are forgetting that you still have to have faith in the fact that it was "no homo".
User avatar #164 to #127 - appleboom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Part of the idea, some theorize, is that many people would reject God on sight, but if they were slowly introduced to the idea they would have a greater chance of following God.
User avatar #334 to #127 - doctorgolgo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
As explained in excrutiating detail in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy".
User avatar #346 to #334 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Never saw it, never read it.
Never interested in it.
Go ahead and hate me, it just never tickled my fancy.
User avatar #347 to #346 - doctorgolgo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
No hate, but the 12-part radio series was the BEST. We just don't allow our imaginations to run wild like in the old days. Now everything's presented to us point-blank and our mind's eye has cataracts. Shame really.
#27 - afreeti
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(05/26/2013) [-]
replace brain with conscious and he might have a better arguement
#206 to #27 - anon id: 13d2300b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
"consciousness" is simply the definition for an abstract construct.
it's not an actual, physical thing.
User avatar #113 - fyaq
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
man someone felt high and mighty writing those paragraphs

congrats you smug bastard, you outsmarted a 13 year old girl on facebook.
#199 to #113 - sixfishsticks
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
why is this getting thumbed up.....
1) How do you know she is 13?
2) He didn't outsmart this said 13 year old
3) He simply applied some logic and reasoning to something someone posted on face book
User avatar #194 - deathcampforjewtie
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
So, I never hear Christians complaining about Atheists on here.
Just Atheists complaining about Christians.
User avatar #286 to #194 - cheeziswin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
There might not be any, or they just don't care.

I honestly don't see a reason to enthuse about Christianity, or hate on Atheists. It's their own choices, they've got a right to them.
User avatar #345 to #194 - incontinence
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Actually if you looked at any atheist content there will be a ******** of religious people complaining about atheist being preachy etc. I mean just look at this thread for instance.
#117 - kevman
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Who needs a cutting tool when you have syler?
User avatar #162 to #117 - sylarr
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
*Sylar
#230 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
agnosticism is the most interesting system of philosophy by far. at it's purest form, it acknowledges that given existences' possibility of infinity, anything is possible given enough rolls-of-the-die and enough time. so basically, if it hasn't been disproven then it is possible, no matter how unlikely. this means that if the universe and time are actually infinite then parallel realities are real and there are an infinite amount of them. that means that if existence is actually infinite then every fictional universe ever conceived exists somewhere or somewhen.   
   
it takes a lot of suspension-of-common sense to actually believe this is possible, which it completely is but after you accept it, it gives you a hell of a lot to think about when you have nothing else to occupy your mind.
agnosticism is the most interesting system of philosophy by far. at it's purest form, it acknowledges that given existences' possibility of infinity, anything is possible given enough rolls-of-the-die and enough time. so basically, if it hasn't been disproven then it is possible, no matter how unlikely. this means that if the universe and time are actually infinite then parallel realities are real and there are an infinite amount of them. that means that if existence is actually infinite then every fictional universe ever conceived exists somewhere or somewhen.

it takes a lot of suspension-of-common sense to actually believe this is possible, which it completely is but after you accept it, it gives you a hell of a lot to think about when you have nothing else to occupy your mind.
#272 to #230 - necroshiz **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #274 to #272 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
i don't disagree with anything you said but from what you said, you seem to think i was calling agnosticism a religion which i wasn't. i just want to make that clear in case you thought i was trying to call it something that i wasn't
#275 to #274 - necroshiz **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #278 to #275 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
... i guess
User avatar #330 to #230 - daentraya
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
It hasnt been disproved that there's no hightech fairies living underground. I want to believe..
#333 to #330 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
have we explored every square foot of the earths' mass and didn't find any? no? then it's still not impossible that they're there. it's highly unlikely, but still possible.   
have this amusing image
have we explored every square foot of the earths' mass and didn't find any? no? then it's still not impossible that they're there. it's highly unlikely, but still possible.
have this amusing image
#344 to #333 - daentraya
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I also want to believe that the matrix was made to test how deep we were in the matrix, by making a movie about the matrix itself
I also want to believe that the matrix was made to test how deep we were in the matrix, by making a movie about the matrix itself
User avatar #350 to #344 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
i think if we were in a simulation and someone got it right, the controller still wouldn't reveal the truth. imagine how much of a mind **** that would be (if the matrix was actually 100% true)
#235 to #230 - silverhellion
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
holy **** i was just about to post something about agnosticism, then this.

kudos to you good sir.
User avatar #236 to #235 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
thank you kindly
#248 to #230 - godhatesusall
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
I agree with you, agnosticism is neato, I just like South Park so I'm posting this
I agree with you, agnosticism is neato, I just like South Park so I'm posting this
User avatar #251 to #248 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
i love you for thinking reasonably. sincerely i love you and i don't even know you in the slightest. we need more people like you and silverhellion
User avatar #253 to #251 - godhatesusall
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
It makes sense, agnosticism isn't arrogant enough to completely deny the existence of a higher power, but isn't far fetched enough to believe that every action you make is based on ridiculous rules and monitored all your life. Its a perfect middle ground.
User avatar #255 to #253 - ishouldplayzelda
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
precisely. i've always considered religious people and atheists to be the most arrogant kinds of people. to claim positively that there is or is not an intelligent force behind the creation of everything there is when it is impossible to know one way or the other is some ignorant ******** if i've ever heard any. they have no humility at all. it's always "there is a god!" or "there is no god" instead of what is the only honest answer, which is "there might be a god. there's really no way to know and i acknowledge that"

PS i find your username hilarious
User avatar #257 to #255 - godhatesusall
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
Agreed.
And thank you, its the name of a Slayer album.
#281 to #255 - silverhellion
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/27/2013) [-]
EXACTLY, i was raised by a bible-thumper for a mother, so you can imagine she was shocked to hear me say "you can't prove god exists anymore more than you can disprove it, so i just refuse to take part in this ludicrous, ages old argument. if i die and there is a god, i'm sure he wouldn't be a total douchebag about it."