But they're so delicious!. Who cares if they make my glow?. ABSOLUTELY EVERY ONE" - ill, OUT OF ill, - BLUFFIN TUNA TESTED IN CALIFORNIA WATERS CONTAMINATED WIT

But they're so delicious!

Who cares if they make my **** glow?

ABSOLUTELY EVERY ONE" - ill, OUT OF ill, -
BLUFFIN TUNA TESTED IN CALIFORNIA WATERS
CONTAMINATED WITH RELOCATION
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+284
Views: 19570
Favorited: 8
Submitted: 06/23/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to fucking-science submit to reddit

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - therealtjthemedic (06/23/2013) [+] (10 replies)
******* fifteen?
That's ******** , you need a bigger test input.
If i picked 15 people from earth, and they were chinese, then I could say all humans are chinese.
#6 - derak (06/23/2013) [+] (4 replies)
So 15 were tested, and how many bluefin tuna are there in the coast of California again?
User avatar #8 to #6 - noamk (06/23/2013) [-]
not nearly as meany as there should be.
#2 - jimjimmerson (06/23/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Oh sure blame fukushima.
Oh sure blame fukushima.
#18 - salihzzz (06/24/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i'm eating tuna right now
i'm eating tuna right now
#16 - slyve (06/24/2013) [+] (9 replies)
This image has expired
It'd be interesting to know just how much they are irradiated. Everything is radiation contaminated to some point, even humans are radioactive (at least i think we are, I'm not 100% sure about that, though) but our cells regenerate anyway, so unless it's quite a load of radiation we get in a short amount of time, we can just walk it off.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
#30 to #16 - whatley (06/24/2013) [-]
Yes, we are radioactive somewhat. Due to us being carbon based life, we contain small amounts of Carbon-14, which decays through β+ decay, emitting radiation.
#7 - upyoursnumbnuts (06/23/2013) [-]
So now they're tasty and the left overs can be used as a night light.
User avatar #1 - takenpie (06/23/2013) [-]
FIFTEEN TUNA OOOOOH NOOOOOOOOOO!
#31 - mmajunkie (06/24/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The one tuna not contaminated.
The one tuna not contaminated.
User avatar #10 - szymonf (06/24/2013) [-]
but not at hazardous levels.
and you failed to mention that these tuna migrate from japan to the west coast of N.A
#50 - blakhawk (07/15/2013) [-]
That is why you don't build nuclear facilities along fault lines in areas historically hit by tsunamis. Thanks Japan, everyone has to pay for your mistake.
#47 - ScottishMinor (06/25/2013) [-]
Maybe it's not just the tuna...
#33 - firesky (06/24/2013) [+] (3 replies)
My knowledge about radiation got a bit rusty.
How do they tell the radiation is from Fukushima?
#24 - hueyfreeman (06/24/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Yellowfin is better
User avatar #15 - ColeTheUber ONLINE (06/24/2013) [-]
I really hope that sample size was something more like 450000, and the researcher was just like "If we announce that 450000/450000 tuna are contaminated, people will call us liars, so **** it, lets just say 15/15."
User avatar #13 - klina (06/24/2013) [-]
15/15?
So does that mean that, they tested more than 15 and since the others weren't irradiated they just put the 15 as a count to use for their banana?
#5 - BreakTank (06/23/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
 Friends (0)