Famliy Guy. Adapted Season 3 Episode 20. To be honest, why do people still making fun of Germans for being Nazis? I mean, Germans are shameful about their count
x
Click to expand

Famliy Guy

Famliy Guy. Adapted Season 3 Episode 20. To be honest, why do people still making fun of Germans for being Nazis? I mean, Germans are shameful about their count

Adapted Season 3 Episode 20.

To be honest, why do people still making fun of Germans for being Nazis? I mean, Germans are shameful about their country's past during World War 2 and showed their regrets by strong censorship, while in Japan, they don't give a **** and are allowed to cover it all up.

  • Recommend tagsx
+1172
Views: 46176
Favorited: 88
Submitted: 07/11/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to goseikiba Subscribe to family-guy submit to reddit

Comments(338):

[ 338 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#9 - anon (07/11/2014) [+] (29 replies)
stickied by goseikiba
User avatar #267 - Faz (07/12/2014) [+] (4 replies)
stickied by goseikiba
Holy **** so many of you are god damn retarded, have you ever heard the quote "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it." this is the reason why its illegal in Germany to deny the acts, THEY DONT WANT THAT **** HAPPENING AGAIN.

Also its funny how most of you seem to have this boner for freedom of speech but you dont even understand whats happening in Japan isn't freedom of speech, its the government brainwashing its population into thinking they did nothing wrong by purposely feeding the newest generation lies.

TL;DR idiots
#1 - morsa (07/11/2014) [-]
When I read "In Japan it is legal..." I thought you were going to say something about underaged girls
How greatly dissapointed I was
User avatar #2 to #1 - internetexplain (07/11/2014) [-]
It is tho
not just in Japan , pretty much everywhere in Eurasia and Africa.
User avatar #3 to #2 - morsa (07/11/2014) [-]
What's the legal age in Japan?
User avatar #113 to #3 - toguro (07/12/2014) [-]
I like your profile picture
User avatar #4 to #3 - internetexplain (07/11/2014) [-]
14 , and pretty much everywhere else on the dual continent due to ancient cultures and such
User avatar #66 to #4 - mikewifi (07/11/2014) [-]
Don't pretty much all prefectures raise it to 18 or higher, though? I thought I'd seen something about age of consent being 13, but prefecture laws overriding that age. The official legal age of consent is 13, but because of prefecture law it's practically 18 everywhere.
User avatar #67 to #66 - internetexplain (07/11/2014) [-]
Well, I'm not THAT well informed on Japan.
What I do know is , 14 is legal in Japan - not well seen - but legal.
User avatar #111 to #4 - toguro (07/12/2014) [-]
Nope its actually 18 but thanks to legal grey zones and loopholes you can technically have sex with a 13 year old in Japan
#229 to #1 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
dong-ey kong
#6 to #1 - sinery (07/11/2014) [-]
My thoughts exactly.
#165 to #12 - munchyman ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
This may be a stupid question but is this legit?
#204 to #165 - popnotes (07/12/2014) [-]
It's an absolutely possible, definite maybe.
It's an absolutely possible, definite maybe.
#57 - I Am Monkey (07/11/2014) [-]
>People in the comments saying "America is just as bad"   
Bitch, we didn't go around just raping entire cities full of people wholesale. Japan fought WW2 like they we're trying to set the high score for "most evil 			****		".    
 Inb4 "Nuh uh, nukes". There's a difference between necessary evil and sadistic evil you commit just because you feel like it.
>People in the comments saying "America is just as bad"
Bitch, we didn't go around just raping entire cities full of people wholesale. Japan fought WW2 like they we're trying to set the high score for "most evil **** ".
Inb4 "Nuh uh, nukes". There's a difference between necessary evil and sadistic evil you commit just because you feel like it.
#90 to #57 - champaigne ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
Slavery
User avatar #95 to #90 - bluenebula (07/12/2014) [-]
I can't think of any other place, any other race, or any other time period where there was slavery. I mean, I can, but 2000 character limit and all.
User avatar #97 to #95 - champaigne ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
So.... You're saying...""America is just as bad""...?
User avatar #101 to #97 - bluenebula (07/12/2014) [-]
I'm saying you're ******* stupid. Slavery was a huge thing and it literally made the modern age. Look at Dubai. A city made by modern slavery. At the time of slavery in the United States (And many other places in the world. I feel the need to remind you of this) slavery was considered okay. If there were no slaves in America during its creation, the country wouldn't have grown as fast or well as it did. That can also be said about, I don't know, most countries? Everywhere? So while slavery IS bad, it's not something you can condemn people for anymore. Especially when those people have been dead for hundreds to tens of thousands of years.

I'm saying that you made a stupid comment, and that you look stupid for making it. As for the United States, it wasn't as bad as Japan during WWII. In fact, we barely did jack **** until they started **** . (I don't count denying them iron and the likes as 'starting it')
User avatar #212 to #101 - imnotkickthecat (07/12/2014) [-]
Slavery made every age really.
User avatar #121 to #97 - skittlesinexcess (07/12/2014) [-]
there has never been any race creed or large group of people that has not had slaves in some capacity.
User avatar #233 to #90 - furiousmarshmellow (07/12/2014) [-]
Destinations of slaves: Africa→Americas

Portuguese America (modern Brazil) 38.5%
British America (minus North America) 18.4%
Spanish Empire 17.5%
French Americas 13.6%
British North America 6.45%
English Americas 3.25%
Dutch West Indies 2.0%
Danish West Indies 0.3%

Citation needed: history.stackexchange.com/questions/1038/what-other-countries-besides-the-us-participated-in-keeping-african-slaves
User avatar #184 to #57 - gunthar (07/12/2014) [-]
i think all the people act like evil mad mans during war.
#202 to #57 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
It's not like there are any Native Americans around anymore, you gentleman of colors drove them to near extinction.
#221 to #57 - zenler (07/12/2014) [-]
the firebombs or w/e were pretty brutal from teh 'mericans too bruh
the firebombs or w/e were pretty brutal from teh 'mericans too bruh
#275 to #57 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
well, america did also rape and murder civilians during ww2. ofc nazi-germany is bad because they lost the war, but england, amerika and russia did the same warcrimes. but since the winner write history, u dont hear it all the time.
User avatar #331 to #57 - schnizel (07/13/2014) [-]
Too bad that stuff was mostly faked images done by the allies.
User avatar #213 to #57 - greyhoundfd (07/12/2014) [-]
To be fair, the atomic bomb was not really necessary. If we were losing, and it was a last ditch effort to force the japanese to capitulate before they landed on the mainland US, then it would have been necessary. It was really because we were running out of support for the war and we wanted to finish it as quickly as possible, so we wiped two towns off the ******* map with a level of firepower never seen in the entire ******* world.

That said, while the US has done some ****** up stuff in the past (camps during the Civil War, treatment of the Native Americans, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, nearly reigniting the Korean War over a ******* tree), it doesn't even nearly approach the level of indescribable evils enacted upon the Chinese by the Japanese Empire, or the Jews by the Nazi Reich.
#242 to #213 - guitarexplain (07/12/2014) [-]
Not necessary? It was estimated there would be 1 million allied casualties if they tried to take Japan by conventional force, due to the tradition of the Japanese people to fight to the end and not surrender. They estimate around 129,000 to 246,000 killed in the two atomic bombings, so that ended up working a lot better, for both sides.
User avatar #321 to #242 - greyhoundfd (07/12/2014) [-]
That doesn't make it necessary, that makes it a convenience. Yeah, casualties are bad, but something is not absolutely necessary in war unless the alternative is losing the war. Like I said, if the atomic bomb was the only difference between winning and losing the war in the pacific, it would have been a necessity. As it stands, it simply expedited how quickly we won.
#337 to #321 - guitarexplain (07/13/2014) [-]
However the casualties on both sides would have been higher in the long run without it, from the conventional warfare that would have taken to the streets of Japan, let alone the invasion force. In the end it cost less lives for both sides.
User avatar #194 to #57 - kinginyellow ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Ya, and it's not even like America liked the bombing of Japan, Oppenheimer even called himself death and broke down crying over it.
User avatar #63 to #57 - avengeralpha (07/11/2014) [-]
Its war there is no good or evil in war there is only perspective
User avatar #68 to #63 - warlordstuart ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
naw dude, the rape of Nanking or however it was spelled was downright evil. just like the holocaust and the **** the nazis did were evil.

its easier however, to do evil things when a superior commands or allows someone to do it. Check out the Milgram experiment on youtube. It really is a crazy eye opener to the question of "why wouldn't they say no? why would they do that?"

freaky **** dude.
User avatar #75 to #68 - avengeralpha (07/11/2014) [-]
Unfortunately perspective comes into play. I lived in Morocco for a year and now with all of the issues between Israel and Palestine there are many of my old friends are openly supporting the holocaust and saying that Hitler should have finished the job. Ghengis khan did alot worse than the Japanese and to him and his people it was not wrong as to their belief if you were strong enough to take something be it land or life they had the right to take it.
User avatar #78 to #75 - warlordstuart ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
I dunno man. Maybe I'm just being naive but there is a right and a wrong way to do something i think. who knows. maybe your right, but i think there are some actions that could definitely be considered too much and could be considered evil.
User avatar #83 to #78 - avengeralpha (07/11/2014) [-]
They could and history tends to judge them as evil or good but at the time to those people it was not an evil action. That being said my knowledge on the Japanese occupation, is not the strongest , but usually people tend to have reasons behind doing things in war, however I am talking about wars, so events like the holocaust and other massacres throughout history usually were justified to the people that committed them.

User avatar #81 to #63 - meganinja (07/11/2014) [-]
While you are partially right, evil is a very objective term, the general consensus of modern society has set in place boundaries that are considered righteous, and beyond those are considered evil. What Japan did is considered evil, and was done for really no reason at all, other than a display of power. What the USA did with nukes was more of a last resort.
User avatar #86 to #81 - avengeralpha (07/11/2014) [-]
Yes however that is all judged by modern society but my point is that in the thick of it to many of those people their actions were not evil.
#72 to #63 - swagmonstah ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
And here we see a pretentious self entitled faggot, who's so introspective.
User avatar #292 to #57 - marqueze (07/12/2014) [-]
HAHAHAHAH necessary evil! oh my god, I bet that is how americans condone invasions in Iraq too.
User avatar #231 to #57 - furiousmarshmellow (07/12/2014) [-]
Well, actually American cities (mainly West Coast cities, San Francisco, for good example) imprisoned most Japanese Americans, regardless if they have any involvement with the war or not, in little prison camps called internment camps which were basically basically concentration camps but not as horrible and without any killing unless forced to. So, while we aren't ANYWHERE as bad as the Axis (we didn't kill 6 milllion+ Jews or bomb a massively major military base just because we won't give resources), it doesn't mean we're not at all to blame.
#208 to #57 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
Killing civilians in Vietnam,sponsoring terrorist in the 80's in Afghanistan,killing civilians again in Iraq 90's,Bosnia and Herzegovina 95',Yugoslavia 99',Afghanistan 01',Iraq again in 03',Libya 11',sponsoring terrorists and blaming a legitimate government for using chemical warfare on civs,to invade Syria 13',sponsoring a government coup and war in Ukraine 13-14' ,all that doesn't really make you the good guy either,you aren't worse than Hitler or ww2 Japan,but you ain't much better.
#209 to #208 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
Oh yes,I forgot to mention murdering native americans and forcing them to live in concentration camp..I mean ,,reservates,, ,in that case I was wrong,you are equally as bad as Hitler.
User avatar #266 to #209 - garymotherfingoak (07/12/2014) [-]
everyone in the 1800's was a bit ****** up, but war crimes to civillians to some degree happen in EVERY conflict ever, its not liked we ordered millions of deaths and to specifically kill civilians, much of it was accidental collateral on our part (other than vietnam maybe), and nothing near what happened in ww2.

also, log in
User avatar #128 to #57 - kristovsky (07/12/2014) [-]
Native Americans hate things that are white and on their land.

Like snow.
User avatar #71 to #57 - planejane (07/11/2014) [-]
Well we did some ****** up things in Vietnam.
#106 to #71 - hikikomori ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Like the My Lai massacre
User avatar #197 to #106 - ICEDgrunge (07/12/2014) [-]
At least a shining jewel known as Thompson came out of that encounter. Nanjing had none of that **** .
User avatar #265 to #71 - garymotherfingoak (07/12/2014) [-]
As true as that is, the Vietnamese weren't much better, and comparing that to ww2 atrocities on all fronts is like comparing a dog bite to a napalm-filled shotgun blast.
#98 - jtgonly (07/12/2014) [-]
Wait a minute, I went to the Hiroshima memorial museum in Japan, and they were surprisingly open about their mistakes in taking part in World War 2. They fully admitted there participation and didn't have anything claiming they were simply victims. I would like to see some sources on this.
User avatar #332 to #98 - schnizel (07/13/2014) [-]
Yeah, because Americans cut their oil supply, that's why they went into the war.
#109 to #98 - jagdjaeger (07/12/2014) [-]
Didn't you know that if you edit some picture with racial stereotypes and write "大日本帝国万歳” you can talk as much **** about Japan as you want?
Here's one I made.
Those ******* Japs ARR ROOK SAME XDXD
#123 to #98 - dorklordrises (07/12/2014) [-]
The Yasukuni Shrine and War Museum both honours war criminals for their contribution to the war and has a really sinister revisionist interpretation of the war that makes out Japan to be a victim of American Imperialism instead of fighting an aggressive war of conquest that brutalized China and Korea callously.

More available at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Yasukuni_Shrine
User avatar #14 - Sworley ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
they shouldnt have to be ashamed of their countries past. you shouldnt be held accountable for something your ancestors did.
User avatar #164 to #14 - symustafa (07/12/2014) [-]
Its kinda funny though how their war memorials and museums offer some of the best information regarding Japanese atrocities. The government isn't actively trying to hide it 100%, that's for sure. It just boils down to a lot of ignorance on the Japanese people's part.
User avatar #286 to #14 - whtkid (07/12/2014) [-]
No, but you should know that even your ancestors were not perfect and the mistakes they made
#290 to #14 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
Too edgy go swim in your denial pool
User avatar #264 to #14 - Faz (07/12/2014) [-]
"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."
User avatar #159 to #14 - youngduece (07/12/2014) [-]
No one is saying they should be ashamed. Its the opposite. This is about how the Japanese are too ashamed and as a result they purposefully act as if WW2 didn't even happen.
User avatar #284 to #159 - skfdkfkehdgurdk (07/12/2014) [-]
Ashamed? hell they don't even acknowledge the actuality of such events in the first place
#88 to #14 - anon (07/11/2014) [-]
But you shouldn't deny and try to whitewash what happened
#152 to #88 - stalini (07/12/2014) [-]
none of your business
#160 - thefifthdoctor ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Japan is changing though, the Japanese are starting to teach it more and more. They are probably just waiting for all the veterans to die, so their offspring don't attack them or ask horrible questions.
Japan is changing though, the Japanese are starting to teach it more and more. They are probably just waiting for all the veterans to die, so their offspring don't attack them or ask horrible questions.
#178 to #160 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
We don't teach our children our real history in the US, no nation really does.
User avatar #179 to #178 - thefifthdoctor ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
In Canada we do.
#189 to #179 - raideoactivepilot (07/12/2014) [-]
But canada never really did nothing 			******		 up like the rest of the world tho. Here we sentenced the native Americans to death and paid people money per kill no matter if it was a man, woman, or child. Gave them lead passifiers for their children and biologically contaminated goods that killed them. While putting them on reservations in one of the most harshest places to live at the time. There's no hiding the fact it was just one big consideration camp  to put them to death. While we tried to do the same thing to the Mormons, but they had brains to run off into the barren areas of utah. Also when WW2 happened we kept almost all the Asian americans locked up in internment camps  and did not treat them that nicely while at the end of WW2 we took alot of germans POW's back with us to force them to dig a huge lake and the ones that lived though that hard labor we just killed them and put them in the bottom of the lake with the rest of them. There is much much more 			******		 up stuff out there america did that is kept out of main history classes. nam was the most 			******		 up to me. Atleast now we know its not a good idea not to drug people with acid and stick them out on a active battle field with weapons
But canada never really did nothing ****** up like the rest of the world tho. Here we sentenced the native Americans to death and paid people money per kill no matter if it was a man, woman, or child. Gave them lead passifiers for their children and biologically contaminated goods that killed them. While putting them on reservations in one of the most harshest places to live at the time. There's no hiding the fact it was just one big consideration camp to put them to death. While we tried to do the same thing to the Mormons, but they had brains to run off into the barren areas of utah. Also when WW2 happened we kept almost all the Asian americans locked up in internment camps and did not treat them that nicely while at the end of WW2 we took alot of germans POW's back with us to force them to dig a huge lake and the ones that lived though that hard labor we just killed them and put them in the bottom of the lake with the rest of them. There is much much more ****** up stuff out there america did that is kept out of main history classes. nam was the most ****** up to me. Atleast now we know its not a good idea not to drug people with acid and stick them out on a active battle field with weapons
User avatar #191 to #189 - thefifthdoctor ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
Probably the worst stuff i can think of right now that we learned in school (im sure there is more) is how our first prime-minister was a raging alcoholic, we forced our people to war during ww1 and we Sentenced the Japanese to interment camps.
User avatar #250 to #189 - divinecreator (07/12/2014) [-]
the mai lei massacre was so shameful
#299 to #179 - dinocaster (07/12/2014) [-]
What terrible deeds did you do to the world? Invented poutine?
#236 to #178 - kmichel (07/12/2014) [-]
Very true. Read the book "Killing Hope", which describes the motivations for over 60 US CIA and military interventions since WWII. We invade for resources, political power, and damage to our enemies. Not for Democracy or freedom of oppressed people.
#32 - theshadowwalker (07/11/2014) [-]
The Rape of Nanjing. Look it up, f you dare. I was cursed to read about it freshman year of high school.   
   
Pic related, the book I read. Can't post images about it, ban material.
The Rape of Nanjing. Look it up, f you dare. I was cursed to read about it freshman year of high school.

Pic related, the book I read. Can't post images about it, ban material.
#44 to #32 - personacv (07/11/2014) [-]
Wait, what? is that a giff and not an image?
User avatar #52 to #44 - theshadowwalker (07/11/2014) [-]
"Pic related"
It's not animated.
User avatar #91 to #52 - thesovereigngrave (07/11/2014) [-]
Nope, that image is definitely a gif. You can't click and enlarge it. Just because it doesn't move doesn't mean it can't be a gif.
User avatar #120 to #91 - theshadowwalker (07/12/2014) [-]
It's not animated. but yes the file is a .gif
User avatar #162 to #32 - habanaro (07/12/2014) [-]
The woman who researched and wrote that book ended up committing suicide. It's a very interesting read, although it definitely feels almost oppressively depressing to read.
User avatar #308 to #162 - theshadowwalker (07/12/2014) [-]
Depressing, gritting, and nasty. If you lost faith in humanity before, try 1935. That's the most disgusting, raunchy acts I ever had the pleasure to read.
#198 - senorfrog (07/12/2014) [-]
Didn't the Allied forces make Germany do that though? And they went in so deep that Wolfenstein New Order can't show Nazi flags in Germany.
#94 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Just read the Japanese wiki page or listen to the stories of Korean "Comfort Women". The Japanese were always huge dicks.   
   
I don't say "Those people deserved to have nukes dropped on them" everyday but...   
   
Those people deserved to have nukes dropped on them.
Just read the Japanese wiki page or listen to the stories of Korean "Comfort Women". The Japanese were always huge dicks.

I don't say "Those people deserved to have nukes dropped on them" everyday but...

Those people deserved to have nukes dropped on them.
#100 to #94 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
Korea was a different story.

I can't deny the atrocities, but Japan's occupation did wonders for the Korean economy. Production was at an all-time high, and population nearly doubled over a span of 30 years. The Japanese built infrastructure and factories to serve this boom in production.

War is hell. Get used to it.
User avatar #102 to #100 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Yeah, but it pales in comparison to what The United States did for Korea after the Korean War.
#137 to #102 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
Or what we did to Germany after the war. 1.9 million German died because of American internment camps between 1945 and 1950.
User avatar #143 to #137 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
And German economy has recovered because we just about single-handedly rebuilt their country after World War 2.
#175 to #143 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
After killing 2+ million people. Yeah, nice of us.
#186 to #175 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Hitler killed 20 million. I'm so super sorry we had to kill 1/10th that amount for Germany to have free healthcare and education that is far better than anything we have in America and did I mention free?

Yeah, you're right. We should've let Hitler stay.
#301 to #186 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
strawman, faggot. Where did I say Hitler should stay in power?
User avatar #303 to #301 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
So what fantasy would you rather have happen in order for Germany to have what it has now? Go ahead and cherry pick, because I totally agree: Hitler should've stepped down from power, given the victory to us without any life loss, we should never have war and always have peace on Earth, and I should have a personal blowjob machine that dispenses cash.

The price for the way Germany is today was 2 million lives. You ask them if it's worth it to not be dragged into the streets, raped and beaten by the Brown Coats.

So is this what you are trying to say? That we should have peace on Earth? What ******* childlike argument are you attempting to present here?
#305 to #303 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
Occupying a nation doesn't require torturing it's citizens to death to promote progress. For **** sake, this isn't hard to understand.
User avatar #307 to #305 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Building a nation doesn't require killing 6 million Jews and 20 million total innocent people in the name of progress, get over it. I'm just saying that we are less of a bad guy than they were in 99% of cases, and our results are so fantastic that now most of us would rather live in Germany than America.

So if the price of free healthcare and incredible free education is 2 million lives, then I'll be the first one to volunteer for that sacrifice- at least so my children's children would see such an amazing day.
#310 to #307 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
your confusing two issues here. When we occupy a nation, we're the government. Our government punished Germans for killing innocent Jews by killing innocent Germans. your twisting this to fit an agenda and it's black and white. It didn't "Cost" 2 million innocent citizens to make "free healthcare". There's no system where people are like "We need free healthcare, but we don't have 2 million people to murder. I guess we'll do without.
User avatar #311 to #310 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
At the same time, I'm STILL making the issue of us vs. them.

2 million lives is better than 20 million, period. I get it, we shouldn't have killed the 2 million- I REALLY DO get that. But that's still better than 20... are you picking up what I'm dropping yet?
#313 to #311 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
your talking in circles.
User avatar #315 to #313 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Look, this is the only point I'm trying to make, so pay attention:

2 million lives lost is better than 20 million.

You figured it out yet? Would you rather lose 2 million dollars or 20 million? How far in debt would you like to go? Have you figured out this simple point yet?
#316 to #315 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
you're not making any sense. It wasn't a 20 million vs 2 million issue. Hitler was partially responsible for a war that cost lives. Once we occupied Germany the war was over but we continued to kill. your logic is faulty. If you punch me and a cop stops the fight but kicks your ass silly after you've been put in cuffs, you're a victim now. That's what we did. We went in to Germany, put them in cuffs and while they were in cuffs beat their ass senseless. We senselessly killed 2 million men from the age of 13 up. 13 year old boys died from our abuse. We didn't do this to establish free healthcare or to stop the deaths of 20 million people.
User avatar #317 to #316 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Listen: Hitler would have murdered 20 million innocent people (and possibly a lot more if we hadn't stopped him) regardless of the war. These were completely innocent people who had done nothing wrong.

When we took control over the country we killed 2 million people that might have been guilty. They had proven themselves largely untrustworthy and we deemed it necessary to eradicate them. Do I agree with their decision? No, but it happened.

So case in point: When Hitler was in charge, 20 million innocent people died. When we were in charge, 2 million died. Which would you rather have? The point I'm attempting to make here is still logically and mathematically sound:

20 million is a larger number than 2 million. You get that? You need me to repeat that... again?

Also, no we didn't do it to establish free and greater education and healthcare, but it happened because of our intervention. We also didn't nearly wipe out all American Natives to build the U.S.S. Comfort, but I'd say the good we've done worldwide was worth the cost.
#320 to #317 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
I've read what you've said multiple times. What I'm trying to convey in so many different words is simple.


We

didn't

have

to

kill

anyone

after

the

war.
User avatar #327 to #320 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
And I understand that. What I'm saying is

Hitler
Didn't
Have
To
Kill
Everyone
Before
The
War
Plus
He
Was
Far
Worse
Than
Us

I've already told you that I agree with you- we should've stopped killing people. We should also have peace on Earth and Half Life 3, but we can't all get what we want. What we have, however- what we will settle for... is pretty whoopass, and it wouldn't have happened without our intervention.
#314 to #313 - gtfomylawnbish (07/12/2014) [-]
On a side note you' re has been changed to you're.
0
#312 to #311 - gtfomylawnbish has deleted their comment [-]
#297 to #186 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
AFTER war. Not during.
User avatar #306 to #297 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
And...? They were getting raped and beaten by The Brown Coats on their own side, and we were killing as many military and as few civilians as possible on our side. At least we were TRYING to not hurt the innocent.
#104 to #102 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
South Korea, you mean.
The fact that two world powers split the nation of Korea in half for their own selfish gains is an atrocity within itself.
Although you're right, the US played a big part in the modernization of South Korea.
#107 to #104 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
Of course I mean South Korea. Do you even Starcraft, 			******		?!
Of course I mean South Korea. Do you even Starcraft, ****** ?!
#124 to #107 - anon (07/12/2014) [-]
Sorry, I don't play **** games.
User avatar #140 to #124 - catburglarpenis (07/12/2014) [-]
It's not a **** game. It's the national sport of South Korea, have some ******* respect.
#235 - kmichel (07/12/2014) [-]
There are also German nationalists who also believe in what Hitler was doing. The Japanese government made 21 official apologies for its actions in WWII since the war ended, some of those made by the Prime Ministers themselves. These apologies recognized the aggressive behavior of the Japanese and the atrocities they committed. I also wouldn't be proud that Holocaust denial is illegal. That borders on 'thought-crime'.
User avatar #238 to #235 - satansferret (07/12/2014) [-]
lol thought crime.
#244 - bitchplzzz (07/12/2014) [-]
Why is denying the holocaust illegal then? Why can you not look for more things to document about it? You cant even dig around in holocaust mass graves because it's illegal. Why hide it?

Not saying it didn't happen btw, just curious
User avatar #252 to #244 - tehlulzbringer (07/12/2014) [-]
i'll have you know that nbc and fox have officially confirmed that there was proof. not that we need it
User avatar #323 to #244 - caffeinecommissar (07/12/2014) [-]
I take it you want me to summon Schnizel ?
User avatar #330 to #323 - schnizel (07/13/2014) [-]
bitchplzzz
The entire holocaust is not for mourning, but simply for propaganda, guilt propaganda. The jews needed a tool with which they would demonize the entire German people and to make them guilty for ever having voted Hitler into office. And for many other things but the prime reason is to keep the Germans at bay so they can't rise into a military machine and in the end a world power.
6 000 000 people is a strong number, first there was 4 million, well, before that a million and now we have 12 000 000 people. But I have found a way to make the Holocaust propaganda useless, it does not matter how many jews died in ww2, they would just take that number that was proven to be true and add never forget the (inster number here) that died in the Holocaust, but the real way to beat them is to not give a **** about it.
User avatar #333 to #330 - bitchplzzz (07/13/2014) [-]
ur still a bootlip eggplant burrhead
User avatar #334 to #333 - schnizel (07/13/2014) [-]
admin
#335 to #333 - caffeinecommissar (07/13/2014) [-]
>bootlip eggplant burrhead   
   
Okay, that one was actually funny.
>bootlip eggplant burrhead

Okay, that one was actually funny.
#255 to #244 - lastgentleman (07/12/2014) [-]
Perhaps because Israel is milking the 			****		 out of it? Honestly the only logical reason to hide it would be if it disproves something,since if it really did happen the way they say then the only thing that could come from digging around would be to prove them right.Not saying it didn't happen at all,just saying it didn't happen to the degree that they milk it.
Perhaps because Israel is milking the **** out of it? Honestly the only logical reason to hide it would be if it disproves something,since if it really did happen the way they say then the only thing that could come from digging around would be to prove them right.Not saying it didn't happen at all,just saying it didn't happen to the degree that they milk it.
User avatar #224 - phoenix grinder ONLINE (07/12/2014) [-]
could've sworn the original went 'cake was served' instead of tea
User avatar #240 to #224 - sketchE (07/12/2014) [-]
asians like tea
#196 - sytheris (07/12/2014) [-]
Honestly, both situations are terrible oppression of free speech, one just happens to be with benevolent intent.
#172 - peinguino (07/12/2014) [-]
related pic  to kamikazes
related pic to kamikazes
+2
#161 - thesuperintendent has deleted their comment [-]
#192 to #161 - raideoactivepilot (07/12/2014) [-]
Wtf that 			****		 is so disturbing and needs some context. how the 			****		 was she just standing there calm while her skin was already peeled to be peeled off like a 			*******		 banana. just someone please tell me whats going on here.  Like are they just  tormenting them and if so why do they need to be in a lab for? "DR.wing-wang; We have discovered not only are our skin is yellow like a banana it also peels like one, watch!"
Wtf that **** is so disturbing and needs some context. how the **** was she just standing there calm while her skin was already peeled to be peeled off like a ******* banana. just someone please tell me whats going on here. Like are they just tormenting them and if so why do they need to be in a lab for? "DR.wing-wang; We have discovered not only are our skin is yellow like a banana it also peels like one, watch!"
#219 to #192 - charmakameleon (07/12/2014) [-]
Men Behind the Sun
I can't remember who made it, I just remember part of his name being 'Mouse' or something similar
It's a movie about a place called Squadron 731, a Japanese 'Terror Camp' towards the end of WW2
If I said anything incorrectly, feel free to reply with the correct info, I haven't seen this movie in a very long time
(Pic semi-related, I think?)
#193 to #192 - mpmanning (07/12/2014) [-]
****** up torture
They kept her torso warm while letting the rest freeze until it became necrotic
User avatar #200 to #161 - ivoryhammer (07/12/2014) [-]
Did the mods just take today off or something? I've seen a ton of stuff today that would normally get flagged just stay untouched.
#117 - cantfindausername (07/12/2014) [-]
Japan's fw
User avatar #17 - monkeybrains ONLINE (07/11/2014) [-]
#15 - karrotj (07/11/2014) [-]
Not all germans were nazis, i hate it when people talk like nazi and german are synonyms
#153 to #15 - stalini (07/12/2014) [-]
nazi refers to the citizens of nazi germany, not people with certain ideologies

#328 to #153 - karrotj (07/13/2014) [-]
Eh i dont think thats accurate, there are still Nazis now days and im pretty sure the minority if any are even german descent
#336 to #328 - stalini (07/13/2014) [-]
Modern Nazis are referred to as neo-nazis.
User avatar #260 to #15 - deansg (07/12/2014) [-]
Well definitely not nowadays, but they did gain a majority vote in democratic elections in the early 1930s and even got more popular in the following years.

P.s. I don't think Germans are naturally bad or something, I think all people are naturally bad. WW2 was just 1 manifestation of that
[ 338 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)