i have a bad feeling this is true. . did you know? d idgou k n : oran A woman asked a local radio station to help her find her estranged mother. Net only did sh i have a bad feeling this is true did you know? d idgou k n : oran A woman asked local radio station to help her find estranged mother Net only sh
Upload
Login or register

i have a bad feeling this is true

did you know?
d idgou k n : oran
A woman asked a local radio station to
help her find her estranged mother. Net
only did she find her mother, but she
also learned that her husband of seven
years and father to her
daughter is actually her brother.
...
+972
Views: 38076 Submitted: 08/23/2014
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (99)
[ 99 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
69 comments displayed.
#2 - hornypotatohumper
Reply +243
(08/23/2014) [-]
Game of thrones spoilers!!!!
#8 - include
Reply +134
(08/23/2014) [-]
#90 to #8 - youdoublecongoid
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
#15 to #8 - misterblack
Reply +23
(08/24/2014) [-]
#16 to #15 - gibroner ONLINE
Reply +25
(08/24/2014) [-]
#1 - mrnpc
Reply +50
(08/23/2014) [-]
Did they get divorced? Because I would love to see the look on the judge's face when this came to trial.
#19 to #1 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +21
(08/24/2014) [-]
let me get this straight... they have been happily married for a long time, had no idea they were siblings, have had sex, have a daughter, and they learn that they are related... you expect them to drop everything simply because they they are blood? its not like they grew up in the same house, they didnt have any other relationship, they came to love eachother as two people seperate... would you say that someone who is adopted isnt allowed to love their family simply because they are not blood? (ik that wasnt 100% relevant, but my point was love it love, whatever the situation)
#28 to #19 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply +10
(08/24/2014) [-]
dude, its her brother.
every party, "so you got any siblings"
"yeah"
"oh yeah, older or younger"
looks ACROSS AT HUSBAND "older"
you will think about that EVERY time
#30 to #28 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
look assmuing they loved eachother enough to get maried and are happy, it shouldnt be a problem
#31 to #30 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply +3
(08/24/2014) [-]
its a BIG oversight to just look past
#32 to #31 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
why?
#33 to #32 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -5
(08/24/2014) [-]
BECAUSE ITS YOU ******* BROTHER/SISTER
i dont know what redneck town you might be from but that means you share the same blood and dna
#37 to #33 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
blood != relationships, as i said, simply because your related, doesnt mean you have any other ties with that person, perhpas im just odd but, if you are not emotionally attached to someone (in the form of plutonic love) then i dont see what the problem is. your family isnt your blood, they are the people you care about, the people you grew up with, the people whom took care of you, while im kind of using this out of context, i feel it pertains: "you cant change your upbringing, where, how, when, to whom you were born, but you can still be a good,loving,caring person" (imo its not exact, and is not exactally relevant but you get my point.
#38 to #37 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -6
(08/24/2014) [-]
seeing as reletives are somthing that is real and has always been around
and love is a "made up" emotion that people are told they feel when actually its affection for people we care about and desire for people we dont know i would say its a big issue
#39 to #38 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +4
(08/24/2014) [-]
well if love is a "made up" emotion how is the love between your spouse and your family any different? what sets the two appart? by your logic nothing.
#42 to #39 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -4
(08/24/2014) [-]
reletives "affection"
others "desire"
i just said that...
#44 to #42 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
ah, sorry i misread what you said, but it would seem based by your comment bringnig scince into this wouldnt be a problem so i shal begin, in nature animals have been known to mate with their siblings (inclusing more evolved species whom mate for life and feel emotional happiness and pain) but you could argue they dont know correct? well these people did not know, and if an animal found out it wouldnt care (but then again we are not talking about reasoning animals). scientifically being related means squat, the only possible problem is that it limits genetic integrity, but even that is only if done for multiple generations, hell if you want to say that humans are just products of eveloution, then being "related" means ****, it means NOTHING, simply that you came from this other thing, you know what makes us not want to **** our siblings? emotion, without emotion it does not matter, there is nothing moraly wrong as long as you dont talk about emotion, and thats true with anything, for all we know the internet could be moraly wrong, but no one has the emotion "i should not use the internet, it is a wrong thing to do for (blank) reason" and because of that we continue to use it
#46 to #44 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -5
(08/24/2014) [-]
TL;DR
#47 to #46 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +3
(08/24/2014) [-]
lol, any integrity, and any possiblity of me considering what you have to say is understandable has gone out the door, if your not willing to be educated, dont speak.
#48 to #47 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -4
(08/24/2014) [-]
anything that long is almost not worth reading, its just expanding a 1 or 2 sentence theory expanded to look smarter, if you want to look smart dont argue on the internet.
#49 to #48 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
you cant claim in expanding a 1-2 sentence theory, when you didnt read it. and as much as you wish it wasnt the case, all collective inteligence isnt thrown out the door the second you connect to the internet, we just choose not to use it, but i choose to use it (sometimes)
#50 to #49 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -2
(08/24/2014) [-]
all im going to say is if inbreeding was ok, then there would not be issues from offspring.
Seeing as increased complications increase through every inbreeding it should not be a thing at all.
#67 to #50 - wallbuilder
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
So now it's inbreeding, and not marriage, that is the problem? If you thought it was only inbreeding that was the problem then your argument would hold up. But you said they should divorce.
#72 to #67 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
isnt that the point of marriage? To have kids and then be together to raise that child?
Maybe im wrong here and judging by the thumbs it must be. But i do have a problem with it and i dont know why im the only one apparently
#73 to #72 - wallbuilder
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Marriage does not equate to children. Sure, most people who do get married have children, but it's not synonymous. I imagine they won't be having any more kids out of their own volition so there is no need to be concerned, as far as I'm concerned. Also, I personally don't give a **** if they **** so long as they don't have any kids.
#34 to #33 - skulldan ONLINE
Reply -3
(08/24/2014) [-]
Your*
#84 to #28 - nigeltheoutlaw
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Who gives a **** at that point? I'd just shrug my shoulders and try not to breed again.
#52 to #19 - mrnpc
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Love may very well hold them together, but if their marriage was strained before, this would be its undoing. This is a big thing to drop on a couple. It also poses a danger to their daughter mentally and physically. Did they keep if from her or did they tell her?What about sex? Would you continue to bump uglies with your spouse if you suddenly found out they were your sibling? Its the little things people wouldn't think about that would break them up.
#55 to #52 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
well of course, thats obvious, i appologise i simply assumed your earlier comment was hostile and subjective in nature, but i dont think telling their child would be a problem... if it really is such a problem in their eyes imply wait a few years
#56 to #55 - mrnpc
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Honestly, they need to tell their daughter at some point. They also need to put her through genetic testing. Their daughter is my only real concern because this is a lot to tell a kid and because she may have ****** up genes hat could cause her problems later in life.
Personally, I'd tell her when she's in her 20's and is more likely to handle the news better
#57 to #56 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
i wouldnt worry about it, its not like it happend for generations, unless a diease runs in the family, and i cant concieve how this could be an emotional burden, maby i was a weird kid but i would have just blown it off and been like "oh, uh okay, thats cool n stuff"
#58 to #57 - mrnpc
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Think about the message tat sends to anyone but an adult. To a kid it says incestuous relationships are ok, and may be make them more likely to be sexually abused by a family member (who wishes to take advantage of said mindset). To a teenager it says your parents are sick and can't be trusted, and will likely cause them to act out.
#61 to #58 - lanfearandthecup ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
while i agree about the kid part, i dissagree about the teenager part, just because your emotional, doesnt mean you cant use logic... i mean i was a teenager once myself, its not some foreign thing i could never understand
#6 - makomirocket
Reply +21
(08/23/2014) [-]
source or it didnt happen

these 'did you know?'s are always extremely suspicious and always lack an accompanying source
#40 to #6 - greendroid
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
These did you knows are most of the time accurate with the occasional batch of ********. Come on, you wouldn't throw in some ******** so that thousands of people that follow your ******* blog can just go for it?
#4 - lordcuntdestroyer
Reply +18
(08/23/2014) [-]
#29 - sockprague
Reply +4
(08/24/2014) [-]
They do blood tests for this very reason before getting married.
#45 to #29 - fitemeirlbro ONLINE
Reply +17
(08/24/2014) [-]
not in some states
#54 to #45 - sockprague
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
yeah you're right. I assumed it was nation wide.
#97 to #54 - xbyronx
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
This happened in Brazil and they never had there marriage officially notarized by the state.
#21 - turdmurpson
Reply +14
(08/24/2014) [-]
di...did i....did i read that correctly
#22 to #21 - theseqceeman
Reply -1
(08/24/2014) [-]
omg lOL I CANT EVEN
sorry, im a dickhead
#23 to #22 - turdmurpson
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
quite but i do like the oney profile picture
#24 to #23 - theseqceeman
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
better quality
#25 to #24 - turdmurpson
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
be careful of those pointy bits
#59 - reaversoulstealer
Reply +4
(08/24/2014) [-]
Gee willikers, a post about incest?! Golly gosh, this is such an interesting topic! If only I knew someone who partook in such devilish things!














Chaoticlaw
#60 to #59 - chaoticlaw
Reply +6
(08/24/2014) [-]
As if you've never ****** your sister.
#62 to #60 - reaversoulstealer
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
But that was just a bet. We didn't have feelings for each other. Unlike someone I know.
But that was just a bet. We didn't have feelings for each other. Unlike someone I know.
#63 to #62 - chaoticlaw
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
**** you.
#64 to #63 - reaversoulstealer
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
#71 to #63 - dronenortle
Reply -2
(08/24/2014) [-]
I hope you ******* dickflips are joking about that whole incest ****, like it's not even humorous.
#74 to #71 - reaversoulstealer
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
Oh it's true, alright. It's true.
#96 to #74 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
I would joke along with you if I didn't have suppressed emotions about my psychotic sister. I'll literally never understand you incest fetishists, and she's why.


Not that that's necessarily a bad thing.
#98 to #96 - reaversoulstealer
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
Oh it's not a fetish for him, he just views her as both a sister and a lover.


Which now that I think about it, sounds super weird, but yeah, not a fetish. For him at least.
#91 to #60 - princessren ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
so what happened?   
I am kinda interested
so what happened?
I am kinda interested
#99 to #91 - chaoticlaw
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
My sister almost got raped by some guys on our birthday a few years back.  I say our birthday cause we're twins  I was there, so nothing happened, but I did have to go to the hospital. A little bit after that, I told her, I was pretty scared something else might happen before I let her know how I felt. That's pretty much it.
My sister almost got raped by some guys on our birthday a few years back. I say our birthday cause we're twins I was there, so nothing happened, but I did have to go to the hospital. A little bit after that, I told her, I was pretty scared something else might happen before I let her know how I felt. That's pretty much it.
#5 - kalagas
Reply +6
(08/23/2014) [-]
I imagine after having what they have now, they'd just go "eh, **** it" and just continue with their life together. Doesn't inbreeding skip the 1st generation anyways? At the 2nd generation of inbreeding all the real bad potential risks kick in, I think.
#9 to #5 - faroeseguy
Reply -1
(08/23/2014) [-]
The risk of retardation and what not isn't really that big in inbreeding. It's just bigger than non-inbreeding.
#14 to #5 - screamingdemon
Reply +1
(08/24/2014) [-]
That's basically what they did. I read that their daughter was a perfectly normal, healthy kid and that they kept being together.
#7 to #5 - joberja
Reply +3
(08/23/2014) [-]
The potential for issues increases with each generation, but you can have issues with the first generation of inbreeding.
#76 to #7 - anon
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
it's only like 3% though, they'll probably get over the grossness, practice safe sex and be fine... one would hope.
#27 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
"Regardless, they say they love each other and plan to stay together."
#35 to #27 - thewulfman
Reply +2
(08/24/2014) [-]
Good.
#70 to #13 - drizztrocks
Reply 0
(08/24/2014) [-]
>Maymay arrows
>Gawker as a relevant source
>Just haven't seen the latest Quinspiracy Theory
#78 to #70 - danniegurl
Reply -1
(08/24/2014) [-]
oh yeah, I know about that. I just used the source I saw on a youtube video that talked about this. didn't even pay attention to the website, tbh.
#77 to #70 - danniegurl
Reply -1
(08/24/2014) [-]
?