i have a bad feeling this is true

Reply

+243

#2 - hornypotatohumper (08/23/2014) [-]

Game of thrones spoilers!!!!

Reply

+134

#8 - include (08/23/2014) [+] (3 replies)

Reply

+23

#15 to #8 - misterblack (08/24/2014) [-]

Reply

+25

#16 to #15 - gibroner (08/24/2014) [-]

Reply

+2

#90 to #8 - youdoublecongoid ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

Reply

+50

#1 - mrnpc (08/23/2014) [+] (27 replies)

Did they get divorced? Because I would love to see the look on the judge's face when this came to trial.

Reply

+21

#19 to #1 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

let me get this straight... they have been happily married for a long time, had no idea they were siblings, have had sex, have a daughter, and they learn that they are related... you expect them to drop everything simply because they they are blood? its not like they grew up in the same house, they didnt have any other relationship, they came to love eachother as two people seperate... would you say that someone who is adopted isnt allowed to love their family simply because they are not blood? (ik that wasnt 100% relevant, but my point was love it love, whatever the situation)

Reply

+10

#28 to #19 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

dude, its her brother.
every party, "so you got any siblings"
"yeah"
"oh yeah, older or younger"
looks ACROSS AT HUSBAND "older"
you will think about that EVERY time

Reply

+2

#30 to #28 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

look assmuing they loved eachother enough to get maried and are happy, it shouldnt be a problem

Reply

+3

#31 to #30 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

its a BIG oversight to just look past

Reply

+2

#32 to #31 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

why?

Reply

-5

#33 to #32 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

BECAUSE ITS YOU ******* BROTHER/SISTER
i dont know what redneck town you might be from but that means you share the same blood and dna

Reply

+1

#37 to #33 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

blood != relationships, as i said, simply because your related, doesnt mean you have any other ties with that person, perhpas im just odd but, if you are not emotionally attached to someone (in the form of plutonic love) then i dont see what the problem is. your family isnt your blood, they are the people you care about, the people you grew up with, the people whom took care of you, while im kind of using this out of context, i feel it pertains: "you cant change your upbringing, where, how, when, to whom you were born, but you can still be a good,loving,caring person" (imo its not exact, and is not exactally relevant but you get my point.

Reply

-6

#38 to #37 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

seeing as reletives are somthing that is real and has always been around
and love is a "made up" emotion that people are told they feel when actually its affection for people we care about and desire for people we dont know i would say its a big issue

Reply

+4

#39 to #38 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

well if love is a "made up" emotion how is the love between your spouse and your family any different? what sets the two appart? by your logic nothing.

Reply

-4

#42 to #39 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

reletives "affection"
others "desire"
i just said that...

Reply

+1

#44 to #42 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

ah, sorry i misread what you said, but it would seem based by your comment bringnig scince into this wouldnt be a problem so i shal begin, in nature animals have been known to mate with their siblings (inclusing more evolved species whom mate for life and feel emotional happiness and pain) but you could argue they dont know correct? well these people did not know, and if an animal found out it wouldnt care (but then again we are not talking about reasoning animals). scientifically being related means squat, the only possible problem is that it limits genetic integrity, but even that is only if done for multiple generations, hell if you want to say that humans are just products of eveloution, then being "related" means **** , it means NOTHING, simply that you came from this other thing, you know what makes us not want to **** our siblings? emotion, without emotion it does not matter, there is nothing moraly wrong as long as you dont talk about emotion, and thats true with anything, for all we know the internet could be moraly wrong, but no one has the emotion "i should not use the internet, it is a wrong thing to do for (blank) reason" and because of that we continue to use it

Reply

-5

#46 to #44 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

TL;DR

Reply

+3

#47 to #46 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

lol, any integrity, and any possiblity of me considering what you have to say is understandable has gone out the door, if your not willing to be educated, dont speak.

Reply

-4

#48 to #47 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

anything that long is almost not worth reading, its just expanding a 1 or 2 sentence theory expanded to look smarter, if you want to look smart dont argue on the internet.

Reply

+1

#49 to #48 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

you cant claim in expanding a 1-2 sentence theory, when you didnt read it. and as much as you wish it wasnt the case, all collective inteligence isnt thrown out the door the second you connect to the internet, we just choose not to use it, but i choose to use it (sometimes)

Reply

-2

#50 to #49 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

all im going to say is if inbreeding was ok, then there would not be issues from offspring.
Seeing as increased complications increase through every inbreeding it should not be a thing at all.

Reply

+2

#67 to #50 - wallbuilder (08/24/2014) [-]

So now it's inbreeding, and not marriage, that is the problem? If you thought it was only inbreeding that was the problem then your argument would hold up. But you said they should divorce.

Reply

0

#72 to #67 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

isnt that the point of marriage? To have kids and then be together to raise that child?
Maybe im wrong here and judging by the thumbs it must be. But i do have a problem with it and i dont know why im the only one apparently

Reply

0

#73 to #72 - wallbuilder (08/24/2014) [-]

Marriage does not equate to children. Sure, most people who do get married have children, but it's not synonymous. I imagine they won't be having any more kids out of their own volition so there is no need to be concerned, as far as I'm concerned. Also, I personally don't give a **** if they **** so long as they don't have any kids.

Reply

-3

#34 to #33 - skulldan ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

Your*

Reply

0

#84 to #28 - nigeltheoutlaw (08/24/2014) [-]

Who gives a **** at that point? I'd just shrug my shoulders and try not to breed again.

Reply

0

#52 to #19 - mrnpc (08/24/2014) [-]

Love may very well hold them together, but if their marriage was strained before, this would be its undoing. This is a big thing to drop on a couple. It also poses a danger to their daughter mentally and physically. Did they keep if from her or did they tell her?What about sex? Would you continue to bump uglies with your spouse if you suddenly found out they were your sibling? Its the little things people wouldn't think about that would break them up.

Reply

+1

#55 to #52 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

well of course, thats obvious, i appologise i simply assumed your earlier comment was hostile and subjective in nature, but i dont think telling their child would be a problem... if it really is such a problem in their eyes imply wait a few years

Reply

0

#56 to #55 - mrnpc (08/24/2014) [-]

Honestly, they need to tell their daughter at some point. They also need to put her through genetic testing. Their daughter is my only real concern because this is a lot to tell a kid and because she may have ****** up genes hat could cause her problems later in life.
Personally, I'd tell her when she's in her 20's and is more likely to handle the news better

Reply

0

#57 to #56 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

i wouldnt worry about it, its not like it happend for generations, unless a diease runs in the family, and i cant concieve how this could be an emotional burden, maby i was a weird kid but i would have just blown it off and been like "oh, uh okay, thats cool n stuff"

Reply

0

#58 to #57 - mrnpc (08/24/2014) [-]

Think about the message tat sends to anyone but an adult. To a kid it says incestuous relationships are ok, and may be make them more likely to be sexually abused by a family member (who wishes to take advantage of said mindset). To a teenager it says your parents are sick and can't be trusted, and will likely cause them to act out.

Reply

0

#61 to #58 - lanfearandthecup (08/24/2014) [-]

while i agree about the kid part, i dissagree about the teenager part, just because your emotional, doesnt mean you cant use logic... i mean i was a teenager once myself, its not some foreign thing i could never understand

Reply

+21

#6 - makomirocket (08/23/2014) [+] (3 replies)

source or it didnt happen

these 'did you know?'s are always extremely suspicious and always lack an accompanying source

Reply

+5

#11 to #6 - locke (08/23/2014) [-]

i come bearing gifts of source!
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2718216/Woman-tracks-mother-abandoned-baby-realises-unwittingly-married-BROTHER.html

Reply

+2

#41 to #6 - greendroid (08/24/2014) [-]

And also heres your source
gawker.com/woman-reunites-with-long-lost-mom-learns-she-married-h-1617604033

Reply

0

#40 to #6 - greendroid (08/24/2014) [-]

These did you knows are most of the time accurate with the occasional batch of ******** . Come on, you wouldn't throw in some ******** so that thousands of people that follow your ******* blog can just go for it?

Reply

+18

#4 - lordcuntdestroyer (08/23/2014) [-]

Reply

+4

#29 - sockprague (08/24/2014) [+] (3 replies)

They do blood tests for this very reason before getting married.

Reply

+17

#45 to #29 - fitemeirlbro (08/24/2014) [-]

not in some states

Reply

+1

#54 to #45 - sockprague (08/24/2014) [-]

yeah you're right. I assumed it was nation wide.

Reply

+1

#97 to #54 - xbyronx (08/24/2014) [-]

This happened in Brazil and they never had there marriage officially notarized by the state.

Reply

+14

#21 - turdmurpson (08/24/2014) [+] (4 replies)

di...did i....did i read that correctly

Reply

-1

#22 to #21 - theseqceeman (08/24/2014) [-]

omg lOL I CANT EVEN
sorry, im a dickhead

Reply

0

#23 to #22 - turdmurpson (08/24/2014) [-]

quite but i do like the oney profile picture

Reply

+2

#24 to #23 - theseqceeman (08/24/2014) [-]

better quality

Reply

0

#25 to #24 - turdmurpson (08/24/2014) [-]

be careful of those pointy bits

Reply

+4

#59 - reaversoulstealer (08/24/2014) [+] (10 replies)

Gee willikers, a post about incest?! Golly gosh, this is such an interesting topic! If only I knew someone who partook in such devilish things!

Chaoticlaw

Reply

+6

#60 to #59 - chaoticlaw (08/24/2014) [-]

As if you've never ****** your sister.

Reply

+2

#62 to #60 - reaversoulstealer (08/24/2014) [-]

But that was just a bet. We didn't have feelings for each other. Unlike someone I know.

Reply

+2

#63 to #62 - chaoticlaw (08/24/2014) [-]

**** you.

Reply

+2

#64 to #63 - reaversoulstealer (08/24/2014) [-]

Reply

-2

#71 to #63 - dronenortle (08/24/2014) [-]

I hope you ******* dickflips are joking about that whole incest **** , like it's not even humorous.

Reply

+1

#74 to #71 - reaversoulstealer (08/24/2014) [-]

Oh it's true, alright. It's true.

Reply

0

#96 to #74 - feelythefeel (08/24/2014) [-]

I would joke along with you if I didn't have suppressed emotions about my psychotic sister. I'll literally never understand you incest fetishists, and she's why.

Not that that's necessarily a bad thing.

Reply

0

#98 to #96 - reaversoulstealer (08/24/2014) [-]

Oh it's not a fetish for him, he just views her as both a sister and a lover.

Which now that I think about it, sounds super weird, but yeah, not a fetish. For him at least.

Reply

0

#91 to #60 - princessren (08/24/2014) [-]

so what happened?
I am kinda interested

Reply

0

#99 to #91 - chaoticlaw (08/24/2014) [-]

My sister almost got raped by some guys on our birthday a few years back. I say our birthday cause we're twins I was there, so nothing happened, but I did have to go to the hospital. A little bit after that, I told her, I was pretty scared something else might happen before I let her know how I felt. That's pretty much it.

Reply

+6

#5 - kalagas (08/23/2014) [+] (4 replies)

I imagine after having what they have now, they'd just go "eh, **** it" and just continue with their life together. Doesn't inbreeding skip the 1st generation anyways? At the 2nd generation of inbreeding all the real bad potential risks kick in, I think.

Reply

+3

#7 to #5 - joberja ONLINE (08/23/2014) [-]

The potential for issues increases with each generation, but you can have issues with the first generation of inbreeding.

Reply

0

#76 to #7 - anonexplains (08/24/2014) [-]

it's only like 3% though, they'll probably get over the grossness, practice safe sex and be fine... one would hope.

Reply

+1

#14 to #5 - screamingdemon ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

That's basically what they did. I read that their daughter was a perfectly normal, healthy kid and that they kept being together.

Reply

-1

#9 to #5 - faroeseguy (08/23/2014) [-]

The risk of retardation and what not isn't really that big in inbreeding. It's just bigger than non-inbreeding.

Reply

+5

#13 - danniegurl (08/24/2014) [+] (5 replies)

source
gawker.com/woman-reunites-with-long-lost-mom-learns-she-married-h-1617604033

Reply

0

#70 to #13 - drizztrocks (08/24/2014) [-]

>Maymay arrows
>Gawker as a relevant source
>Just haven't seen the latest Quinspiracy Theory

Reply

-1

#78 to #70 - danniegurl (08/24/2014) [-]

oh yeah, I know about that. I just used the source I saw on a youtube video that talked about this. didn't even pay attention to the website, tbh.

Reply

-1

#77 to #70 - danniegurl (08/24/2014) [-]

?

Reply

0

#27 to #13 - anonexplains (08/24/2014) [-]

"Regardless, they say they love each other and plan to stay together."

Reply

+2

#35 to #27 - thewulfman (08/24/2014) [-]

Good.

Reply

+4

#18 - apexbossin (08/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)

**apexbossin rolled image** KFW he finds out he's the spawn of incest.

Reply

0

#53 to #18 - accalia ONLINE (08/24/2014) [-]

Somehow oddly appropriate

Reply

+3

#92 - princessren (08/24/2014) [-]

"regardless, they say they love each other and plan to stay together"
awwww
gawker.com/woman-reunites-with-long-lost-mom-learns-she-married-h-1617604033

Reply

+3

#51 - undead (08/24/2014) [-]

Reply

+2

#68 - darkoblivion ONLINE (08/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)

they say when sibling aren't brought up together and have never met there's a chance that when they do meet they'll develop strong feeling for each other. And since i know real incest is a thing i'm certain this happened in some way shape or form.

Reply

0

#79 to #68 - lebarricuda (08/24/2014) [-]

There's also the fact that growing up in a broken apart family teaches people to be introverted and rather unsocial. There's a chance that the father/uncle also found her first and being the only person he ever socially developed a relationship with, do to his inexperience and low self-esteem, knew that already.

Anyone have more in-depth detail (links) of where this is from?

Reply

+1

#87 - tealkangaroo (08/24/2014) [-]

that's simply ********

Reply

-4

#66 - WTFburger (08/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)

VIVA LA RACCOON!! DOWN WITH JOSHLOL!!

Reply

+1

#69 to #66 - dronenortle (08/24/2014) [-]

Feeding their flame is not the game sport.