Deadpool Rant. .. I'm sorry but what is your point again? All I heard was how badly you're but hurt by the internet.
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
I'm sorry but what is your point again? All I heard was how badly you're but hurt by the internet.
I'm sorry but what is your point again? All I heard was how badly you're but hurt by the internet.
#5 to #3 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
I want to enjoy a character. Writers will pander to the idiotic crowd and eventually, deadpool will be nothing more than a bumbling idiot.
User avatar #7 to #5 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Or maybe if the writers of the comic were TRUE writers they wouldn't care about the public and maintain the character they way he is because it is their "baby" and they will "raise" it to their liking not the social views of what it should be. Do you see how your assumption makes you no better then the people you criticize?
Before your rage and post about your assumptions keep this in mind:
When you assume all you're doing is making an ass out of you and me.
Do you get it OP?
#9 to #7 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
Not so much an assumption as an observation. More people happy = more money.
User avatar #11 to #9 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
But a TRUE writer doesn't care about money or people's opinion of their work. They do it because it is something they love to do and they choose to express their creations in the form of literary works. Understanding of BOTH sides from a exploratory and informed view point will lead to a clearer mind as well as less disdain for others and their opinions or their choice of perception.
#12 to #11 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
For other pieces of literature, that's very true. But for comics, there's a lot of pressure to sell a lot every week, so making people happy with their purchase is priority one.
User avatar #16 to #12 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
If that was true a lot of comics, as well as graphic novels would not still be in print and creating new issues whilst still keeping to the original character. By you choosing 1 thing and nit picking at it, all you have done is TRY and create a cause which has no foothold. It is like me saying "Oh you misused a meme. You're cancer. Use them properly". No one actually cares what you think about others doing to something you enjoy as long as they are happy. The best advice I can give you you is LET IT GO. By you "raging" at people who are destroying your favorite, or 1 of your favorite, characters you are becoming cancer yourself. Also look at a silver lining. Even if they do conform and change the character to meet the publics demands another company may buy rights to the character and produce their own Deadpool comic and keep it as strongly to the character as it is now. It has been done in the past and now both series do exceedingly well because there are people on both sides of the fence.
User avatar #10 - thegoodgatsby (09/12/2012) [-]
And what, pray tell, makes you think people don't read the Deadpool comics? It sounds to me that you're just angry that everyone doesn't know everything about Deadpool, and you think you do.
#13 to #10 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
It's pretty obvious from some of the comments i posted above.
User avatar #14 to #13 - thegoodgatsby (09/12/2012) [-]
You can't expect everyone to read every issue of Deadpool or Deadpool-related stories. That's insane. If you know a lot about the character, good for you. You're a true fanboy. But not everyone is like that. Some people just don't like comics, but do like the humor in Deadpool. You're going to have to deal with that.
#15 to #14 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
Well, you're entitled to your opinion.
User avatar #17 to #15 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
I think you just disproved your rage post by saying that. Just saying.
#18 to #17 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
By saying he's entitled to his opinion?
User avatar #19 to #18 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Yes. You're raging because people are misusing Deadpool images or not understanding Deadpool because they haven't read the comics. In their opinion they do not need to because everything they WANT to know they already know. Then you have your opinion of they are destroying Deadpool. Opinions are like assholes: Everyone has one and sometimes they are ****** but it doesn't mean you have to clean theirs for them.
#20 to #19 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
Man. Another one. Anyway, it doesn't really disprove anything... especially since you can't disprove an opinion.
User avatar #21 to #20 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
You can when it is contradictory to itself. You're mad because people have their opinion on how Deadpool is or how it should be so you created the content. Then you say "Well, you're entitled to your opinion". Do you not see the contradiction in your content and your comment? If you don't like being notified then you shouldn't have created this account and stayed logged in since you do not care if it is thumbed up or down. The best thing to do is recognize you have posted your point, delete the account, and get on with your life.
#22 to #21 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
That's not why i'm mad. Where did you get that from? I'm mad because people claim to be "huge fans of Deadpool", yet know nothing about the character.
User avatar #23 to #22 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Just because someone says "OMG I LOVE DEADPOOL!" or "IM A HUGE DEADPOOL FAN" doesn't mean they ruin a character. They said that because they have an OPINION of the character and fell in love with the character based on THEIR opinion of them. Love or hate for a character or anything for that matter is based on the persons OPINION of it not how well they are informed or know about it. Like I love Reese's Peanut Buttercups but that doesn;t mean I know when they were invented or the creators name or the candies original name. I love them because in MY OPINION they are delicious. Is any of this getting through to you yet cause repetition is gettiing REALLY old REALLY quick.
#24 to #23 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
Then stop replying if it bothers you so much. Everything you're saying is getting through to me, but you don't seem to understand what i'm saying. (Trust me, repetition is getting old for me too.) I'm not saying that just because they say the like the character ruins it. I'm also not saying the character is ruined. (hence the name DON'Truindeadpool.) I'm saying that the large amount of the fanbase (specifically on FunnyJunk) seem to think that the character is good for nothing other than jokes and general quirkiness. I'm saying that, because of that, fans of the ACTUAL character are quickly becoming the minority and, as I've said before, writers will be forced to pander to the masses in order to sell.
User avatar #25 to #24 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Yes I know what you are saying. And these new fans are now fans because they have the opinion that that is how deapool is even though he is not (well not all the time as he does have moments). see, an opionion. As for the writers comment(s) I refer you to history as well as modern writers who many will not know of or heard of any of their works. There are countless writers who hold to their standing of their characters. To give you an example: I am reading the Department 19 series by Will Hill. A teen vampire fiction series that when looked at by most would seem like a twilight rip off. It has similarities but is the complete opposite and he is releasing a 3rd book next year. Why do I mention this? because he had an idea that was similar to twilight but he did not pander to the screaming fans of these style books when his 2nd book was released. Instead he wrote the characters the same in both books as he invisioned them. That is what TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE writers do. If the authors of Deadpool are "forced" to write him a certain way then they are not writers but merely scribes for the public's wants a desires. I would expect this kind of arguement to take place on something other then a comic series or graphic novel but alas to each their own.
#33 to #25 - arguement (10/07/2012) [-]
#27 to #25 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
To avoid the repetition you were complaining about, I refer you to my earlier comment about how comic writers are different from novel writers. Also, the cases are different in one aspect. The majority. As many fans there are of Twilight, there are more who hate it. That's not the case here.
User avatar #28 to #27 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
All writers are the same. They became writers for the same reasons no matter the media they portray it in whether it be novel or comic. So that point you have makes no sense. They love to write in certain genres and persued it. As for Twilight, It doesn't matter how many haters something has as the hate is never publicized in media but only positive feedback (which causes greater negative feedback that still goes on ignored) thus creating the "standard" that fans of the genre see all written media in the genre should be. If a writer surcomes to the peer pressure then they are not a writer but a scribe. If this happens to Deadpool then you were never reading an origional idea but merely a reflection of the public and corporate ideals of the super hero.
#29 to #28 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
The hate never publicized in the media? The internet is the largest form of media in the world and the hate's ALL OVER IT. And you keep using the word scribe, but you obviously don't know what it means. I'm not going to reiterate my main point, because it's obviously lost on you. Talk to some writers. You'll find out how much social pressure affects their writing.
User avatar #30 to #29 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
A scribe, per ancient definition, was someone who wrote what was dictated to them by a ruler or someone who could afford to pay for their services. The term has taken on new definition over the centuries thus losing its true roots as most words int he english language has. And no your point is not lost to me. What is lost however is you're ability to rebutle. As for the internet "publicizing" the hate for Twilight. Never once on any repuitable news source website have I seen an article entitled "Twilight haters show their hatred in new ways" or "Twilight haters attack Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson in the street to show their hate". No it always the stories of fangirls and fanboys showing their love for a character in extreme and odd ways.
#31 to #30 - dontruindeadpool (09/12/2012) [-]
Actually, a scribe, per ancient definition, is someone who can write, as it was not a very common skill back then. What do you consider a reputable news website? Because, depending on your definition, I can refer you to several. And no, there is plenty of talk of dislike for Twilight and Stephanie Meyer on the internet. To say otherwise is either ignorant or idiotic.
User avatar #32 to #31 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Notice I said the hat on the internet then went to referring to the news sites of the web. Not the entire web. Also you are partially correct on your definition, it was someone who could write and is a word that would later be replaced by writer, but as a trade a scribe is nothing more then someone who writes what is dictated. I will continue this discussion tomorrow as I am headed to bed with my wife, a writer, so i bid you good day or goodnight.
User avatar #26 to #25 - zapdospkmn (09/12/2012) [-]
Oh and I would stop replying if you're incessant need to rage was not present in all fo your replies. Want this to stop? then simply do not reply. Bite your tongue and (as stated earlier) move on.
#2 - donekilledyou has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)