Here, you missed a spot. Many dogs are being taken from their homes right now. To make a difference, you can visit Chang dot org and type Pitbull Round Up into  bunny Dog pitbull sharky lick
x
Click to expand

Here, you missed a spot

Here, you missed a spot. Many dogs are being taken from their homes right now. To make a difference, you can visit Chang dot org and type Pitbull Round Up into

Many dogs are being taken from their homes right now. To make a difference, you can visit Chang dot org and type Pitbull Round Up into the search bar. Sorry to be kinda' FB, but many dogs are already being put down.

  • Recommend tagsx
+527
Views: 19197
Favorited: 46
Submitted: 12/23/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to iducur Subscribe to dawwwww submit to reddit
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#40 - rabbitfood (12/24/2012) [-]
bunnies :D
bunnies :D
#69 to #40 - kotos (01/13/2013) [-]
BUNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#43 to #40 - matoob ONLINE (12/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#20 - brandeerawr (12/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #13 - tonttu (12/23/2012) [-]
Why many dogs are being taken from their homes? What Is this about?
User avatar #15 to #14 - tonttu (12/23/2012) [-]
Holy **** . That has to be the most dickish and the most horrible thing ever.
+2
#25 to #14 - cryaotic **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #61 to #25 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
For some reason that gif always makes me think of "Boom there it is, boom there it is, boom there is is..." it works...
User avatar #45 - gekkohunter **User deleted account** (12/24/2012) [-]
AH **** ! THE FEELS FOUND ME!!
#34 - thereasonableperso ONLINE (12/24/2012) [-]
Have all my thumbs. And i'd hate to be that person but im reposting this everywhere.
#23 - anon (12/24/2012) [-]
signed
User avatar #17 - starlightloves (12/23/2012) [-]
Signed it! That is such stupid **** . It's not the dogs' faults. It is the fault of their owners. Even beagles and golden retrievers can be vicious.
#33 - darkjustifier (12/24/2012) [-]
That's adorable.
#2 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
Nig
-1
#3 to #2 - jarvanthetopcamper has deleted their comment [-]
-2
#1 - iducur Comment deleted by iducur [-]
User avatar #6 - kingnarnode (12/23/2012) [-]
they're just dogs, who actually gives a ****
0
#18 to #6 - yourmomtotherescue **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #50 to #18 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
something dogs don't have
0
#57 to #50 - yourmomtotherescue **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #67 to #57 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
i never said i didn't like them, i just don't care for them, domesticated animals are useless, save for a few purposes
#32 to #6 - thisotherdude (12/24/2012) [-]
Really hope your entire family dies a horrible, painful death right in front of you asshole.
Really hope your entire family dies a horrible, painful death right in front of you asshole.
User avatar #44 to #32 - matoob ONLINE (12/24/2012) [-]
it funny cos i care more for my dog than i do my brother
User avatar #51 to #44 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
because you're a lunatic
#35 to #32 - darkjustifier (12/24/2012) [-]
I recognize him from mp comics but who is he?
User avatar #37 to #35 - thisotherdude (12/24/2012) [-]
Dan, he's from a show on the hub called Dan vs. It's a decent show in my opinion, though fairly under-rated compared to shows like MLP.
#38 to #37 - darkjustifier (12/24/2012) [-]
So it's animated sounds interesting.
#39 to #38 - thisotherdude (12/24/2012) [-]
If you want a plot synopsis look it up yourself, I gave you the name of the show already! What more do you want you needy 			****		!?   
   
Nah, I'm just 			************		 ya. Basically the show revolves around Dan, an angry lactose intolerate short jobless man who lives in a really 			******		 apartment. Mostly the episodes follow a formula: Something or someone rustled Dan's jimmies, Dan gets mad and plans to commit ridiculously over the top revenge (he destroyed half of Canada because he got covered in maple syrup in one episode), and usually succeeds. He usually carries out his schemes with his more level headed (and by level headed I mean sane) friend Chris, who generally acts as the voice of reason but almost always ends up doing whatever Dan tells him to because he's a little bitch.
If you want a plot synopsis look it up yourself, I gave you the name of the show already! What more do you want you needy **** !?

Nah, I'm just ************ ya. Basically the show revolves around Dan, an angry lactose intolerate short jobless man who lives in a really ****** apartment. Mostly the episodes follow a formula: Something or someone rustled Dan's jimmies, Dan gets mad and plans to commit ridiculously over the top revenge (he destroyed half of Canada because he got covered in maple syrup in one episode), and usually succeeds. He usually carries out his schemes with his more level headed (and by level headed I mean sane) friend Chris, who generally acts as the voice of reason but almost always ends up doing whatever Dan tells him to because he's a little bitch.
#41 to #39 - darkjustifier (12/24/2012) [-]
Oh dear sweet celestia I'm already in stitches.
User avatar #36 to #35 - darkjustifier (12/24/2012) [-]
mlp
User avatar #53 to #32 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
and i hope they bring all those dogs to your house and murder them right in front of you
User avatar #54 to #53 - thisotherdude (12/24/2012) [-]
So it's agreed, we both hate each other and want the other guy to go through a horrible experience.
User avatar #55 to #54 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
well i wouldnt necessarily say I hate you, im kind of an eye for an eye person, so if you wish ill will on me the i wish it on you
User avatar #56 to #55 - thisotherdude (12/24/2012) [-]
But I hate you, so by your eye for an eye philosophy you should hate me because I hate you.
User avatar #68 to #56 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
sure I hate you then
#48 to #6 - thexxtalonxx (12/24/2012) [-]
Maybe I should just round up people like you and murder them just for being dicks and dick-like people.   
   
My excuse will be "They're just dicks, who gives a 			****		?"   
   
PS. You're on the list.
Maybe I should just round up people like you and murder them just for being dicks and dick-like people.

My excuse will be "They're just dicks, who gives a **** ?"

PS. You're on the list.
User avatar #52 to #48 - kingnarnode (12/24/2012) [-]
do it fagot
#9 to #6 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
cunt
User avatar #10 to #9 - kingnarnode (12/23/2012) [-]
what, we kill animals all the time, oh but this one is domesticated, i guess it's special
+5
#16 to #10 - keggut **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #10 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
Well, one can still hope that the animals we DO kill we kill for a reason. The MIssouri regulations however would be killing domesticated animals that some people have grown to love, and are based on some idiot's ill-informed statements...
0
#47 to #10 - yourmomtotherescue **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#7 to #6 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
Sir, to some people, dogs are part of the family. To them it's the same as having their children or their siblings taken away.
It breaks peoples hearts.
Innocent dogs are being killed senselessly due to some idiots not raising their dogs correctly.
User avatar #8 to #7 - kingnarnode (12/23/2012) [-]
you could have just said some people are lunatics
User avatar #12 to #8 - codyxvasco ONLINE (12/23/2012) [-]
You should just stop posting....
#4 - anon (12/23/2012) [-]
It is bad that they are being put down. OH LOOK CARTOONS ARE ON!
User avatar #5 to #4 - bonboy (12/23/2012) [-]
asshole....
#30 to #4 - caperess (12/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#71 - diegrammernazis (05/13/2013) [-]
< this is defiantly one violent bugger.
#59 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
You need to login to view this link good info on Pits if you or some one you know is doubtful about them.
User avatar #19 - mutzaki (12/23/2012) [-]
I think it's pretty extreme to take pitbulls away and have them put down, but I definitely think any large or potentially dangerous breed of dog should require a license to own, and penalty towards owners should increase.
User avatar #49 to #19 - nighkey (12/24/2012) [-]
I happen to own a large, neutered pit bull. They do in fact have so much muscle around their skull that a man once shot one in the back of the head, thinking they hit bone, and only found muscle. (It had gotten hit by a car on accident, the owner couldn't do anything, it was dying, cop saw and tried to put it down. Cop took it to vet, vet put it in freezer, the cold stopped the bleeding, and it woke up alive. Vet saved it, owner got it back.)

Working in a vet clinic myself, from experience with my own pitbull and caring for other's, they are very good family dogs. The catch that could make them dangerous is that they love their family so much, and want to protect them so much, that they aren't afraid to potentially be aggressive to someone they perceive as a threat. Like that guy trying to steal gas from my lawn mower. - - He nearly got attacked. Only time that dog's ever wanted to hurt someone before. But he cuddles and "shares his toys" with my new baby. Very caring, gentle with family.
User avatar #58 to #49 - mutzaki (12/24/2012) [-]
Yes, of course, if you are up to the task of owning a potentially dangerous breed, it's fine. People never seem to understand what I mean when I get into this, and just talk about how their dogs are well-behaved and so great; no offense.
But fact is that certain large breeds of dogs have a history of being used as basically weapons, or becoming a threat if unproperly taken care of or disciplined. If someone who doesn't know how to raise such a dog is taking care of one, it's only naïve to believe that the dog couldn't possibly endanger people it comes into contact with. Of course it's a bit different between individuals, but it's not a coincidence that breeds like rotweilers and pitbulls, etc. have the kind of infamy when absolutely anyone can adopt one. That's why I think a required license is in order.
#60 to #58 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
But also, wounds and bites from smaller dogs are much less likely to be reported.   

			
			You need to login to view this link
But also, wounds and bites from smaller dogs are much less likely to be reported.
You need to login to view this link
User avatar #62 to #60 - mutzaki (12/24/2012) [-]
Probably because they're usually a lot less serious, and smaller dogs are easier for people to fend off. Undisciplined large dogs have a history of sometimes killing children.
User avatar #63 to #62 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
Yes, almost 90% because the parents won't watch them. It's sad, and some things do need to change, but making more legal hoops to jump through before an animal can be rescued, in my opinion, may not be the best choice. They should get rid of BSL, which they even admit just cost $ and protects nobody, and have more thorough interviews with the possible owner and a background check.
User avatar #66 to #63 - mutzaki (12/24/2012) [-]
Owners need to keep watch over their dogs, rather, since they're the ones that cause danger. Obviously parents should keep watch of their children, but at the same time, a child who approaches a dog on the street should never be in danger because of that. Both are at fault, but mainly the dog owner if the animal isn't fit to be around children, since they are everywhere and aren't the ones that make up for danger upon others.

Instead of focusing mainly on the rescuing of animals, I think that something should be done about continued superfluous breeding. Much more controlled breeding and punishment for bringing unwanted puppies into the world should be established, since that helps take care of the problem. So a license to breed puppies and making sure that they're wanted should be a must.
#64 to #63 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
Maybe random drug tests wouldn't hurt either. There's more drugs and such involved in dog fighting rings than drug rings these days.    
Ugh, why do people have to be awful to begin with?   
They make the once called &quot;nanny dog&quot; fight to the death, steal, shoot up places...I say tougher psyc screenings for dogs weapons. That way, psycho's can only resort to this to hurt anyone (gif)
Maybe random drug tests wouldn't hurt either. There's more drugs and such involved in dog fighting rings than drug rings these days.
Ugh, why do people have to be awful to begin with?
They make the once called "nanny dog" fight to the death, steal, shoot up places...I say tougher psyc screenings for dogs weapons. That way, psycho's can only resort to this to hurt anyone (gif)
User avatar #65 to #64 - iducur (12/24/2012) [-]
*dogs and weapons
User avatar #22 to #19 - jessieqwertyu (12/24/2012) [-]
So even other nice family dogs? Like retrievers and labs?
User avatar #21 to #19 - pull (12/24/2012) [-]
Please. That's like saying fat people should have to have a license to be as obese as they are, or pay a special tax.
User avatar #26 to #21 - circuit (12/24/2012) [-]
... i kind of like that idea.
User avatar #27 to #26 - pull (12/24/2012) [-]
What, fat people, or dogs? One earns my respect, one makes me want to shank you with a corkscrew. Because I like dogs.
User avatar #28 to #27 - circuit (12/24/2012) [-]
no no i like dogs. fat people however.
User avatar #29 to #28 - pull (12/24/2012) [-]
Yeah lol. I'm slightly overweight at about 205 pounds, but DAMN some of these guys.
 Friends (0)