Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#58 - drcroccer
Reply +35
(06/10/2012) [-]
Science = Atheism now?

Must be awkward for all those religious scientists.
#91 to #58 - vanishingpoint
Reply 0
(06/10/2012) [-]
Sounds like something right out of the Enlightenment in early American times.
#74 to #58 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2012) [-]
Dont forget Issac Newton. Its not like he was the most important scientist to ever live or anything..
#68 to #58 - noblexfenrir
Reply -3
(06/10/2012) [-]
Again, people are looking way to far into this, I think OP was just using the words science and atheist to apply to the common situation where a theist will deny scientific evidence that doesn't help prove their deity. This is common so it's makes sense.
#73 to #68 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2012) [-]
^ actually this makes perfect sense sociologically. That does happen a lot in this particular term 'can your science explain that' is very commonly used in the debate particularly when someone starts presenting stupid cases with their religion at the heart of it. It's specifically targeted towards those hardcore religious believers who think their religion explains everything.
Although the title Sokka is atheist is kinda stupid.
#76 to #73 - noblexfenrir
Reply 0
(06/10/2012) [-]
Yes since it really doesn't have anything to do with religion, I think "Sokka is skeptic" would have been better but oh well. I can't really complain it gives me ********** to join in on.