Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #223 - arsonistchapel (01/29/2013) [-]
Go take a Theology class before you think you're the genius that cracks the Bible.
User avatar #270 to #223 - cullenatorguy (01/29/2013) [-]
You take the bible seriously? It doesn't take a degree in theology to recognize that the Bible is just the group of desert scribbles that won. What if the Egyptian religion had survived? Their scriptures and writings are older and better preserved than the Jews', leading one to the conclusion that Egyptians were smarter and better accustomed to actually keeping better histories and works on their religion.
User avatar #434 to #270 - theexo (02/01/2013) [-]
dude. egyptian religion is kick-ass. but i think we all need to get back to worshiping the one true king of gods, zeus. poor guy's been feeling neglected recently
User avatar #435 to #434 - cullenatorguy (02/01/2013) [-]
I know, right? I don't know when the last time he got some mortal ass was.
User avatar #231 to #223 - princenarnode (01/29/2013) [-]
as if we need to take theology to know the bible is a load of horse **** ? For example God kills the first born of every Egyptian family, and within the same boom proceeds to say thou shall not kill. **** you.
User avatar #282 to #231 - parlimantum (01/29/2013) [-]
Moses told the Egyptians to let the Israelites go, the Pharoah did not, so God sent the Ten Plagues. This was God's specific command. He was showing His power and glory through the Plagues, and showing how all the Egyptian gods could not stop him. He then goes to tell the Israelites "you shall not kill", as in murder, which is a deliberate, conscious taking of another person's life with malice aforethought. In the Old Testament, he had several laws that had the death penalty. These people sinned, and God brought down judgement on them.

So basically, I respectfully disagree with your example. You need context before you go making these so-called points.
User avatar #290 to #282 - princenarnode (01/29/2013) [-]
this is so funny it has to be a joke. So it must be ok when I myself kill innocents just to show my power and glory, so long as it does not involve the deliberate conscious taking of another persons life? Or is it only ok when God does it? The way you are explaining this to me gives me the impression that God is above his own law.

also "These people sinned, and God brought down judgement on them." You have to be some sick **** to believe this **** . Who did God kill? the first born of every house hold, who many were probably evil people but many were probably decent people. Who was the real sinner in all this who adamantly refused God's word? It was the ******* pharoah, but God let the poor **** live in the destruction of his own kingdom and people because God is a sick maniacal **** . Please tell me where the justice is in that? Please tell me why a God can live above his law?
#235 to #231 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]

- You, right now.
User avatar #272 to #235 - thatguywhohasbacon (01/29/2013) [-]
You don't need proof that something is false, proof is needed to prove something is true, no no proof is found then it can be safely assumed that it is false. It's like unicorns, where is the proof that they don't exist? No-one has ever seen one but no-one has ever seen god either (and don't quote the bible, it was written over multiple thousands of years ago when it wasn't used as a guideline to be a good person but as a way to control a population.)
User avatar #241 to #235 - princenarnode (01/29/2013) [-]
Well you speak as if I need proof to disprove the unfalsifiable hypothesis that God exists. I don't, as far as I'm concerned it is uncertain to be true until proven true. But in the case of unfalsifiable hypotheses it is safe to assume they are untrue until proven true, because there are an infinite amount of unfalsifiable hypotheses. When you chose to place faith in these you should expect ridicule.

I insulted the previous person not because he had a different belief, but because his comment was stupid. No one needs a theology course to see through the flaws of the bible. That is fact, and fact will always be true regardless of belief.
User avatar #399 to #241 - patrickmiller (01/29/2013) [-]
No one needs a Theology course to see the faults in the bible? He's telling you to take one so that you could see these "faults" you see aren't actually faults and explain them.
#263 to #241 - anon (01/29/2013) [-]

so how does it feel when someone just insults your beliefs because of your title without knowing what your rationality is.
User avatar #269 to #263 - princenarnode (01/29/2013) [-]
well I explained my rationality, but you didn't read it. Actually I explained my rationality in my first comment with an example. You have warped my comments to be some sort of discriminatory hate when in actuality I have done nothing but provide reasons for my actions. What title are you referring to? You are making false assumptions about my religious beliefs. I on the other hand only insulted the first comment because it was a stupid out of place comment, because he implies that one requires a theology class to see through the many contradictions littered through the bible. so I conclude, **** you anon, though you probably will never read this because you are an ignorant **** .
User avatar #229 to #223 - illusiveman (01/29/2013) [-]
i think he just found the picture on tumblr or somethin
#224 to #223 - kiratheunholy has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #226 to #224 - patrickmiller (01/29/2013) [-]
Let a man have an opinion and say why disagree instead of telling people to drink bleach before you post.
 Friends (0)