Religion does no harm. stop hating, uguyz, your just a bunch of autistic neckbeards in fedoras, religion doesn't hurt anybody!. This is Nicholas Capella, he Thi

Religion does no harm

Religion does no harm. stop hating, uguyz, your just a bunch of autistic neckbeards in fedoras, religion doesn't hurt anybody!. This is Nicholas Capella, he Thi

stop hating, uguyz, your just a bunch of autistic neckbeards in fedoras, religion doesn't hurt anybody!

This is Nicholas Capella, he This is Father Murphy. He
was removed by the Catholic raped hundreds of young boys
Church from volunteering at a school for the deaf where he
in his Parish, where he had served for 24 years. The Catholic
served over a decade, for Church knew of his actions for
marrying his same sex partner. decades. He died a priest and was
buried on Church grounds.
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 35608
Favorited: 66
Submitted: 07/05/2013
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to teranin Subscribe to atheism


Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - KingOfTheWorld (07/05/2013) [-]
Let the ********* begin
#164 to #1 - missrainbowdash (07/06/2013) [-]
what if like, there is no god
User avatar #177 to #164 - princeofbrokensoul (07/06/2013) [-]
shut up fizz
#41 - AreyouSerious ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
they should do what Henry VIII did.

You can't do that, it's against the Catholic Church and Christ.

"lol fuk u, imma make my own church!
User avatar #156 to #41 - jajathezombie (07/06/2013) [-]
I don't get why people don't make a gay church and force gay marriage through with it. It's not even that far of a stretch - some cultures in the past worshiped gay and trans people.
#129 to #41 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
It does make me giggle, "Same sex marriage is an alteration of the definition of marriage, our church (which came into being simply because a guy wanted to get a divorce) demands that marriage is not re-defined"
User avatar #131 to #129 - listerthepessimist (07/06/2013) [-]
and i forgot to sign in

I posted as anon

I am ashamed
User avatar #52 to #41 - solidderking (07/06/2013) [-]
but with blackjack and hookers
User avatar #97 to #52 - tehbanana (07/06/2013) [-]
and Headsmen
User avatar #105 to #52 - fuckthehabs (07/06/2013) [-]
You know what? Forget the church
User avatar #172 to #105 - solidderking (07/06/2013) [-]
why? the church makes lots of money so that you can have golden hookers
#3 - ZeGerman (07/05/2013) [-]
This is Nicholas Kim Coppola.
#12 - jakatackka (07/06/2013) [-]
Since, you know, all of religion and the very concept of religion are to blame for this, and not the Catholic Church.
#13 to #12 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
statement in contestation "religion does no harm". Catholocism is a religion. Catholocism does harm. Therefore, "religion does no harm" is false. That is literally all I'm saying here.
#15 to #13 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
The catholic church is also one of the the largest charitable organizations on earth, but feel free to ignore that part completely.

and here i am a Protestant, defending them.
User avatar #43 to #15 - ilovehitler (07/06/2013) [-]
Religion does both harm and good. It's not the religion itself, but rather the people who follow it, and what they choose to make of it.
It's the difference between somebody believing in Allah and someone blowing up buildings in his name.
User avatar #44 to #43 - rather ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
I'm trying to get past your name.
It's not easy.
User avatar #45 to #44 - ilovehitler (07/06/2013) [-]
My name, while glorious on posts about Nazism, is... less than great on non-Nazi posts.

I can assure you, I do not actually love Hitler, nor do I hate him.
User avatar #46 to #45 - rather ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
"You have been mentioned by ilovehitler"
'I gotta see this.'
User avatar #47 to #46 - ilovehitler (07/06/2013) [-]
How often is your name mentioned?
User avatar #49 to #47 - rather ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
500+ times a day give or take.
User avatar #50 to #49 - fanfiction (07/06/2013) [-]
I know that feel, bro.
User avatar #51 to #50 - rather ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
The only issue is never knowing when someone actually wants to talk to me.
User avatar #144 to #44 - scootpilgrim (07/06/2013) [-]
I guess you could say...

it's rather hard
User avatar #16 to #15 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
again, not saying they do no good, simply contesting the common statement "religion does no harm".
User avatar #170 to #15 - cheesymondo (07/06/2013) [-]
a mass murderer goes to court, and complains the prosecution is ignoring all the charity work he did.
#92 to #13 - mattkingg **User deleted account** (07/06/2013) [-]
But i could say exactly the same about athiests.
#14 to #13 - jakatackka (07/06/2013) [-]
Ah, good point.
User avatar #24 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
Religion doesn't do harm. Jesus said to feed the poor, care for the sick, love people and love God. It's not his fault human beings can be jerks, and being a jerk knows no creed, same as being a good person knows no creed.
User avatar #25 to #24 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
Jesus also literally told people to cut out their own eyes if they are aroused when married. His words, not mine, sermon on the mount.
User avatar #26 to #25 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
Jesus taught using parables. It most likely means "if there is a temptation you struggle with, remove the temptation" not "actually gouge your eye out". And people say Christians take the bible too literally...
User avatar #29 to #26 - noblexfenrir (07/06/2013) [-]
So why is anything Jesus said about god or his divinity a parable and a representation for something else?
User avatar #32 to #29 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
Sometimes a point is most easily understood by telling a story. Like Aesop's fables, they might not be true stories but it leads the audience to discover the moral lesson for themselves.
User avatar #34 to #32 - noblexfenrir (07/06/2013) [-]
Alright, again I ask then why isn't anything about god or Jesus' divinity a moral lesson? Why are these actual realities but other things told in a concrete manner are considered parables?

Please avoid it just being the way you interpret it, I want an actual reason please.
User avatar #36 to #34 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
I thought you were asking why someone would teach using parables instead of just saying things outright. I'm having a hard time trying to decipher what you are asking.
User avatar #37 to #36 - noblexfenrir (07/06/2013) [-]
If certain things are moral lessons through parable (Even though Jesus never says it is a parable, and instead says it in a concrete manner), then why are god and the divinity of jesus not also representations for either moral lessons or underlying meaning?

I really don't know any other way to type it.
User avatar #59 to #37 - largilloquent (07/06/2013) [-]
before saying that anything in the bible is "concrete". understand that the bible was written by man. also the rest of what you said is gibberish, not trying to be mean, but i understood none of it. Also goodnight, work tomorrow and all that.

have a nice day
User avatar #163 to #59 - facadeon (07/06/2013) [-]
It isn't gibberish.
He's saying that "why are the moral lessons in the bible considered metaphorical, excluding the concept of God and Jesus?"
He already knows, from what I have gained from his contention, that the bible is man made. He is just arguing the validity of the morality and holiness surrounding the bible.
User avatar #219 to #163 - facadeon (07/08/2013) [-]
Yup, red thumb us to curb your butthurtedness.
User avatar #209 to #163 - noblexfenrir (07/06/2013) [-]
Thank you lol, I thought maybe I was having a seizure and even though I read the words correctly, I was actually just slamming my fists on the keyboard.
User avatar #169 to #163 - largilloquent (07/06/2013) [-]
thank you sir, i very much understood that. speaking as an agnostic atheist, god and Jesus are the only parts in the bible i consider fact. primarily cause the idea of a hateful god that will punish me for eternity for such trivial and finite crimes... is not something i choose to have faith in. thats my take on reading the bible, feel free to disagree
User avatar #210 to #169 - noblexfenrir (07/06/2013) [-]
You aren't answering the question though, and it's even stranger that I have to ask it from an agnostic atheist.

Here, I'll make it incredibly easy. Why is god not a metaphor for the unknown? I'm not asking for faith/belief that something is real, I'm asking why such reasoning can be used anywhere else in the bible, but not to god.
#204 to #169 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
You make a bold and incorrect assumption about God here that a lot of atheists do. First of all, sin and law in regards to morality is not quantitative. When you say "finite" crimes I'm assuming you believe that just because you did one thing bad you don't deserve an eternity of punishment. That's not how sin and justice works. There aren't points for being sinful, as if you need to somehow equate ones punishment points with ones crime points. There are only consequences in justice and justice for sin is punishable by death. So what then is sin? Sin is a rebellion against God, or humans organizing themselves without or against God. Understand something very clearly. God does not send anyone to hell. There are those who say "God let your will be done" or God says "let your will be done." If you choose to reject God on earth, you're not going to like God very much in heaven. Heaven is a place where God gets his way all the time, all the time.
#27 to #26 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
Fair enough, I'll give you the parable assertion, and raise you mass murder fueled by religion across the ages, from the crusades, to the buddhist massacre of christians in Japan, to Sunni vs Shiite conflict, to the Inquisition, to the salem witch trials, on and on over and over across history. I don't even need to do that, though, because the catholic church defends and protects pedophiles, who molest children that are brought before them due to adherence to religion, and that very protection they receive stems from the extra protections society puts in place for religions that no other group receives. Seriously, can you think of any company that could get caught hiding the mass rape of children, and get away with it without losing their whole customer base? The only word you can use to describe harm to that degree is "monsterous".
User avatar #30 to #27 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
that has nothing to do with religion, the laws of most of those religions are usually pretty against all of those things you described. It's when hateful people pervert the religion and use it as a justification to commit atrocities.

On the same token, people don't need religion to commit horrible atrocities either-- Stalin's Great Purge was little different than those acts, the only difference is that he used Communism as his justification instead of a religion. Communism, in the hands of righteous people, is a fantastic idea. But when used by people who are corrupt, bad things happen.

It's the darkness in people's hearts. That's where the harm comes from.
User avatar #33 to #30 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
While I do agree that the evil of some people with power is where the choice was made to do evil, understand this. That evil, in the vast majority of cases where it involves mass slaughter (not all) and where it involves racial or gender discrimination (again, not all) has always been justified to the constituents of the evildoers through the use of religion, and those books actually supported those ideals. The bible says that slavery is OK, it suggests that mass murdering and genocide are A-OK as long as they are to uphold God's commandments... does that not strike you as harmful? Humans can be evil, but when granted the power of a tool for manipulation as dangerous and harmful as religion, evil can do incredible things with very little explanation needed, and can drive mass humans to help with that evil.

For Stalin's "Great Purge" that could never have worked had the people in that country not worshipped Stalin and communism as though they were a religion. As soon as religious level devotion was achieved for Stalin's governance, the oppression and mass murder set in. Read George Orwell's Animal Farm for a more clear understanding of this dynamic.
User avatar #35 to #33 - delphine (07/06/2013) [-]
What you say does make sense, and really I think we can agree that religious fanaticism is the danger here. There are plenty of religious people all over the world who wouldn't hurt a fly, I'm one of them.

And yes, I know the bible does contain several passages where slavery is condoned... but then I'm one to take what the bible says with a grain of salt. I follow the main tenants (love God, love your neighbor) Some people might say this makes me a bad Christian for picking and choosing what I believe, I say it's using the brain God gave me. But that's a whole other can of worms that I could talk about forever.
User avatar #220 to #35 - facadeon (07/08/2013) [-]
And yes, I know the bible does contain several passages where slavery is condoned...
User avatar #221 to #220 - delphine (07/08/2013) [-]
Disclaimer: I do not condone any form of slavery. This is an explanation of how the concept of slavery was dealt with in biblical times.

Specifically, the bible does not outlaw slavery. It states how slaves should be treated. They were to be treated well, and have all their needs cared for, and after a number of years they are to be freed.

Mini history lesson: What many fail to understand is that slavery in biblical times was very different from the slavery that was practiced in the past few centuries in many parts of the world. It was more like indentured servitude. People were not enslaved because of their nationality or the color of their skin. Slavery was more a matter of social status. People sold themselves as slaves when they could not pay their debts or provide for their families. In New Testament times, sometimes doctors, lawyers, and even politicians were slaves of someone else. Some people actually chose to be slaves so as to have all their needs provided for by their masters.

In addition, both the Old and New Testaments condemn the practice of “man-stealing” which is what happened in Africa in the 19th century. Africans were rounded up by slave-hunters, who sold them to slave-traders, who brought them to the New World to work on plantations and farms. This practice is abhorrent to God. In fact, the penalty for such a crime in the Mosaic Law was death: “Anyone who kidnaps another and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to death” (Exodus 21:16).
User avatar #236 to #221 - facadeon (07/09/2013) [-]
I just indicated you acknowledged that there were verses in the bible containing slavery.
Now, debunking what you have just said, "Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result." Exodus 21:20
This bible verse basically condones mistreatment on slaves. "You can beat them however brutally as you want, just as long as they don't die from it- then you will be punished."
If it doesn't make sense with other things said in the bible, maybe the bible was just broken and contradictory to begin with, and should not be treated as a trustworthy source to reference.
#48 to #27 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
Never judge a philosophy by its abuse. I think you would find it irrational if one were to say, "Anti-theism is evil because of what Hitler did." You look at the underlying principles, the core, of an ideology and determine whether or not the followers of said ideology are in keeping with the fundamentals of their beliefs. That having been said, if you want to play the numbers game then you ought to know that more bloodshed has come from anti-theism than religion. Friedrich Nietzsche who pronounced the "death" of God said that if God was dead, a mass chaos would break out and there would be more blood shed in the 20th century than any other. He was right on both accounts. Mao, Stalin, Lenin and so many more under the influence and correspondence of the anti-theist world view have killed people than all world views combined.
User avatar #99 to #27 - TastyBurger (07/06/2013) [-]
Are you retarded? Literally, one of the first things delphine said was "human beings can be jerks". Some assholes make religion look terrible because they're assholes. Just like ponyfags make My Little Pony seem terrible and overly devout "my music is better than your's" metalheads make metal seem bad.

Blame the people, people are cunts. Religion didn't do a thing except get misinterpreted and taken in the wrong way.
User avatar #158 to #26 - facadeon (07/06/2013) [-]
It isn't a parable when people actually did this in the past, because that's how their society was back then...
Also, the bible was created in those times, therefore it was influenced by this society when stoning people to death and eye gouging was the norm.
#153 to #24 - sparkysparkybooman (07/06/2013) [-]
"Religion doesn't do harm." ha. OK. Lets take a brief look at it.

Most wars were started by religions. The Crusades.The Inquisition.The 9/11 tragedy.ethic cleansing campaigns.Suppression of women .Suppression of gays. Suppression of blacks.Fatwas.suicide bombings.arranged marriages to minors.human sacrifices.witch burnings.systematic sex with children.
prevention of stem cell reseach."Faith healing".useless circumcisions. prevention of minority rights.
promotion of slavery.
the Jim jones tragedy.
genital mutilation.
religious terrorism.
Catholic sex scandal cover- ups.
Suppression of art and literatureThe KKK
Punishment and suppression of free thinkerscreation of bigotry
exorcisms that result in death of victimSerial killers doing the work of Jesus/God/satan/Allahdiscouragement of critical and rational thoughtabuse of power by religious figures.
Hitler said in Mein Jamph he was "doing the work of God" to get support
The boxer rebellion
Constant battles of Jerusalem and the middle east
Bloodshed in Ireland between Catholics and Protestants.
I can go on and on. Not saying everyone whos religious is mean/stupid or does these things. But religion, is NOT harmless.
User avatar #189 to #153 - gunthar (07/06/2013) [-]
All this wars and bad things you mentioned would have happened anyway, religion has been used by bad people to manipulate and cover their actions but that doesnt mean religion harms people. People harm people and people are the leaders of the religions. Most religions in the world talk about peace and tolerance (true most of them need to be updated)
#157 to #153 - sparkysparkybooman (07/06/2013) [-]
And of course everyone likes to turn a blind eye on all these things and make excuses about how "they aren't doing it" so its totally fine.

Please shower me in red thumbs you Christian nation of ignorants. Im mad bro.
User avatar #186 to #157 - vgcollosus (07/06/2013) [-]
Religion was used as a tool in all of those cases, if it weren't religion it would have been something else, while yes religion seems to have been the tool to power in ALL of those cases, if it weren't religion it would have been other tools. Previously used tools for genocide/discrimination include, wealth, race, and social status. Keep in mind here, I'm not quite saying you're wrong. Religion has ABSOLUTELY the method most used for starting many wars, but it was going to happen, one way or another, religion simply sped up the process.
User avatar #192 to #186 - gunthar (07/06/2013) [-]
just as i finished writing my comment i saw that you wrote pretty much the same thing.
#190 to #186 - vgcollosus has deleted their comment [-]
#155 to #153 - sparkysparkybooman (07/06/2013) [-]
had to mess up the format because FJ is annoying.
#103 - PedoBearFTW (07/06/2013) [-]
Nicholas Copolla is Nicholas Cage's birth name...
Nicholas Copolla is Nicholas Cage's birth name...
User avatar #109 to #103 - tabarzins (07/06/2013) [-]
it's Nicolas Coppola
User avatar #152 to #109 - PedoBearFTW (07/06/2013) [-]
I know. I was trying to make a funny.
#100 - SonofChuck (07/06/2013) [-]
"Religion is bad because this person used it to do bad things!"
"Religion is good because this person used it to do good things!"

To me religion is just that, religion and that like everything else in this world it can be used to accomplish great good and great evil but that the choice is ours to make.

Also not for anything but Father Murphy couldn't have picked a better place to rape little boys.
#60 - goll (07/06/2013) [-]
no one can hear you scream
#73 to #60 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
Well...they are ******* deaf after all.
#75 to #74 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
Hey you never know on this site, some people are that damn dense.
User avatar #77 to #60 - freddyhollensen (07/06/2013) [-]
Because he worked in a school for deaf kids, that's funny.
#89 - ineedthistothumb (07/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
This is Mother Teresa. Claiming she had a vision from the Christian God in her late teens, she spend her entire life giving to the poor and literally living among them to help them in any way possible. When she won the Nobel Peace Prize, she donated the prize money to charity. She was a devout Catholic and a nun.
#114 to #89 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #161 to #114 - toosexyforyou (07/06/2013) [-]
What does Mother Teresa have to do with Albania?
User avatar #246 to #89 - thereoncewasaman (07/30/2013) [-]
Actually after she died her notebook or journal thing was found and she actually confessed in there to not believing or being skeptical of the teaching of the church. All those years pretending to be catholic and she turned out not to be religious.
#200 to #89 - newall (07/06/2013) [-]
and then she spend the last 50 years of her life in bed, moaning.

Literally, look it up.
User avatar #116 to #89 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, no. Mother Teresa delighted in the suffering of others, doing nothing to help them with their ailments, rather watching them die instead, then posthumously given credit for supposed miracles she never actually performed.
User avatar #146 to #116 - mayormilkman (07/06/2013) [-]
Let me ask you this: What's the difference between a hospice and a hospital?
User avatar #222 to #146 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
Well, I'm not exactly sure what this has to do with Mother Theresa, but a hospice is a place to alleviate emotional or spiritual worries, as well as often providing a setting for the end of a person's life. To care for a dying individual. A hospital is a medical facility where the priority is to treat whatever is harming the patient, and also provide some care to their physical or emotional suffering. Why?
User avatar #225 to #222 - mayormilkman (07/08/2013) [-]
She worked with hospices, not hospitals.
User avatar #226 to #225 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
Ok. And? She didn't care for her patients' needs in a hospice sense, either. She allowed them to suffer in squalid conditions, not offering medical, emotional, or physical comfort.
User avatar #227 to #226 - mayormilkman (07/08/2013) [-]
I really doubt she was a sociopath, or as bad as Hitchens and other atheists describe her as.
User avatar #228 to #227 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
Too bad it's not as if it's only Hitchens and atheists that describe her that way.

(As if we'd benefit in any manner by making that kind of stuff up)

Here you go.


and the book in question if you'd like to read it
You need to login to view this link
User avatar #229 to #228 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
Also, I never said sociopath. She believed suffering was holy. She wasn't numb to it like a sociopath. She understood it.
User avatar #230 to #228 - mayormilkman (07/08/2013) [-]
>two definite antitheist sources

Her purpose was to resolve the lives of those dying by affirming their faith in God. I guess that means you're a terrible person, though.
User avatar #231 to #230 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
You didn't read it at all, did you?

It's peer reviewed. That means it's NOT just some thing written by some atheist.
User avatar #232 to #231 - mayormilkman (07/08/2013) [-]
It's not like they can't be biased, but whatever.

Anyway, she may have not been a perfect person, but she was not evil or anything. I can see how such people can be mad at her, anyway.
User avatar #233 to #232 - YllekNayr (07/08/2013) [-]
That's entirely true. But it's not as if them being anti-theistic automatically means they can't be unbiased.

It's not a matter of her "not being a perfect person"
If you'll actually look at any of the links I said, the allegations are not of her just not being saintly, but of her being absolutely evil. That's how people could be the idea of her. Her as a person is dead and gone, but her as an idea is still held as a moral, excellent person.

In either case, her goodness is contested at best, and entirely discredited at worst. Before you comment any more, either go look at some of the stuff, or just flat out tell me you're not going to so I can quit wasting my time.
User avatar #234 to #233 - mayormilkman (07/08/2013) [-]
I'd rather not even bother at this point. I don't know enough about her, but I still have some doubts.
User avatar #235 to #234 - YllekNayr (07/09/2013) [-]
Well, if you'd like to get more informed, I have provided the links.

P.S. In Pen and Teller's video, there's actual footage of her and the inside of her main hospice. You think they can stick bias in her own words?
User avatar #122 to #120 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
What's with the Luffy?
User avatar #127 to #126 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
Well ok then.
#165 to #89 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
sorry to crush your dreams, but please, watch 'Penn & Teller ******** - Holier than Thou' episode on you tube.
User avatar #180 to #110 - thephantur (07/06/2013) [-]
Oh dear... oh dear...

I have to say I am highly disappointed. :/
#90 to #89 - ineedthistothumb (07/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
This is Mahatma Gandhi. He was a devout Hindu who not only led the peaceful, yet effective movement to bring India to independence, but also was one of the most most charitable and giving men of his time, being an inspiration to anybody who knew of him, regardless of their religion.
#91 to #90 - ineedthistothumb (07/06/2013) [-]
So the title is correct. Religion does no harm, no more than different political parties do. It's the people that follow the religion (and political parties) that cause the harm.
#197 to #91 - funmanigro (07/06/2013) [-]
no not really, its just assholes that do harm.
User avatar #117 to #90 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
Mahatma Gandhi was a ******* racist.
User avatar #174 to #117 - alltimetens (07/06/2013) [-]
Yet you spend your time browsing a website that degrades black people by calling them ******* .
User avatar #211 to #174 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
..........and? What, so I'm a racist because other people on a website I look at are racist?

Also, it's one thing to be some yahoo on the internet saying racist things, and another to be hailed as a model human being.
User avatar #171 to #117 - darrensankari (07/06/2013) [-]
Did he openly preach that Africans were lesser than other races?
User avatar #237 to #171 - YllekNayr (07/11/2013) [-]
Yes. Someone else in this thread mentioned an episode of Penn and Teller's ******** series, and I provided the link.

Granted, Ghandi was definitely very wise and philosophical, but not nearly as moral and perfect as people would like to think. He wasn't an awful person, but he WAS very racist.
#239 to #90 - anon (07/11/2013) [-]
Gandhi also beat his wife and slept nude with teenage girls to "test his restraint."
User avatar #98 - mrtwilightsparkle (07/06/2013) [-]
Okay, this is why ********** happen. Christianity ***** up, but so does everything else. No one who is sensible gets upset about Atheism until you post **** like this. We get the point by now; Christianity has a pretty big dark side. But that doesn't mean all of us are bad, and that doesn't mean all of us are idiots. Yes, I agree this post is interesting and I definitely disagree with the Church's decisions, but that does not justify denouncing an entire religion and all of its followers.
User avatar #121 to #98 - YllekNayr (07/06/2013) [-]
He's not denouncing an entire religion. He's refuting the point some people make of saying "religion does no harm". He's saying it's capable of evil. Not that it's always evil.
#112 - backlash (07/06/2013) [-]
this is Mao Zedong. he is responsible for the deaths of 100 MILLION people and like you he refuted any form of religion. Does this make all atheists Genocidal maniacs? I certainly hope not
#203 to #112 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
i am an atheist and proud to have stolen candy, when i was 9.
User avatar #242 to #112 - masterboll (07/25/2013) [-]
yes it does
#137 to #112 - shadecrenshaw (07/06/2013) [-]
While what you said makes sense, but you missed the point of this post completely.
User avatar #182 to #112 - thephantur (07/06/2013) [-]
I'm an Atheist and I once pushed someone.

I'm not even sorry, they had it coming.
User avatar #141 to #112 - sodapops ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
I'm an atheist and I can get quite irate if someone steals my parking spot...
#149 - kanali (07/06/2013) [-]
Mfw when Nicolas Cage's real name is Nicolas Coppola
#118 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
They couldn't scream but I'm sure their hands were signing as frantically as they could.
User avatar #124 to #118 - tigerrish ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
Deaf, not mute.
User avatar #145 to #124 - fukkenbisharp (07/06/2013) [-]
A lot of times being deaf for a long time makes the person unable to talk because they have no idea how the words sound because they cant hear themselves or others
#128 to #118 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
Deaf and mute are two different things dumbass
User avatar #173 to #128 - violentpixi (07/06/2013) [-]
Have you ever even met a deaf person? More often than not signing is for communicating with the deaf as it is a language accessible to both them and their converser. Signing also can be used with autistic children.
User avatar #202 - uzbekistan (07/06/2013) [-]
Well **** teranin you got banned for 12 hours for some comment you left. People really don't like you.
User avatar #244 to #202 - masterboll (07/25/2013) [-]
its okay, he takes pride in being a faggot
#214 to #202 - teranin [OP]ONLINE (07/06/2013) [-]
it was risque, person with not much clothing on.  It doesn't surprise me.
it was risque, person with not much clothing on. It doesn't surprise me.
#160 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #104 - pandamoncia (07/06/2013) [-]
that's one big hand!
User avatar #107 to #104 - bitchplzzz (07/06/2013) [-]
gay men like fisting more
#53 - kinglobster (07/06/2013) [-]
ill post about it on the internet! that will stop the pedophiles!
#142 - payseht (07/06/2013) [-]
I don't think I've seen any atheist bashing pictures on the FP. Anybody have any? I feel we have it too easy on the internet, fedora wearing euphoric neck beard beta faggots aside.
User avatar #205 to #142 - sgc (07/06/2013) [-]
one time a long time ago a brave troll posted many anti atheism images and got the front page. much butthurt was had all around and the theist's rejoiced at the radical atheists and the atheists rejoiced at the radical theist's and all was well.
User avatar #245 to #205 - masterboll (07/25/2013) [-]
pretty much sums up teranin

except its the other way around, of course
#140 - boylan (07/06/2013) [-]
This sick **** Told a 7 YEAR OLD BOY his dead grandfather would go to heaven if the boy had sex with him. He was recently sentenced to just 2 years in jail. And I just learned that for the last 10 years a convicted peadophile priest lived on my street. 10 YEARS.
You need to login to view this link
#175 - anon (07/06/2013) [-]
Is this post implying that religious people cant be stupid? Atheist people and religious people are all just people, and people are stupid. I think there are non religious people that did the same as that father Murphy guy. People abuse power, I hope this isnt new news for you. Also, today the church is more accepting of gays, and will continue to get better.

Also fedoras are in fact gay,
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)