Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
24 comments displayed.
#31 - mastusone
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
so it's a contest on which religion is the most annoying?
#32 to #31 - poutinesalad
Reply +26
(05/08/2012) [-]
thats the best part about atheism, it isn't a religion.
#133 to #32 - poutinesalad
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
seems I rustled some jimmies.
#116 to #32 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
hahaha! thats the sad part about atheism, you guys think you're so much better and different than the morons that go around forcing beliefs down others throats, while blatantly acting in the exact same manner.

"We're not a religion" you say. Orly? Then why act like every other Jehovahs witness and fanatical christian nutjob out there.

"you don't believe in God? Let me tell you why you're an idiot who's gonna burn in hell" and "you believe in a God? Let me tell you what a blind dumbass you are"

What's the difference? No, don't answer, likely you're gonna list a whole load of scientific crap to make yourself feel smart. I don't want to hear another pointless "my beliefs vs yours" war.

Just wish you bloody morons would shut the hell up. And yes, my Jimmies are rustled.
#123 to #116 - carnivoreapples
Reply +2
(05/08/2012) [-]
i just believe that everything can be scientifically explained.
if it can be proven that a being created the universe, so be it.
but it won't be the god in any religious books.

#126 to #123 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
yeeeesss... but tell me good sir, where does it end?
Lemme tell you something.

Since mankind started,
Theists have lived by faith, believing that there are higher beings out there beyond the comprehension and explanation of mankind, science and logic. This is why it's so hard to convince them otherwise by science alone.

Atheists have lived by sight, believing like you that everything has a logical or scientific explanation. This is why it's so hard to convince them otherwise through talk about spirituality and faith alone.

both just find the other completely close minded and impossible to relate to.

Seeing as both are likely to scorn and insult the other, while all the while being completely unable to relate to one another, isn't it better that everyone just shut the hell up?

#127 to #126 - carnivoreapples
Reply +1
(05/08/2012) [-]
agreed.
but if they "attack" me personally, naturally i will fight back.
#128 to #127 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
oh... well damn, i'd do the same. thumb for you.
#96 to #32 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
religion:the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices
atheism is a religion,the only way not to be part of a religion is to not share your beliefs with anyone,and that means to live out of society
#36 to #32 - ireallylikepotatoe
Reply -3
(05/08/2012) [-]
That doesn't mean atheists should still be allowed to shove their beliefs down others throats.
#42 to #36 - anotherponyaccount
Reply +12
(05/08/2012) [-]
by that logic neither should anyone else: Christians, jewish, muslim
#56 to #42 - ireallylikepotatoe
Reply +2
(05/08/2012) [-]
That's my point. No one should.


#40 to #36 - dragonette
Reply -5
(05/08/2012) [-]
even though we're right?
#43 to #40 - anotherponyaccount
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
I wouldn't say we're right, just we lack ***** to give about afterlife or anything like that
#41 to #40 - captaincabinet **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#73 to #41 - semisane
Reply +3
(05/08/2012) [-]
But if someone claims a supernatural being exists, THEY have to prove it.
No theist can prove their claims, making them useless.
#121 to #73 - captaincabinet **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#131 to #121 - semisane
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
No, I don't have to prove a supernatural being doesn't exist.
I don't have to prove that unicorns don't exist, and I don't have to prove that Zeus doesn't exist. Why? Because the burden of proof is NOT on me. Anyone who says something exists has to prove it (see for example, an atom).
#137 to #131 - ilovehitler
Reply -1
(05/09/2012) [-]
Prove to me that other human beings besides you and me exist, and are not all an elaborate figment of your imagination due to insanity.

Impossible to prove, impossible to disprove.
#141 to #137 - semisane
Reply +1
(05/09/2012) [-]
That's different, because it questions our ability to observe.
All of science is based on the assumption that we can observe the world around us.
If you're going to say "no we can't", you can't even attempt to understand anything, and ANYTHING could be considered true. It's a pointless way to look at reality.
#144 to #141 - anon
Reply 0
(05/11/2012) [-]
You sir, have a very good grasp on scientific ideas. The reason we make this first assumption is because it's the best way we've found to improve our knowledge and understanding. The reason that is good is because that's the best way we've found to improve the quality of life.
#134 to #131 - captaincabinet **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#120 to #73 - anon
Reply 0
(05/08/2012) [-]
'blah blah blah, I'm right"
"stop insisting that you're right, I'm the one who's right"
"Okay, how bout we both stop insisting"
"But... but i'm right!"
"what a coincidence, so am I"

Where the hell does it end?
#132 to #120 - semisane
Reply +1
(05/08/2012) [-]
Anon isn't going to read this, but for other people:
The fact that both people claim they are right does not make them both right.
If you claim something and have no proof for it, you are NOT right. It doesn't matter how much you argue or how many of you there are, claiming something exists with no evidence is just not right.