Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#27 - camthepedobear
Reply +4
(05/26/2012) [-]
Sigh. Take a theology class. One of the first lessons is that the old testament was to serve little more than a history lesson, because once jesus got nailed, almost all of the old testament became null and void.

Lrn2Religion.
#141 to #27 - anon
Reply 0
(05/16/2015) [-]
If that's the case, then why do Christians use Leviticus as an argument against gay marriage?
#77 to #27 - kirkbot
Reply 0
(05/27/2012) [-]
>got nailed
if you know what i mean
#43 to #27 - HGOnethreeone [OP]
Reply 0
(05/26/2012) [-]
Well then, perhaps Christians should stop turning to Leviticus to support their homophobia.
#46 to #43 - camthepedobear
Reply 0
(05/26/2012) [-]
Any homophobic Christian is not a true Christian. It doesn't say anywhere in the new testament ANYTHING on homosexuality, I personally think it's wrong only because it isn't "natural" sex, meaning there's no possibility of procreation. Also, most homosexual intercourse is outside of marriage or civil union, which IS wrong according to the new testament. The bible teaches to love your brother, hate the sin, not the sinner. It does state in the new testament that only a man and a woman should be married though. I personally believe that we should allow them civil unions so that they can enjoy all the benefits of marriage without being married.

Sources: www.westarinstitute.org/Periodicals/4R_Articles/homosexuality.html
You need to login to view this link
#101 to #46 - anon
Reply 0
(05/27/2012) [-]
Actually, the new testament does mention homosexuality at least once. Check out 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. There's quite a long list.
#52 to #46 - thecreeperslayer
Reply +2
(05/26/2012) [-]
^^ this
#53 to #52 - thecreeperslayer
Reply +1
(05/26/2012) [-]
Well sort of... i honestly believe lte them do what they want.. why do their decisions pertain to me?
Just because someone is on a diet doesn't mean everyone must stop eating donuts
But i think it's weird homosexuals insist on marriage rather than civil union because marriage is in it's essence a religious act
But i say let them have everything we have... their sexual preferences make them not any less human
#42 to #27 - patchesdacrazy
Reply +4
(05/26/2012) [-]
I believe the point being made here is that nowadays, these are just as you said. Old, and no longer followed today. However, despite acknowledging this, people still cling to 18:22 as an exception, in matters involving Gay Rights.
#47 to #42 - camthepedobear
Reply -1
(05/26/2012) [-]
See my other reply, above :P