KNOW THE DIIFERENCE. People maybe blind >.>.. And this is a spoon tag vandalism Art
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#35 - inuzukaa (07/03/2012) [-]
And this is a spoon
User avatar #37 to #35 - konradkurze (07/03/2012) [-]
you earn a thumb for a blast wave reference
User avatar #38 to #37 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
You earn a thumb for recognizing Blast Wave, one of the most underrated webcomics period.
#43 to #38 - konradkurze (07/03/2012) [-]
This image has expired
< best one ever
#44 to #43 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
I humbly request of you, "Bitch, please," and submit this for review.
User avatar #50 to #44 - konradkurze (07/03/2012) [-]
but then i counter with laughing at 2 dead guys under a tank

you laugh at the means i laugh at the end
User avatar #54 to #50 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
In the end, friend, isn't the most important thing that we're laughing at the same murder in different points in time? Isn't it important that we're laughing together? Don't you realize? WE'RE LAUGHING ON FUNNYJUNK.
User avatar #63 to #61 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
And... I'm out of funny. I just learned that Andy Griffith died.
#64 to #63 - konradkurze (07/03/2012) [-]
This image has expired
#126 to #68 - alfrazzy (07/03/2012) [-]
I ******* love gone with the blastwave
User avatar #47 to #38 - Shramin (07/03/2012) [-]
I wish there was more blast wave, there can never be enough of it.
if only the guy's life would improve so he has time to give us more.
User avatar #49 to #47 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
True... Remember your first time reading through it? Were you as confused as I was when he did the first WAAAAAAAAAY into the future post?
User avatar #52 to #49 - Shramin (07/03/2012) [-]
Not confused, just amused xP
User avatar #55 to #52 - kanatana (07/03/2012) [-]
My brain was full of "Huh?"
#53 to #35 - danielph (07/03/2012) [-]
I love fallout!
#73 to #53 - skumbaner ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
User avatar #56 to #53 - neokun (07/03/2012) [-]
I hope you are kidding.
User avatar #57 to #56 - danielph (07/03/2012) [-]
i am
User avatar #59 to #57 - neokun (07/03/2012) [-]
I hope you are not just saying you are kidding because I said I hope you are kidding which led you to think you are wrong and just pretend to be kidding.
User avatar #62 to #59 - danielph (07/03/2012) [-]
i posted a pic of metro 2033 and said i love fallout on a post that isnt even about fallout, do you really think im serious...
User avatar #69 to #62 - neokun (07/03/2012) [-]
I was kidding with my second comment...
User avatar #79 to #69 - anonymouslive (07/03/2012) [-]
I hope you are not just saying you are kidding because he said he was kidding which led you to think you are wrong and just pretend to be kidding.
#83 to #79 - neokun (07/03/2012) [-]
It was a joke, please forgive me FJ.
#97 to #83 - Rascal (07/03/2012) [-]
then use this
#136 to #83 - swedz (07/03/2012) [-]
Oi, ye lookin for a fight, mate?
#113 - Deavas (07/03/2012) [-]
This image has expired
<<this will get painted over by the city

<<this **** will stay there forever
#119 to #113 - frysfrys (07/03/2012) [-]
You can use paint to cover the vandalism, too. mfw logic.
User avatar #122 to #119 - schneidend ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
He means nobody will bother to paint over the vandalism, while the urban art will lead to public outcry and other such ******* .
User avatar #127 to #113 - happyshark (07/03/2012) [-]
well i hope someone flushes that toilet someday.
#168 - ozzuguru (07/03/2012) [-]
No. This is Patrick!
#66 - trollmetoday ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
No, it's still vandalism. If somebody damages property that they don't own without permission, it's vandalism. It doesn't matter if it's a 100% accurate replica of the ******* Mona Lisa, it's vandalism none the less. There are plenty of places where people can legally do this **** . I'm tired of people trying to argue that's it's not vandalism because it looks cool.
User avatar #91 to #66 - askafj (07/03/2012) [-]
I thinks op is talking about it's cooler/nicer to see the "urbal art" at illegal places instead of the "vandalism".
User avatar #111 to #66 - gidmp (07/03/2012) [-]
This man deserves a medal made of frozen nutella.
User avatar #70 to #66 - froghole ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
User avatar #160 - theeballsack (07/03/2012) [-]
Different people have different definitions
#149 - ofwgbagelbites (07/03/2012) [-]
**ofwgbagelbites rolled a random image posted in comment #6602828 at FJ Pony Thread ** MFW we have an art channel?
#96 - warlockrichard (07/03/2012) [-]
this is a redhead
#98 to #96 - warlockrichard (07/03/2012) [-]
this is a ginger
know the difference
#104 to #98 - specialops (07/03/2012) [-]
this is a ginger
#109 to #104 - dzamie (07/03/2012) [-]
No, this is a ginger!
#108 to #96 - zeusx (07/03/2012) [-]
if anyone cares the girl in this picture is a pornstar. her name is Ariel Fawn.
#120 to #108 - drblolol (07/03/2012) [-]
her roots look brown lol
#51 - winners (07/03/2012) [-]
MFW i try to sell an apartment but gang members have "vandalized" the walls
User avatar #95 to #51 - dyllygaf ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
I understand your frustration

Beaners used to tag my grandparent's backyard wall until we installed a motion light
#76 - aqproductions (07/03/2012) [-]
**aqproductions rolled a random image posted in comment #5833 at Drawing & Art ** MFW i realise i couldn't give any more ***** than 0
User avatar #75 - nucularwar (07/03/2012) [-]
out in public that's vandalism, in the bathroom that's reading material
#22 - Rascal (07/03/2012) [-]
I disagree. Art is bigger then just a well designed image. What does that "URBAN ART" say about society. Although the "URBAN ART" is designed well, its just one mans view and thoughts on a wall. Where as this "VANDALISM" is what the streets really produce. And THAT is truly URBAN.
#24 - Rascal (07/03/2012) [-]
both suck..

if someone draws **** on my wall I'll shoot them.
#172 - gmarrox (07/03/2012) [-]
Consider this:

You work for days doing this job for someone. You build this really cool house or building. You get paid, but mostly you feel proud of your handiwork.

A few days later, you take your kids and wife to go see the building you've been working on for weeks. Your oldest son has an interest in architecture and you want him to feel inspired or proud of his father. You tell your son that no matter what, the client is your boss, and you build it how they want it, as long as it meets standards.

You tell him how your client wanted brick walls with a stone foundation, no paint. But when you pull your car up, your son sees a huge mural that's tarnishing your work and violating your client's wishes.

Your son loses respect for you and decides to give up architecture and look into being a party clown. You argue with your son which leads to fights. Unable to handle to household strain, your wife leaves you and takes your two kids.

You live your life as a depressed alcoholic architect. Life has no value to you anymore. And then, years and years later, you turn on the TV to watch the news in your hole in the wall apartment building. The story on the news is about a young male stripper who was killed at a bachelorette party in Vegas by an drunken bridesmaid.

The man is your son, who turned to stripping after finding no jobs as a clown. Finally, the last sign you needed that your life has meant nothing. You end it all with the old shard of a beer bottle to the throat method.

And that's why graffiti kills architects.
User avatar #178 to #172 - theviusking (07/03/2012) [-]
User avatar #180 to #172 - lolfire (07/04/2012) [-]
or you know...just paint over it.
#181 to #180 - gmarrox (07/04/2012) [-]
Why are people even taking this seriously?
Why are people even taking this seriously?
User avatar #182 to #181 - lolfire (07/04/2012) [-]
We're not.
#71 - frodr (07/03/2012) [-]
It might be vandalism, but it's still, in my opinion, a very respectable form of art. I personally am pro-graffiti but I respect anyone who isn't because it is an extremely subjective topic. The problem with this though is where I deferentiate between what is good and what is bad. I do not believe all forms of graffiti are art, what is being depicted is what matters. In my attempt to find a universal law and objective truth, this becomes nearly impossible, as I am simply judging based on whether I am pleased by the aesthetics or message being portrayed. I absolutely love socially-critical graffiti such as Banksy but I am not for "gangsta-rap-my-dick-was-hurrrr" 'art'.

inb4 TL;DR
This is just a touchy subject for me.
User avatar #81 to #71 - Noah (07/03/2012) [-]
I think bigger cities should have areas especially for graffiti, have all the good respectable **** in one place since most of the gangs will be tagging in their areas.
#72 to #71 - frodr (07/03/2012) [-]
*differentiate, jesus christ how did I manage to typo that ugly.
#173 - andrz (07/03/2012) [-]
Then what's this?
#174 to #173 - Rascal (07/03/2012) [-]
Urban Vandalism
User avatar #177 to #174 - andrz (07/03/2012) [-]
Oh, i see. thank you so much, kind sir.
User avatar #187 - shesaidshewaslegal (07/04/2012) [-]
If you're still doing it on someone else property when it's not permitted, it's still vandalism
User avatar #151 - klaatu (07/03/2012) [-]
They're both lawfully vandalism, ha.
User avatar #176 - donkeyking (07/03/2012) [-]
Yeah, but if you do "urban art" where it's not permitted, then it's vandalism. There's no need to deface something someone else owns in a situation like this, whether it looks cool or not.
User avatar #154 - darthblam ONLINE (07/03/2012) [-]
They're both vandalism. It's just one looks nicer than the other.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)