Project Veritas: NYT "Objectivism"

#2 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply+21

(10/10/2017)[-]

cringeworthy asshole
think he's trying to get laid

#9 to #2 - arsenalthegunners

Reply+9

(10/10/2017)[-]

still, shows that he is not professional, and his job and his choices in life are complete polar opposites.

Which in turn questions the "legibility and the unbiased" reporting of times. And THAT means good news for us, times is the fake news we claim it to be.

Also this is only part 1, wait for the other videos

#13 to #9 - JGKingpin#39 on commentsRank#39 [OP]

Reply+11

(10/10/2017)[-]

I like Veritas, but almost always its their initial video of a series that happens to be the most entertaining, informative, or useful. The rest kind of feel like filler episodes.

But we will see. This was a longer video, they may have a lot of content.

#11 to #9 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply+3

(10/10/2017)[-]

I can't imagine they'll have to do too many videos before this asshole self-destructs

#14 to #11 - arsenalthegunners

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

yes but with veritas, they always drop multiple destructive bombs, not just one.

Its like americans trying to clear out a german position. They will bombard it enough times to make sure at least visually there is nothing left

#16 to #14 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply0

(10/10/2017)[-]

as it should be

#17 to #16 - arsenalthegunners

Reply+3

(10/10/2017)[-]

had to dig DEEP to find this

#31 to #17 - cthulhudreams#59 on commentsRank#59

Reply0

(10/11/2017)[-]

Pfft ive had that downloaded for a year

#19 to #2 - SammieBoy

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Can't say that too loudly. They'll dismiss it as entrapment. Motherduckers.

#21 to #19 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply+3

(10/10/2017)[-]

If that asshole's willing to casually fabricate stories about our country and his employer just to pull some tail, imagine the lengths to which he'd go to affect political change while working as a "journalist"

#1 - chevcelios#406 on commentsRank#406

Reply+11

(10/10/2017)[-]

"Well, they needed someone to help them do video, and how to make it heartfelt, for Clinton"

I would not publicly admit to having anything to do with how "heartfelt" Clinton came off as. I still wonder if that woman is a robot or a reanimated corpse.

#4 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply0

(10/10/2017)[-]

cheshirecatless, what's your opinion?

#6 to #4 - cheshirecatless

Reply+3

(10/10/2017)[-]

It's amazing how these people will just openly talk about the things they shouldn't be doing. I mean, since he didn't disclose that Comey is his godfather to the NYT he's got to be fired now. Who does that and then just talks to random people about it?

#7 to #6 - cheshirecatless

Reply+2

(10/10/2017)[-]

Alright, lol, either he decided to clamp up so he wouldn't get in trouble or he's that kid from you school who lies about weird ridiculous things, and he's in journalism. Great.

#8 to #7 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply0

(10/10/2017)[-]

now do you think my thumbs down were deserved?

#10 to #8 - cheshirecatless

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Now that I've actually finished the video, no. Sorry about that. I thought you were calling O'Keefe an asshole, but now I see that you were talking about the weird journo.

#12 to #10 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply0

(10/10/2017)[-]

Correct, glad we are on the same page
I could have been clearer with my aim too

#15 to #12 - cheshirecatless

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Nah, you were very gentle in telling me I was wrong.

#5 to #4 - cheshirecatless

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Well I'm still watching it put the word objectivism is used wrong in this title

#22 - anon id: 501f732f

Reply+2

(10/10/2017)[-]

This is just the beginning. Wait until they respond distancing themselves saying they know nothing about it, then he releases parts 2 and 3 proving they were in fact involved.

#18 - kurbeh

Reply+2

(10/10/2017)[-]

I am amazed a video like that is even needed.
I thought everyone knows how much the New York Times suck.

#23 to #18 - teevee

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

But now they get to say goodbye to being able to reasonably object to those claims.

#32 to #18 - tubbytubs#241 on contentRank#241

Reply0

(10/11/2017)[-]

#3 - stabbedinthecrotch#22 on commentsRank#22

Reply+2

(10/10/2017)[-]

Answering questions with questions

#26 - shakkushan

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

God these these staff members of the times are really cringy. They have an atitude of being god like or they're the true heroes. More like backstabbers.

#24 - cthulhudreams#59 on commentsRank#59

Reply-1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Okay, this is a big "nothing burger" and that tip line is going to get swarmed with so many fake tips it will be rendered useless

#27 to #24 - mychaelmoar

Reply0

(10/10/2017)[-]

You sorts come out for every video like this. Since last year, PV has released very substantial information that would have led to prosecution if it had become at all apparent in the public view. Yet even without such cases presented, most everyone who has been fingered by this investigative journalism has been canned and ties cut in order to preserve the underbelly of the DNC, Clinton's campaign, and the other latent elements of sedition that are only becoming more evident as time progresses.

#28 to #27 - cthulhudreams#59 on commentsRank#59

Reply+1

(10/10/2017)[-]

Lol, hate to toot my own horn here. But trust me I'm not one of those people

#29 to #28 - mychaelmoar

Reply0

(10/11/2017)[-]

Saw you in another thread, you right. Baited myself.

#30 to #29 - cthulhudreams#59 on commentsRank#59

Reply0

(10/11/2017)[-]

Thats okay. Also thanks man