lol 4chan. lol .. I'm going to go with ants, myself. lol 4chan I'm going to go with ants myself
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (53)
[ 53 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
38 comments displayed.
#1 - atrocitustheking
Reply +17
(04/20/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I'm going to go with ants, myself.
#5 to #1 - nephritho
Reply +11
(04/20/2013) [-]
I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
#7 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/20/2013) [-]
1. The word is 'sapience'
2. It can easily be argued that we're not the only sapient species on the planet. Dolphins have been seen using distinct calls for one another. Different pods of whales (of the same species) in different places of the world have different dialects and cultures, despite being the same species. Crows understand currency. Non-human apes are probably in the early stages of sapiency, as they've been seen using tools, and with sign language they can express actual thoughts, and talk about past experiences to humans. Elephants have death rituals for one another. Some parrots actually understand some of the words they mimic, and use them in legitimate sentences.
I don't think all the above-mentioned animals are sapient, except for maybe dolphins.
If elephants were already sapient, we'd know, as they have an efficient way of grasping and manipulating thing, and they live on land. Dolphins live in the water, so they can't utilize fire, which would make it impossible for them to have any kind of a civilization, but they may be just as smart, regardless.
#22 to #7 - occamsrazor
Reply -1
(04/21/2013) [-]
HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE WRONG ******
#24 to #22 - nightmaren
Reply -4
(04/21/2013) [-]
I'll know when someone proves me wrong, won't I?
I'll know when someone proves me wrong, won't I?
#39 to #7 - lolibear
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
I can't understand how you think fire is essential for civilization, or that land is. Fire isn't needed for civilization at all, nor is land. All that is needed for civilization is an intelligent species that can communicate and desires social grouping. All other things such as fire and only help the species survive and grow which can help support civilization. In a way, ants and bees have "civilization" because they stay in large groups that communicate in complex ways and have a social order.
#41 to #39 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
I don't think land is essential to creating a civilization, but I do believe fire is.
#42 to #41 - lolibear
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
could you elaborate?
#44 to #42 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
Everything we have came from, or came from something that came from fire. I'm not saying an underwater species couldn't be sapient, but I doubt you'd be landing on a planet, with an ocean filled with fabulous underwater cities built by alien water creatures.
#45 to #44 - lolibear
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
well that didn't explain anything. I guess i'll try to explain my point. Fire is not essential to civilization. Fire was only ever needed by humans because we needed to stay warm in the winters in colder climates. Fire never gave us anything we absolutely needed for survival, and fire's only main use was for heat, which water animals do not need, and making food safer, which isn't a serious problem to water animals either.
#47 to #45 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
You're the one not understanding my point.
Because of fire, we could harness basic metals, which allowed us to form everything we did, and form a civilization amongst our species.
Dolphins wouldn't be able to because obviously, fire can't burn underwater.
We could be surviving in our completely primal state without fire, yes, but then we wouldn't have any form of civilization. We'd still be chasing gazelles around the plains until they died off exhaustion, and then dragging them back to our families to eat.
#49 to #47 - lolibear
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
Why does metal usage need to be there for civilization? All metal was used for for many years was war. Civilization doesn't need to have every technology we have, and could find ways around it, it would be impossible to tell now.
#50 to #49 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
I'm not going to bother arguing about this any further. I frequent a xenobiology forum, and this thread comes up quite often, and every time they discuss it for days on end, and it's always the ones arguing against it who seem to win. There could be devices and contraptions that operate purely of levers and pulleys and gears made of some kind of underwater-alien plant species, so precise that basic-mechanics can be implemented, but that's far too impractical to be even remotely likely.
I can link you to one of the threads, if you want.
#51 to #50 - lolibear
Reply +1
(04/21/2013) [-]
No thank you, my point is more on the definition of civilization rather than the advancement of technology they could have. I'll end it there.
#8 to #7 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +3
(04/20/2013) [-]
There's even one kind of ape who uses vocal communication with a similar pattern to human speech (no, I'm not talking about *******).
#13 to #7 - demandsgayversion
Reply +12
(04/20/2013) [-]
sen·tience (snshns, -sh-ns)
n.
1. The quality or state of being sentient; consciousness.
2. Feeling as distinguished from perception or thought.

Just ignore the pronunciation....
#14 to #13 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(04/20/2013) [-]
Dogs, cats etc; are all sentient.
But only humans (and maybe dolphins), and any alien species that visit us would classify as sapient.
Sentient: Capable of emotion and awareness of oneself
Sapient: Highly intelligent
#15 to #14 - demandsgayversion
Reply +3
(04/20/2013) [-]
Definition of SAPIENT
: possessing or expressing great sagacity

Goddammit Marriam-Webster

sa·gac·i·ty
/səˈgasitē/
Noun
The quality of being sagacious

************ GOOGLE

sa·ga·cious
/səˈgāSHəs/
Adjective
Having or showing keen mental discernment and good judgment; shrewd.

I'd say dogs and cats have good judgement.
#27 to #14 - anon
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
Dogs and cats are not sentient, as they are unable to recognise themselves in a mirror.

Primates and Dolphins are both sentient, as they can recognise themselves in a mirror.
#35 to #27 - rotinaj
Reply +1
(04/21/2013) [-]
My dog recognizes itself
#28 to #27 - nightmaren
Reply -1
(04/21/2013) [-]
Self recognition =/= Self awareness
#4 - nephritho
Reply +10
(04/20/2013) [-]
So then i was all "*******!"   
*******!!!!
So then i was all "*******!"
*******!!!!
#12 to #4 - TheSoviet
Reply +2
(04/20/2013) [-]
#3 - cockenballs
Reply +8
(04/20/2013) [-]
I say dogs
#33 - rdangerdash
Reply +4
(04/21/2013) [-]
I've been told that it would be squids. I don't know if anyone here has ever seen the future is wild but it's basically like walking with dinosaurs except in the future, so scientists do some sciencey things to come up with what animals might be like in the distant future and pretty much everything in that show on sea and land is some kind of squid.
#25 - lolfire
Reply +4
(04/21/2013) [-]
It's gotta be fish.    
I mean, they did that **** millions of years ago.    
They'll do it again.
It's gotta be fish.
I mean, they did that **** millions of years ago.
They'll do it again.
#37 - darkdragonswrath
Reply +2
(04/21/2013) [-]
What is this "specist" force that only goes after humans? And I go with Parrots.
#17 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#38 to #17 - rhiaanor
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
They even have an overwhelming urge to **** like humans! I THINK YOU ARE RIGHT!
#18 to #17 - spacestalin
Reply +2
(04/21/2013) [-]
nope.
Dolphins are an extremely delicate specie
they can only stand waters at certain temperatures, acidity and cleanliness. Conditions that would change dramatically in any cataclysm.
whatever wiped us out, would wipe them out too.
and I hope you're joking about the telekinesis part...
#31 to #18 - chaotixx
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
Dolphins evolved from a land dwelling animal.
#19 to #18 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#20 to #19 - spacestalin
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
even so, is still unlikely aquatic creatures would evolve sentience.
We still don't even know if other creatures can evolve sentience, or if we're the product of unique evolutionary conditions.
it's all speculations at this point.
#21 to #20 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#23 to #21 - spacestalin
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
well, you happened
is impossible to say if there will ever exist another human being like you, down to your genetic code, life experiences, personality, etc.
there's too many possible variations to say.
same with sentience
#26 to #23 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 - oikake
Reply +2
(04/20/2013) [-]
bears.... got a feeling they are plotting already
#10 - Vandeekree
Reply +2
(04/20/2013) [-]
Is it boring to just say I think primates would just do it again?