Min comment interval: 14 seconds
Remaining character count: 4000
Remaining character count: 4000
Spoiler Image
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
#470 to #463

ingebrigtsen (07/25/2012) []
so if he rolls again but use the metric system it's still 0?
#105 to #33

pooispancake (07/24/2012) []
**pooispancake rolls 0** Now multiply by this!
(i hope you see what i did there)
(i hope you see what i did there)
#396 to #146

anon (07/24/2012) []
****, you guys thought dividing by zero was bad, 0/0 is like the ******* antichrist.
Well, the numerator's 0, so it must be 0,
but wait, the denominator is 0, so is it also infinity?
Hold on, it's also a number over the same number, so maybe it's 1??
I DUNNO, ****
Well, the numerator's 0, so it must be 0,
but wait, the denominator is 0, so is it also infinity?
Hold on, it's also a number over the same number, so maybe it's 1??
I DUNNO, ****
#377 to #146

mrbuu (07/24/2012) []
time to drop some math on you guys. dividing zero by zero is a real answer its just the answer is anything and everything. 6/3 what times the bottom gives you the top. well that would be 2. 0/0 what times zero would give you zero the answer is  infinity to infinity. it just means you have to do more math to the problem.
#469 to #447

mrbuu (07/25/2012) []
lim as x approaches 2 of x^2  4 dived by x2 solve when x = 2. well that will give you 0/0 right? wrong. 0/0 means there is more math. infact its (x2)(x+2) / (x2) factor and simplify x+2 and solve when x=2. the answer is 4. god, this is chapter 1 calculus crap.