cya earth. thanks for all the fish. Carissa Juan finally sent child support so i went and bought hunts and got my nails. dune AAA Like . Comment . Share . 5 min

cya earth

Juan finally sent child support so i went and bought hunts and
got my nails. dune AAA
Like . Comment . Share . 5 minutes ageist
26 people like this.
itll? Mayra Vargas "r' nur boots T , T
W Carissa Grosella my new bestfriends ' T
E Write a comment,.,
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 27385
Favorited: 25
Submitted: 02/16/2013
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit Add to favorites Subscribe to thisoneworks Subscribe to 4chan


Anonymous comments allowed.
#14 - oimatewtf (02/16/2013) [-]
you know the possibility of her being the daughter and calling her father by his name is high right?
#42 to #14 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
does your father send you child support?
User avatar #45 to #42 - oimatewtf (02/17/2013) [-]
19. Don't need child support. Even then i've been friends with girls who get the child support check all to them because their mothers let them spend it on whatever the **** they want.
#52 to #14 - deathhardiv (02/17/2013) [-]
It would be
But 30 people liked it, this was taken by instagram with ****** filters, and 26 people she probably doesn't know liked it in 5 minutes
So I doubt it
#56 to #52 - oimatewtf (02/17/2013) [-]
all implications that it's by a young teenage girl. more than likely the daughter my good sir.
#60 to #56 - deathhardiv (02/17/2013) [-]
That would a be logical conclusion as well but not much better considering it should be spent on quality food, vehicle, and other necessary things in stead of unnecessary stuff like this, at least until she gets a job.
And considering she's using her mother's child support money to get her nails done and new boots, she probably doesn't.
User avatar #78 to #60 - danniegurl (02/17/2013) [-]
well, actually, child support is meant to make a child's life almost how it would be if their parents were still together.
so, if the mom has enough to cover necessities, the child gets extras from child support, because if their parents were still married, they more than likely would get those.
#62 to #60 - oimatewtf (02/17/2013) [-]
Well maybe the mother was a no good whore who took the father to the cleaners? She doesn't really need the child support because she has a stable job and can provide the bare necessities for her daughter, then she allows the daughter to blow the check on whatever she wants?
#84 to #62 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
Or maybe it is okay for a child to get treats from a parent, even if it is through child support?
Or maybe it is okay for a child to get treats from a parent, even if it is through child support?
#88 to #84 - oimatewtf (02/17/2013) [-]
That's the point im trying to make. just having a wonderful civil argument for once.
User avatar #17 to #14 - samous (02/16/2013) [-]
That's quite possible , I call my father by it's name to makee him feel younger and stuff
never thaught about it like this
User avatar #23 to #17 - joaomartins (02/17/2013) [-]
Do the same , but just for annoying him!
#4 - morgan freeman **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #51 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
It has been posted before, this girl is the child, Juan is her dad, and she is the child the money is going to.
#54 to #51 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
its still supposed to be going toward food and nescesities..... like maybe cheaper clothes. i take it those are expensive shoes
#81 to #54 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
Just because you are being paid child support does not mean that you are at the bottom of the financial ladder. I doubt that child support is the difference between if she eats this week or not. If Juan was living with her, he would probably spend that money on her some other way besides necessities. It is okay to treat your self once in a while. Yada yada yada.
Just because you are being paid child support does not mean that you are at the bottom of the financial ladder. I doubt that child support is the difference between if she eats this week or not. If Juan was living with her, he would probably spend that money on her some other way besides necessities. It is okay to treat your self once in a while. Yada yada yada.
User avatar #85 to #81 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
Depending on his income, the child-support "Juan" pays may be putting him on the lower end of the financial ladder.
User avatar #87 to #85 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
Is it the child's fault he knocked up her mother? Nope. How do we know that Juan isn't the deadbeat, and not the mother? We don't. Everyone is crying that the girl must have the awful mother, but maybe it is the dad this time? We don't. He should still be responsible for a child he helped to bring to this earth. If he was still with her mother, or if she lived with him, he would still be paying for her stuff.
User avatar #89 to #87 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
We would have to look into the divorce case and see how his income is affected.

Bottom line, is though, fathers' rights are in the ******* for divorce, despite the fact that women are more likely to commit abuse and domestic violence than men.
User avatar #90 to #89 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
Yeah it is a bit of a messed up system, but I don't think it is as bad as everyone here is making it. There are bad mothers, but there are also bad fathers too. I am pretty sure the sites misogyny is coming off pretty harsh right now.
User avatar #92 to #90 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
Are 9/10 men bad enough in divorce to not get the children?

It's not just kind of ****** up, it's unmitigated partisan in favor of women.

This is the very reason why I will probably never want to get married. The same goes for thousands of men in the modern era.
User avatar #93 to #92 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
Then don't marry/ **** a psycho bitch then. People rush in to things too quickly and don't learn enough of their 'significant other'. Think before you stick a ring on it, it isn't that hard. Don't go after someone with a drug/alcohol problem, or a nympho, or anything. My mom has three kids with three dads and none of them were any good. It is not always the mother's fault, and it is up to you who you have sex with.
#57 to #54 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
Yeah theyre hundreds of dollars. ******* cunt. I dont care if she IS the child, **** that bitch.
User avatar #74 - pepemex (02/17/2013) [-]
What if Juan is her dad?
User avatar #104 to #74 - roflsaucer (02/17/2013) [-]
She looks like she's in her 30s.

But even if she isn't she's DEFINITELY above the age of 18, which is when you would have to stop paying child support, as you know, the other parent doesn't need to support the child anymore.

So no, this is just a terrible mother.
User avatar #113 to #104 - Ruspanic ONLINE (02/17/2013) [-]
She does not look anywhere near her 30s. Neither does her friend, or her fashion taste.
I think she could easily be 17 or something.
User avatar #114 to #113 - roflsaucer (02/17/2013) [-]
Don't see what her friend or fashion taste have to do with it. And I mean her face, you know, the profile pic? She looks like she has age lines.

I fear for what she might look like when she actually IS in her 30s.

But I digress, other comments say she's the one the child support was for, and juan is her father, so it doesn't really matter.

Her face still looks like that of an aged mother, though.
User avatar #15 - timelordeternal (02/16/2013) [-]
Last time this was posted someone said that they knew this girl and that Juan is her father.
#5 - wretchedlarva (02/16/2013) [-]
why the 4chan channel?
why the 4chan channel?
User avatar #19 to #5 - thisoneworks [OP](02/16/2013) [-]
because i found it on a recent expedition to /b/
#95 - picklefighter (02/17/2013) [-]
Maybe she spent all of her money before the childsupport on the child and then bought something for herself when the child support came (doubtful though)
User avatar #109 to #99 - ultimateiceman (02/17/2013) [-]
centipedes? in my vagina?
#91 - bakinboy ONLINE (02/17/2013) [-]
kill it
kill it
#36 - enragedanon (02/17/2013) [-]
mfw the comments here
User avatar #3 - maxillius (02/16/2013) [-]
and when we finally got a meteor to hit earth

it killed none of those people

User avatar #112 to #68 - Ruspanic ONLINE (02/17/2013) [-]
Not to be a buzzkill here, but a few points in response to this - the chart, not the video (not going to get into happiness).

First of all, the government portion of the chart is silly because both men and women pay taxes to the government and both men and women benefit from entitlement payments and other government spending. So both purple arrows should be bidirectional.

The blue arrow is mostly accurate, and you can throw marriage in with dating there.

However: marriage complicates things. Traditionally, women raised children and cared for the children while men were the breadwinners of the family. Although these gender roles are now much less defined and the tradition is eroding in favor of equality (rightfully so, in my opinion), women still tend to assume housekeeping and child-rearing roles even in households where both parents work.

The "gender pay gap" is especially true of married women and men of similar age, but less true among single people, accounting for age (this is not to say discrimination doesn't happen or is irrelevant). Married men also make more than unmarried men, accounting for age. This suggests that getting married actually benefits a man financially, because some of the burdens and responsibilities associated with living at home are now taken on by his wife and he can focus on his career. Meanwhile, the wife now has additional household duties beyond what she would do if she were single. On the other hand, she now benefits from the greater income that she shares with her husband, and probably spends more money than he does on commodities.

So there we go. However, none of the above really applies to dating because while the man does spend money on the woman (much less vice-versa), she does not share her income with him or shoulder many of his responsibilities, unless they've moved in together.
User avatar #97 to #68 - sketchysketchist (02/17/2013) [-]
Yeah, and when men **** many women it's awesome and when they don't they're losers.
When women **** many men they're sluts, and prudes when they don't.
Double standards make the world go round.
Unless you want to complain about why men can't put on women's clothing and make out with other men and be considered hot while women can dress in men's clothing and make out with women and look really hot.
#100 to #97 - palindromia ONLINE (02/17/2013) [-]
you're whole argument
#98 to #97 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
Men are meant, naturally, to have sex with many women. Women are the creators of babies, of which sex is required. As such, women are only supposed to have sex in order to procreate, which should not be very much at all.

This has its benefits to women, in traditionalist society. Women are worth much more than men. It only takes seconds for a man's sperm to do its part but almost a year for a woman to give birth. This is why, disregarding basic anatomy, men are the ones who have been lined up for centuries to be butchered in war, while women were spared the part (with the exception of some barbaric peoples like the Germanics).

What you call a "double standard" is centuries of society at work. People do not like whores because they would not make good wives. If a woman has had sex with over 1,000 men, why would anybody want to marry her? On the opposite side, men are supposed to have sex with many women from puberty. They have much larger sexual impulses; a nature centered around impregnating many women for the survival of the species.
#103 to #98 - spidahridah (02/17/2013) [-]
For a neo-Nazi, you're actually not that retarded.
For a neo-Nazi, you're actually not that retarded.
User avatar #116 to #98 - sketchysketchist (02/17/2013) [-]
Everyone's heard this logic already.
True is, it doesn't make sense anymore. We've got ways to prevent pregnancies so now woman can pick and choose whether they'd like to risk getting pregnant or not with specific men.
You're only using this excuse because you want to justify why men have this right but women don't.
Using your logic, the reason men have to pay for the women and have their money taken by the government is because for many years women weren't able to work. They had no way to make money, and couldn't be independent.
So the government made laws before they knew they would allow women to work in the first place and it was considered that a well mannerned man would be able to treat a woman and take her out. Now we still have that belief but forgot it's unnecessary.
So **** the concept of Masculism.
#110 to #98 - anon (02/17/2013) [-]
You had me until "much larger sexual impulses". Women go through an extreme hormonal cycle every month, this cycle includes ovulating which makes women incredibly horny. Women have a limited number of eggs, therefore to ensure we procreate women get the extreme urge to have sex every time there bodies are ready to be impregnated. Yet women are expected to be modest and not act on these urges while guys get a free " **** everything pass".

tl;dr **** you chicks get really horny too.
User avatar #105 to #98 - roflsaucer (02/17/2013) [-]
But doesn't that technically work against itself? If men are having sex with lots of women, doesn't the directly relate to how much sex women are having?

Let's take a regular city public school population, for example. There's about 1800 people in the school, and lets divide that in half for 900 men, and 900 women. And then lets say that 80% of the women are attractive enough to the opposite sex, and 60~70% of men are able to actually bed these girls. That'd give us 720 women, and 540~630 men ( which we'll average out to 585). If each of these men have sex at least once, then 81% of the women have had sex. And if these men continue to have sex, and with different women, the number of times one of these women have had sex would continue to rise as well.

While the logic in what you said about the value of a women is sound, the amount of times having sex is not, at least in this day and age with various types of contraception.

In short, society has progressed past most of your logic.
User avatar #49 - biograde (02/17/2013) [-]
holy **** the number of times this has been reposted is more than any other possible repost and omg she is the kid

who doesn't even know even I don't even people
User avatar #37 - jacklane ONLINE (02/17/2013) [-]
I'm a guy paying child support. If my ex was doing **** like this and everything was fine, it would be fine with me. Let's say she is JUST able to make it on her own. Yeah, well she is also supporting the kid 100% which it should be 50%. So after Juan started sending money, now she can afford luxuries again.

I, however, thing this particular bitch is a bitch. She just gives off that vibe from the way she said she got boots and her nails done.
User avatar #48 to #37 - jessieqwertyu (02/17/2013) [-]
Apparently it was her dad who payed child support, so she bought boots
User avatar #10 - monkeywithgun (02/16/2013) [-]
Consider the following: She hasn't been able to do that because she has been having to pay for extra things (children's close, food, gas, etc). Now that he finally sends money she can spoil herself.... Not likely, but it's a possibility... NOW on the band-wagon; this girl is dumb as hell._.
User avatar #11 to #10 - zacch (02/16/2013) [-]
I want to thumb you both up and down.

Decisions decisions.
#12 to #10 - zeetalicious (02/16/2013) [-]
Thank you for not being retarded and not judging someone without even knowing all the circumstances.

For everyone else who are stupid enough to not realize that this might be the case, you are just as stupid as you claim that girl is.
User avatar #13 to #12 - stupidffff (02/16/2013) [-]
Thinking before assuming is stupid. On with calling her retarded!
User avatar #107 - thrashtilldeath (02/17/2013) [-]
As soon as I saw this post, I knew what all the comments were going to be. Lo and behold, I was right about what they were.
User avatar #9 - fasthink (02/16/2013) [-]
She's the daughter, gais.
User avatar #66 - TheOriginalNerd (02/17/2013) [-]
im pretty sure you can report this

take the bitch downnnnnnnnnn
User avatar #82 to #66 - AkatsukiNekoJr (02/17/2013) [-]
She is the child. The money is being used for her anyways. Child support doesn't always mean the difference between if a kid is starving and wearing a potato sack to school. The money is probably used 'correctly' most of the time, and she decided to use it this time to get herself a new pair of shoes and treat herself with new nails.
#70 to #66 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
No. Divorce Courts are skewed so extremely in favor of women that it really would not make a difference. The father is required to pay money in alimony without question; where the money goes, is not of any matter.
User avatar #75 to #70 - Hyoukin (02/17/2013) [-]
Child support ≠ alimony. Child support is, obviously, meant to provide for a child. Alimony is paid by a working ex-spouse to someone who does not, or cannot work, or does not have the skills to work a job that pays enough to provide for themselves. And no, not all men have to pay child support or alimony "without question".
#77 to #75 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
It would certainly seem that way given the plurality of decisions favor women, with or without reason.

MONTREAL - A father has been ordered to pay child support to his ex-wife despite results of DNA testing that found three of the four children he helped raise are not biologically his, a Quebec Superior Court ruled.
User avatar #79 to #77 - Hyoukin (02/17/2013) [-]
There are always exceptions, and ridiculous rules. My step-dad has been required to pay child support for two children his former wife testified were not his, and that DNA results have proved are not his. Even though the oldest child is now 22 and has children of her own, they are still making him pay, and that's complete ******** . That is some ridiculous ******** . Though, in the case of my own mother, who worked two jobs to scrape by and support my brother and I, was denied any sort of support from my father who worked making over $150,000 a year. Even though we are his biological children. **** comes from both ends of the spectrum unfortunately, no matter who the court rules in favor of it's hardly ever fair.
#80 to #79 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
There has to be more to the story of your mother for the court to actually favored against her. The circumstances of the divorce would probably show said motive.

It would be beneficial to both genders if marriage, as a binding, lasted. Women should not look at marriage as an opportunity to leech and men should question and confirm the prudence of the women before marriage.
User avatar #83 to #80 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
to have actually*
User avatar #71 to #70 - kiremino (02/17/2013) [-]
Not always true. For example, friend's mother is a deadbeat. Father takes care of her. Father gets money, Mother is barred from seeing friend for health-hazard reasons.
User avatar #73 to #71 - byposted (02/17/2013) [-]
That is a rare scenario, around 1/10 of cases are in favor of the man.
User avatar #76 to #73 - kiremino (02/17/2013) [-]
Rare, yes. But it still puts a small hole in your logic. Women, scratch that, SLUTS are the cause of some, not all, cases of Child Support. Unfortunately, the government thinks all women are angels and none of them could ever in a million years harm their own children....haven't they learned yet?
User avatar #106 to #76 - roflsaucer (02/17/2013) [-]
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say that by "cases of child support", you meant cases in which it is abused.

But in the off chance it isn't, that is absolute ******** . My parents are divorced, and my mother does NOT have the type of job that would allow her to raise me and my sister in a favorable environment, so my dad must pay child support, as he is not the one who has custody of me and my sister most of the time.

However, it is because of cases like this that courts are skewed towards women, along with the fact that women are paid less than men, and various other reasons.

But in the end, yes, there are terrible people, and yes, some of these people are women. It is how things have been, and always will be. Best thing you can do is try to keep it from happening to yourself, and try to expose those that are doing it.
User avatar #117 to #106 - kiremino (02/17/2013) [-]
In your case, you are very very lucky. In my case, one where my mother is a bitch and she's rich as **** , my father is not so lucky. Back when I was a small child, my parents divorced. My mother, mind you, owned a very prestige restaurant and made a ******** of money. My father was just a mechanic barely making anything. She /still/ told the court she /needed/ the money because she was broke or some piss-poor excuse. He had to pay her well over 1k a month. ******** government.
#44 - tls (02/17/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#8 - lamnad (02/16/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)