Women

Adjust content blocking

mudkipfucker

Channel: 4chan

Comment

Source: 4chan

I Anonymous as ) : Renae:
3 wemen apparently get paid less than men
I 3 start business
Like men, 3 anly hire women
3 less toasts means mere profits
an aw‘ 3 undersell competitors
3 competing companies gen mt of business
smfw flawless business strategy
C) Anonymous JIM : 02 Ranks: ? aee? 4
wwomen
slushees

...

+1439

Views: 66374 Submitted: 09/22/2013

Related Top Content:

/v/tard's sister plays Skyrim

4036

/ck/ decides to start a business

3619

"Sir, you've got a child in the car with no child seat."

3350

Motivation From Morgan Freeman

3221

Anon has a tardbro bodyguard

3225

Pussy guardian

3140

I Wish Someone Could Hire Me For Their Meme Marketer

3047

/fit/izen meets Chad at the gym

3011

Anon has a serious question

2985

Police

2972

I For One Welcome Our New Fast Food Overlords

2898

/pol/ack goes to a job interview

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (113)

First 2 3 4 Last Next

[ 113 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#7 - arabiddrummer **User deleted account**

Reply +87 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Ehh. For the most part, the wage gap for genders is due to the actual jobs men and women are doing. There are a lot less women in high risk and physically demanding jobs, which tend to pay more.

#17 to #7 - helenwheels

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Except physically demanding jobs for the most part pay like ****.

#36 to #17 - thirdjess

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

One of the best paid jobs in Australia (not including doctors and things, be realistic) is working in the mines because it;s a risky job.

#30 to #17 - anon id: 4c5ae5a5

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

What? A roughneck (oil rig worker) makes about 80K a year, starting salary.

#12 to #7 - lesrin

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

im so ******* glad someone finally pointed this out, its the same reason why on average women live 10 years longer, its not often you hear a women working as a coal miner or in a logging camp (2 of the highest mortality rate jobs)

#13 to #12 - arabiddrummer **User deleted account**

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Any time there's a post like this, there's generally a ********* that follows arguing the "wage gap" issue, and the majority usually falls in agreement with this. I figured I'd preemptively strike and (hopefully) cut down on it.

#18 to #13 - anon id: 8921365a

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Um while that may be true in some cases, most of the wage gap issues are created when men and women doing the same job in an office, lets say, get paid completely different salaries...

#28 to #18 - nogphille

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

that's true, and in those cases, men even tend to earn less than women.

#27 to #18 - Aejax

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

That's because men statistically work longer hours (despite working the same job as their female counterparts), are more likely to ask for a promotion, and are more likely to ask for a raise. Women need to step the **** up

#41 to #7 - metalmind

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Plus on average women have less job experience, since they often take a leave to raise children, which means that they don't progress in their job in that time.
Also, many employers see that as a risk they don't want to take.
And their work differs, even if it's the same job.
And you have to factor in 3 sick days per month, which accounts for 10% work time loss.
But they should get the same pay for the same work, just like men should not be treated worse than women, which they are outside of places like the American south, where transvaginal ultrasounds are mandatory before abortions, or where in some places spousal abuse of the wife is legal.
But we need harder punishments for people who accuse others of rape, or any pther crime (at least the maximum punishment the person that was wrongly accused).

#46 to #41 - anon id: c38ea4d0

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Wow it must take skill to ******** so much in one comment, i'm actually impressed

#47 to #46 - metalmind

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Wow, so tell me, courageous anon, what about what I wrote was incorrect.

#48 to #7 - anon id: 6e8d7f14

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

There are other studys that say that woman get less paid in jobs where woman and men are doing the same job, same hours.

#37 to #7 - shumdek

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Someone actually did some calculations abou the average wage gap, and then the average cost of dates, etc justifying the fact that men er paid more.

Since the costs of an average man to go dating, movies, dinner etc with a woman, pretty much adds up to the wage gap. I can't remember the study, but it was pretty accurate.

#69 to #37 - anon id: 2992ecfe

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

In other words it evens out since men are usually the ones that pay the most in the family.

#19 - ciacheczko

Reply +56 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Funny... I always thought that woman is something that costs a guy more money than anything else.

#9 - fuckinfuckinfuck

Reply +42 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

#20 - redrepeater

Reply +31 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

>Be in a relationship with a woman
>Makes less money because girlfriend needs some of my cash
>Go gay instead
>Makes tons of money because we dont need to rely on each others wallets
>Spend all day with best gay friend and still have money left over at the end of the day.
>???
Proft

#43 to #20 - anon id: 5030b453

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

I don't think you just go gay....

#51 to #43 - anon id: d41c5f02

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

You wanna bet?

#68 to #51 - anon id: 5030b453

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Yes, I am gay. And if I had the choice, I would have chosen to be straight. There was no decision is sexual orientation for me, or any of my homosexual colleagues whatsoever.

#44 to #20 - spanishninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

#31 to #20 - rmdx

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

I am not homosexual

but it made me think, kids

#40 to #31 - alimais

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Then get a trap because that's totally not gay.

#59 to #40 - rmdx

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

so .. it's half-gay ?

#97 to #59 - mrunobvious

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

more like 25% gay. unless its got gorilla legs.

#32 to #20 - spysappinmysasha

Reply +18 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

the >??? part is your ass and it will be filled with dick.

#2 - rocksteady

Reply -8 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Women employees are awful.

#5 to #2 - curtkobain

Reply +16 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

#8 to #5 - Silver Quantum

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

^woman employee

#10 to #8 - curtkobain

Reply -5 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

If you say so.

#11 to #8 - coursicar

Reply -6 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

you had a couple woman workers thumb yo down, so i evened the playing field for ya by thumbing up your funny comment. good day to you.

#16 - psydoc

Reply +11 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

This is what it should say:
> women apparently work for less
> apparently work

#6 - Jabberwocky

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Does anyone have that story about that woman who started a production agency or something and hired only women and they were complete bitches who put her out of business? I would like to read that again.

#14 to #6 - psydoc

Reply +9 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

My goodness, I am amazed by what I just read.

#23 to #14 - meestaa

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

A pleasant comic relief story...

BUT, what if there was a TV company only hiring men? We'd be reading a whole other news story, one about sexism, misogyny, and a bunch of other words referring to the evil tyranny of men who blatantly still control the world

#26 to #23 - psydoc

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

That's what I kept thinking while I read it. I thought this was the funniest part though:

"Though I will not absolve myself of all guilt, I believe the business was ruined by the destructive jealousy and in-fighting of an all female staff."
(She blames herself and her female staff for the failure)

And while I stand by my initial reason for excluding male employees - because they have an easy ride in TV - if I were to do it again, I'd definitely employ men. In fact, I'd probably employ only men.
(She now considers men as superior employees, yet still maintains that things are too easy for men. She's feels there should be some sort of unnatural way to level the playing-field for women, and she would still consider that just.)

#34 to #26 - deadrifler

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Problem with her is, she doesn't recognize the biggest issue of why her company failed. **** management. you can't have a GM who doesn't crack down, or a boss who doesn't play bad cop. If you have behavioral issues in staffing, replacements can be filled easy. In the TV industry there are people who would kill to get those job opportunities. Blaming it all on her women staffing is a scapegoat. Sure some of the reasons behind the failure were an all women staff, but also an owner who didn't know when to put her foot down, hiring incompetent individuals who can't differentiate work from a social mixer and just incompetence on budgeting.(High salaries for most the staff. Boo hoo hoo, women are underpaid so I am gonna overpay my entire staff to compensate.)

#105 to #34 - psydoc

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

I think she partially recognizes it, but not fully. Also, my philosophy on employees is that if you can't train them to do their job without constant supervision, then you should fire them. It's a huge waste of time for me to supervise someone doing something I could probably do quicker and better myself. There's no reason to pay for that.

#113 to #105 - deadrifler

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(09/25/2013) [-]

Exactly. Bothering to get staffing and delegation of duty is pointless if what free time extra staffing clears up is overtaken by having to constantly babysit who ever is supposed to do it.

#29 to #26 - meestaa

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

She's a perfect example of somebody who thinks too much, about the wrong things.

Regardless, here's a funny picture to make everybody's days better

#25 - ohgodwaitimatheist

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Well, I beg to friggin' differ.

Thomas Sowell acaba com feminista defensora do racialismo e das cotas

#57 - onceman

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

No company in pretty much any country advertises a job then lowers it based on your gender, you get less because you work less, simple as that.

#21 - herpaderderp

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

OK, I've said this before, and I'm going to say this again. Women do not get paid less for doing the same job. Any company that tried to pay anyone differently due to gender or race would immediately find themselves in many massive lawsuits. The reason women get paid less as an average is because they work lower paying jobs.

Feminists use the medical field as an example, arguing that men get paid way more than women in hospitals. This is because there are different jobs within the hospital. Salary is based on the job they do. You can't expect a nurse to get paid the same as a doctor.

More to the topic of this post, not only would you have to pay women the same, but due to things like maternity leave, you would actually have to pay more. Ergo, you would lose money if you tried undercutting competitors.

#82 to #21 - birdss

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Thesechocodiles

#83 to #21 - TheseChocodiles

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

That's not how it works, only an idiot would make it that obvious.
It's in the job titles, same job, different titles, different pay cheques.

I have studied this, it does happen.

#35 to #21 - thirdjess

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(09/23/2013) [-]

Also a lot of women get optional benefits the men would not, which gets taken out of their pay. So if a man and a woman both get paid 500k a year (******* hell, I wish), and the woman elects to receive dental, health and salary care, she ends up getting paid 487k while the man elects none of these and gets the full 500k.

First 2 3 4 Last Next

[ 113 comments ]

Add Comment