The world is ****ed

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

gavnthsociopth Rank: #24

Channel: 4chan

next random

Comment

The world is ed. . bbe american gget fat, get shot, become poor because surgery is 100 sbe european wet beheaded by isis bbe asian scuicide because of stress an

bbe american
gget fat, get shot, become
poor because surgery is
100
sbe european
wet beheaded by isis
bbe asian
scuicide because of stress and no
sbe african
we african
sbe australasian
wet killed by venomous animal and lose
war against emu
I guess no place on earth is good after all

...

+2254

Views: 40346 Submitted: 11/24/2017

Block User's Content

Block Channel Content

Related Top Content:

/b/ is back with their weaponized autism

3368

Introvert inside and outside

Anon helps the family business

3097

Anon and his friend are Functioning Autists

2985

Iglytyo Mavney Daterys

2967

Sabluelsea Davat ---r

2942

Anon gets competitive

2935

Anon turns 21

2931

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (383)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 383 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#356 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+4

(11/25/2017)[+](3 replies)

stickied by gavnthsociopth

First half of the comments: "New Zealand is a good place"
Second half: "Iceland seems nice"

#376 to #356 - huepike

Reply+1

(11/28/2017)[-]

Well at least we dont have any war here

#361 to #356 - shirigami

Reply0

(11/25/2017)[-]

New Zealand is the Australian Iceland, isn't it?

#362 to #361 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply0

(11/25/2017)[-]

Seems about right.

#2 - killerkonan

Reply+252

(11/24/2017)[-]

CANADA MASTER COUNTRY WE WIN AGAIN

#370 to #2 - LaBarata

Reply0

(11/25/2017)[-]

Trudeau literally just brought 60 known terrorists into the country and set them loose but it's ok because they're really really sorry

#272 to #2 - jamesalmighty

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

join list: Canadians

Mention History

#247 to #2 - thebaconstripman

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

81 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#337 to #219 - prancingkid

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Canadian American

#248 to #23 - thebaconstripman

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

You almost redeemed yourself, then turned it around again and screwed it.

#253 to #248 - epiclootcosplay

Reply-4

(11/24/2017)[-]

> And this matters to me... because?

#254 to #253 - thebaconstripman

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

killerkonan was just messin' aroudn with ya an joking, and you took it all seriously. Almost redeemed it with >>21 but then turned it back for the worse with >>#23 and just kept on going and going. Just sayin', as >>#24 said

#255 to #254 - epiclootcosplay

Reply-4

(11/24/2017)[-]

Regardless of joking or not, when you boil it down, it's still some twat on the other end. I don't care nor did I ask for your opinion.

#256 to #255 - thebaconstripman

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

>>#24

#258 to #256 - epiclootcosplay

Reply-5

(11/24/2017)[-]

Can't think of your own insult so you regurgitate someone elses? **** off, pleb.

#369 to #3 - kradoz

Reply-1

(11/25/2017)[-]

Hey dude, free healthcare is a BLESSING!

#342 to #31 - anon id: 3740ae49

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Its a joke

#288 to #31 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

they tell most cancer patients that they can't be treated because it's too expensive to treat them.

I know three ladies who went to the states for cancer treatment because all canada offered was paleative.

#241 to #95 - anon id: 9fb74a60

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

81 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#267 to #173 - lolollo#367 on commentsRank#367

Reply+10

(11/24/2017)[-]

"I went to Merica and was seen mediately!"

No you werent ******. At best you were brought into a room immediately and still had to wait upwards of 1-2 hours for the doctor to see you.

I dont know why people feel the need to lie about this ****.

#344 to #173 - imapsychiatrist

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

they put you through so many procedures because they get paid more for doing it

#283 to #164 - edisontrent

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

#290 to #138 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

I paid a grand total of 200 grand in taxes my whole life

I deserve a million in medical care..

My kids will pay for it so we won't run a deficit. We just need to make sure we constantly breed a larger population than we currently have.

Oh yeah, that's not a system designed to fail at all.

#292 to #290 - mormagil

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Despite the fact that their healtchcare is privatised, the American government pays more taxpayers money per person towards healthcare than many comparable nations (your country included) which have universal healthcare. So they actually pay for it twice lmao. And you think that you have it bad. Should be grateful.

#293 to #292 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Citation. The **** is the american government paying healthcare for?

What you mean to say is the average cost per person for medical care in the states is higher. That's true. Because the medical care is privatized there are costs associated with the competition and the waste involved in that competition.

You're basically saying "guys, monopolies are great, cause if you don't have to compete you don't have to waste money on competition!" Which is great until the monopoly starts screwing you and you have no legal alternative to them. Aka what's happening in canada as routine checkups are made fewer and fewer and cancer patients are more routinely given paliative care compared to actual treatments.

We can't afford to pay for everyone. Now, I'm not a ******* nazi. I just think the social healthcare system we've currently designed is retarded. Introduce co-pay, re-introduce an element of privatization, put a ceiling on medical coverage, whatever you gotta do. Just end the ponzy scheme. The coffers are emptying out. No one my age will have anything to work with when we're as old as the boomers who designed this retarded system.

#300 to #293 - mormagil

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

No, you were right the first time - I'm saying that more taxpayers money goes into healthcare per person in America.

Citation:
www.commonwealthfund.org/publications...
www.commonwealthfund.org/publications...

They are being ripped off big time.

#301 to #300 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Ah ****... I forgot about medicare and medicaid.

See the problem is Americans are **** at socializing. They just end up with the worst of both philosophies.

America is mismanaged as ****. That's WHY they hate the government so much. No **** they pay more per person with social healthcare - the government is a garbage advocate on their behalf.

The reason why Canadian healthcare works at all is because we bent over the healthcare industry and ****** it with a giant dildo. We made the government the monopoly. In the states, the government is just a competitor. It doesn't work well that way.

In any case, the problem is weird for the states because of how massive the country is and the nature of how state rights operate. In Canada, the provinces have the money so the federal is sort of beholden to us. In the States the federal has the money and often takes the approach of "do this or we cut your funding" to poorer states.

So the issue becomes, how do you socialize, on the state or federal level? In Canada we socialized at the provincial level despite it being federal ordinance.

That aside you completely ignored my harsh reality - our social healthcare system is a ponzy scheme hurtling towards collapse. That's cool with you?

#307 to #301 - mormagil

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

"America is mismanaged as ****."

Haha no arguments from me there.

Nah you're right, it sounds like things are pretty bad over in Canada, I didn't know things were heading that way. When was the last time you would say it was decent?

The problem in Britain right now is that the government is waging a war against our national health service. No joke - our current minister of health is a man who wrote a book about how the NHS could be transformed into an American style system without the British public noticing or resisting. Absolutely nuts.

#311 to #307 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

It was decent back when the boomers were working.

The problem is that we have this huge glut of the population not working, disproportionately pulling from the healthcare system (because they're old) after only giving birth to ... well 1 or 2 kids each - basically replacement rate.

But we have a system that says "we cannot turn anyone away or refuse further care" including incredibly expensive vegetative state care. Literally thousands of dollars a day keeping a dead body warm.

We are at a bloody crossroads. The left are trying to cut costs by slashing doctor wages. That will likely cause a doctor exodus. Now, the question is if that exodus will matter. There are thousands of happy pre-med students who will be glad to replace them. It's difficult to project if the quality of care will drop.

The conservatives propose what I've said. Co-pay, reintroducing limited private medical care (like for abortions, or basic medical procedures that can be done in clinical settings, not requiring the infrastructure of a hospital).

Currently we are making very liberal right to die legislation in hopes to encourage people to kill themselves lol.

Healthcare is a ******* headache. My dream system is one with a flat medical account for all citizens. We pay our taxes, our account fills up over time. You use services, you pull from the account. Special allowances are made for children born with congenital disorders, basically swallowing the cost with an unlimited account for compassionate reasons. In addition to this system I would allow for private medical insurance. So if you want more coverage you have the option.

All the fun of wealth redistribution with the added bonus of letting rich people spend even more money insuring their cheque signing hand.

#306 to #301 - anon id: a240188d

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

This, I can't possibly support social programs because my government is so incompetent at implementing them. That's not to mention the insane amount of free riders that would benefit.

#269 to #119 - anon id: 7d120a2f

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

...then why werent they?

Its not like the housing market temporarily went socialist when it crashed in the 00's, literally spawning a B rated summer blockbuster movie.

#244 to #174 - megakillerx

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

81 replies hidden: Please view thread directly to view.

#289 to #244 - mormagil

Reply-2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Before Stalin, Russia was miles behind the other powers of the world in terms of industry. These other countries had been dominating in war because of their industry.

He had to grab a vastly agricultural nation by the scruff of the neck and enforce progress - which had taken hundreds of years for other countries - into a very short space of time.

Although it was brutal, it worked. This industrialisation was what gave Russia the capability to smash the German army at Stalingrad.

You don't have to admire or respect the man to understand why he did what he did.

#291 to #289 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Classic! WITHOUT COMMUNISM THERE WOULD BE NO MODERN CHINA

You're literally quoting communist propaganda you numpty. The progress experienced by the soviets did not require the brutalizing of the population nor the adoption of the corrupt dictatorial style of government required to promote "communism".

How would you feel if Capitalists argued "without capitalism there'd be no america"? It's a dumb ******* argument because you don't know what Russia could have been if it were run more morally.

#297 to #291 - mormagil

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Stalinist Russia wasn't communist. I know you'll roll your eyes at that but it's the truth. Communism hasn't existed anywhere - there have been revolutions in the name of communism and socialism, but communism hasn't been achieved.

I'm just asking you to have a peek around the other side of the curtain. Stalin is no hero of mine, all I'm saying is try to understand what his motives were.

Stalin killed plenty that's for sure, but many of the deaths attributed to "Communism" or "Stalin" were actually caused by a blockade which the western powers put in place, inducing a terrible famine. We don't attribute every death in America to capitalism, but you can bet that every death in Russia within that time period gets blamed on communism or Stalin.

Also, just to reflect back to you, you and a lot of funnyjunkers sound like you're quoting capitalist propaganda.

#299 to #297 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

"blockade" or "embargo" - why could none of these communist countries feed themselves? Why did they require foreign imports to sustain their populations?

And "that wasn't real communism" is a freaking meme. It has never been properly done because it requires so much intrinsic goodness in all members of society that it collapses under the weight of the inevitable corruption that flourishes under it

The fundamental problem with communists is that they think human nature can be socially reformed. That if you brainwash people - you can make them happy workers for the state. It doesn't work because we resist social programming. How many times do you need to learn that lesson?

#303 to #299 - mormagil

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Embargo - pardon.

Well first of all, what you call human nature I would call social programming.

Second, there is no state in communism. During the period of socialism - which is supposed to prepare the people for communism - the workers, who have seized control, are the state. (This is proper socialism, democratic socialism is where a party will preserve the capitalist state while introducing social programs.)

#305 to #303 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

An Embargo is very different from a blockade. The former is a social inhibitor to trade - people who don't like you won't trade you. The second is a military inhibitor to trade - preventing ALL trade from occuring.

You're lamenting how when the world was divided in half, the communist side couldn't make a functional enough economy to feed itself while the capitalist side could. Just thought I'd make that clear.

>what you call human nature I call social programming

Look, there is a range of acceptable dispositions that can be programmed but we are ultimately biologically constrained when it comes to our range of natures. There is no perfect human altruist possible en masse. Pure altruism is a genetic dead end. We have evolved explicitly to be as altruistic as we have to be to get away with cheating as much as we can. That's human nature. There's a range - certain people are more altruistic, others are worse cheaters... But you can't get rid of that cheating, not without genocide. Because yes, if you decide to murder every person caught cheating at any level, eventually only the people predisposed to altruism will remain.

But jesus man, you'd be killing billions. I know that a thing communists like to do, but still...

>there is no state in communism

Perfect. You live in England. You don't know what it means to be poor. Being poor is being born in a village in Kenya. You have 10 siblings and there's an excpectation that around half of you will die before reaching adulthood. Your life expectancy is in the thirties or fourties, and you will know very few luxuries. You want to create a world where that level of abject poverty is averaged with the relative wealth of first world countries.

The grand result of communism. Everyone eats **** together But at least no one is getting any more than anyone else!

Capitalism never promises anyone anything for free - but it promises everyone the opportunity to live a good life relative to their peers if they work hard enough. Communism promises you everything for nothing just for being alive but also promises you will be as poor as everyone else in society.

I prefer the former. Sorry.

#313 to #305 - mormagil

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

I know the difference, I used the wrong word.

Actually, the capitalist side wasn't much better - the great depression?

For me personally, I think we're far too much of a product of our environment to say that what we exist as now is human nature. If you think about it, there are so many ways humans could exist, but we know only one. (Barring what we know of tribes etc - funnily enough they seem much happier than us.)

No, I live in Scotland. And it's those people in Kenya or Palestine, or wherever the poor or oppressed are that makes me feel this is the right way. That type of existence is part and parcel with capitalism. Someone must be oppressed, someone must be poor, otherwise the system doesn't work. It wasn't a better economic plan that put us so far above the third world, it was riding over them all and taking everything that they had. That's why me and you don't have to worry about food but people elsewhere can barely get a drink of water. The free market didn't do that.

And before you come back with that's all in the past, it's not at all. The African nations have every resource available to them to achieve success in the capitalist world, so ask yourself why they're not. And ask yourself why the African leader that advocated for an African-wide currency (something which could have been a huge step towards African success) was wiped out by the West. Alongside many other African politicians who stand up to the colonists.

If the child that's currently starving to death in Kenya somehow appeared out there in front of your house, don't try to tell me that you could leave it out there to die. You would help. But because it's not in our direct experience, we don't care, or don't think we can help.

And it's absolutely possible. We produce something like 120% the amount of food that it would take to feed the world - the problem is that it's distributed in terms of profit rather than need.

I would amend what you've said and say that Capitalism has sometimes provided the opportunity to live a good life if you work hard. There have been plenty of times where capitalism didn't provide that opportunity for Britain. And always the dark secret is that you're living off the backs of oppressed people elsewhere. Unless you lose the birth lottery, then you are one of the oppressed.

And don't apologise, I wouldn't hold anyone's beliefs against them. Well, unless they're Nazis or some ****.

#316 to #313 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

The great depression was pre-wwii. We all know history doesn't extend that far ;)

Villagers in Africa may seem happier but they're objectively worse off... We're less happy because we know more. Ignorance is bliss my dude. I think the big pull for socialism is the fact that all these poor people see what they can't have and envy it.

What they don't realize is socialism won't get you what the rich people have. It will make sure the whole world has about as much as the average poor person.

You claim we are exclusively a product of our environment which is weird cause I don't think you think Gay people are Gay because of their environment do you? Our reality is a marriage of genetics and environment. You cannot he anything your genes cannot express. That's why no amount of environmental cueing will make a human a banana.

Now you can argue with me the extent to which altruistic behaviour is genetically constrained and study whether it is labile enough to be easily bred for... But you gotta acknowledge the necessary biological constraints on humanity.

As for the suffering of poor people, remember my definition of capitalism is "you will have a good life relative to your peers". In reality the poorest schmuck won't be able to become president overnight. There are notable exceptions but exceptions don't make rules. But you can reasonably presume in a first world capitalist country that if you work hard and smart enough you will end up better than you were before. My grandparents came to Canada with nothing. My father became a lawyer and hustled his way to Bay street. Now I'm at the most prestigious law school in Canada rubbing elbows with supreme court judges. If the poor were meant to stay poor this wouldn't be possible.

The only thing to be wary of in capitalism is establishing a minimum standard of living. Yes, the exceptional and hard working can push through poverty, but most human beings are average. We need to make sure average people can live comfortable lives

So I don't necessarily oppose all social systems. What I deny is tossing capitalism out entirely. I'd rather a distribution of power 75:25 for a capitalist:socialist system to ensure that the exceptional have adequate societal reinforcement for working diligently while allowibg the average to be comfortable.

What I dont want is a system where the deserving poor, the lazy, the liar, the cheat, suck the life out of the average and blame the exceptional. Thats the risk in socialism.

I think Africa is ****** because their iq is a full standard deviation below the global average. You can't properly negotiate with China over mineral rights if you're literally someone who would be classified as legally retarded in china...

I dont know how we would fix that.

#334 to #316 - mormagil

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

So was the famine, stalins' reign began in 1929 ;)

Well, it could be said that the poor are unhappy because they see what the rich have whereas the rich are unhappy because they have it all and therefore realise that it's not where happiness comes from. In fact, maybe that was said by someone and I've half-remembered it. I'm unsure.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that we are exclusively a product of our environment. As I said - simply too much a product of it to say with certainty where human nature starts and stops.

There have been times where capitalism didn't provide those opportunities though, is that not so? Depressions, financial crashes, or simply economic failure.

Arguably, communism would be more efficient. How many roads go unrepaired, how much necessary work never gets done because it isn't profitable? In communism, the work that is required is the work that gets done. In capitalism, how much effort is wasted on meaningless work?

Personally, I think communism is inevitable, although it seems a long way away just now. It's fairly forward thinking because it incorporates automation, IE, the fact that physical labour at least seems to be slowly dying out in favour of automation. What then? Do the machine builders become the new bourgeoisie, and everyone else lives with nothing? No, that would be silly. Of course, some disaster could take us back years technologically, who knows.

It's true that their education levels contribute to the problem - an uneducated country can be exploited with ease. The Africans who do educate themselves about the situation and organise against it end up assassinated.

Anyway, that's me for tonight because I'm up early for work in the morning. Thanks for a good chat, tbh this is one of the most rational conversations I've had on funnyjunk. Give me a shout

#345 to #334 - Sethorein#368 on commentsRank#368

Reply-1

(11/25/2017)[-]

Oh yeah, communism is inevitable. Once we achieve a world without scarcity. Post scarcity humanity is totally achievable.

I figure the quickest path there will be via the unequal distribution of goods between those most and least qualified to exploit them for maximal ultimate gain over time. But meh yeah. Gnight mate.

I like talking about this kind of **** cause at the end of the day I'm a liberal. I think communism is a dumb idea right now and I'm not afraid to explain why. Anyone who gets offended by the mere idea of communism (or in reverse, the mere idea of fascism) defeats themselves. If your arguments can't effectively refuse those of your opponents, offense convinces no one of anything.

And hell if I'm wrong or your wrong theoretically it's better to know than not to. Worst part of being at my law school is everyone is a very proud communist such that I'm forced to be silent. Drives me bonkers. And if it drives me bonkers, I can't imagine it wouldn't drive commies bonkers in reverse haha

#360 to #170 - yama

has deleted their comment [-]

#372 to #360 - pingun#144 on commentsRank#144

Reply+1

(11/25/2017)[-]

At that point though, theres no free market, at that point its a monopoly.

Monopolies are a end result of free markets depending on a few factors. Like size and all.

Best thing would be to avoid alloing that, a free market can function without a monopoly forming. I'm not arguing for non-regulated nothingness, i'm arguing for a free housing market. You can still sneak in a handfull regulations in there to improve quality of life.

I used to have a few apartments on myself actually. But i lost meine jobs and the apartments. Today our socialist paradise (as our politiciaians like to look at it) have a housing crisis with more than 2.4 million houses missing, and the prices of single room apartments is massive. Buying a house is 10x worse.

I found an apartment i liked on about 50m2, almost a million for the place. Regulations dont fix everything. And they gave us the issue up here

#317 to #203 - pingun#144 on commentsRank#144

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

We have the same issue here. But more than 1/3rd are involved in it.

#277 to #235 - mormagil

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

That is pure nonsense mate. Are you telling me that every single person in England right now could afford to go to university?

Not only that, but you're claiming that Westminsters method would allow everyone in Scotland to afford university, which is an incredible claim to make when not only is it already cheaper here, but you don't have to pay back your tuition. Westminsters' method costs more for the student and you have to pay back your tuition fees, yet you say that would allow everyone in Scotland to go to university, even when the current methods put in place by the Scottish government don't allow such a thing?

I've seen people drop out of uni up here because of their finances. Sit there and tell me "everyone can afford it" all you want, you and I both know that's ********.

And tuition fees are not decided by the free market rofl, the government decides the tuition fees.

#296 to #277 - ChewyConor#401 on commentsRank#401

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Yes, I am telling you that every single person, upon completing school, can afford to go to university. I am telling you that everyone not otherwise excluded due to age, nationality, already having gone to uni, etc. can afford to go to university.

During their time at uni, students have their tuition paid for them (just like in Scotland) and they're loaned enough money to get by, determined by family income and circumstances, so during studying there should be little financial difficulty. Practical difficulties can be a problem, like kids, etc. but unless they've gotten themselves into so much debt that they'd struggle to live anyway, they'll be able to get by. If they spend their entire maintenance loan on booze in the first week and then drop out for financial difficulties then that's their own fault.

After they finish, they now might make student loan repayments. If they earn below a moderate threshold (something like £18-21k currently) they they pay zero. They don't pay back their tuition loan, and they don't pay back their maintenance loan either (which you would do in Scotland). Anything above the threshold, they pay 9%, so it's never crippling and always affordable. It lasts 35 years and then it's gone, no matter how much (or how little) you've paid off. It's entirely possible for someone to pay less in England than they would in Scotland.
Someone who gets a high paying job out of university will pay back all of their loan plus interest.
Someone who gets a moderate job out of university will pay a moderate amount back and get the rest written off.
Someone who doesn't really benefit from their degree and never earns above the threshold pays nothing and get it all written off.

#314 to #296 - mormagil

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Haha you've been listening to the tories too much mate, their brainwashing has worked a treat on you. My loan wouldn't even pay for my accommodation. I don't know what fantasy land you live in.

#315 to #314 - ChewyConor#401 on commentsRank#401

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

How much loan do you get? I got around £8k per year a few years back. Rent was £350 in a shared house, so £4200 in the year, then food bills and all the rest was easily covered.

#271 to #47 - anon id: 7d120a2f

Reply+3

(11/24/2017)[-]

And then enjoy the $50,000 bill which puts your family into bankruptcy.

#261 to #181 - eeveelutionize

Reply+17

(11/24/2017)[-]

**** your spoiler bait

#295 to #261 - fagdude#288 on commentsRank#288

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

It's the only way I know how to convey sarcasm without some gay disclaimer or a jk also you a gay

#343 to #295 - dragonprincessiii#146 on contentRank#146

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

kappa?

#262 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+76

(11/24/2017)[-]

Winner for the nicest place in the ******* world: ICELAND

#270 to #262 - thetarget

Reply+5

(11/24/2017)[-]

>Be Icelandic
>Get burned to death by a volcano

#347 to #262 - ninjaflapjack

Reply+4

(11/25/2017)[-]

Be Icelandic
Suicide because no sunlight

#365 to #347 - evilhomer#3 on commentsRank#3

Reply+2

(11/25/2017)[-]

LITHUANIA IS NUMBER 1
WE'RE NUMBER 1

help me

#349 to #347 - anon id: f2eb2ebe

Reply0

(11/25/2017)[-]

Jesus Christ, Lithuana

#363 to #349 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply0

(11/25/2017)[-]

Evilhomer you're in Lithuania right?

#364 to #363 - evilhomer#3 on commentsRank#3

Reply+3

(11/25/2017)[-]

I sure am

#366 to #364 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+1

(11/25/2017)[-]

I see.

#281 to #262 - klulli

Reply+3

(11/24/2017)[-]

Stop telling everyone we want to keep it that way.

#286 to #281 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Was habe ich gemacht?

#348 to #262 - cannibalvegan

Reply+1

(11/25/2017)[-]

Not enough diversity. /s

#32 - thecraftedmine#79 on commentsRank#79

Reply+75

(11/24/2017)[-]

>be rhodesian
>cease to exist

#33 to #32 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+14

(11/24/2017)[-]

#91 to #32 - crazycommando

Reply+11

(11/24/2017)[-]

Everytime someones mentiones Rhodesia, i feel obligated to post this

#36 - thelastcrusade#140 on commentsRank#140

Reply+31

(11/24/2017)[-]

Be American
Get shot
Go into crippiling debt because of surgery
Sue shooter and family for emotional distress
????
Profit.

#41 to #36 - thatguyontheright

Reply+50

(11/24/2017)[-]

>Be American
>Get Shot
>Go into crippling debt because of hospital bills
>Sue Shooter and family for negligence
>Shooter family on welfare
>Go into crippling debt because of hospital bills and lawyer fees.

#214 to #41 - steppenwolfvg

Reply+6

(11/24/2017)[-]

>Shooter counter-sues, somehow wins

#42 to #41 - TheAndroid

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Wouldn't the debt just be transferred to the shooter and the family?

#46 to #42 - thelastcrusade#140 on commentsRank#140

Reply+5

(11/24/2017)[-]

I'm pretty sure if you sue someone and win you have to be compensated for whatever the judge orders. So if someone doesn't have a job and gets gobment benefits you can probably start taking property
Like if they have a car they put $10,000 into rims and sound sytem you can probably request the car.

#98 to #46 - anon id: aa4e801a

Reply+4

(11/24/2017)[-]

>welfare
>10000$ rims

#136 to #98 - rurik

Reply+6

(11/24/2017)[-]

>People with 10000$ rims making smart decisions.

#233 to #98 - Zaxplab

Reply+3

(11/24/2017)[-]

I don't see the contradiction here.

#43 to #42 - thatguyontheright

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

I dunno, never sued anyone.

#48 to #36 - therealkhorne

Reply+4

(11/24/2017)[-]

>be American
>Read and Look at everything
>Find some stupid little thing
>Sue the Company
>Make Millions

#49 to #48 - thelastcrusade#140 on commentsRank#140

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Americans can't read

#50 to #49 - therealkhorne

Reply+11

(11/24/2017)[-]

WELL LEARN YOURE AMERICAN NOT AMERICANT

#70 to #50 - nofilter

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Oddly wholesome...

#38 to #36 - gavnthsociopth#15 on commentsRank#15 [OP]

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

#129 - unbelievable

Reply+16

(11/24/2017)[-]

Europeans are not beheaded by Isis... WTF? Unless they travel to Iraq and other such countries that ARE OUTSIDE OF EUROPE.

#145 to #129 - leftistbastard

Reply+39

(11/24/2017)[-]

no no, remember? Europe is literally an active warzone. All the americans who've never actualy lived there say so!

#146 to #145 - liero

Reply+18

(11/24/2017)[-]

yeah, can confirm.
I had an RPG hit my living room earlier today.
killed my grandma, but what can I say, it's europe yo

#147 to #146 - autumntea

Reply+9

(11/24/2017)[-]

It's really sick how thos ISIS goons get advanced weaponry like the Beheading RPG 4000 !

#155 to #147 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

>>#153

#154 to #146 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Lee Rigby ring a bell?

#156 to #154 - leftistbastard

Reply+7

(11/24/2017)[-]

>when you use a single death as proof that a whole continent is a warzone
America must be literal hell given all the death here, right?

#308 to #156 - anon id: a240188d

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Depends on where you go. If you go to a college campus then no, if a Detroit ghetto then yes.

#157 to #156 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

The planet is hell, at least in America we get to shoot the demons.

#159 to #157 - leftistbastard

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

>the most peaceful time in human history
>hell
holy crap it's actually kinda funny how scared you are

#160 to #159 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Not scared, resigned.
The coldest part of a fire still burns.

#166 to #154 - liero

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Stephen Paddock ring a bell?

#274 to #166 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-2

(11/24/2017)[-]

Lee Rigby was killed by two muslims, Paddock was a muslim convert
I'll mention the elephant in the room but I'll not point at it for you

#275 to #274 - liero

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

source on the muslim convert

#276 to #275 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-2

(11/24/2017)[-]

archive.is/Ngc3o

#278 to #276 - liero

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

you serious?
"The Islamic State militant group (ISIS) has published a new infographic detailing how the jihadists orchestrated the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history on Sunday night, despite serious doubts as to the group's involvement by authorities."

as if they couldn't have made that **** afterwards?
you know ISIS are attention grabbers right? they claimed responsibility for the 2011 norway shooting, are you this deluded?

#279 to #278 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-4

(11/24/2017)[-]

Well they didn't claim responsibility for the shooting at the baseball game with the congressmen, so clearly they don't just claim responsibility for every shooting.

#280 to #279 - liero

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

""There is no indication that there is any link whatsoever. They claim a lot of things," a U.S. official, unauthorized to speak publicly and speaking on condition of anonymity, told Newsweek Monday.
ISIS has previously claimed responsibility for attacks only to be later denied by authorities, such as an apparent botched robbery in the Philippines."

did you even read the article yourself?

#282 to #280 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Anonymous US official could be a ******* mailman for all we know.
No name, no credibility. Anything said by an "anonymous source" is to be taken as a blatant lie and falsehood.

#285 to #282 - liero

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

....rrrrright
whatever fits your narrative dude

#338 to #285 - leftistbastard

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

I'm sure he believes wikileaks tho, despite all sources being anonymous

#339 to #338 - liero

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

doesn't wikileaks ironically shill for Trump massively?

#340 to #339 - leftistbastard

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

I think that's more assange than wikileaks itself, but I don't follow it close enough to know

#341 to #340 - liero

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

yeah, could be Assange, which still is ironic, but not really surprising

#151 to #145 - themaninacan

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Yeah, it is not quite how they say, but it is still pretty toned down in the mainstream.
There's quite a lot more attacks, and in some countries police refuses to reveal identity of criminals in order to make it sound like dumping all people coming into like one neighbourhood had no effects.

Am pollock, was in Rome and ********* literally an APC every few intersections, armed soldiers in combat fatigues everywhere- and it is similar in Belgium, France and recently the UK too, apparently.

#153 to #145 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply-3

(11/24/2017)[-]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_R...

#229 to #153 - thegamegestapo#320 on commentsRank#320

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

chicago.suntimes.com/news/police-pers...

What is the difference between these two crimes?

#273 to #229 - heartlessrobot#127 on commentsRank#127

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Nobody ever said the US was crime-free
But given for scale, the US is paradise compared to the UK.

#320 to #273 - attilathehunn

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

www.nationmaster.com/country-info/com...
Stats say otherwise.

#206 to #129 - dethrey

Reply+4

(11/24/2017)[-]

Correct, tehy are run over by trucks

#210 to #129 - meganinja

Reply+3

(11/24/2017)[-]

And not every American gets shot

And not every Asian commits suicide.

Unfortunately the majority of Australians are killed by Emus and venomous animals.

But these are jokes made for comedic effect.

#312 to #210 - unbelievable

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

Beheading should not be a stereotype for Europeans. It literally never happened. People getting ran over by Muslim drivers is common here in Europe.

#172 to #129 - nootleofamerica

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

issa joke

#193 to #172 - eeech

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

I doubt it, many people here take that as fact.

#80 - dudefromsoviet

Reply+34

(11/24/2017)[-]

>be Kazakh
>Get ****** at childhood by a drunk man
>no job
>rich for me is average for you

#304 to #80 - rockamekishiko

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

I'm convinced Kazakhstan is run by the illuminati or some ****. By the powerful jews of the earth. It's gonna be a safe heaven

#75 - beezox

Reply+26

(11/24/2017)[-]

antarctica master race

#141 to #75 - belshir#8 on commentsRank#8

Reply+4

(11/24/2017)[-]

>antarctica
>be the least relevent place on the planet after places like sealand

#1 - savedstuff#277 on contentRank#277

Reply+22

(11/24/2017)[-]

> be forrest dwelling hermit
> not experiencing the unconceading self inficlted misery, that living in a society bursting at the seams provides.
> be kinda lonely occasionally
> all in all live a happy, insignificantly-shorter life

#106 to #1 - kageken

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

**kageken used "*roll picture*"**
**kageken rolled image** Ever since I was a kid I've wanted to have my own piece of land preferably forest, and just live. Maybe work part time to help pay for a few things here and there. But just enjoy life. I knew people who earned about £100,000 a year, lived in a huge home and drove fancy cars but their lives were devoted to work. They were stressed out and unhappy 90% of the time and would defend it, by saying they got to have a big home (that they rarely saw) and go on holiday abroad (1/2 weeks a year).

I'd rather live in a modest house, work 20 or so hours a week and have the rest of my time to enjoy myself. Besides You can get a ferry to france for £30 or less if you still want to go abroad.

#135 to #106 - graywolffour

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

sounds like a good life that i'd like to have (i'd also like to have my internet..)

just need that special someone there with me.

#142 to #135 - kageken

Reply+3

(11/24/2017)[-]

Definitely internet! I'm pretty content being by myself but I know what you mean, be nice to have someone to share the quiet with.

#225 to #135 - savedstuff#277 on contentRank#277

Reply+2

(11/24/2017)[-]

I'm telling yall, Hughes Net, satellite internet. I live out in back roads no where on a farm and we get internet.

#224 to #106 - savedstuff#277 on contentRank#277

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

Same here

#169 to #1 - nulltype

Reply+1

(11/24/2017)[-]

But then you wouldn't get to ********. I think living in the forest would be fine with internet access, but without that it's just kind of camping forever. Also farming.

#223 to #169 - savedstuff#277 on contentRank#277

Reply0

(11/24/2017)[-]

I think I could do fine without internet. But there's always Hughues Net.

#150 - themaninacan

Reply+16

(11/24/2017)[-]

>be Antarctican
>be a penguin
>iceberg melts

#105 - liero

Reply+15

(11/24/2017)[-]

>be american
>survive the bi-annual preschool shootings
>survive the tri-annual high school shootings
>survive the weekly mall shootings
>die from splinter in finger
>taking it out would cost 60 000 dollars

#123 to #105 - skebaba

Reply+4

(11/24/2017)[-]

>preschool shootings