2014 was 0 years ago. source: 4chan subscribe for more. 08008, j (45 KB, 569x51 in Em gm CC) Anonymous LE, 18 minutes ago Na, 18716750 Page o [Esau] [w] was 7 y 2014 was 0 years ago source: 4chan subscribe for more 08008 j (45 KB 569x51 in Em gm CC) Anonymous LE 18 minutes Na 18716750 Page o [Esau] [w] 7 y
Upload
Login or register

2014 was 0 years ago

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
2014 was 0 years ago. source: 4chan subscribe for more. 08008, j (45 KB, 569x51 in Em gm CC) Anonymous LE, 18 minutes ago Na, 18716750 Page o [Esau] [w] was 7 y

source: 4chan
subscribe for more

08008, j (45 KB, 569x51 in Em gm
CC) Anonymous LE, 18 minutes ago Na, 18716750 Page o [Esau] [w]
was 7 years ago
19 posts and g image replies emitted.
I - I I Anonymous '' 1 minute ago lwl
what do I feer. wgg (45 KB, mam} Egg
IN teste. ,
11 872 was 142 years ago
...
+812
Views: 38196 Submitted: 01/01/2014
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (111)
[ 111 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - friedgreenpomatoes
Reply -30 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
all the kawadoody kids were born after 2000
User avatar #4 to #1 - datsheriff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Saaaauce
#7 to #4 - anon id: 3d144642
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Crime Zone
User avatar #13 to #7 - killerliquid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Must've been the earlier chapters 'cause I forgot that moment.
User avatar #5 to #4 - friedgreenpomatoes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I have no idea.
#39 to #1 - anon id: 5620e180
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
all you people talk about is anime jesus ******* christ
#61 to #1 - anon id: 81ea5318
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
That picture shouldnt turn me on, should it?
#3 to #1 - jcruikjcruik
Reply +132 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I scrolled down and my mouse cursor hovered over that picture.   
   
I nearly **** myself
I scrolled down and my mouse cursor hovered over that picture.

I nearly **** myself
User avatar #17 - maxismahname
Reply -41 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
1999 was 26 years ago, let that sink in....
User avatar #43 to #17 - howunexpected
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
This would be relevant if thats what the post contained
But all figures in that post were correct, therefore this is misplaced and unfunny
User avatar #99 to #17 - theseventhalias
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
it was just a joke people.

geeze.
User avatar #110 to #99 - maxismahname
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Thank you, I saw this used on a Tumblr post that said "2007 was 14 years ago" and it got front page. Seriously what the ****
User avatar #18 to #17 - VirtualGamer
Reply +86 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Your math teacher must hate you
#44 to #18 - anon id: 5de97b77
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
"MATH TEACHERS HATE HIM! 1 simple trick to look like a ******* retard!"
User avatar #19 to #18 - maxismahname
Reply -20 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
You mean my mom?
User avatar #20 to #19 - pulluspardus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
.... even if his mom is a teacher she probably hates you for failing math
User avatar #22 to #20 - maxismahname
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I was kidding, does FJ not know what sarcasm is? Jesus Christ
User avatar #27 to #22 - Ohforf
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
You may have been kidding, but it wasn't funny.
User avatar #32 to #27 - maxismahname
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
K
User avatar #82 to #32 - thehardcorechimp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
1999 may have been 26 years ago... but 1998 was 56 years ago.
User avatar #91 to #82 - maybelline
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
that's not how it works
User avatar #72 to #22 - psykobear
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
"Sarcasm"
Nothing sarcastic in any way in the comment, nor was it funny. Just a math failure.
#65 - ajroach
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
#85 to #65 - tittentei
-6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#89 to #85 - gamerkill
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
User avatar #86 to #85 - ShitJustGotReal
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
THATS THE JOKE
#104 to #85 - ajroach
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
really? i thought pokemon blue and red were actually 146 years old....crazy
#87 to #85 - anon id: 259bc575
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Tittentei is pretty sure something's impossible, guys! It can in no way be possible.
Tittentei is pretty sure something's impossible, guys! It can in no way be possible.
#108 to #65 - sniperjudas
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Fake.
#106 to #65 - anon id: d5fe209d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I can confirm this, I am old
User avatar #114 to #65 - ChumLeee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2014) [-]
I feel like such a dumbass half-believing the PPG one until I read the others.
User avatar #38 - JohnnyBlaire
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Halo 3 came out seven years ago.

I'm... ****, man.
User avatar #55 to #38 - bodox
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
found the 19 year old
#68 to #38 - akho
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#63 to #38 - zeusx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
hello **** man, i'm dad
User avatar #64 to #38 - badmotorfinger
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Yeah, and Call of duty 4. Back when the series was good.
User avatar #41 to #38 - karson
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
damn, didn't realize it was that old. I still feel like it is rather new.
#40 to #38 - dildobarbarian
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
****....I remember it like it was 2007.
#34 - dvdstvns
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Wake up, America.
I know that's probably why he chose that year
#107 to #34 - anon id: d5fe209d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!
User avatar #6 - witislimited
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Actually, 2014 was 1/730 years ago.
User avatar #28 to #6 - maracasguy
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Actually, I think you'll find that 2014 is now
User avatar #30 to #28 - witislimited
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I meant that in the sense of time since the moment it turned 2014.
User avatar #31 to #30 - maracasguy
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
No ****. It is also extremely self centered to calculate out from your own time zone.
#33 to #31 - witislimited
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Well, if it was so ******* obvious, why'd you correct me?   
   
I didn't calculate from my own zone. If 1/365 is a day, then 1/730 is half a day, 12 hours, which accounts for all timezone variation (I think) since the comment was made.   
   
On that note, calculating from your own time zone doesn't make you a selfish ****. Just a forgetful or clueless one.
Well, if it was so ******* obvious, why'd you correct me?

I didn't calculate from my own zone. If 1/365 is a day, then 1/730 is half a day, 12 hours, which accounts for all timezone variation (I think) since the comment was made.

On that note, calculating from your own time zone doesn't make you a selfish ****. Just a forgetful or clueless one.
User avatar #36 to #33 - deathstare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Calculating from your own time zone is very normal. If my co-worker asked me the time at 4:30 pm in my time zone, I would not tell him it was 7:30 am. That would be just stupid.
Don't let that fool phase you.
User avatar #37 to #36 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I should've considered the 0 GMT time, so there's where I screwed up. Well, if I wanted to give an accurate number anyhow.

He's an idiot, but I'm a more arrogant idiot. Funny how it goes.
User avatar #46 to #37 - meganinja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
no, GMT is stupid.
User avatar #47 to #46 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Either you think UTC is superior or the concept is stupid- I'm not sure which. Details.
User avatar #51 to #47 - meganinja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
GMT was made by the ******* British who decided that Britain was the center of earth and put the Prime Meridian there. And people say America's self centered. I'm EST but I don't think that should be used as the main time source (no reason other than it's the time where I live). People should just personally use their own time zone, and there shouldn't be a main time zone, because that's ******* retarded.
User avatar #56 to #51 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I see. Well, pompous as it is, anything can be used as a reference point- GMT/UTC are simply standardized references- Britain decided it was wherever and everyone went along with it instead of standardizing some other reference because who gives a ****.

Or so is my understanding.
User avatar #57 to #56 - meganinja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
It just started pissing me off because there was a content on here of a map with America in the middle, and there was a caption bashing America for being self centered and putting itself in the middle. The ******* nerve of some people.
User avatar #58 to #57 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I see. There's ****** up people all over the world- America just has more then it's share.
User avatar #69 to #28 - akho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
No...
User avatar #113 to #69 - maracasguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2014) [-]
Then what year is it?
User avatar #8 to #6 - crampers
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
wat
User avatar #9 to #8 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
1/365 = 1 day (24 hours) in a year

0.5/365=1/(2x365)
User avatar #10 to #9 - crampers
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
i did math once
User avatar #11 to #10 - witislimited
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
I don't get why you don't get it then. Sorry.
User avatar #12 to #11 - crampers
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
didn't get why you said 2014 was 1/730 years ago - since it is still 2014
User avatar #14 to #12 - witislimited
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
And now you know.
User avatar #75 to #14 - edwardyeap
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
"Actually, 2014 was 1/730 years ago."

"1/730 years ago."

He was confused about this, not the calculation.
User avatar #109 to #75 - witislimited
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Then he should've understood, given the explanation I made. Human stupidity never ceases to disappoint.
#111 to #109 - edwardyeap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/03/2014) [-]
At the very least you could've pointed out that YOU made the mistake.
User avatar #112 to #111 - witislimited
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/03/2014) [-]
I agree, except for some reason, I can't see a mistake I made.
User avatar #15 to #6 - yugzer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
He means the first moment in 2014.
User avatar #73 to #6 - psykobear
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
He didn't say the first moment of 2014. 2014 is right now, so 2014 was, really, 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds ago. Even sooner than that.
User avatar #21 - pepemex
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Today I realized that every single child I see on the street was born after the year 2000...
User avatar #48 - lespoisson
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
why the **** would you get feels from this
User avatar #54 to #48 - overlordantares
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
Feels for the stupidity of humanitY?
User avatar #53 to #48 - failtolawl
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
nostaligafags
#71 to #48 - applescryatnight
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
cause we gettin old.
#60 - tehbestever
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
2012 was 28 years ago
#2 - otroviciado
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/02/2014) [-]
what
what