Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

"Your Thumbing Violation"

+710
Views: 43305
Favorited: 40
Submitted: 10/08/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to adu E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(413):

[ 413 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#57 - hopskotch (10/08/2013) [+] (187 replies)
So not only can we not post even moderately sexy things, we get banned for upvoting them too.

Tough crowd man, tough crowd.
#58 to #57 - adu ONLINE (10/08/2013) [-]
People have been complaining recently about how front-page posts and comments only have a fraction of the thumbs that they used to, how the community is supposedly dying out, or people contributing less.   
   
The reason people are contributing less is because of stricter and poorly-defined regulations.   
First it was level 10 account.   
Then it was level 40 account.   
Then people get thumb banned for thumbing up stuff with mildly lewd content, regardless if the lewdness was the focus of the content or comment.   
That's why thumbs seem like such a scarce resource, which is ironic now that lurkers just started caring about them, because they need level 40 to thumb.   
   
But it gets worse... People started getting banned for SFW mildly-sexualized contented inside SFW, and even NSFW in NSFW. I saw some of this on the 						******					 board where people were getting banned for girls that merely "looked" or were otherwise stated to be underage. So, in otherwords, whoever the 						****					 Phanact or Admin feel like, because just about any anime girl can be seen as 17 or under if you're got a stick up your ass. One time I saw someone get banned for posting a NSFW picture of Yoko in the 						******					 board, and the ban reason was because Yoko was known as 14, but it was post-timeskip Yoko who was actually 21... but to be honest, it's a 						*******					 goddamn cartoon, as long as its not 						*******					 undeveloped children or raping babies then it shouldn't even 						*******					 matter.   
   
						******					 sake.
People have been complaining recently about how front-page posts and comments only have a fraction of the thumbs that they used to, how the community is supposedly dying out, or people contributing less.

The reason people are contributing less is because of stricter and poorly-defined regulations.
First it was level 10 account.
Then it was level 40 account.
Then people get thumb banned for thumbing up stuff with mildly lewd content, regardless if the lewdness was the focus of the content or comment.
That's why thumbs seem like such a scarce resource, which is ironic now that lurkers just started caring about them, because they need level 40 to thumb.

But it gets worse... People started getting banned for SFW mildly-sexualized contented inside SFW, and even NSFW in NSFW. I saw some of this on the ****** board where people were getting banned for girls that merely "looked" or were otherwise stated to be underage. So, in otherwords, whoever the **** Phanact or Admin feel like, because just about any anime girl can be seen as 17 or under if you're got a stick up your ass. One time I saw someone get banned for posting a NSFW picture of Yoko in the ****** board, and the ban reason was because Yoko was known as 14, but it was post-timeskip Yoko who was actually 21... but to be honest, it's a ******* goddamn cartoon, as long as its not ******* undeveloped children or raping babies then it shouldn't even ******* matter.

****** sake.
User avatar #1 - mausisdead (10/08/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Its simple, if you thumb anything resembling a woman outside NSFW, you get banned
#133 - acidreign (10/08/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Meanwhile, at FunnyJunk headquarters.
Meanwhile, at FunnyJunk headquarters.
#62 - phanact (10/08/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Only admin can permaban
Or set times on bans
I can only ban by flagging comments, and its a max of 6 hrs, so I can't do any harm
Admin must have done it himself, and he doesn't unban anyone anymore
User avatar #77 to #62 - adu ONLINE (10/08/2013) [-]
Perhaps admin sees which things you flag, and decides to up the punishment for whatever reason?
User avatar #20 - ragingbrony (10/08/2013) [+] (20 replies)
If you get comment flagged by a mod it gives you a link to the comment that got flagged in your inbox.

....A lot of good that does though since the picture, as well as any text you had with it, is gone with the flag.
Replace this useless Comment link with a Link to the picture you posted. It'd stop a lot of the "Why am I banned" comments people make, and actually help people understand what you consider NSFW

Seriously, the definition of 'nsfw' on this site has changed too much anyways.
Originally it was "If there's ******** showing, it's NSFW, that's it"
Then it got slightly stricter, and extreme borderline with sexual implications were NSFW
Then you at some point added Gore to that
Then you added the most tame of Borderline to the list.
Then all this other crap, like Hate Speech and Harassment
Now, if there's a girl in the picture, or a human not facing forward (so you can see their Butt), it's apparently NSFW

A little clarification would be nice right about now.
#113 - optimussum (10/08/2013) [+] (11 replies)
(I'll probably get banned for this pic because it has a female in it)

I'm not even sure what's going on with this site. Admin says he's "improving" it, but he's not. He's making it so the site will appear more often on Google and companies will advertise on the site.

There's no point complaining, Addy doesn't care about the site's users. He only cares about his wallet.

I'd just advise leaving and going to one of the other infinitely better sites.
#118 - pulpunderground ONLINE (10/08/2013) [+] (3 replies)
FJ administration is the gay overlords of an army of massive ******* , this I have learned to accept. But t **** those guys for real this time.
User avatar #2 - austoboyko (10/08/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I was banned for posting a pic with a dildo in it,attached to a toy helicopter. For 6 hours. So i think its "No discriminating against women" Because dicks only gets you 6 hours not life.
User avatar #5 to #2 - adu ONLINE (10/08/2013) [-]
I got 6 hour comment banned for posting a gif of Kamina slapping his ass.

Totally ***** , right? You know, the kind of stuff they've been showing on children's cartoons for the last 20 years? Heaven forbid...
#36 - princessren (10/08/2013) [+] (4 replies)
in my opinion   
I am starting to think   
"Banned for posting porn outside of NSFW"   
is just an excuse/cover up when there isn't a good reason to ban someone but they do anyways   
 inb4 B&
in my opinion
I am starting to think
"Banned for posting porn outside of NSFW"
is just an excuse/cover up when there isn't a good reason to ban someone but they do anyways
inb4 B&
#115 - lolokoko **User deleted account** (10/08/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Pfff... Don't ya know?

Mods have been searching rule breaking pictures with the allcomment thingie they installed. You could'a posted something months or years ago, and they can find it if they dig deep enough.

Everyone is getting banned for stupid things now. There's no rhyme nor reason for the bans either. There's really no standard, since bans are based on opinion and not facts. Post something and pray you don't tick off any of the mods short fuse, that's how it works now.

And it goes both ways, here and in the NSFW section. Just ask anyone, and they'll chant it.

Admin has made the common mistake of choosing biased mods, and that's it. You can have bronies posting rule-breaking stuff and getting out **** free. Or one mod making up a list of people and a list of reasons why he "thinks" they should be banned.

Hell, you can even bribe admin into unbanning you. Someone else did it before, and I bet is not the last time. Bans aren't permanent, thankfully, if you get on your knees and suck some dick. I'd rather delete the account and create a new one.
#193 - shitflippingpattie (10/09/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Well, I think Mudkips are sexy. Do I get a ban too?
+9
#178 - bigdikdave has deleted their comment [-]
#169 - arcticassassin (10/08/2013) [-]
It says I had a thumbing violation a while back. I was so startled.
What for?
No one knows.
User avatar #61 - cupcakescankill ONLINE (10/08/2013) [+] (13 replies)
Even worse than that, the moronic moderators won't stop flagging 5 MONTH OLD sfw pictures posted on the SECOND PAGE of my PROFILE.

They couldn't have just "found it"

They were actively searching for it.
#217 - robbyarcane (10/09/2013) [-]
Don't you have to be 18 to sign up for the site anyway? Even 9gag has this **** down.
#216 - bitchpleaseshutup (10/09/2013) [-]
don't ban me
User avatar #8 - lilmatty (10/08/2013) [-]
Its simple, you do anything, you get banned
[ 413 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)