Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - guywithapen has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #4 - LaughAtYou (10/27/2013) [-]
China is north koreas only ally and have said they will not go to war if north korea initiate.

I still remember when they launched a "test" missile at australia against everyone better judgement just to see if they could make it to us in case of a war. That missile didnt even make it out of north korean boarders, so we had a nice little laugh at them for a while :/
User avatar #10 to #4 - herecomesjohnny ONLINE (10/27/2013) [-]
china is part of the security council and is the main holder of the american debt, it obviously won't back north korea in case of war
User avatar #9 to #4 - defender (10/27/2013) [-]
Do you really think china or Russia is going to risk war by backing North Korea
User avatar #23 to #9 - heartlessrobot (10/27/2013) [-]
China's army would be considered pitiful by most standards, and Russia still hasn't got guns for each soldier. Just like it's always been.
User avatar #24 to #23 - defender (10/28/2013) [-]
But do you honestly think they would back North Korea against NATO, what do you think they would have to gain from that. Both China and Russia aren't thrilled with NK's saber rattling.
User avatar #25 to #24 - heartlessrobot (10/28/2013) [-]
NATO is useless, what with their baby-blue helmets. Now, the actual armies of the other countries would **** them up.
#28 to #25 - defender (10/28/2013) [-]
That's the UN that has baby blue helmets, I present you NATO members in green
User avatar #29 to #28 - heartlessrobot (10/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, rapterjesus corrected me. NATO is pretty much anyone with a respectable army. And some that don't have one.
User avatar #30 to #29 - defender (10/28/2013) [-]
It doesn't matter china or Russia wouldn't risk going to war with NATO by backing NK and before you say they wouldn't be fighting NATO, NATO members share a collective defense
User avatar #27 to #25 - rapterjesus (10/28/2013) [-]
I think you are mistaking NATO for the UN. It is UN peacekeepers that normally wear blue helmets, and do jack **** . NATO is an organization that coordinates the military of its members. All armies remain independent, but in the case of a full NATO vs. Someone war, the supreme commander would operate through NATO, much like Eisenhower did during WW2.
User avatar #6 to #4 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account** (10/27/2013) [-]
Calm down no ones going to war with NK. It's just kim yelling stuff at people again about nukes or something.
#5 to #4 - anon (10/27/2013) [-]
Please do. Based on nothing more than that post I would guess our national IQ might jump up a bit.
 Friends (0)