War. War never changes.. Same cut scene from the ending of MW2 and the start of Ghosts... Call of Duty... Call of Duty never changes... at least not after Cod 4
x
Click to expand

Comments(301):

[ 301 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#81 - asasqw (11/08/2013) [-]
War remained relatively unchanged till the rise of atomic weapons. At that point no major powers dare to go into war with one another due to mutually assured destruction. War now is fought in cloak and dagger, puppet wars, and economics.
User avatar #94 to #81 - ihatem (11/08/2013) [-]
The French guerilla changed war, so did the mounted Mongolians, the early Chinese, the Ottomans, the Greek, Spartans, Shogunate Japanese, the Seljuk Turks.
User avatar #96 to #94 - asasqw (11/08/2013) [-]
It went from club people to stab people to shoot people to hiddey shooty people to trenchy shooty people to nazi shooty people to nukes. Nothing was so drastic of a change, just strategists and weapons but it remained the same, throw people on your side at people on their side till someone runs out of people.
User avatar #106 to #81 - trivdiego (11/08/2013) [-]
war between powers you mean. you forgot guerilla war between those that oppose the powers yet refuse to be easily wiped out
#7 - pearfield (11/07/2013) [-]
Call of Duty... Call of Duty never changes... at least not after Cod 4
User avatar #289 to #7 - kattbajs (11/08/2013) [-]
Well BF3 and BF4(Feels like the same game)...Why complaning if you dont like CoD just dont ******* buy it. I dont like BF or CoD.Thats why i dont buy them. It's really easy to not complain about a game you dont like, Try it sometime :3
#290 to #289 - pearfield (11/08/2013) [-]
I don't buy them... I didn't buy BF4 either because it feels like the same as BF3. Your argument fails against me.
User avatar #305 to #7 - gayboard (11/10/2013) [-]
You seriously forgot WaW
#146 to #7 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
Because GTA and Battlefield changed so much
#163 to #146 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
There was a significant difference between GTA IV and V, as well as BF2 and BF3.
User avatar #168 to #163 - rplix (11/08/2013) [-]
I agree with you.
User avatar #244 to #146 - psykobear (11/08/2013) [-]
No one even mentioned GTA or Battlefield.
And GTA has changed... a lot.
Battlefield, not so much. But pretty.
User avatar #157 to #7 - nippuhl (11/08/2013) [-]
Comments like this are very naive. You're forgetting zombies.
User avatar #190 to #157 - gobnick (11/08/2013) [-]
but that was a different company, and even still they copied their game over to a sequel as well
User avatar #195 to #190 - nippuhl (11/08/2013) [-]
It's still Call of Duty, is it not?
User avatar #282 to #195 - gobnick (11/08/2013) [-]
yes, but it still just plastered together stuff from the old one and called it a new game, in the same fashion as the content and in other ways as well
#126 - squalllionhart (11/08/2013) [-]
oh no a generic modern military shooter isn't being original
oh no a generic modern military shooter isn't being original
User avatar #144 to #126 - nyuORlucy (11/08/2013) [-]
theres a difference between lacking originality and copying and pasting
User avatar #185 to #144 - TittyCinnamon (11/08/2013) [-]
^ exactly
User avatar #26 - popesoybean (11/07/2013) [-]
"Gosh, I'm so glad I got BF4 instead! It's totally different! EA would never rehash things in the name of profit!"
#181 to #26 - arcticassassin (11/08/2013) [-]
It's not exactly a new, revolutionary game. It's more of an overall improvement. But then again, name one thing this year that is totally new and completely original.
#201 to #181 - DJFatcat (11/08/2013) [-]
Ride to Hell: Retribution

Sometimes, it's best to stick to the beaten path
User avatar #214 to #26 - jordanish (11/08/2013) [-]
Battlefield has such glorious exploits/bugs/obvious beta moments though. How can you not love launching tanks across buildings?
User avatar #251 to #26 - sergeantnovak (11/08/2013) [-]
Something I've learned about shooters and just a lot of games that have successive titles in general is that the players don't like change to the core gamepley. Players want the same kind of game with improvements. I think BF4 had a good balance of that. Halo: Reach I think changed the formula of Halo way too much and now the fanbase is in perpetuating ******* since Halo 4 continued from it's changes.

If anything Call of Duty is a testament to how to maintain a franchise. It may get a lot of hate on the internet, but godamn does it pull in revenue.
+6
#46 to #26 - infernis has deleted their comment [-]
#131 - sinclairr (11/08/2013) [-]
-Warning, long post-   
   
I liked MW2 more than any other CoD game. CoD 4 was pretty good too, but I think MW2 bettered it in multiplayer, even if the community kinda sucked. It felt like a game you could play, and have the worst weapons, yet still win because you have strategy involved. Perks felt more like perks, rather than in other games where it was either A-'pick a perk that makes you a 			*******		 space marine' or B-'pick a perk that makes you walk .0000000000002 meters faster'.   
   
The maps felt more centeral, and were fun to navigate around, finding weak points in the other team's defenses. Yeah, spawns could suck ass, but most people were too stupid to take advantage of the spawns. I felt like the game types were well balanced and fun for everyone, no matter what you wanted. Teams didn't suck because you could go solo and avoid your team completely, but you could also work with them, which I almost never did because everyone was about 12 years old.   
   
Black ops was fun, but had that definite edge to it that made it more about attacking and having the best gun, not using weapon attachments/perks/kill streaks as strategic uses.    
   
Black Ops 2 sucked ass. Everything felt like cardboard, the maps were meh, and the community- oh jesus- sucked dick.   
   
CoD Ghosts feels very... weak. The maps are too open, and the whole 'solo-rambo' thing is thrown out the window so you HAVE to work with your team, which ruins the game for me. They also broke a lot of little things like kill streaks, the map, the fact you now buy things rather than work for them, and a lot more. It feels like they force you to do so much, which may make the game feel smoother, but makes it so boring.    
   
>MFW people tell me to stop playing MW2 and get play the newer games
-Warning, long post-

I liked MW2 more than any other CoD game. CoD 4 was pretty good too, but I think MW2 bettered it in multiplayer, even if the community kinda sucked. It felt like a game you could play, and have the worst weapons, yet still win because you have strategy involved. Perks felt more like perks, rather than in other games where it was either A-'pick a perk that makes you a ******* space marine' or B-'pick a perk that makes you walk .0000000000002 meters faster'.

The maps felt more centeral, and were fun to navigate around, finding weak points in the other team's defenses. Yeah, spawns could suck ass, but most people were too stupid to take advantage of the spawns. I felt like the game types were well balanced and fun for everyone, no matter what you wanted. Teams didn't suck because you could go solo and avoid your team completely, but you could also work with them, which I almost never did because everyone was about 12 years old.

Black ops was fun, but had that definite edge to it that made it more about attacking and having the best gun, not using weapon attachments/perks/kill streaks as strategic uses.

Black Ops 2 sucked ass. Everything felt like cardboard, the maps were meh, and the community- oh jesus- sucked dick.

CoD Ghosts feels very... weak. The maps are too open, and the whole 'solo-rambo' thing is thrown out the window so you HAVE to work with your team, which ruins the game for me. They also broke a lot of little things like kill streaks, the map, the fact you now buy things rather than work for them, and a lot more. It feels like they force you to do so much, which may make the game feel smoother, but makes it so boring.

>MFW people tell me to stop playing MW2 and get play the newer games
#135 to #131 - anonmynous (11/08/2013) [-]
I agree
User avatar #140 to #131 - kommandantvideo (11/08/2013) [-]
World at War was the best IMO. The only people that play now are hackers, though.
User avatar #154 to #140 - sinclairr (11/08/2013) [-]
I also liked WaW, but it felt VERY overpowered once you got to level 65 (I think) and could use a heavy machine gun and a flame thrower...
User avatar #166 to #154 - kommandantvideo (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, I never personally did that. I liked the game because of the time, so I always enjoyed mixing it up. I had special classes for different countries. I never mixed guns of different countries, for instance a Japanese pistol with a German gun. It was stupid to me. I enjoyed the era of the game, and the weapons, more than the gameplay really, but that's not saying the gameplay isn't great. I had so many great hours on that game. It is what REALLY got me into WWII and history, and I wouldn't have it any other way.

What I wouldn't give to just play a game of it without hackers....
#141 to #131 - trygve (11/08/2013) [-]
Try go back to MW2. It sucks. Maps are good, but guns are terrible and the streaks are laughably OP. MW2 had certain roles you could play as, and it was difficult to mix playstyles up.

Black Ops 2 have 10 point create a class system, so a lot more variety, fun game modes, but decent maps.

Ghosts is the first cod that doesnt stick to the regular formula where run and gun is a playstyle. Ghosts forces the pace down with huge maps and laser cannon guns.

I believe millitary shooters will die out, as with all trends and Ghosts is a reminder that IW have the balls to try out something new.
User avatar #147 to #141 - sinclairr (11/08/2013) [-]
'Military shooters will die out'
-trygve

y'know, they said that back in Wolfenstein times too!
User avatar #148 to #147 - trygve (11/08/2013) [-]
>Believe

Step up faggot I can believe whatever I want
#162 to #131 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
MW2 had worst perks and kill streaks in my opinion. Only perk sets were stopping power, a commando lol 21foot knife, and explosives that got more explosives from kills. Kill streaks were awful because it was just a race to a ~9 kill streak, and then they get a chopper, leads to ac130, and then game over nuke.
User avatar #173 to #131 - falloutplayer (11/08/2013) [-]
Wut about MW3? I loved it
#192 to #131 - turretbuddy (11/08/2013) [-]
>the whole 'solo-rambo' thing is thrown out the window so you HAVE to work with your team   
How is this bad   
play FFA if you want to do that   
   
>Game starts   
>TEAM DEATHMATCH-GET READY   
>TEAM DEATHMATCH   
>team deathmatch   
>kil da oter guiyz
>the whole 'solo-rambo' thing is thrown out the window so you HAVE to work with your team
How is this bad
play FFA if you want to do that

>Game starts
>TEAM DEATHMATCH-GET READY
>TEAM DEATHMATCH
>team deathmatch
>kil da oter guiyz
#204 to #131 - jammesss (11/08/2013) [-]
MW2 was fun. Spent a whole lot of time on that game. The main problem though was it had no post support. Glitches/exploits took forever to patch ( javelin glitch) or was never fixed (Noob Tubes). To me, those were the killers of the game
MW2 was fun. Spent a whole lot of time on that game. The main problem though was it had no post support. Glitches/exploits took forever to patch ( javelin glitch) or was never fixed (Noob Tubes). To me, those were the killers of the game
#138 to #131 - applesdied (11/08/2013) [-]
couldn't have said it better myself
couldn't have said it better myself
User avatar #23 - rabaneristo (11/07/2013) [-]
MW2 is my favorite CoD so far.
#67 to #23 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
It's not MW2, it's ME2,because it'sCalled Mass Effedt 2, retarded faggot
#104 to #23 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
WaW > MW2 >MW > CoD 2 > **** > Every other call of duty
User avatar #169 to #23 - rplix (11/08/2013) [-]
I liked MW2 the most as well. Mostly because I was damn good at it.

Prestiged to 10 then reset then got to prestige 9 in 160 hours playtime
User avatar #174 to #23 - nervaaurelius (11/08/2013) [-]
I prefer Cod4. I remember the only "noob" weapon was the p90(even though thinking about it now it wasn't that bad. Really most of the things that were considered noobish in Cod4 were nothing compared to the things added in later installments. Also the three kill streak allowed for a less likely chance of a guy to one man army the other team and encouraged more teamwork. I also liked how the servers were combined so sometimes play with brits and that was pretty fun for me. Honestly I wish they would release a Cod that kept the simplicity of Cod4 and just added in better graphics and new maps. I know that will never happen though and I can only hope for another WW2 set COD.
#83 to #23 - MasterManiac (11/08/2013) [-]
For me MW2 is the one that ruined the franschise, and all later titles followed its example. It was the first one that added too many stupid attachments and customizations on weapons and classes, really bad effects (ie. what I call the "jam cam" when you get shot) and gameplay more like an arcade game than an FPS. It was still fun to play, like every CoD game to date, but you kind of felt something had been lost along the way. That's probably why CoD4 was my favourite, gameplay wise, and I think WaW probably had the most fun storyline. But hey, that's just my opinion.
For me MW2 is the one that ruined the franschise, and all later titles followed its example. It was the first one that added too many stupid attachments and customizations on weapons and classes, really bad effects (ie. what I call the "jam cam" when you get shot) and gameplay more like an arcade game than an FPS. It was still fun to play, like every CoD game to date, but you kind of felt something had been lost along the way. That's probably why CoD4 was my favourite, gameplay wise, and I think WaW probably had the most fun storyline. But hey, that's just my opinion.
#165 to #83 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
Aside from Zombies, WaW was the one that began the downfall with the multiplayer.
It was basically just a re-skinned version of CoD4, but with tanks.
Terrible, terrible tanks.
User avatar #91 to #23 - analleakage (11/08/2013) [-]
I like CoD 2, 4 and MW2.

The rest is just **** , in my opinion
User avatar #129 to #23 - trygve (11/08/2013) [-]
Black Ops 2 was the best CoD ever made in my opinion.
User avatar #33 to #23 - moosespoon **User deleted account** (11/07/2013) [-]
Jesus, how old are you? You've obviously never played any before MW2 then.
User avatar #37 to #33 - rabaneristo (11/07/2013) [-]
I'm 25 years old.
The thing is I didn't like FPS untill this generation of consoles. And now even the best ones of older consoles seem too unappealing if I try to play.
User avatar #35 to #23 - captainnedkelly (11/07/2013) [-]
Mines between CoD 3 and WaW
User avatar #170 - mummyslittlebitch (11/08/2013) [-]
Let's rephrase that. Call of Duty never changes
#16 - skinstiches (11/07/2013) [-]
War... what is it good for?
User avatar #36 to #16 - ninjamyles **User deleted account** (11/07/2013) [-]
Edwin Starr - War (What Is It Good For?)
User avatar #50 to #16 - fredthemilkman (11/07/2013) [-]
I'd say its good for killing people
User avatar #64 to #16 - esmebuffay (11/07/2013) [-]
That song always reminds me of Small Soldiers.
User avatar #116 to #16 - hoponthefeelstrain (11/08/2013) [-]
ah! say it again!
User avatar #197 to #16 - mikoli (11/08/2013) [-]
huh?
#66 to #16 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
I would disagree, war forces innovation. With war many technologies have been created.
Without it we wouldn't be where we are today.
#68 to #66 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
Without it, we wouldn't have guns, bombs, tanks, jets, nuclear weapons...

Yeah, war is really good... NOT
#92 to #68 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
the modern computer, radio, microwave, nuclear science, different kinds of natural energy sources, and insanely big amounts of medicine was developed to the level they're at today because of war. i don't like war, but it's a bigger question than you'd think, you can't just give an absolute about it. if a war ends in a result that's better for the greater good of the majority of the world, but still makes it worse for some, is it then a good war? and the war hadn't been there, would we have percieved whatever "good things" that came out as the war, as someone to strive for?



sorry im writing a project about ethics and what it means that something is "good" at the moment
User avatar #4 - tittylovin (11/07/2013) [-]
Homage? Running joke? or shameless copy and pasting? or is it just manipulated to look similar?
User avatar #171 to #4 - puut (11/08/2013) [-]
Well, as a game maker, reusing assets is ridiculously effective time saving technique. It's really a pain in the ass to do it every time.
#6 to #4 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
Shameles copy pasting.

Kinda what happens when you have to pump out a new game every year. And their target audiences doesnt notice, or care.
User avatar #149 to #6 - retentions (11/08/2013) [-]
every 2 years*
User avatar #167 to #6 - pvtgoblin (11/08/2013) [-]
I noticed, and I saw it as a nice little throwback. Maybe it wasn't, but it doesn't really bug me.
User avatar #115 to #6 - swagloon (11/08/2013) [-]
Well someone notice.
User avatar #137 to #115 - licestr (11/08/2013) [-]
reviewers.
#240 to #137 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
Hey alucord.

Go **** yourself. Just cause you have a block profile doesn't mean we can't get you. www.funnyjunk.com/search/?q=alucord&search-target=comment&s=thumbs&o=desc&l=30&u=

#247 to #6 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
Infinity pumps out one COD game every second year not every year......
User avatar #3 - rynkar (11/07/2013) [-]
Ghosts is a joke. Even on the best graphic settings, it still looks like CoD 4.
User avatar #20 to #3 - breaken ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
The textures are garbage
#40 to #3 - anon (11/07/2013) [-]
Too bad its not nearly as good as CoD 4.
#69 to #3 - Sampsy (11/07/2013) [-]
That''s because it is COD 4
User avatar #205 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
guys...
guys maybe.....
maybe call of duty was doing something artistic by showing a similar (and great imo) scene in order to create a link between the two games that causes players who are familiar to the franchise to reflect on their past experience in enjoyment. Many games movies, and novels have this exact effect in them, but all you butt-hurt hipster faggots see is call of duty and go ahead and label it copy-pasting **** just because you don't like the way the game plays. Go ahead and give me red thumbs you cock-munching band wagoners, i don't really care.

tl;dr saying cod is ****** gets you easy thumbs, you thumb-whoring bastards
User avatar #208 to #205 - schneidend (11/08/2013) [-]
It would be one thing to draw a parallel, but what we have here is the EXACT same scene played out with different character models.
User avatar #210 to #208 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
What better way to put the player in a familiar and comfortable place? I may be inclined to agree with you if the scene was less significant or if it was longer than 7seconds, but they make it pretty obvious what they are doing.
User avatar #213 to #205 - baditch (11/08/2013) [-]
But they actually literally copy and pasted the same scene with different textures.
#224 to #205 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
Maybe...
Hey, maybe...
You're giving them too much ******* credit
User avatar #229 to #224 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
...and maybe you're not giving them enough.
#2 - thehumor (11/07/2013) [-]
I got ghosts, and i 			*******		 hated in in less than a day
I got ghosts, and i ******* hated in in less than a day
User avatar #9 to #2 - dapape (11/07/2013) [-]
Can you really honestly say you're suprised? You knew this was coming.
User avatar #86 to #2 - mitchellking (11/08/2013) [-]
If you're on pc i feel the pain, Its a HORRIBLY optimised port... At the beginning of every game you lag hard core for like 1-2 minutes.
User avatar #139 to #2 - batmanbeyonddgrave (11/08/2013) [-]
well if you don't want it.. i'll take it
User avatar #206 to #2 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
Why? if you don't mind me asking.
User avatar #264 to #206 - thehumor (11/08/2013) [-]
Campaign was horribly predictable, an idiotic premise, and characters you dont care for. and the multiplayer has a **** ton of issues
User avatar #275 to #264 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
Well that sucks, but is not entirely unexpected i guess. Did you like the other CODs? (I only ask because i'm considering buying ghosts, but am not sure yet)
User avatar #276 to #275 - thehumor (11/08/2013) [-]
I did enjoy mw2 and 3
User avatar #283 to #276 - grayham (11/08/2013) [-]
Huh... alright thanks for the input. Here's a thumb for your time.
#5 to #2 - johangran (11/07/2013) [-]
>implying you should take this because it is dangerous out there   
>implying we should have sex
>implying you should take this because it is dangerous out there
>implying we should have sex
#10 to #5 - dieterkaiser ONLINE (11/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#143 - sanguinesolitude (11/08/2013) [-]
ur mom lyks long diks n her bum n blowin me all nyt u camping noob fagget hakker bitch
User avatar #70 - trisketthebiskit (11/07/2013) [-]
i actually liked CoD until MW2
#243 - hentaisweetie (11/08/2013) [-]
Speaking of plagiarism-> Kodomo no Jikan Ending VS One Fine Day
User avatar #280 to #243 - rbpwn (11/08/2013) [-]
A homage to a previous installment in a series isn't plagiarism
#239 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
Disney reuses animations in several different movies more than once and no one bats an eye.   
   
CoD does it once and everyone loses their minds.
Disney reuses animations in several different movies more than once and no one bats an eye.

CoD does it once and everyone loses their minds.
User avatar #250 to #239 - Shramin ONLINE (11/08/2013) [-]
Ending of both games, we aren't just talking reusing animation, that's been done in CoD before and nobody cared, but this time two games ended exactly the same way.
#254 to #250 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
Actually, that's not the ending, that's the opening scene to Ghosts.
User avatar #255 to #254 - Shramin ONLINE (11/08/2013) [-]
Yeah I just saw that *points at comment 253 posted at exact same time*

I will have to play the game, I won't not mostly because I play all CoD and I like the mindless campaigns, wish they were lengthier though.
User avatar #253 to #250 - Shramin ONLINE (11/08/2013) [-]
also it appears I was misinformed, one is an opening an another is an ending, still its a large chunk of the same and it shouldn't really be done that similarly.
User avatar #281 to #253 - rbpwn (11/08/2013) [-]
What am homage
User avatar #257 to #253 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
It's like 15 seconds, really not that long. and this particular clip was edited. They went out of their way to make them sync up perfectly.
#259 to #239 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
True,

but with the amount of income from the team, and the simplicity of animations for video games, this is really unacceptable.
User avatar #260 to #259 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
It probably takes more work to animate these video games than it does to animate Disney movies. At least with movies no one is controlling which direction the animations are moving.
#288 to #260 - Neodude (11/08/2013) [-]
Incorrect. Disney's animations are insane. There is no way to compare the quality, complexity, and detail of a Disney film to COD, or most games in general. Doing something like this is absolutely terrible. I am currently going through an undergraduate in game design, and you know what, from all of my instructors, all of them find COD as a joke. Sure, it makes money, but here gets to be a point where, if people from EA laugh at it, ***** got some problems.
#261 to #260 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
Call of duty has been using the same animations for years.

what this was, was a WHOLE ******* SEQUENCE.

YOU DON'T DO THAT IN VIDEO GAMES

Also, they only reused animations in the older disney movies, when it was hand drawn and very time consuming.
User avatar #263 to #261 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
My point is they did it, and this sequence, which was cut and sped up so that it synced like it does, is only like 15 seconds. Why is it ok for one company to do it, but not another? Is it because so many people just autohate every new CoD game because they're stuck in the past or they're sucking Battlefag 4's dick? And no, I'm not a CoD fanboy, I am getting it, but I just hate it when people just autohate something with no actual reason.
User avatar #267 to #263 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
First, they are the bottom feeders of the gaming community.

secondly, everyone hates them because of the first.

Thirdly, When you have a huge team that makes the huge amounts of money they make, it is not acceptable for them to reuse a whole sequence from 3 games ago.
And i will suck Battlefield 4's dick. Not because of bandwagons, or fanboyism, but because it tastes better than the **** covered dick that is CoD.
User avatar #269 to #267 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
How are they the bottom feeders of the gaming community? Because they have an incredibly successful franchised that is played competitively all over the world? Why does that make them bad? Also, Disney makes exponentially more money than these guys yet they still reuse animations.
User avatar #270 to #269 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
i mean't they are the bottom feeder developers

Note: those were the hand drawn animations they reused.
the process for that was way harder to animate.
With today's technology, and how simple the animations are for the CoD series, it wouldn't have taken them too long to animate a whole different cut scene.
User avatar #271 to #270 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize that I could just pick up a new laptop and make one of the best selling franchises in video game history. My bad. And you still haven't explained why they're the bottom feeders of anything, developers or otherwise.
User avatar #272 to #271 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
because they put no effort into making their yearly games any better than the last.

with the amount of money they make, they should be using it to better their games beyond what they are putting out. Just because a game sells, doesn't mean it's of good quality.
User avatar #273 to #272 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
Black Ops was great game, I only played a few hours of the story, but what I played I enjoyed. The online play was fantastic. MW was also a great game with a awesome story and amazing online. MW2 is the game everyone always compares recent CoDs to and that had pretty sweet online play too. The Zombies part of the games is also something that was innovative and very enjoyable to play. Just because you don't like a game, doesn't mean everyone else has to have the same blind hatred as you.
User avatar #274 to #273 - padawonjohn (11/08/2013) [-]
i'm not saying i hate the franchise,
i grew up playing the original Call of Duty games and medal of honor games.
After Blops 1 i realized that the games were going to continue down the same path and never change; i became a more mature gamer.
I only favor Battlefield over CoD because they at least try to make the gameplay fresh and enjoyable.
In all honesty, i really don't like playing First person shooters anymore; i prefer RPG's and games that tell a story over them.
I'm not asking people to stop liking the franchise, i'm just asking the team behind them to put more effort into their games, and act like a real video game development team.
User avatar #265 to #239 - hentaisweetie (11/08/2013) [-]
examples?
User avatar #266 to #265 - schmitty (11/08/2013) [-]
Have you seriously never seen any of the posts on here about it? Here's a link to the Disney wiki disney.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_recycled_animation_in_Disney_movies
#34 - ellrotts (11/07/2013) [-]
CoD never changed since Modern warfare
User avatar #85 to #34 - MasterManiac (11/08/2013) [-]
I'd say since MW2 tbh, but yeah, you're right.
User avatar #39 to #34 - zpryed (11/07/2013) [-]
pokemon hasn't changed much since the beginning
User avatar #111 to #39 - lateday (11/08/2013) [-]
Double/Triple battles, IVs, natures, Special Att/Special Defense, Online Trading, Shiny Pokemon, Pokerus, New types. New attacks. Mega Evolutions. Legendaries. Forme Changes. Sexual dimorphism. Different Evolution requirements. Event Pokemon. Come on dude.
User avatar #114 to #111 - zpryed (11/08/2013) [-]
online trading- something that couldn't be around early on in its life cycle, different evolution requirements- im glad not every pokemon is the same or needs the same things would have been weird if that wasn't there (pretty sure its always been there or for a long time at least)
mega evolution- yeah that seems totally cannon these people that can transform pokemon into something else and this is the first time we heard of them
event pokemon- again something that sounds like it can only happen one time probably as a form of publicity
legendaries? what you mean like all 170+ or whatever at some point they stop being special and new
double/triple battles again doesn't really seem that innovative
#110 to #39 - anon (11/08/2013) [-]
x and y bitch!°!!!1asdaskassdfdsf
#258 - tacticalhog (11/08/2013) [-]
Now that is insanity...
#234 - Bforbacon (11/08/2013) [-]
People. People. Holy 			****		 people. I just saw an IGN video on this cutscene 			****		 too. It is NOT EVEN sixteen seconds of barely matching gameplay. The "HURR DURR COWADOOBY SUX" circlejerking is really getting old. Legitimate complaints, like you don't like the gameplay, or the graphics aren't up to par, or it shares too many similarities with previous CoD games are acceptable, the "THESE FIFTEEN AND A HALF SECONDS LOOK SIMILAR TO MODAWARFAR TOO!!!!!!!!!" has to stop.   
   
   
Oh, and also that gif is from IGN's edit to make the footage sync up. They sped it up and cut some parts out. This is weak 			****		.   
   
watch:
People. People. Holy **** people. I just saw an IGN video on this cutscene **** too. It is NOT EVEN sixteen seconds of barely matching gameplay. The "HURR DURR COWADOOBY SUX" circlejerking is really getting old. Legitimate complaints, like you don't like the gameplay, or the graphics aren't up to par, or it shares too many similarities with previous CoD games are acceptable, the "THESE FIFTEEN AND A HALF SECONDS LOOK SIMILAR TO MODAWARFAR TOO!!!!!!!!!" has to stop.


Oh, and also that gif is from IGN's edit to make the footage sync up. They sped it up and cut some parts out. This is weak **** .

watch:
Call of Duty: Ghosts Copied Cutscene from Modern Warfare 2
[ 301 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)