Vladi's infocomps 9: computers
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
84 comments displayed.
#14
-
xtremehivoltage (06/30/2015) [+] (16 replies)
This is gonna get more favorites than thumbs. I thumbed solely for dem flowcharts
I am erect
stickied by vladi
I am erect
#1
-
vladi [OP](06/30/2015) [+] (4 replies)
stickied by vladi
************ mentions morkoelorko captaincrapface cassielizabeth xermudco theworstlurker swagpony chitogekirisaki dinobro awesomedoge cisdroidcommander hwangnuneo whataphreek delyrious wizlock lordofbumcrack thesilveresteagle ichigoblue goldenquil Dawn yisumad anonasdaasdasd alexwinning stianan xshadowslayerx bomberbib raidaltamimi computor comicsansisback remyfire sluck therepostrapist gokuson lgninjaleetful flamingbananas **************** nonanonnon whichever gnumag rootytootyfrooty furillo ajcdish jascintotherubo stely daemonking xaelin greyhoundfd icewraithking maxifrost tgruica bloodrocutation dimppa sakuraba avatice quintonsword ghostmonk mangafix penisisawsome ************ pikumin pettysoysauce blackoutonetwotwo regularorange zenexazure ************** theimmortalemperor terrycrewsjunk beliaranzo dawsoco bostonboy disembob makerofmemes skeletonmachine applecooler Silthrim analrapevictim tokazakime ieatscenekids alarubra sixsicsix zantox dfromnewyork sirfiiddlesticks phoenixprince aftalbeating yodaiam thatonefilipino matoromahri YHjakeyboy mashi opoloki zoroso mctetris aleoventris nightroller ******** lietuvisss takuaboy kharmelion perfectcomment jarnood jasonafex ijustwannaplay ohhh ryuggu Bawls kiratheunholy teevee crimzonhazard youregaylol agentsora masteroffj shadowsoldierbro atonial nasko sagen chimpaflimp regdestroy leithian flyingwhale ezioauditoredakrat charliethepotato bogdaneight FreakinCortez thekiwihacker poopums randombro itsapie wherejohnny imeandus leolegalll echotheambient justsomechickyo theshifter ohmeghon theashenwhiteness spidahridah garyhasmorebadges PebbleBinder greatsofa fierysquirrel bokbokbok nomsergirl ssidzyik theshinylucario hwaraam dedj oniseiji unanonanon LoveAmorAi caprisundewicious quantumranger fauxshores themilker methylbutane Amaquelin blahred spooked moistplacenta pikapoopie ArkAngel orangejuicejohnson ministermax megaguyx selectedmicobe soldiertwo wlaine bumpin sybo abnormalgames megiddo jjarvs anacondasunshine spidydolanquick chugwug askfoxxy dafogman josejosedragon trainted freerustrytrombone poisonsilk arktorious cleateater attilathehunn mountaindewkie keitheespieces tacticalhog shinycharizard oldmangoodman itztater notorc impacts ************* dacluck adimskiy achillesofsparta cleverless mobilebull Flesme bismarcksback littlefish lordsepulchure Fabregas pootnscoot hardjunk johnnygatsrevenge ghchamp radtroll zoomanfar narcheska doomeythekink kuupuuchan huffenpuff whetorangesa colorfulprism zeroshot chummyxray *********** notbane calmindiandude notgayinathreeway ninesundev mezcal ***************** dannyvx alfrsa rdibp orkanoidz nevergoingtrollyou plepsi pyroteknyx justirishthings tenouttaten jimtheneckbeard artificerp VengefulSoul jaeha brainbug jakeslesnakes grimagination jerichonumberone nothingheretosee prvcowboy ieatcheezburgerz skullington atomschlumpf brutalviking jaminnsnoo feindmachines pim applecows waffenmia
Thumb this sticky to be on the mention list. Do not thumb the sticky if you're already on the list. Simple. Alternatively you could just subscribe to me. As always, don't forget to thumb up the content if you like it, it'll motivate me greatly to continue this series. Enjoy the comp!
Thumb this sticky to be on the mention list. Do not thumb the sticky if you're already on the list. Simple. Alternatively you could just subscribe to me. As always, don't forget to thumb up the content if you like it, it'll motivate me greatly to continue this series. Enjoy the comp!
#64
-
karenoniks (06/30/2015) [-] "All Squares Are Pentagons If You Look At Them Very Closely"
~Jaden Smith
~Jaden Smith
#199 to #53
-
anon (07/01/2015) [-]
It's pointing out that nothing constructed in real life will be a 100% perfect square. It wouldn't be a perfect pentagon either, but there will always be a little bit of rounding on the corners if were being picky. Even if you had a robot draw one, the way that ink/pencil lead leaves marks on a page makes slightly curved lines. Just print one out sometime and look at it under a powerful magnifying glass, you'll see what I'm talking about.
#200 to #199
-
JHoYouKnow (07/01/2015) [-] Maybe. But a rounded corner doesn't make a pentagon. And the same thing would happen to all polygons
#142 to #53
-
rockamekishiko (07/01/2015) [-] i know. aren't we supposed to go by the angles of the sides? if they're all 90 degrees and all sides equal length, then it's a square.
#50
-
screencleaner (06/30/2015) [-] Well, i'm sorry. The first one is utter ******** .
MSE is a **** virusscanner. It's detection rates are seriously bad. Avira and Avast are among the best. MBAM isn't even a virusscanner.
This is not *********** or anything, the information is just plain wrong
MSE is a **** virusscanner. It's detection rates are seriously bad. Avira and Avast are among the best. MBAM isn't even a virusscanner.
This is not *********** or anything, the information is just plain wrong
#154 to #101
-
attilathehunn (07/01/2015) [-]
It is notorious for false positives, I've seen instances of it blocking steam, java, adobe, etc. It then also misses numerous actual infections.
#201 to #101
-
screencleaner (07/01/2015) [-] Reasons why Norton sucks:
1. False positives, norton often blocks things that arent virusses.
2. I have seen numerous times (I work at a help at home service for computers) that Norton blocks all the traffic on port 80 and 443. Those two ports are really important, all http and https traffic uses those. If they're blocked, you cannot use the internet.
3. It is way too expensive, and the detection rates are just avarage. Avira free has better detection rates.
4. It doesn't include any anti-malware, which in my opinion, any paid virusscanner should include.
5. This has gotten better in the last few years, but Norton is still not a virusscanner I would even consider running on anything that has less than an i3 CPU. It consumes resources like crazy in comparison to other AV's.
1. False positives, norton often blocks things that arent virusses.
2. I have seen numerous times (I work at a help at home service for computers) that Norton blocks all the traffic on port 80 and 443. Those two ports are really important, all http and https traffic uses those. If they're blocked, you cannot use the internet.
3. It is way too expensive, and the detection rates are just avarage. Avira free has better detection rates.
4. It doesn't include any anti-malware, which in my opinion, any paid virusscanner should include.
5. This has gotten better in the last few years, but Norton is still not a virusscanner I would even consider running on anything that has less than an i3 CPU. It consumes resources like crazy in comparison to other AV's.
#176 to #50
-
steppenwolfvg (07/01/2015) [-] also among the free versions, Bitdefender is always in the top 3 choices.
that infographic is horrible.
that infographic is horrible.
#96 to #50
-
vorarephilia 
ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-] use all of them as well as 7 proxys. NSA can't beat that.
#120 to #96
-
bagguhsleep ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-] only an idiot would think using 7 proxies will help you if you aren't using incognito
#124 to #50
-
captchakid ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-] I was gonna say, Ive always used Avast! because its fast and effective. That one was total bs.
#97 to #72
-
darktoucan ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-] why should we? its over priced and others work the same. plus some powerful viruses wont even get detected by the paid ones. only sure clean is a system restore.
#100 to #97
-
cousin (07/01/2015) [-] In my experience (5 years ICT consultant) the best for detection rate is Kaspersky (paid for) . The best mix between detection and speed is ESET (paid for).
How do you think companies fund the researchers and pay for the security experts? Paid for antivirus will always trump free antivirus.
The only 100% sure way to avoid malware, viruses, trojans etc is not to be on the internet and have a total stand alone PC. I'd rather have the internet, a good antivirus and common sense.
How do you think companies fund the researchers and pay for the security experts? Paid for antivirus will always trump free antivirus.
The only 100% sure way to avoid malware, viruses, trojans etc is not to be on the internet and have a total stand alone PC. I'd rather have the internet, a good antivirus and common sense.
#173 to #100
-
anon (07/01/2015) [-]
.
i've always assumed that even the best anti-virus protection software will not fully remove a nasty virus or trojan without reformatting the harddrive, once the malware gets in.
at least not to the point of making it like it never even happened.
i see there's some youtube vids of some antivirus doing some clean up but i'm still skeptical about them. IDK.
.
i've always assumed that even the best anti-virus protection software will not fully remove a nasty virus or trojan without reformatting the harddrive, once the malware gets in.
at least not to the point of making it like it never even happened.
i see there's some youtube vids of some antivirus doing some clean up but i'm still skeptical about them. IDK.
.
#84 to #50
-
mrdarp ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] >Discourages BitDefender
>Encourages MSE and only one other AV that I've never heard of and you have to pay for
>No mention of SAS in sight
>Put AVs on a known-infected computer because there's no way in the universe that a virus can spread to the drive
Some of his tips are good but overall I agree with you.
>Encourages MSE and only one other AV that I've never heard of and you have to pay for
>No mention of SAS in sight
>Put AVs on a known-infected computer because there's no way in the universe that a virus can spread to the drive
Some of his tips are good but overall I agree with you.
#111 to #84
-
unicornslayer (07/01/2015) [-] O
I'm with you that Bitdefender is dope, but ESet is pretty good as well.
Some of those pics look pretty old, maybe this one is too.
I'm with you that Bitdefender is dope, but ESet is pretty good as well.
Some of those pics look pretty old, maybe this one is too.
#78 to #50
-
kiratheunholy (06/30/2015) [-] I agree, this infographic is spreading misinformation... I have Avast and MBAM because MBAM isn't an anti-virus, it's anti-malware. Avast is an anti-virus.
#125 to #78
-
captchakid ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-] is MBAM Malware bytes? If so, you use the same two things I do.
#19
-
captnnorway (06/30/2015) [-] Look at all these facts that I think is interesting, but I'll forget in a day.
#21
-
mayoroftownsville (06/30/2015) [-]
>we don't recommend paying for any antivirus
>so steal this one instead, here's how
Well at least it's consistent
>so steal this one instead, here's how
Well at least it's consistent
#45
-
anon (06/30/2015) [-]
The very first picture is complete ******** , both bitdefender and kaspersky are ranked nearly number 1/2 every month on
You need to login to view this link
which ranks the best AV's out there. Secondly malwarebytes isn't even an antivirus program its an anti malware program and they're very different
#4
-
kinginthenorthh ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] Is avast not a good antivirus? I've been using it for a couple years now.
#8 to #4
-
atomschlumpf (06/30/2015) [-] It was pretty good a few years back but got really bloated and I personally didn't like that most of the time it didn't let me tell it that a specific file was in fact not a virus and it made the decisions for me
#13 to #4
-
alarubra ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] I would not recommend. I use Malwarebytes. I recommend it to everyone. I've installed it on computers that were "protected" by pretty much every anti-virus on the "what not to use list" and every time but 1 it's found malware they missed. The free version does nearly everything the premium version does. The only thing is you've got to do it manually. The premium version lets you set up automatic updates and scans.
#51 to #13
-
screencleaner (06/30/2015) [-] MBAM's not a full virusscanner though, it's meant as addition to an AV.
#29 to #4
-
greyhoundfd ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] Malwarebytes, though it's a premium antivirus, is singularly the greatest antivirus software I have ever used. It's quite, it's not computer-intensive, it almost never makes false-positives, and it can scan very quickly.
#54
-
chuckstein (06/30/2015) [-] I thought Avast was really good? I've got both Avast and Malware Antibytes and Avast tends to detect malware that Malware Antibytes can't find sometimes.
#55 to #48
-
opu ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] Windows Defender is supposed to be a built-in Microsoft Security Essentials for Windows 8 users, however personally i've found Defender to be quite crap, over an entire year i don't think i've had a single case of it picking up anything, whereas Malwarebytes works perfectly and will actually get rid of anything resembling a virus, it has updates almost daily as well which is pretty decent
#59 to #58
-
opu ONLINE (06/30/2015) [-] It's always safe to have a couple if you're worried, but for me Malwarebytes is good by itself, you get a free 30 day trial where it'll actively scan for you, but you'll need to pay premium after that to keep it doing that for you, but quite honestly nothing stopping you just scanning manually, literally only a couple of clicks and let it do it's job, happy virus killing
#158 to #46
-
anon (07/01/2015) [-]
Nothing. The infographics is very old. Nowadays it is highly discouraged to use Microsoft Essentials as its detection rate is very poor. Many of the "What not to use" AVs have improved over time - Kaspersky, Bitdefender (haven't tested others) and have superb detection rate.
At any rate you can disable the active/real-time protection and only use the AV to manually scan shady files you've downloaded and thus save resources.
At any rate you can disable the active/real-time protection and only use the AV to manually scan shady files you've downloaded and thus save resources.
#179
-
gongwiththewind (07/01/2015) [-]
the Anti-virus one is just a complete joke....
and here is why
www.av-comparatives.org/
this company here directly compares EVERY MAJOR AV software under the EXACT same conditions (exact same problems/hardware)
the microsoft AV software is not only one of the worst but was BEAT by Norton which is a complete joke of a software
and here is why
www.av-comparatives.org/
this company here directly compares EVERY MAJOR AV software under the EXACT same conditions (exact same problems/hardware)
the microsoft AV software is not only one of the worst but was BEAT by Norton which is a complete joke of a software
#144
-
topheavymonkeyy (07/01/2015) [-] All of this bar 2 things WRONG.
Avast is the second best Antivirus in the world. Low usage and very accurate in it's readings. ESET is absolute ******** and is worse than Panda an Notron.
Those flow charts aren't what you do, you turn the ****** on and listen for beeps, if none are heard play with RAM and go from there Or you know you could use multiple methods of actually scientifically working **** out VIA osciloscope, multimeter etc. The video file one is incorrect because it has more than that (a lot more) but it has been heavily simplified.
>File Server
>Linux
Top kek. Just use a ******* dedicated server router, or cloud storage device whatever they call it now
"CLI Commands" Is it meant to invoke CSI? Because the command line interface has **** all to do with that and the commands shown aren't even that impressive.
"Parts of windows" >Uses ************* '97 good job dummy
Thus concludes my report on "Why you're a ******* idiot"
Avast is the second best Antivirus in the world. Low usage and very accurate in it's readings. ESET is absolute ******** and is worse than Panda an Notron.
Those flow charts aren't what you do, you turn the ****** on and listen for beeps, if none are heard play with RAM and go from there Or you know you could use multiple methods of actually scientifically working **** out VIA osciloscope, multimeter etc. The video file one is incorrect because it has more than that (a lot more) but it has been heavily simplified.
>File Server
>Linux
Top kek. Just use a ******* dedicated server router, or cloud storage device whatever they call it now
"CLI Commands" Is it meant to invoke CSI? Because the command line interface has **** all to do with that and the commands shown aren't even that impressive.
"Parts of windows" >Uses ************* '97 good job dummy
Thus concludes my report on "Why you're a ******* idiot"
#112
-
twentyten ONLINE (07/01/2015) [-]
The square/pentagon one is ******** . At least one side is rounded off? The word you're looking for is corner.
Secondly, if one corner can be rounded off, then all corners could be rounded off. Making it not a pentagon, but an octagon (going by this ****** logic).
And if you really want to be anal about it, squares and other polygons don't actually exist in our 3D world, cause they're 2D.
Secondly, if one corner can be rounded off, then all corners could be rounded off. Making it not a pentagon, but an octagon (going by this ****** logic).
And if you really want to be anal about it, squares and other polygons don't actually exist in our 3D world, cause they're 2D.
