Twitter is the little sister of Tumblr

Adjust content blockingContent Blocking

setsan Rank: #2409

next random

Comment

Twitter is the little sister of Tumblr. . Regular' marriage and 'Gay' marriage is like bikini tops and bras. Exactly the same thing, yet only one is allowed in

Regular' marriage and 'Gay'
marriage is like bikini tops and bras.
Exactly the same thing, yet only one
is allowed in public.

...

+1309

Views: 41169 Submitted: 07/29/2014

Block User's Content

More from setsan:

Made a a more of a thing

Made a thing...

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (166)

First 2 3 4 Last Next

[ 166 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#1 - tkbz

Reply+250

(07/29/2014)[-]

Yet, I'd still be happy to see either.

#9 to #1 - kriml#145 on contentRank#145

Reply+47

(07/29/2014)[-]

Just go outside, there are plenty of married couples

#7 - subtard

Reply+141

(07/29/2014)[-]

Many view gay marriage to change the fabric of society just as the main difference between a bra and bikini top is often just a change of fabric.

#58 to #7 - kerfufflemachtwo

Reply+20

(07/30/2014)[-]

Calm down there, Socrates.

#95 to #7 - anon id: e53e8f9f

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

thatsthejoke.jpeg

#5 - therebemoose

Reply+78

(07/29/2014)[-]

To everyone saying they aren't the same: You may be right, but only technically, and for very superficial reasons. Just like the perceived differences between hetero/homo marriage. At the end of the day, both items achieve the same goal: protecting and supporting the ones you love.

#123 to #5 - worker

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

You know besides reproduction

#162 to #5 - wrocky

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

bible isn't superficial

#47 to #5 - demicus

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Bloody brilliant, and amusing too!

#45 to #5 - anon id: dd7729b1

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

By that logic, if I loved a 12 year old girl, I should be able to marry her because love is love right?

#60 to #45 - instalation

Reply+5

(07/30/2014)[-]

Yup! Give her 6 years and you two should be fine.

#148 to #60 - nuckfuggets

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

**nuckfuggets rolled image** or 6 inches

#144 to #60 - nuckfuggets

has deleted their comment [-]

#24 - nuclearkitteh

Reply+65

(07/29/2014)[-]

Do I think I gays should be allowed to marry? Yes.
But I also think gays should shut the **** up about being gay. "We just want to be treated like normal people." Then stop dressing in incredibly flamboyant clothing and marching through the streets. I don't go walk down the street grinding and dry humping every girl I see, so you and your boyfriend don't need to wear leopard skin shirts and short-shorts while sucking on dick shaped lollipops. It sickens me how now-a-days people get put on a pedestal for being gay. Some football player comes out of the closet and the president calls him and tells him he's a hero. So then what are the firemen? Or police, or soldiers or anyone else who endangers themselves everyday for others? Are they just regular people? I think gays should be treated as equals, and to do that we need to take them off of this social high horse.

Pic related: MFW Someone is really dramatic about admitting they're gay, lesbian, or some other special little Tumblr sexuality.

#40 to #24 - flamingpie

Reply+12

(07/30/2014)[-]

I completely agree, however that football player did have a lot of courage doing so, it probably lost him many fans, and almost his job. I'm not saying he needs a call from the president though, that's just overkill

#42 to #24 - thebeatlesfan

Reply+2

(07/30/2014)[-]

I agree except for the Michael Sam thing. I think he's advancing gay rights and should be commended. It's almost like saying MLK Jr. shouldn't be celebrated for his role in the Civil Rights movement

#127 to #42 - nuclearkitteh

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

I agree that he should be commended. But the president himself called him a hero. I think that's a little too much.

#113 to #24 - anon id: 3d8f67c2

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

nuclearkitteh what you described was a faggot. look at the pic and learn the difference

#104 to #24 - dronenortle

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

I'm gay myself, and I couldn't agree with you more.

#49 to #24 - lolsrsslybro

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

completely agree. i have no problem with a guy loving another guy. there's nothing wrong with that.

but i ******* HATE flamboyantly gay people. they act more diva than your average woman. most of them are stuck up and cocky it sickens me. and where the **** does the gay accent come from too? i really just don't get how lots of them can collectively have this personality trait.

#41 to #24 - sagedivinity

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

I hope don't you mean gay pride marchers. I don't see anything wrong with those. But walking down a street putting your sexuality on display doesn't help anyone, I agree with that.

#128 to #41 - nuclearkitteh

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

I feel that Gay Pride marches should have a different name, but I don't have too much of a problem with them, unless they have little kids dressed flamboyantly. I'm talking about gay people who will for no reason act like a super diva and dress in so many different shiny colors that it looks like they took a shower in rainbow jizz.

#142 to #128 - sagedivinity

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

I agree completely.

#33 to #24 - fishinyourface

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

completely ******* agree. And this is what prompts attention seekers to claim they're gay. Someone I know recently came out as a lesbian. Yet she still likes men. mfw she won't stop going on about pride and is doing everything conceivable (including haircuts) to "fit the part"

#150 to #24 - neosonic

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Do I mind if you and your boyfriend bump and grind in public?
No, I like it, cause yknow, I'm into that..

#149 to #24 - anon id: a539fe29

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

******* yes, You said it my *****.

#37 to #24 - lecorbi

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Idk... sometimes I think that, if a guy just wants to oversexualize himself because he likes it, im ok with that. The only problem is this 'trend' thing involving being gay. It's like stoners that make their whole personalities float around 420. Its just plain retarded

#29 to #24 - anon id: 6d783143

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

how dare you not respect my tri gendered black lesbian disabled pyrofox inner being. im special and i demand equality by being better then you.

#12 - ldial

Reply+41

(07/29/2014)[-]

I would let gays get married so they will shut up already. You want to be miserable like the rest of us, go ahead.

#48 to #12 - anon id: dd7729b1

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Old joke is old

#51 to #48 - ldial

Reply+7

(07/30/2014)[-]

who was joking.

#126 to #51 - connorjacks

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Frank Reynolds

#167 to #126 - ldial

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Who in the blue hell is Frank Reynolds

#20 - teranin

Reply+31

(07/29/2014)[-]

#31 - Loppytaffy

Reply+10

(07/30/2014)[-]

My favourite is when people ask a gay couple which is the woman.
Yeah, and which chopstick is the fork, ********...

#70 to #31 - jakefenris

Reply+23

(07/30/2014)[-]

#141 to #70 - atrocitustheking

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

You don't get to use that very often, do you?

#163 to #141 - jakefenris

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

Very rarely does it work itself in.

#135 to #31 - Crusader

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Except it's rare for a chopstick to be a bottom

#36 to #31 - anon id: c941dc29

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

I love you for this

#32 to #31 - mcstorms

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

think they mean witch chop stick do you use on top.

#34 to #32 - Loppytaffy

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Both chopsticks play equal roles.

#35 to #34 - mcstorms

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

not all the time depends on the relationship.

#72 to #35 - jakefenris

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Regardless of which chopstick gets stuck where, which they're nearly always interchangeable. They can both be used for any role or purpose you so choose and neither is more important or better than the other.

#89 to #35 - Loppytaffy

Reply-2

(07/30/2014)[-]

That doesn't mean one serves as a fork or knife. The point of it is that there is no chopstick. Just because one prefers to be the holder/grabber, doesn't mean it has ambitions to be other cutlery.

#101 to #89 - mcstorms

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

wait...wat now im confused we are talking about who is on top in bed right?

#54 - skateabuga

Reply-21

(07/30/2014)[-]

#57 to #54 - bluenebula

Reply+19

(07/30/2014)[-]

See about that

#159 to #57 - lostmyaccounts

Reply-1

(07/30/2014)[-]

gay marriage is called sodomy look it up

#59 to #57 - skateabuga

Reply-11

(07/30/2014)[-]

>wikipedia
>best credible source

#63 to #59 - bluenebula

Reply+6

(07/30/2014)[-]

Might be a good idea to check yourself before you rekt yourself. I wouldn't call Wikipedia an uncredible source considering the, you know, 315 citations.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage

#65 to #63 - skateabuga

Reply-9

(07/30/2014)[-]

Let's see how well that excuse works for your dissertation

#66 to #65 - bluenebula

Reply+6

(07/30/2014)[-]

You mean citing a Wiki page, or using the 315 citations on said Wiki page? Because I think I'd be using the 315 citations first. It just seems more impressive that way, you know?

#69 to #66 - skateabuga

Reply-8

(07/30/2014)[-]

Most schools don't typically allow any websites. Maybe I'll try that if I want to fail getting my next degree

#73 to #69 - bluenebula

Reply+6

(07/30/2014)[-]

>All 315 citations are websites
>You've been to most schools
K

No really, help me figure out who wrote that in your little picture there. It has to be someone at Google. Bing gave me a totally different answer to the exact same question. Well, different from Google. Wiki agrees.

#75 to #73 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

try
>define marriage

#76 to #75 - bluenebula

Reply+6

(07/30/2014)[-]

Well if you're going to be lazy, I guess I'll just do it for you.

#80 to #76 - skateabuga

Reply-8

(07/30/2014)[-]

I'm done talking to retards today

#100 to #80 - lizardlickscereal

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

#83 to #80 - bluenebula

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

#132 to #69 - Crusader

Reply+2

(07/30/2014)[-]

I have never heard of any school that disallowed websites.

Not to mention many of the citations are of books, published studies, documentaries, films, and encyclopedias.

And if they disallowed those, then you would have no citations at all.

#79 to #69 - newforomador

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

When you say schools, do you mean high school or college/university? Because in high school you can use as many websites as you please, as long as you cite what websites you used.

#81 to #79 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

Not high school
.gif irrelevant

#84 to #81 - bluenebula

Reply+5

(07/30/2014)[-]

Please allow me to fix that for you.

#86 to #84 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

You do realize I'm in the middle of getting my master's degree, right?

#87 to #86 - bluenebula

Reply+6

(07/30/2014)[-]

You do realize I don't give a ****, right? You could cure cancer and you'll still be acting like a little ****. I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, I guess that makes me right about everything.

#91 to #87 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

#93 to #91 - bluenebula

Reply+5

(07/30/2014)[-]

Did I not reply fast enough for you?

#97 to #93 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

No I just felt two reaction images necessary

#98 to #97 - bluenebula

Reply+4

(07/30/2014)[-]

Oh... alright then. If you say so.

#99 to #98 - skateabuga

Reply-7

(07/30/2014)[-]

#90 to #87 - skateabuga

Reply-6

(07/30/2014)[-]

#96 to #90 - MrAsdf

Reply+3

(07/30/2014)[-]

#62 to #59 - bluenebula

Reply+2

(07/30/2014)[-]

And where does your source come from?

#77 to #59 - anon id: 71042057

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

About as credible as you not including the other results of define marriage.

"(in some jurisdictions) a formal union between partners of the same sex."

#145 to #54 - leglesslegolegolas

Reply+1

(07/30/2014)[-]

Good troll

#151 to #54 - welliguessitsaname

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

#2 - dickthebutt

Reply-11

(07/29/2014)[-]

nope, its not the same to be honest....

but ok

#6 to #2 - defendyouropinion

Reply+18

(07/29/2014)[-]

Why isn't it?

What makes the metaphor simile, whatever irrelevant?

#14 to #6 - faimbot

Reply+16

(07/29/2014)[-]

because bras and bikini tops are like a gay marriage in only one way.

it only works with really hot womens. noone wants to see them otherwise.

#16 to #14 - anon id: d5194c1b

Reply0

(07/29/2014)[-]

good point

#44 to #6 - fuckedbyapony

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

Is it an analogy?

#28 to #6 - anon id: 6d783143

Reply0

(07/30/2014)[-]

sociteity is a lot more complex then pieces of cloth

#18 to #6 - dickthebutt

Reply-1

(07/29/2014)[-]

Lets stop with that mentallity, its like saying that men and women are the same hurr durr

no they are not, face it! That doesn't mean that they deserve less, I'm just stating a fact, ITS different, but that doesnt mean that we shouldn't tolerate it or permit it....

#19 to #18 - dickthebutt

Reply+2

(07/29/2014)[-]

btw not english, sorry for my crappy.... explanation

#106 - ribocoon

Reply+17

(07/30/2014)[-]

First 2 3 4 Last Next

[ 166 comments ]

Add Comment